Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Mapping Environmental Consciousness In Marketing Literature Cover

Mapping Environmental Consciousness In Marketing Literature

Open Access
|Jun 2025

References

  1. Abbasi, G. A., Keong, K. Q. C., Kumar, K. M., and Iranmanesh, M. 2022. Asymmetrical modelling to understand purchase intention towards remanufactured products in the circular economy and a closed-loop supply chain: An empirical study in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production 359: 132137.
  2. Abd’Razack, N. T., Medayese, S. O., Shaibu, S. I., and Adeleye, B. M. 2017. Habits and benefits of recycling solid waste among households in Kaduna, North West Nigeria. Sustainable Cities and Society 28: 297–306.
  3. Ahn, J.-M., Koo, D.-M., and Chang, H.-S. 2012. Different impacts of normative influences on pro-environmental purchasing behavior explained by differences in indi vidual characteristics. J. Glob. Scholars Market. Sci. 22 (2): 163-182.
  4. Ajzen, I., 1985. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl, J., Beckman, J. (Eds.), Action Control: from Cognition to Behavior. Springer, Heidelberg.
  5. Ajzen, I., 1991. The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process: 50 (2): 179-211.
  6. Akbar, P., and Hoffmann, S. 2018. Under which circumstances do consumers choose a product service system (PSS)? Consumer benefits and costs of sharing in PSS. Journal of Cleaner Production 201: 416-427.
  7. Alzghoul, A., Aboalganam, K. M., and Al-Kasasbeh, O. 2024. Nexus among green marketing practice, leadership commitment, environmental consciousness, and environmental performance in Jordanian pharmaceutical sector. Cogent Business & Management, 11 (1): 2292308.
  8. Arslanagić-Kalajdžić, M., Kadić-Maglajlić, S., Dlačić, J., and Žabkar, V. 2022. “We Go Together”: Understanding social cause-related purchase intentions of young adults. Journal of Business Research 140: 130-142.
  9. Babiak, K. and Trendafilova, S. 2011 CSR and environmental responsibility: Motives and pressures to adopt Green Management Practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 18 (1): 11–24.
  10. Bhatt, Y., Ghuman, K., and Dhir, A. 2020. Sustainable manufacturing. Bibliometrics and content analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production 260: 120988.
  11. Boldero, J., 1995. The prediction of household recycling of newspapers: the role of attitudes, intentions, and situational factors. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 25 (5): 440-462.
  12. Bruine de Bruin, W. and Ulqinaku, A. 2021. Effect of mortality salience on charitable donations: Evidence from a national sample. Psychology and Aging 36 (4): 415.
  13. Caspers, K. 2020. Role of Trust in Adopting Consumer Social Responsible Behaviour in the Context of Water Use in Domestic Households. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 15 (1): 1–13.
  14. Chang, N.-J., and Fong, C.-M. 2010. Green product quality, green corporate image, green customer satisfaction, and green customer loyalty. African Journal of Business Management 4 (13): 2836–2844.
  15. Chen, Y. S. 2008. The positive effect of green intellectual capital on competitive advantages of firms. Journal of Business Ethics 77: 271-286.
  16. Chen, M.-Y., and Chiu, C.-I. 2016. Go green: How to influence the perceived effectiveness of a green product? International Journal of Advertising 35 (4): 622–641.
  17. Cheung, S.F., Chan, D.K.S., Wong, Z.S.Y., 1999. Reexamining the theory of planned behavior in understanding waste-paper recycling. Environ. Behav 31 (7): 587-612.
  18. Christofi, M., Pereira, V., Vrontis, D., Tarba, S., and Thrassou, A. 2021. Agility and flexibility in international business research: A comprehensive review and future research directions. Journal of World Business 56 (3): 101194.
  19. Chu, M., Muhamad, H.B., Mustapha, M.B., San, O.T., Zan, F. and Jia, X. 2022. Research Trends in Corporate Social Responsibility and Innovation: A Bibliometric Analysis. Sustainability 14 (21): 14185.
  20. Dabić, M., Maley, J., Dana, L. P., Novak, I., Pellegrini, M. M., and Caputo, A. 2020. Pathways of SME internationalization: A bibliometric and systematic review. Small Business Economics 55: 705-725.
  21. Davies, J., Foxall, G.R., Pallister, J. 2002. Beyond the intention-behavior mythology: an integrated model of recycling. Market. Theor. 2 (1): 29-113.
  22. Davis, G., Phillips, P.S., Read, A.D., and Lida, Y. 2006. Demonstrating the need for the development of internal research capacity: understanding recycling participation using the theory of planned behavior in West Oxfordshire, UK. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 46 (2): 115-127.
  23. Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B.B., Sinkovics, R.R., arend Bohlen, G.M. 2003. Can socio- demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. J. Bus. Res. 56: 465-480.
  24. Ertz, M., Addar, W., Ouerghemmi, C., and Takaffoli, M. 2023. Overview of factors influencing consumer engagement with plastic recycling. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment 12 (6): 493.
  25. Fatima, T. and Elbanna, S. 2023. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) implementation: A review and a research agenda towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 183(1): 105-121.
  26. Fitz-Koch, S., Nordqvist, M., Carter, S., and Hunter, E. 2018. Entrepreneurship in the agricultural sector: A literature review and future research opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 42 (1): 129-166.
  27. Garvey, A. M. and Bolton, L. E. 2017. Eco-Product Choice Cuts Both Ways: How Proenvironmental Licensing versus Reinforcement is Contingent on Environmental Consciousness. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 36 (2): 284-298.
  28. Gaspar Ferreira, A. and Fernandes, M. E. 2021. Sustainable advertising or eco-labels: Which is the best for your brand and for consumers’ environmental consciousness? Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 30 (1): 20–36.
  29. Ghorbani, Z., Kargaran, S., Saberi, A., Haghighinasab, M., Jamali, S. M., and Ale Ebrahim, N. (2021). Trends and patterns in digital marketing research: bibliometric analysis. Journal of Marketing Analytics: 1-15.
  30. Hao, Z. and Chenyue, Q. 2022. Impact of environmental and health consciousness on ecological consumption intention: The moderating effects of haze and self-competence. Journal of Consumer Affairs.
  31. Jain, S., Singhal, S., Jain, N.K., and Bhaskar, K. (2020). Construction and demolition waste recycling: Investigating the role of theory of planned behavior, institutional pressures and environmental consciousness. Journal of Cleaner Production 263: 121405.
  32. Juvan, E., and Dolnicar, S. 2014. The attitude–behavior gap in sustainable tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 48: 76-95.
  33. Khan, A. N. 2024. Elucidating the effects of environmental consciousness and environmental attitude on green travel behavior: Moderating role of green self-efficacy. Sustainable Development 32 (3): 2223-2232.
  34. Kisieliauskas, J. and Jančaitis, A. 2022. Green Marketing Impact on Perceived Brand Value in Different Generations. Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development 44 (2): 125–133.
  35. Kollmuss, A. and Agyeman, J., 2002. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environ. Educ. Res. 8: 239-260.
  36. Kumar, A., Prakash, G., and Kumar, G. 2021. Does environmentally responsible purchase intention matter for consumers? A predictive sustainable model developed through an empirical study. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 58: 102270.
  37. Lages, C. R., Perez-Vega, R., Kadić-Maglajlić, S., and Borghei-Razavi, N. 2023. A systematic review and bibliometric analysis of the dark side of customer behavior: An integrative customer incivility framework. Journal of Business Research 161: 113779.
  38. Lee, K. and Ball, R. 2003. Achieving sustainable corporate competitiveness: Strategic link between top management’s (green) commitment and corporate environmental strategy. GMI 44: 89–104.
  39. Lin, S.T. and Niu, H.J. 2018. Green consumption: Environmental knowledge, environmental consciousness, social norms, and purchasing behavior. Business Strategy and the Environment 27 (5): 677-684.
  40. Lopes, J. and Farinha, L. 2019. Industrial Symbiosis in a circular economy: towards firms’ sustainable competitive advantage. International Journal of Mechatronics and Applied Mechanics 5: 206-220.
  41. Mishal, A., Dubey, R., Gupta, O.K., and Luo, Z., 2017. Dynamics of environmental consciousness and green purchase behavior: an empirical study. Int. J. Clim. Change Strategies Manage 9 (5): 682-706.
  42. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., and Altman, D. G. 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ 339.
  43. Montiel, I. 2008. Corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability: Separate pasts, common futures. Organization and Environment 21 (3): 245–269.
  44. Naeem, M. 2021. The role of social media to generate social proof as engaged society for stockpiling behavior of customers during Covid-19 pandemic. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 24 (3): 281-301.
  45. Narver, J. C. and Slater, S. F. 1990. The effect of market orientation on business profitability. Journal of Marketing 54 (4): 20-35.
  46. Nazir, J. and Pedretti, E. 2015. Educators’ perceptions of bringing students to environmental consciousness through engaging outdoor experiences. Environmental Education Research.
  47. Nekmahmud, M. and Fekete-Farkas, M., 2020. Why Not Green Marketing? Determinants of Consumers’ Intention to Green Purchase Decision in a New Developing Nation. Sustainability 12 (19): 7880.
  48. Palmatier, R. W., Dant, R. P., Grewal, D., and Evans, K. R. 2006. Factors influencing the effectiveness of relationship marketing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing 70 (4): 136-153.
  49. Pandey, N., Nayal, P., and Rathore, A. S. 2020. Digital marketing for B2B organizations: structured literature review and future research directions. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 35 (7): 1191-1204.
  50. Popkova, E., DeLo, P., and Sergi, B. S. (2021). Corporate Social Responsibility amid Social Distancing during the COVID-19 Crisis: BRICS vs. OECD Countries. Res. Int. Bus. Finance 55: 101315.
  51. Prashar, A. 2020. A bibliometric and content analysis of sustainable development in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production 245: 118665.
  52. Ramos, R.F., Barros, V., Barbosa, A.M. and Silva, M.G., 2022. Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: A Bibliometric and Visualization Analysis of the Literature between the Years 1994 and 2020. Sustainability 14 (3): 1694.
  53. Sanchez, M. and Lafuente, R., 2010. Defining and measuring environmental consciousness. Rev. Int. Sociol. 68: 731-755.
  54. Schlegelmilch, B. B., Bohlen, G. M., and Diamantopoulos, A. 1996. The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. European Journal of Marketing 30 (5): 35-55.
  55. Sharma, K. and Bansal, M., 2013. Environmental consciousness, its antecedents and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Indian Business Research 5 (3): 198-214.
  56. Srisathan, W.A., Malai, K., Narathawaranan, N., Coochampoo, K. and Naruetharadhol, P., 2024. The impact of citizen science on environmental attitudes, environmental knowledge, environmental awareness to pro–environmental citizenship behaviour. Journal of Environmental Education.
  57. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., and Smart, P. 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review.
  58. Ulqinaku, A., Sarial-Abi, G., and Kinsella, E. L. 2020. Benefits of heroes to coping with mortality threats by providing perceptions of personal power and reducing unhealthy compensatory consumption. Psychology & Marketing 37(10): 1433-1445.
  59. Van Eck, N.J., Waltman L. 2010. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84 (2): 523-538.
  60. Viglia, G., Zaefarian, G., and Ulqinaku, A. 2021. How to design good experiments in marketing: Types, examples, and methods. Industrial Marketing Management 98: 193-206.
  61. Welford R, Chan C, and Man, M. 2007. Priorities for corporate social responsibility: A survey of businesses and their stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management 15: 52–62.
  62. Xu, X.P., Hua, Y.N., Wang, S.Y., and Xu, G.F. 2020. Determinants of consumer’s intention to purchase authentic green furniture’, Resources, Conservation and Recycling 159: 104721.
  63. Yankovskaya, V., Gerasimova, E.B., Osipov, V.S. and Lobova, S.V. 2022. Environmental CSR From the Standpoint of Stakeholder Theory: Rethinking in the Era of Artificial Intelligence. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10: 953996.
  64. Yilmazsoy, B., Schmidbauer, H., and Rosch, A. 2015. Green segmentation: a cross national study. Market. Intell. Plann. 33, 981-1003.
  65. Zhang, W.Q. and Liu, L.L. 2021. Unearthing consumers’ intention to adopt eco-friendly smart home services: an extended version of the theory of planned behavior model’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 64 (9): 1607-1626.
  66. Zheng, Y. 2010. Association analysis on pro-environmental behaviors and environmental consciousness in main cities of East Asia. Behaviormetrika 37 (1): 55–69.
  67. Zhu, J. and Liu, W. 2020. A tale of two databases: the use of Web of Science and Scopus in academic papers. Scientometrics 123 (1): 321-335.
  68. Hassan, L. M., Shiu, E., and Shaw, D. 2016. Who says there is an intention–behavior gap? Assessing the empirical evidence of an intention–behavior gap in ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics 136: 219-236.
  69. Grimmer, M., and Miles, M. P. 2017. With the best of intentions: a large sample test of the intention-behavior gap in pro-environmental consumer behavior. International Journal of Consumer Studies 41 (1): 2-10.
Language: English
Page range: 176 - 191
Published on: Jun 30, 2025
Published by: University of Sarajevo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2025 Mediha Arnaut Smajlović, Esmeralda Marić, published by University of Sarajevo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.