Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Institutions and Firms’ Performance in Transition Countries: The Case of Selected Cesee Countries Cover

Institutions and Firms’ Performance in Transition Countries: The Case of Selected Cesee Countries

Open Access
|Aug 2018

References

  1. Abramovitz, M. 1986. Catching up, forging ahead and falling behind. Journal of Economic History 46 (2), The Tasks of Economic History (June): 385-406.10.1017/S0022050700046209
  2. Acemoglu, D., Gallego, F. A., Robinson, J. A. 2014. Institutions, human capital, and development. Annual Reviews of Economica 6 (1): 875-912.10.1146/annurev-economics-080213-041119
  3. Aghion, P., Howitt, P. 1992. A model of growth through creative destruction. Econometrica 60 (2): 323-351.10.2307/2951599
  4. Archibugi, D., Denni, M., Filippetti, A. 2009. The technological capabilities of nations: The state of the art of synthetic indicators. Technological Forecasting & Social Change 76 (7): 917-931.10.1016/j.techfore.2009.01.002
  5. Atieno, R. 2001. Formal and informal institutions› lending policies and access to credit by small-scale enterprises in Kenya: An empirical assessment. AERC Research Paper 111 African Economic Research Consortium, Nairobi November, https://www.africaportal.org/documents/5926/RP111.pdf (accessed 2 March 2018)
  6. Baltagi, B. 2008. Econometric analysis of panel data. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Bartlett, W., Čučković, N., Krešimir, J., Nojkovič, A. 2013. Institutional quality and growth in EU neighbourhood countries. WP05/11 Search working paper. http://www.ub.edu/searchproject/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/WP-5.11.pdf (accessed 2 March 2018)
  8. Baum, C. F. 2006. An introduction to modern econometrics using Stata. College Station, TX: Stata press.
  9. Beck, T., Laeven, L. 2006. Institution building and growth in transition economies. Journal of Economic Growth 11 (2): 157-186.10.1007/s10887-006-9000-0
  10. BvD - Bureau van Dijk 2017. Orbis, brochure. https://www.bvdinfo.com/en-gb/ourproducts/data/international/orbis?gclid=EAIaIQobChMI_dW0hNTD1wIVC7gbCh-3ScgWhEAAYASAAEgKcHvD_BwE (accessed September 15, 2017)
  11. Commander, S., Svejnar, J., 2011. Business environment, exports, ownership and firm performance. Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (1): 309-337.10.1162/REST_a_00135
  12. Crafts, N. 2001. Historical perspectives on development. In Frontiers of development economics: The future in perspective, edited by G. Meier, J. Stiglitz, 301-340. New York: Oxford University Press.
  13. Dang, V. 2009. Institutional determinants of investment in transition economies. Economics and Finance Working Paper Series No. 09-33. Brunel University West London. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/e03e/96fa9c61cc160b765afcac49f9036f4ddca3.pdf
  14. Dias, J., Tebaldi, E. 2012. Institutions, human capital, and growth: The institutional mechanism. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 23 (3): 300-312.10.1016/j.strueco.2012.04.003
  15. Dollar, D., Kraay, A. 2003. Institutions, trade, and growth. Journal of monetary economics 50 (1): 133-162.10.1016/S0304-3932(02)00206-4
  16. EIS 2017. - European Innovation Scoreboard 2017, European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/24829 (accessed October 22, 2017)
  17. Edler, J., Fagerberg, J. 2017. Innovation policy: What, why, and how. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 33 (1): 2-23.10.1093/oxrep/grx001
  18. Efendic, A., Pugh, J. 2015. Institutional effects on economic performance in post socialist transition: A dynamic panel analysis. Acta Oeconomica 65 (4): 503-523.10.1556/032.65.2015.4.1
  19. Efendic, A., Mickiewicz, T., Rebmann, A. 2015. Growth aspirations and social capital: Young firms in post conflict environment. International Small Business Journal 33 (5): 537-561.10.1177/0266242613516987
  20. Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., Mickiewicz, T. 2013. Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? Journal of Business Venturing 28 (4): 564-580.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.05.001
  21. Estrin, S., Mickiewicz, T. 2011. Entrepreneurship in transition economies: The role of institutions and generational changes. In: The dynamics of entrepreneurship: Evidence from global entrepreneurship monitor data, edited by M. Minniti, 181-208. Oxford, Publisher?10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199580866.003.0009
  22. Fagerberg, J. 1987. A technology growth approach, to why growth rates differ. Research policy 16 (2-4): 87-99. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) (2017): WorldReport 2016/17. http://www.gemconsortium.org/report/49812 (accessed November 10, 2017)10.1016/0048-7333(87)90025-4
  23. Global Entrepreneurship Monitor data. 2017. http://www.gemconsortium.org/data/sets#bnes (accessed November 15, 2017)
  24. Goedhuys, M., Srholec, M. 2015. Technological capabilities, institutions and firm productivity: A multilevel study. European Journal of Development Research 27 (1): 122-139.10.1057/ejdr.2014.32
  25. Hsiao, C. 2003. Analysis of panel data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511754203
  26. Hu, A. G., Jefferson, G. H., Jinchang, Q. 2005. R&D and technology transfer: Firm-level evidence from Chinese industry. Review of Economics and Statistics 87(4): 780-786.10.1162/003465305775098143
  27. Kaufmann, D., A. Kraay, M. Mastruzzi. 2010. Worldwide Governance Indicators methodology and analytical issues. Policy Research Working Paper 5430. World Bank, September. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTMACRO/Resources/WPS5430.pdf (accessed October 10, 2017)
  28. Klevmarken, N. A. 1989. Panel studies: What can we learn from them? Introduction. European Economic Review 33: 523-529. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(89)90131-1 (accessed 22 October 2017)10.1016/0014-2921(89)90131-1(accessed22October2017
  29. Lanjouw, J. O., Levy, P. I. 2002. Untitled: A study of formal and informal property rights in urban Ecuador. The Economic Journal 112 (482): 986-1019.10.1111/1468-0297.00067
  30. Mair, M. Marti, I. 2009. Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing 24: 419-435.10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.006
  31. Meyer, K. E., Peng, M. W. 2016. Theoretical foundations of emerging economy business research. Journal of International Business Studies 47 (1): 3-22.10.1057/jibs.2015.34
  32. Miščević, T., Mrak, M., 2017. The EU Accession process: Western Balkans vs EU-10. Croatian Political Science Review 54 (4): 185-204.
  33. Mitra, P., Muravyev, A., Schaffer, M. E. 2008. Convergence in institutions and market outcomes: Cross-Country and time-series evidence from the BEEPS surveys in transition economies. IZA DP No. 3863. http://ftp.iza.org/dp3863.pdf (accessed October 11, 2017)10.2139/ssrn.1429258
  34. Mohnen, P., Mairesse, J., Dagenais, M. 2006. Innovativity: A comparison across seven European countries. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 15 (4-5): 391-413.10.1080/10438590500512950
  35. Monteiro, J. C., Assunçao, J. J. 2012. Coming out of the shadows? Estimating the impact of bureaucracy simplification and tax cut on formality in Brazilian microenterprises. Journal of Development Economics 99 (1): 105-115.10.1016/j.jdeveco.2011.10.002
  36. Nakabashi, L., Gonçalves Pereira, E. A., Sachsida, A. 2013. Institutions and growth: a developing country case study. Journal of Economic Studies, 40 (5): 614-634.10.1108/JES-09-2011-0111
  37. Ngo, V., D., Jansen, F., Leonidou, L., C., Christodoulides, P. 2016. Domestic institutional attributes as drivers of export performance in an emerging and transition economy. Journal of Business Research 69: 2911-2922.10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.060
  38. Nguyen, T. V., Le, N .T. B. , Bryant, S. E. 2013. Sub-national institutions, firm strategies, and firm performance: A multilevel study of private manufacturing firms in Vietnam. Journal of World Business 48 (1): 68-76.10.1016/j.jwb.2012.06.008
  39. North, D. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511808678
  40. Olbrecht, V. 2016. Multilevel modeling in exploring institutional effects on performance. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis 64(6): 2087-2094.10.11118/actaun201664062087
  41. Raiser, M. 1999. Trust in transition. Postcommunist transformation and the social sciences: cross disciplinary approaches. Conference proceedings, Berlin.
  42. Redek, T., Sušjan, A. 2005. The impacts of institutions on economic growth: The case of transition economies. Journal of Economic Issues 39(4): 995-1027.10.1080/00213624.2005.11506864
  43. Rodrik, D., Subramanian, A., Trebbi, F. 2004. Institutions rule: The primacy of institutions over geography and integration in economic development. Journal of Economic Growth 9(2): 131-165.10.1023/B:JOEG.0000031425.72248.85
  44. Romer, P. M. 1986. Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy 94 (5): 1002-1037.10.1086/261420
  45. Talbott, J., Roll, R. 2001. Why many developing countries just aren’t. Anderson School UCLA, Finance Working Paper No. 19-01. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=292140 (accessed 22 October 2017)
  46. Temple, J., Johnson, P. A. 1998. Social capability and economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (3): 965-990.10.1162/003355398555711
  47. Verspagen, B. 1991. A new empirical research to catching up or falling behind. Structural Change and Economic Dynamic 2 (2): 359-380.10.1016/S0954-349X(05)80008-6
  48. Vijayaraghavan M., Ward, W. A. 2001. Institutions and economic growth: Empirical evidence from a cross-national analysis. Center for International Trade, Working Paper 001302. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/112952/2/citpaper11.pdf (accessed 25 October 2017)
  49. WB - World Bank, 2017. Worldwide Governance Indicators. http://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/index.aspx#home. (accessed November 15, 2017)
  50. Williams, C., C., Franic, J. 2016. Explaining participation in the informal economy in post-socialist societies: A study of the asymmetry between formal and informal institutions in Croatia. Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 24 (1): 51-65.10.1080/0965156X.2015.1118817
  51. Williams, C. C. Shahid, M. S. 2016. Informal entrepreneurship and institutional theory: Explaining the varying degrees of (in)formalization of entrepreneurs in Pakistan. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 28 (1-2): 1-25.10.1080/08985626.2014.963889
  52. Williams, N., Vorley, T. 2015. Institutional asymmetry: How formal and informal institutions affect entrepreneurship in Bulgaria. International Small Business Journal, 33 (8): 840-861.10.1177/0266242614534280
  53. Williams, N., Vorley, T. 2017. Fostering productive entrepreneurship in post-conflict economies: The importance of institutional alignment. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 29 (5-6): 444-466. DOI: 10.1080/08985626.2017.1297853 (accessed 22 October 2017).10.1080/08985626.2017.1297853(accessed22October2017)
  54. Zamberi Ahmad, S, Xavier, S.R. 2012. Entrepreneurial environments and growth: Evidence from Malaysia GEM data. Journal of Chinese Entrepreneurship 4 (1): 50-69. https://doi.org/10.1108/17561391211200939 (accessed October 22, 2017).10.1108/17561391211200939(222017)
Language: English
Page range: 68 - 80
Published on: Aug 24, 2018
Published by: University of Sarajevo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2018 Zoran Aralica, Tonci Svilokos, Katarina Bacic, published by University of Sarajevo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.