Have a personal or library account? Click to login
European Seaports Information Systems. The Impacts of Directive 2010/65/EU Cover

European Seaports Information Systems. The Impacts of Directive 2010/65/EU

Open Access
|Dec 2020

References

  1. Anunciação, P. F. & Zorrinho, C. (2006). Organizational Urbanism - How Managing Technological Shock in Companies, Lisbon, Sílabo Publishing (In Portuguese)
  2. ASEAN. (2013). About ASEAN Single Window. Retrieved June 21, 2016, from http://asw.asean.org
  3. Bezic, H., Tijan, E., & Aksentijevic, S. (2011). Port Community Systems: economic feasibility evaluation. Osijek: University of Osijek
  4. Carbone, V., & Martino, M. (2003). The Changing role of ports in supply-chain management: an empirical analysis. London: Taylor & Francis10.1080/0308883032000145618
  5. Carlan, V., Sys, C., & Vanelslander, T. (2015). Port Community System cost and benefits: from competition to collaboration within the supply chain
  6. Competition Authority. (2015). Study on competition in the port sector (In Portuguese)
  7. Doing Business. (2011). Doing Business 2012: Trading Across Borders. The World Bank
  8. EPCSA - European Port Community Systems Association - (2013a). EPCSA Policy Statement - May 2013: EU Port Policy Proposals
  9. EPCSA - European Port Community Systems Association - (2013b). Message Standards in the EU
  10. ESPO - European Sea Ports Organisation. (2010). European Port Governance. Brussel: ESPO
  11. ESPO - European Sea Ports Organisation. (2014). Position of the European Sea Ports Organisation on the implementation of reporting formalities Directive 2010/65/EU. Bruxelas: ESPO
  12. European Commission. (2009). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, “Strategic goals and recommendations for the EU’s maritime transport policy until 2018. COM(2009) (In Portuguese)
  13. European Commission. (2011). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on Union guidelines for the development of the trans-European transport network. COM (2011) 650 final (In Portuguese)
  14. European Commission. (2013a). Blue Waist, a unique space for growth. COM(2013) 510 final (In Portuguese)
  15. European Commission. (2013b). Ports an engine for growth. COM(2013) 295 final (In Portuguese)
  16. European Commission. (2014a). Building the main transport network: the main network corridors and the Connecting Europe Facility. COM(2013) 940 final
  17. European Commission. (2014b). Report from the Comission to the European Parliament and the Council: “on the functioning of Directive 2010/65/EU on reporting formalities for ships arriving in and/or departing from ports of the Member States. COM(2014) 320 final
  18. European Commission. (2015). National Single Window Guidelines. Directorate General for Mobility and Transport, Directorate D - Logistic, maritime & land transport and passenger rights, Brussels
  19. GS1. (2007). Logistics Interoperability Model, Version 1
  20. Hermans, P. (2015). The Zachman Framework for architecture revisited. On conceiving the informational enterprise. Retrieved May 18, 2016, from www.zachman.com
  21. IMO. (2011). Guidelines for setting up a Single Window System in maritime transport. FAL.5/Circ.36
  22. IPCSA. (2011). White Paper: The role of Port Community Systems in the development of the Single Window. Brussels
  23. ISO 28005-1. (2013). Security management systems for the supply chain - Electronic port clearance (EPC) - Part 1: Message structure
  24. ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010. (2011). Systems and software engineering - Architecture description
  25. Josey, A. (2011). TOGAF Version 9.1 Enterprise Edition: An Introduction. Retrieved June 10, 2016, from https://www2.opengroup.org/ogsys/catalog/W118
  26. Lankhorst, M. (2005). Enterprise Architecture at work: Modelling, communication and analysis. New York: Springer
  27. Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2010). Management Information Suystems: Managing the digital firm. New Jersey: Pearson
  28. Lee-Partrige, J., Teo, T., & Lim, V. (2000). Information technology management: the case od the Port of Singapore Authority. Jornal of Strategic Information Systems, 9(1), 85-99.10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00035-4
  29. Long, A. (2009). Port Community Systems. World Customs Jornal, 3, 63-6710.55596/001c.91356
  30. Mobility and Transport Authority. (2016). Follow-up of the Port Market: Report for December 2015 (In Portuguese)
  31. Notteboom, T. (2008). The relationship between seaports and the intermodal hinterland in light of global supply chain. Paris: OECD/ITF10.1787/9789282102251-3-en
  32. OECD/ITF. (2008). Port Competion and hinterland connections. Paris: OECD/ITF
  33. OECD/ITF. (2015). The impact of Mega-Ships. Paris: OECD/ITF
  34. Pereira, C. M., & Sousa, P. (2004). A method to define an enterprise architecture using the Zachman Framework. Nicosia, Cyprus: SAC ‘0410.1145/967900.968175
  35. Rodon, J., & Ramis-Pujol, J. (2006). Exploring the intricacies of integrating with a Port Community System. 19th Bled eConference. Bled
  36. Rodrigue, J. (2010). Maritime Transportation: Drivers for the Shipping and Port Industries. Leipzig: OECD/ITF
  37. Rodrigues, L. (2014). Determining Factors of the Value of Enterprise Architectures, New Academic editions Publishing (In Portuguese)
  38. Sessions, R. (2007). A comparison between the four main methodologies of corporate architecture. Retrieved June 10, 2016, from https://msdn.microsoft.com/pt-br/library/bb466232.aspx(In Portuguese)
  39. Smit, S. (2014). A Comparison of Port Community Systems: A framework to compare Port Community Systems and an application to the Port Community Systems of Hamburg, Rotterdam and Antwerp. Rotterdam: Master Thesis
  40. Srour, F. J., van Oosterhout, M., van Baalen, P., & Zuidwijk, R. (2007). Port Community System Implementation: Lessons Learned from an International Scan. Rotterdam
  41. Tijan, E., Kos, S., & Ogrizovic, D. (2009). Disaster Recovery and Business Continuity in Port Community Systems. Rijeka: University of Rijeka
  42. Tsen, J. K. (2001). Ten years of Single Window implementation: Lessons learned for the future. Global Trade Facilitation Conference 2011
  43. UN/CEFACT. (2005). Recommendation and Guidelines on establishing a Single Window: to enhance the efficient exchange of information between trade and government. United Nations, The United Nations Center for Trade Facilitation and Electronic Business. Geneva: United Nations Publications
  44. UNCTAD. (2004). Assessment of seaport land interface: an analytical framework. UNCTAD. UNCTAD/SDTE/TLB/MISC/2004/3
  45. UNECE. (2011). Single Window Implementation Framework. Geneva and New York
  46. Van Oosterhout, M., Zielinski, M., & Tan, Y. (2000). Inventory of flows & processes in the port. Virtuele Haven [Virtual Port], deliverable T2.D1a
  47. WCO. (2008). Single Window Information Store. Retrieved May 10, 2016, from http://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/facilitation/activities-and-programmes/single-window/single-window.aspx
  48. WCO. (2011). WCO Compendium: How to build a Single Window Environment, Volume 1 The executive guide. World Customs Organisation
  49. Zachman, J. (2008). John Zachman’s concise definition of the Zachman Framework. Retrieved May 18, 2016, from www.zachman.com
  50. Zachman, J. A. (2016). The framework for enterprise architecture: background, description and utility. Retrieved June 22, 2016, from www.zachman.com
Language: English
Page range: 38 - 49
Published on: Dec 28, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2020 Claudio Jose Pinto, Pedro Fernandes Anunciacao, published by EKA University of Applied Sciences
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.