Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Measuring the Efficiency of Polish Municipalities – Data Envelopment Analysis Approach

South East European Journal of Economics and Business
Volume 14 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)
By:
Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Alsharif, K., Ferozb, E. H., Klemerc, A. and Raabd, R. 2008. Governance of water supply systems in the Palestinian territories: a data envelopment analysis approach to the management of water resources. Journal of Environmental Management 87: 80-94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.008.10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.008
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Andersen, P. and Petersen, N. C. 1993. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 39 (10): 1261-1264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261.10.1287/mnsc.39.10.1261
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. andCooper, W. W. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30: 1078–1092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078.10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W. and Rhodes, E. 1978. Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2 (6): 429-444. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Clark, G., Huxley, J. and Mountford, D. 2010. Organising local economic development: the role of development agencies and companies. OECD. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264083530en.10.1787/9789264083530en
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Corrado lo Storto 2013. Evaluating technical efficiency of Italian major municipalities: a data envelopment analysis model. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 81 (2013): 346-350. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.440.10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.440
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Czyż-Gwizdała, E. 2003. Conceptions of organizational efficiency measurement - the use of the DEA method in evaluating the organization efficiency. Zarządzanie i Finanse 11 (1): 103-116.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. De Borger, B. and Kerstens, K. 1996. Cost efficiency of Belgian local governments: a comparative analysis of FDH, DEA and econometric approaches. Regional Science and Urban Economics 2: 145- 170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(95)02127-2.10.1016/0166-0462(95)02127-2
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. De Sousa, S. and Cribari, M. 2005. Explaining DEA technical efficiency scores in an outlier corrected environment: the case of public services in Brazilian municipalities. Brazilian Review of Econometrics (25): 287-313. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12660/bre.v25n22005.2507.10.12660/bre.v25n22005.2507
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Debreu, G. 1951. The coefficient of resource utilization. Econometrica 19 (3): 273-292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1906814.10.2307/1906814
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Drew, J., Dollery, B. and Kortt, M. A. 2015. What determines efficiency in local government? A DEA analysis of NSW local government. Economic Papers A Journal of Applied Economics and Policy 34 (4): 243-256. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/1759-3441.12118.10.1111/1759-3441.12118
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Farrell, M. J. 1957. The measurement of productive efficiency. Journal of the Royal 28 Statistical Society Series A (General) 120 (3): 253-290. DOI: http://doi.org/10.2307/2343100.10.2307/2343100
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Geys, B. and Moesen, W. 2009. Measuring local government technical (in)efficiency: an application and comparison of FDH, DEA and econometric approaches. Public Performance and Management Review 32: 489-504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2753/pmr1530-9576320401.10.2753/pmr1530-9576320401
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Guzik, B. 2009. Podstawowe modele DEA w badaniu efektywności gospodarczej i społecznej (Basic DEA models in the study of economic and social efficiency). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Poznaniu.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Guzik, B. 2009. Propozycja metody szacowania efektywności instytucji non profit (A proposal a method for estimating the efficiency of non-profit institutions). Roczniki Ekonomiczne Kujawsko-Pomorskiej Szkoły Wyższej w Bydgoszczy2.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Hajduk, S. 2018. Efficiency evaluation of urban transport using the DEA method. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy 13 (1): 141-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.008.10.24136/eq.2018.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Huang, C. H., Lin, Y. H. and Tseng, M. L. 2008. Application of cost benefit analysis and data envelopment analysis to evaluate the municipal solid waste management projects in metro Manila’. Wseas Transactions On Business And Economic 12 (5): 524-540. ISSN: 1109-9526.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Jacobs, R., Smith, P. C. and Street, A. 2013. Mierzenie efektywności w ochronie zdrowia (Measuring the efficiency in the Healthcare). Warszawa: ABC Wolters Kluwer Business.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Jewczak, M. and Żółtaszek, A. 2011. Ocena efektywności technicznej podmiotów sektora opieki zdrowotnej w Polsce w latach 1999-2009 w ujęciu przestrzenno-czasowym na przykładzie szpitali ogólnych (Assessment of technical efficiency of healthcare sector entities in Poland in the years 1999-2009 in space-time perspective on the example of public hospitals). Problemy Zarządzania, 9 (3): 194-210. ISSN 1644-9584.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Kirigia, J. M., Emrouznejad, A., Cassoma, B., Asbu, E. Z. and Barry, S. 2008. A performance assessment method for hospitals: the case of municipal hospitals in Angola. Journal of Medical System 32 (6): 509–519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-008-9157-5.10.1007/s10916-008-9157-5
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Kobiałka, A., Kubik, R. (2018). Efficiency of the investment activity of Polish communes in rural areas. Proceedings of the 8th International Scientific Conference Rural Development 2017.10.15544/RD.2017.207
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Kisman, Z. A. and Tasar, I. 2014. The key elements of local development. Procedia Economics and Finance Volume 15: 1689 – 1696. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00642X.10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00642X
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Kudła, J. 2011. Zastosowanie analizy obwiedni danych do badań jakości usług ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem sektora bankowego (The use of data envelopment analysis to examine the quality of services with particular emphasis on the banking sector). Ekonomia 11: 46-63.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Mehrabian, S. A., Alirezaee, A. and Jahanshahloo, G. R. 1999. A complete efficiency ranking of decision-making units in DEA. Computational Optimization and Applications (COAP), 14: 261-266.10.1023/A:1008703501682
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Miszczyński, P. M. 2013. Measuring the efficiency of local government units management in the central region of Poland in a dynamic perspective. Quantitative Methods in Economics, XIV (2): 108 – 117.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Murillo-Zamorano, L. R. 2004. Economic efficiency and frontier techniques. Journal of Economic Surveys 18 (1): 33–77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2004.00215.x.10.1111/j.1467-6419.2004.00215.x
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Myna, A. 1998. Rozwój lokalny, regionalne strategie rozwoju, regionalizacja (Local development, regional development strategies, regionalization). Samorząd Terytorialny No 11: 30-48.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Łękawa, Z. 2012. Ocena efektywności gmin województwa dolnośląskiego z wykorzystaniem metody DEA (Evaluation of the effectiveness of communes in the Lower Silesian Voivodship using the DEA method). Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska. Sectio H, Oeconomia 4 (2012): 515-526.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Nijkamp, P. and Suzuki, S. 2009. A generalized goals-achievement model in data envelopment analysis: an application to efficiency improvement in local government finance in Japan. Spatial Economic Analysis (4): 249-274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17421770903114687.10.1080/17421770903114687
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Nowak, M. 2015. Prakseologiczna ocena użyteczności metody DEA w diagnozie efektywności organizacji (Praxeological assessment of the usefulness of the DEA method in the diagnosis of organizational effectiveness). Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Poznańskiej, 66:101-112.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Pereira, H. andMarques, R. C. 2017. An analytical review of irrigation efficiency measured using deterministic and stochastic models. Agricultural Water Management 184: 28-35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.12.019.10.1016/j.agwat.2016.12.019
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Ramanathan, R. 2003. An Introduction to Data Envelopment Analysis: a Tool for Performance Measurement. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Seiford, L. M. and Zhu, J. 1999. Infeasibility of super-efficiency data envelopment analysis. INFOR 37 (2): 174-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03155986.1999.11732379.10.1080/03155986.1999.11732379
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Shanling, L., Jahanshahloob, G. R. and Khodabakhshic, M. 2007. Super-efficiency model for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Applied Mathematics and Computation 184 (2): 638-648. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2006.06.063.10.1016/j.amc.2006.06.063
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Sierak, J. 2016. The role of local government in the process of stimulating the development of the local economy. Journal of Management and Financial Sciences 25 (9): 61-82.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Storto, C. L. 2016. Ecological efficiency based ranking of cities: a combined DEA cross efficiency and shannon’s entropy method. Sustainability 8: 124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8020124.10.3390/su8020124
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Sztando, A. 1998. Oddziaływanie samorządu lokalnego na rozwój lokalny w świetle ewolucji modeli ustrojowych gmin (The impact of local government on local development in the light of the evolution of communal system models). Samorząd Terytorialny 11: 12-29.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Tone, K. 2001. A slakes-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research 130: 498-509.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Olejniczak, J. 2019. Efficiency vs. the level of per capita income of urban-rural municipalities in Poland. E-Finanse : Financial Internet Quarterly 15 (1)Z; 20–29.10.2478/fiqf-2019-0003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Opolski, K., Podgórska, J. and Leśniowska-Gontarz, M. 2018. Quality criterion in measuring the efficiency of health facilities. Journal of Management and Financial Sciences 35 (2018): 81-92.10.33119/JMFS.2018.35.5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Vitezić, N. N., Šegota, A. A. and Setnikar-Cankar, S. S. 2016. Measuring the efficiency of public health services by DEA. International Public Administration Review 14 (4): 27-48. DOI: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3002377.10.17573/ipar.2016.4.02
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Worthington, A. 1999. Performance indicators and efficiency measurement in public libraries. The Australian Economic Review 32 (1): 31–42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/14678462.00091.10.1111/14678462.00091
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Yang, W., Lee, Y. and Hu, J. 2016. Urban sustainability assessment of Taiwan based on data envelopment analysis. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews (61): 341–353. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.015.10.1016/j.rser.2016.04.015
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Yuan, X., Wang, Q., Wang, K., Wang, B., Jin, J. and Wei, Y. 2015. China’s regional vulnerability to drought and its mitigation strategies under climate change: data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy process integrated approach. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 20: 341. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-013-9494-7.10.1007/s11027-013-9494-7
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Ziębicki, B. 2014. Efektywność organizacyjna podmiotów sektora publicznego (Organizational efficiency of public sector entities). Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego w Krakowie.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. Zioło, M. 2012. Modele polityki inwestycyjnej gmin i ich wpływ na rozwój przedsiębiorczości (Municipal investment policy models and their impact on entrepreneurship development). Ekonomiczne Problemy Usług 97 (2012): 283-293.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jeb-2019-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2233-1999
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 54 - 66
Published on: Dec 30, 2019
Published by: University of Sarajevo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA),
municipalities,
sustainable development
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Business management, other,
Political economics,
Political economics, other

© 2019 Tomasz Skica, Małgorzata Leśniowska-Gontarz, Katarzyna Miszczyńska, published by University of Sarajevo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 14 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)Next article