References
- Aceleanu, M. I., Serban, A. C., and Burghelea, C. 2015. “Greening” the youth employment—a chance for sustainable development. Sustainability 7 (3): 2623-2643.
- Ah Fook, L. and McNeill, L. 2020. Click to buy: The impact of retail credit on over-consumption in the online environment. Sustainability 12 (18): 7322.
- Ajzen, I. 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organizational behavior and human decision processes 50 (2): 179-211.
- Andruszkiewicz, K., Grzybowska-Brzezińska, M., Grzywińska-Rąpca, M., and Wiśniewski, P. D. 2023. Attitudes and Pro-Environmental Behavior of Representatives of Generation Z from the Example of Poland and Germany. Sustainability 15 (20): 15068.
- Bloodhart, B. and Swim, J. K. 2020. Sustainability and consumption: what’s gender got to do with it? Journal of Social issues 76 (1): 101-113.
- Bogueva, D. and Marinova, D. 2022. Australian Generation Z and the nexus between climate change and alternative proteins. Animals 12 (19): 2512.
- Booi-Chen, T. and Teck-Chai, L. A. U. 2009. Examining sustainable consumption patterns of young consumers: is there a cause for concern?. Journal of International Social Research 2 (9): 465-472.
- Bulut, Z. A., Kökalan Çımrin, F., and Doğan, O. 2017. Gender, generation and sustainable consumption: Exploring the behaviour of consumers from Izmir, Turkey. International journal of consumer studies 41 (6): 597-604.
- Campbell, D. T. 1963. Social attitudes and other acquired behavioral dispositions. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1964-06919-003. Accessed 4 May 2024.
- Cao, Y., Lu, H., and Zhu, C. 2022. Consumer preference for end-of-life scenarios and recycled products in circular economy. Sustainability 14 (19): 12129.
- Carrero, I., Valor, C., and Redondo, R. 2020. Do all dimensions of sustainable consumption lead to psychological well-being? Empirical evidence from young consumers. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 33: 145-170.
- Chen, Y. S., Yan, X., and Liew, C. B. A. 2023. University Social Responsibility in China: The Mediating Role of Green Psychological Capital. International journal of environmental research and public health 20 (4): 3634.
- Chiu, M. C., Kuo, T. C., and Liao, H. T. 2020. Design for sustainable behavior strategies: Impact of persuasive technology on energy usage. Journal of Cleaner Production 248: 119214.
- Cyfert, S., Górka, J., Piórkowska, K., Dyduch, W., Glabiszewski, W., and Batko, R. 2024. Shaping sustainable development of tomorrow: generation Z competencies, green consumption values and the role of knowledge acquisition sources. Central European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/CEMJ-07-2024-0213 Accessed 20 October 2025.
- Dąbrowski, L. S., Środa-Murawska, S., Smoliński, P., and Biegańska, J. 2022. Rural–urban divide: Generation Z and pro-environmental behaviour. Sustainability 14 (23): 16111.
- Delmas, M. A. and Burbano, V. C. 2011. The drivers of green-washing. California management review 54 (1): 64-87.
- Djafarova, E. and Foots, S. 2022. Exploring ethical consumption of generation Z: Theory of planned behaviour. Young Consumers 23 (3): 413–431.
- Doğan, O., Bulut, Z. A., and Kökalan Çımrın, F. 2015. A scale development study to measure individuals’ sustainable consumption behavior. Ataturk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences 29: 659–678.
- European Commission 2024. Achievements of the von der Leyen commission, The European Green Deal. https://commission.europa.eu/documents_en. Accessed 30 July 2024.
- Ewe, S. Y. and Tjiptono, F. 2023. Green behavior among Gen Z consumers in an emerging market: eco-friendly versus non-eco-friendly products. Young Consumers 24 (2): 234-252.
- Fischer, D., Böhme, T., and Geiger, S. M. 2017. Measuring young consumers’ sustainable consumption behavior: Development and validation of the YCSCB scale. Young consumers 18 (3): 312-326.
- Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research 18 (1): 39-50.
- Francis, T. and Hoefel, F. 2018. True Gen’: Generation Z and its implications for companies. McKinsey & Company. http://www.drthomaswu.com/uicmpaccsmac/Gen%20Z.pdf. Accessed May 5 2024.
- Gadenne, D., Sharma, B., Kerr, D., and Smith, T. 2011. The influence of consumers’ environmental beliefs and attitudes on energy saving behaviours. Energy policy 39 (12): 7684-7694.
- Gajović, A., Bjelica, D., Pavlović, D., and Vukmirović, D. 2023. Educating youth on project sustainability: project engagement and recognition of the green deal. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research 2023 21 (4): 2969–2989. http://dx.doi.org/10.15666/aeer/2104_29692989. Accessed April 4 2024.
- Gazzola, P., Pavione, E., Pezzetti, R., and Grechi, D. 2020. Trends in the fashion industry. The perception of sustainability and circular economy: A gender/generation quantitative approach. Sustainability 12 (7): 2809.
- Gupta, V. 2021. Investigating the mediating role of green intention between green attitude-behaviour gap. Marketing in 2021, 33. https://www.researchgate.net/. Accessed 10 June 2024.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., and Anderson, R. E. 2009. Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Prentice-Hall.
- Ham, C. D., Chung, U. C., Kim, W. J., Lee, S. Y., and Oh, S. H. 2022. Greener than others? Exploring generational differences in green purchase intent. International Journal of Market Research 64 (3): 376-396.
- Hajian, M. and Kashani, S. J. 2021. Evolution of the concept of sustainability. From Brundtland Report to sustainable development goals. In Sustainable resource management (1-24). Elsevier.
- Harland, P., Staats, H. and Wilke, H. A. 1999. Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the Theory of Planned Behavior 1. Journal of applied social psychology 29 (12): 2505-2528.
- Hinton, P. R., McMurray, I., and Brownlow, C. 2014. SPSS explained. Routledge.
- Hu, L. T. and Bentler, P. M. 1999. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal 6 (1): 1-55.
- Kara, A. and Min, M. K. 2024. Gen Z consumers’ sustainable consumption behaviors: influencers and moderators. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 25 (1): 124-142.
- Klug, K. and Niemand, T. 2021. The lifestyle of sustainability: Testing a behavioral measure of precycling. Journal of Cleaner Production 297: 126699.
- Knez, S., Štrbac, S., and Podbregar, I. 2022. Climate change in the Western Balkans and EU Green Deal: status, mitigation and challenges. Energy, Sustainability and Society 12 (1): 1-14.
- Krstinić Nižić, M. and Butković, I. 2023. Can Generation Z implement sustainable development in tourism? In 7th International Scientific Conference ToSEE–Tourism in Southern and Eastern Europe 2023 Engagement & Empowerment: A Path Toward Sustainable Tourism (231-248). University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management.
- Lavuri, R., Jusuf, E., and Gunardi, A. 2021. Green sustainability: Factors fostering and behavioural difference between millennial and Gen Z: Mediating role of green purchase intention. Ekonomia i Środowisko: 8-38.
- Liang, J., Li, J., and Lei, Q. 2022. Exploring the influence of environmental values on green consumption behavior of apparel: A chain multiple mediation model among Chinese Generation Z. Sustainability 14 (19): 12850.
- Lisboa, A., Vitorino, L., and Antunes, R. 2022. Gen Zers’ intention to purchase products with sustainable packaging: An alternative perspective to the attitude-behaviour gap. Journal of Marketing Management 38 (9-10): 967-992.
- Longoni, C., Gollwitzer, P. M., and Oettingen, G. 2014. A green paradox: Validating green choices has ironic effects on behavior, cognition, and perception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 50: 158-165.
- Loo, W. H., Yeow, P. H., and Yee Yen, Y. 2023. Antecedents of the responsible acquisition of computers behaviour: Integrating the theory of planned behaviour with the value-belief-norm theory and the habits variable. Plos One 18 (6): e0286022.
- Lopes, J. M., Gomes, S., Suchek, N., and Nogueira, S. 2024. The hidden reasons behind generation Z’s green choices. Discover Sustainability 5 (1): 1-17.
- Moore, J. E., Mascarenhas, A., Bain, J., and Straus, S. E. 2017. Developing a comprehensive definition of sustainability. Implementation Science 12: 1-8.
- Muralidharan, S. and Xue, F. 2016. Personal networks as a precursor to a green future: A study of “green” consumer socialization among young millennials from India and China. Young Consumers 17 (3): 226-242.
- Muranko, Ż., Tassell, C., Zeeuw van der Laan, A., and Aurisicchio, M. 2021. Characterisation and environmental value proposition of reuse models for fast-moving consumer goods: Reusable packaging and products. Sustainability 13 (5): 2609.
- Narayanan, S. 2022. Does Generation Z value and reward corporate social responsibility practices? Journal of Marketing Management 38 (9-10): 903-937.
- Nikolić, T. M., Paunović, I., Milovanović, M., Lozović, N., and Đurović, M. 2022. Examining Generation Z’s attitudes, behavior and awareness regarding eco-products: A Bayesian approach to confirmatory factor analysis. Sustainability 14 (5): 2727.
- Ninan, N., Roy, J. C., and Cheriyan, N. K. 2020. Influence of social media marketing on the purchase intention of Gen Z. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technolog 29 (1): 1692-1702.
- Nguyen, T. N., Lobo, A., and Nguyen, B. K. 2018. Young consumers’ green purchase behaviour in an emerging market. Journal of Strategic Marketing 26 (7): 583-600.
- Olsson, P., Galaz, V., and Boonstra, W. J. 2014. Sustainability transformations: a resilience perspective. Ecology and society 19 (4).
- Park, H. J. and Lin, L. M. 2020. Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: Comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. Journal of business research 117: 623-628.
- Perić, N., Mamula, N. T., and Delić, T. 2020. Analysis of attitudes of GenZ toward media and consumption: The region of Balkans. Marketing 51 (3): 210-218.
- Pšurný, M., Mokrý, S., Langr, A., and Stavkova, J. 2024. A reusable product from the point of view of a young generation: How companies can increase their competitiveness. Journal of Competitiveness 16 (4): 128-148.
- Rausch, T. M., Baier, D., and Wening, S. 2021. Does sustainability really matter to consumers? Assessing the importance of online shop and apparel product attributes. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 63: 102681.
- Reisch, L., Eberle, U., and Lorek, S. 2013. Sustainable food consumption: an overview of contemporary issues and policies. Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 9 (2): 7-25.
- Robichaud, Z. and Yu, H. 2021. Do young consumers care about ethical consumption? Modelling Gen Z’s purchase intention towards fair trade coffee. British Food Journal 124 (9): 2740–2760.
- Sheoran, M. and Kumar, D. 2022. Benchmarking the barriers of sustainable consumer behaviour. Social Responsibility Journal 18 (1): 19-42.
- Shrestha, B., Tiwari, S. R., Bajracharya, S. B., Keitsch, M. M., and Rijal, H. B. 2021. Review on the importance of gender perspective in household energy-saving behavior and energy transition for sustainability. Energies 14 (22): 7571.
- Silveira, P. D., Sandes, F. S., Xara-Brasil, D., and Menezes, K. 2024. Brands’ Green Activism: An Empirical Comparison between Posts of Digital Influencers and Brands. Sustainability 16 (16): 6863.
- Stern, P. C. 2000. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues 56 (3): 407-424.
- Šebek, V., Sarajlić, H., and Jurković, N. 2023. Towards Sustainable Consumption: Attitudes, Barriers, and Practices. Marketing in multiverse 2023 : from real to virtual : conference proceedings/28th CROMAR Congress: 373-392.
- Tan, C. S., Ooi, H. Y., and Goh, Y. N. 2017. A moral extension of the theory of planned behavior to predict consumers’ purchase intention for energy-efficient household appliances in Malaysia. Energy Policy 107: 459-471.
- Tangari, A. H. and Smith, R. J. 2012. How the temporal framing of energy savings influences consumer product evaluations and choice. Psychology & Marketing 29 (4): 198-208.
- Testa, F., Iraldo, F., Vaccari, A., and Ferrari, E. 2015. Why eco-labels can be effective marketing tools: Evidence from a study on Italian consumers. Business Strategy and the Environment 24 (4): 252-265.
- Tewari, A., Mathur, S., Srivastava, S., and Gangwar, D. 2022. Examining the role of receptivity to green communication, altruism and openness to change on young consumers’ intention to purchase green apparel: A multi-analytical approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 66: 102938.
- Theocharis, D. and Tsekouropoulos, G. 2025. Sustainable consumption and branding for Gen Z: How brand dimensions influence consumer behavior and adoption of newly launched technological products. Sustainability 17 (9): 4124.
- UN 2015. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development (A/RES/70/1). United Nations, October 2015. https://www.eea.europa.eu/policy-documents/resolution-adopted-by-the-general Accessed April 4 2024.
- Wang, S., Liao, Y. K., Wu, W. Y., and Le, K. B. H. 2021. The role of corporate social responsibility perceptions in brand equity, brand credibility, brand reputation, and purchase intentions. Sustainability 13 (21): 11975.
- Weigel, R. H. 1983. Environmental attitudes and the prediction of behavior. Environmental psychology: Directions and perspectives: 257-287.
- Xiong, K. 2020. Research on Influencing Factors of Impulsive Buying in Online Shopping Environment Bases on Perspective of a Payment Method. In 2020 International Conference on E-Commerce and Internet Technology (ECIT) (109-112). IEEE.
- Yusak, N. A. M., Mohd, Z., and Yusran, N. F. N. 2022. An empirical study of online impulsive buying behavior. Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal 7 (SI8): 27-32.
- Ziesemer, F., Hüttel, A. and Balderjahn, I. 2021. Young people as drivers or inhibitors of the sustainability movement: The case of anti-consumption. Journal of Consumer Policy 44 (3): 427-453.