Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Productivity Change of Microfinance Institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovina

South East European Journal of Economics and Business
Volume 14 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)
By:
Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Ambarkhane, D., Singh, A. S., and Venkataramani, B. 2018. Measuring total factor productivity change of microfinance institutions in India using Malmquist productivity index. Indian Growth and Development Review 12 (1): 105-130.10.1108/IGDR-12-2017-0105
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. Azad, M. A., Masum, A. K., Munisamy, S. and Sharmin, D. F. 2015. Efficiency analysis of major microfinance institutions in Bangladesh: A Malmquist index approach. Quality & Quantity 50 (4): 1525-1537.10.1007/s11135-015-0219-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. Bassem, B. S. 2014. Total factor productivity change of MENA microfinance institutions: A Malmquist productivity index approach. Economic Modelling 39: 182-189.10.1016/j.econmod.2014.02.035
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. Bateman, M. and Chang, H. 2012. Microfinance and the Illusion of Development: From Hubris to Nemesis in Thirty Years. World Economic Review 1: 13-36.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. Bateman, M. and Sinkovic, D. 2017. Bosnia’s post conflict microfinance experiment: A new Balkan tragedy. In Seduced and Betrayed: Exposing the Contemporary Microfinance Phenomenon, 127-146. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. Bella, G. D. 2011. The Impact of the Global Financial Crisison Microfinance and Policy Implications. IMF Working Papers 11(175).10.5089/9781462313303.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. Caves, D. W., Christensen, L. R. and Diewert, W. E. 1982. The Economic Theory of Index Numbers and the Measurement of Input, Output, and Productivity. Econometrica 50 (6): 1393 - 1414.10.2307/1913388
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. Chan, S. H. and Lin, J. J. 2015. Microfinance Products and Service Quality in Financial and Quasi-Financial Institutions in China. Strategic Change 24: 267–284.10.1002/jsc.2008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. Chandran, V. G. and Pandiyan, V. 2008. Technical efficiency and technological change in Malaysian service industries. Applied Economics Letters 15 (8): 655-657.10.1080/13504850600721932
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. Cooper, W. W. 2006. Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: with DEA-solver software and references. New York: Springer.10.1007/978-0-387-45283-8
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. Efendic, V. 2014. Efikasnost banaka u Jugoistocnoj Evropi s posebnim osvrtom na Bosnu i Hercegovinu. Sarajevo: Ekonomski fakultet Sarajevo.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. Efendic, V. and Hadziahmetovic, N. 2017. The social and Financial Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions: The Case of Bosnia and Herzegovina. South East European Journal of Economics and Business 12 (2): 85-101.10.1515/jeb-2017-0018
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. Efendic, V. and Hadzic, F. 2017. Business Model and Operational Efficiency of Microfinance in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Lessons for Islamic Microfinance. In Critical Issues and Challenges in Islamic Economics and Finance Development, 191-211. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-319-45029-2_9
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. Emrouznejad, A. and Yang, G. 2017. A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in DEA: 1978–2016. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 61 (1): 1-5.10.1016/j.seps.2017.01.008
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., Norris, M. and Zhang, Z. 1994. Productivity Growth, Technical Progress, and Efficiency Change in Industrialized Countries. The American Economic Review 84 (1): 66-83.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. Flückiger, Y. and Vassiliev, A. 2007. Efficiency in Microfinance Institutions: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis to MFIs in Peru. In: Balkenhol B. (eds) Microfinance and Public Policy, 89-110. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230300026_6
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. Gebremichael, B. Z. and Rani, D. L. 2012. Total Factor Productivity Change of Ethiopian Microfinance Institutions (MFIs): a Malmquist Productivity Index Approach (MPI), European Journal of Business and Management 4 (3): 105-114.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. Grifell–Tatje, E. and Lovell, C.A.K 1996. Deregulation and Productivity Decline: The Case of Spanish Savings Banks. European Economic Review 40: 1281-1303.10.1016/0014-2921(95)00024-0
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. Gutiérrez-Nieto, B., Serrano-Cinca, C. and Molinero, C. M. 2007. Microfinance institutions and efficiency. Omega 35 (2): 131-142.10.1016/j.omega.2005.04.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. Hassan, K. M. and Sanchez, B. 2009. Efficiency Analysis of Microfinance Institutions in Developing Countries. SSRN Electronic Journal.10.2139/ssrn.1492238
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. Hermes, N., Lensink, R. and Meesters, A. 2011. Outreach and Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions. World Development 39 (6): 938–948.10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.10.018
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. Isik, I. and Hassan, M. K. 2003. Financial deregulation and total factor productivity change: An empirical study of Turkish commercial banks. Journal of Banking & Finance 27 (8): 1455-1485.10.1016/S0378-4266(02)00288-1
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. Kablan, S. 2012. Microfinance efficiency in the West African Economic and Monetary Union: have reforms promoted sustainability or outreach? Munich RePEcArhive.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. Kar, A. K. and Rahman, S. 2018. Changes in total factor productivity and efficiency of microfinance institutions in the developing world: A non-parametric approach. Economic Analysis and Policy 60: 103-118.10.1016/j.eap.2018.09.012
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. Kipesha, E. 2012. Efficiency of Microfinance Institution in East Africa: DEA. European Journal of Business and Management 4 (17): 77-88.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. Le, V., Vu, X-B (Benjamin) and Nghiem, S. 2018. Technical efficiency of small and medium manufacturing firms in Vietnam: A stochastic meta-frontier analysis. Economic Analysis and Policy 59: 84–91.10.1016/j.eap.2018.03.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. Lee, B.L. 2013. Productivity Performance of Singapore’s Retail Sector: A Two-Stage Non-Parametric Approach. Economic Analysis and Policy 43 (1): 67-77.10.1016/S0313-5926(13)50004-X
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. Littlefield, E. and Kneiding, C. 2009. The Global Financial Crisis and Its Impact on Microfinance. CGAP 52: 1-7.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. Mia, M. A. and Chandran, V. G. 2015. Measuring Financial and Social Outreach Productivity of Microfinance Institutions in Bangladesh. Social Indicators Research 127(2): 505-527.10.1007/s11205-015-0979-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. Mia, M. A. and Soltane, B. I. 2016. Productivity and its determinants in microfinance institutions (MFIs): Evidence from South Asian countries. Economic Analysis and Policy 51: 32-45.10.1016/j.eap.2016.05.003
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. Mia, M. A., Zhang, M., Rasiah, R. and Alam, A. F. 2018. Evaluating Productivity of Chinese Microfinance Institutions: A Malmquist Approach. The Chinese Economy 51(5): 432-445.10.1080/10971475.2018.1479603
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. Milford, B., Sinkovic, D. and Skare, M. 2012. The contribution of the microfinance model to Bosnia’s post-war reconstruction and development: how to destroy and economy and society without really trying. Austrian Foundation for Development Research (Ofse) 36: 4-31.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  33. Nawaz, A. 2010. Efficiency and productivity of microfinance: incorporating the role of subsidies. Working Papers CEB: 10-009.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  34. Ramanathan, R. 2003. An Introduction to data envelopment analysis: A tool for performance measurement, 174-175. New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  35. Sedzro, K. and Keita, M. 2009. Assessing the Efficiency of Microfinance Institutions Using Data Envelopment Analysis. Journal of International Finance & Economics 9 (2): 54-67.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  36. Serrano-Cinca, C., Gutiérrez-Nieto, B. and Molinero, C. M. 2009. Social Efficiency in Microfinance Institutions. Journal of The Operational Research Society 60 (19): 104-119.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602527
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  37. Simar, L. and Wilson, P. W. 1999. Estimating and bootstrapping Malmquist indices. European Journal of Operational Research 115 (3): 459-471.10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00450-5
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  38. Tahir, I. M. and Tahrim, S. N. C. 2013. Efficiency Analysis of Microfinance Institutions in ASEAN: A Proposed Efficiency Framework. Interdisciplinary Journal of Research in Business 3 (4): 13-23.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  39. Tahir, I. and Tahrim, S. 2015. Efficiency and Productivity Analysis of Microfinance Institutions in Cambodia: A DEA Approach. International Review of Business Research Papers 11 (1): 25-42.10.21102/irbrp.2015.03.111.03
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  40. Wagner, C. and Winkler, A. (2012). The Financial Crisis – a Microfinance Perspective. Die Unternehmung 66 (4): 324-339.10.5771/0042-059X-2012-4-324
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  41. Walter, I. and Krauss, N. A. 2008. Can Microfinance Reduce Portfolio Volatility? Economic Development and Cultural Change 58 (1): 85-110.10.1086/605206
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  42. Wang, Y. and Lan, Y. 2011. Measuring Malmquist productivity index: A new approach based on double frontiers data envelopment analysis. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 54 (11-12): 2760-2771.10.1016/j.mcm.2011.06.064
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  43. Widiarto, I. and Emrouznejad, A. 2015. Social and financial efficiency of Islamic microfinance institutions: A Data Envelopment Analysis application. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 50: 1-17.10.1016/j.seps.2014.12.001
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  44. Wijesiri, M., Viganò, L. and Meoli, M. 2015. Efficiency of microfinance institutions in Sri Lanka: a two-stage double bootstrap DEA approach. Economic Modelling 47: 74-83.10.1016/j.econmod.2015.02.016
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  45. Wijesiri, M. and Meoli, M. 2015. Productivity change of microfinance institutions in Kenya: A bootstrap Malmquist approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 25: 115-121.10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.04.004
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  46. World Bank Report. 2005. In WB Site resources. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTBOSNIAHERZ/Resources/LIP2.pdf. (accessed August 5, 2018).
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jeb-2019-0011 | Journal eISSN: 2233-1999
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 23 - 33
Published on: Dec 30, 2019
Published by: University of Sarajevo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Productivity change,
Microfinance institutions,
Malmquist productivity index,
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Related subjects:
Business and economics,
Business management,
Business management, other,
Political economics,
Political economics, other

© 2019 Velid Efendić, Nejra Hadžiahmetović, published by University of Sarajevo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 14 (2019): Issue 2 (December 2019)Next article