References
- Anyaoku, E. N., & Anunobi, C. V. (2014). Measuring HINARI use in Nigeria through a citation analysis of Nigerian Journal of Clinical Practice. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 31(2), 148–155. https://doi. org/10.1111/hir.12056
- Basson, I., Simard, M.-A., Ouangré, Z. A., Sugimoto, C. R., & Larivière, V. (2022). The effect of data sources on the measurement of open access: A comparison of Dimensions and the Web of Science. PLOS ONE, 17(3), e0265545. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0265545
- Beasley, G. (2016). Article processing charges: A new route to open access? Information Services and Use, 36(3–4), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-160815
- Björk, B.-C., & Solomon, D. (2014). How research funders can finance APCs in full OA and hybrid journals. Learned Publishing, 27(2), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.1087/20140203
- Borrego, Á. (2023). Article processing charges for open access journal publishing: A review. Learned Publishing, 36(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1558
- Borrego, Á., Anglada, L., & Abadal, E. (2021). Transformative agreements: Do they pave the way to open access? Learned Publishing, 34(2), 216–232. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1347
- Budzinski, O., Grebel, T., Wolling, J., & Zhang, X. (2020). Drivers of article processing charges in open access. Scientometrics, 124(3), 2185–2206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03578-3
- Butler, L.-A., Matthias, L., Simard, M.-A., Mongeon, P., & Haustein, S. (2023). The oligopoly’s shift to open access: How the big five academic publishers profit from article processing charges. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(4), 778–799. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00272
- Culbert, J. H., Hobert, A., Jahn, N., Haupka, N., Schmidt, M., Donner, P., & Mayr, P. (2025). Reference coverage analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus. Scientometrics, 130(4), 2475–2492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-025-05293-3
- Damaševičius, R., & Zailskaitė-Jakštė, L. (2023). The Impact of a National Crisis on Research Collaborations: A Scientometric Analysis of Ukrainian Authors 2019–2022. Publications, 11 (3), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications11030042
- Gaind, N., Abbott, A., Witze, A., Gibney, E., Tollefson, J., Irwin, A., & Van Noorden, R. (2022). Seven ways the war in Ukraine is changing global science. Nature, 607(7919), 440–443. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022- 01960-0
- Green, T. (2019). Is open access affordable? Why current models do not work and why we need internet-era transformation of scholarly communications. Learned Publishing, 32(1), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1219
- Halevi, G., & Walsh, S. (2021). Faculty Attitudes Towards Article Processing Charges for Open Access Articles. Publishing Research Quarterly, 37(3), 384–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-021-09820-x
- Hill, T. (2021). Research4Life: Landscape and situation analysis: Review. Learned Publishing, 34(3), 468–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1367
- Hladchenko, M. (2025). APCs and citation impact of Gold OA articles authored by Ukrainian scholars before and during Russia’s full-scale war against Ukraine (2020-2023). https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.8850
- Kaliuzhna, N., & Hauschke, C. (2024). Open access in Ukraine: Characteristics and evolution from 2012 to 2021. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(4), 1022–1041. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00324
- Klebel, T., & Ross-Hellauer, T. (2023). The APC-barrier and its effect on stratification in open access publishing. Quantitative Science Studies, 4(1), 22–43. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00245
- Laakso, M., Welling, P., Bukvova, H., Nyman, L., Björk, B.-C., & Hedlund, T. (2011). The Development of Open Access Journal Publishing from 1993 to 2009. PLoS ONE, 6(6), e20961. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal. pone.0020961
- Lawson, S. (2015). Fee Waivers for Open Access Journals. Publications, 3(3), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications3030155
- Nazarovets, M., & Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2022). Scientific publishing sanctions in response to the Russo-Ukrainian war. Learned Publishing, 35(4), 658–670. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1487
- Nazarovets, S. (2024). Paradoxical growth of publications by authors from developing countries in gold open access journals: a commentary on Dr. Cernat’s, 2024 article. Scientometrics, 129(12), 7981–7984. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-05186-x
- Simard, M.-A., Butler, L.-A., Alperin, J. P., & Haustein, S. (2024). We need to rethink the way we identify diamond open access journals in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(4), 1042–1046. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_c_00331
- Solomon, D., & Björk, B.-C. (2016). Article processing charges for open access publication—the situation for research intensive universities in the USA and Canada. PeerJ, 4, e2264. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2264
- Tenopir, C., Dalton, E., Christian, L., Jones, M., McCabe, M., Smith, M., & Fish, A. (2017). Imagining a Gold Open Access Future: Attitudes, Behaviors, and Funding Scenarios among Authors of Academic Scholarship. College & Research Libraries, 78(6). https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.78.6.824
- Visser, M., van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2021). Large-scale comparison of bibliographic data sources: Scopus, Web of Science, Dimensions, Crossref, and Microsoft Academic. Quantitative Science Studies, 2(1), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00112