The Academic Midas Touch: A citation-based indicator of research excellence
References
- Abramo, G. (2018). Revisiting the scientometric conceptualization of impact and its measurement. Journal of Informetrics, 12(3), 590–597.
- Aithal, P. S. & Aithal, S. (2023). Key performance indicators (kpi) for researchers at different levels & strategies to achieve it. International Journal of Management, Technology and Social Sciences (IJMTS), 8(3), 294–325.
- Alexi, A., Lazebnik, T., & Rosenfeld, A. (2024). The scientometrics and reciprocality underlying co-authorship panels in google scholar profiles. Scientometrics, 129(6), 3303–3313.
- Andersen, J. P., Didegah, F., and Schneider, J. W. (2017). The necessity of comparing like with like in evaluative scientometrics: A first attempt to produce and test a generic approach to identifying relevant benchmark units. In STI Conference Paris: Open indicators: innovation, participation and actor-based STI indicators.
- Ansari, M., Noruzi, A., Fallah, M., Saedmoucheshi, S., & Valinejadi, A. (2022). Bibliometric Analysis of the Top Ten Percent Iranian Medical Researchers Based on the I10-index and the H-index in Web of Science. Informology, 1(2), 27-40.
- Aviv-Reuven, S. & Rosenfeld, A. (2023). A logical set theory approach to journal subject classification analysis: intra-system irregularities and inter-system discrepancies in web of science and scopus. Scientometrics, 128(1), 157–175.
- Bai, X., Zhang, F., & Lee, I. (2019). Predicting the citations of scholarly paper. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 407–418.
- Ball, P. (2007). Achievement index climbs the ranks. NATURE-LONDON-, 448(7155), 737.
- Bar-Ilan, J. & Halevi, G. (2017). Post retraction citations in context: a case study. Scientometrics, 113(1), 547–565.
- Biryukov, M., & Dong, C. (2010). Analysis of computer science communities based on DBLP. In Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries: 14th European Conference, ECDL 2010, Glasgow, UK, September 6-10, 2010. Proceedings 14 (pp. 228-235). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
- Borchardt, R. & Hartings, M. R. (2018). The academic papers researchers regard as significant are not those that are highly cited. Impact of Social Sciences Blog.
- Cavacini, A. (2015). What is the best database for computer science journal articles? Scientometrics, 102, 2059– 2071.
- Dillon, R. (2022). The u-index: a simple metric to objectively measure academic impact of individual researchers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.14925.
- Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.
- Froghi, S., Ahmed, K., Finch, A., Fitzpatrick, J. M., Khan, M. S., & Dasgupta, P. (2012). Indicators for research performance evaluation: An overview. BJU International-British Journal of Urology, 109(3), 321.
- Garfield, E. (1999). Journal impact factor: a brief review. Cmaj, 161(8), 979–980.
- Garousi, V. & Fernandes, J. M. (2016). Highly-cited papers in software engineering: The top-100. Information and Software Technology, 71, 108–128.
- Glänzel, W. & Schoepflin, U. (1994). Little scientometrics, big scientometrics… and beyond? Scientometrics, 30, 375–384.
- Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google scholar to overshadow them all? comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 177–214.
- Hernández, J. M. & Dorta-González, P. (2020). Interdisciplinarity metric based on the co-citation network. Mathematics, 8(4), 544.
- Hu, Y., Hu, C., Tran, T., Kasturi, T., Joseph, E., & Gillingham, M. (2021). What’s in a name?–gender classification of names with character based machine learning models. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 35(4), 1537-1563.
- Jong, L., Franssen, T., and Pinfield, S. (2021). ‘excellence’in the research ecosystem: a literature review. RoRI Working Paper Series, 5(5).
- Ke, Q., Ferrara, E., Radicchi, F., and Flammini, A. (2015). Defining and identifying sleeping beauties in science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(24), 7426–7431.
- Kim, J. (2018). Evaluating author name disambiguation for digital libraries: a case of dblp. Scientometrics, 116, 1867–1886.
- Kim, J. (2019). Correction to: Evaluating author name disambiguation for digital libraries: a case of dblp. Scientometrics, 118, 383–383.
- Koltun, V. & Hafner, D. (2021). The h-index is no longer an effective correlate of scientific reputation. PLoS One, 16(6): e0253397.
- Kozak, M. & Bornmann, L. (2012). A new family of cumulative indexes for measuring scientific performance. PloS one, 7(10): e47679.
- Kpolovie, P. J., Onoshagbegbe, E. S.(2017). Research productivity: h-index and i10-index of academics in nigerian universities. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 5(2), 62–123.
- Kulczycki, E., Korzen’, M., & Korytkowski, P. (2017). Toward an excellence-based research funding system: Evidence from poland. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 282–298.
- Kumar, D., Bhowmick, P. K., & Paik, J. (2023). Researcher influence prediction (resip) using academic genealogy network. Journal of Informetrics, 17(2), 101392.
- Kusakunniran, W., Ponn, T., Boonsom, N., Wahakit, S., & Thongkanchorn, K. (2021). Construction of h5-index for conference ranking indicator and its correlation to era. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 20(01):2150011.
- Leibel, C. & Bornmann, L. (2024). What do we know about the disruption index in scientometrics? an overview of the literature. Scientometrics, 129(1), 601–639.
- Lindahl, J. (2023). Conscientiousness predicts doctoral students’ research productivity. Journal of Informetrics, 17(1):101353.
- Lippi, G. & Mattiuzzi, C. (2017). Scientist impact factor (sif): a new metric for improving scientists’ evaluation? Annals of Translational Medicine, 5(15).
- Liu, Y., Jiang, M., Hu, L., & He, Z. (2023). The statistical nature of h-index of a network node and its extensions. Journal of Informetrics, 17(3):101424.
- MacFarland, T. W., Yates, J. M., MacFarland, T. W., & Yates, J. M. (2016). Mann–whitney u test. Introduction to nonparametric statistics for the biological sciences using R, 103-132.
- Massucci, F. A. & Docampo, D. (2019). Measuring the academic reputation through citation networks via pagerank. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 185–201.
- Mavrogenis, A. F., Pećina, M., Chen, W., & Scarlat, M. M. (2020). Useful and useless publications measured by bibliometrics and scientometrics in orthopaedic surgery. Are the relevance of a journal and publication metrics useful enough for the scientific promotion of surgeons?. International Orthopaedics, 44, 1875–1879.
- Meneghini, R. & Packer, A. L. (2010). The extent of multidisciplinary authorship of articles on scientometrics and bibliometrics in brazil. Interciencia, 35(7), 510–514.
- Minasny, B., Hartemink, A. E., McBratney, A., & Jang, H.-J. (2013). Citations and the h index of soil researchers and journals in the web of science, scopus, and google scholar. PeerJ, 1:e183.
- Mryglod, O., Kenna, R., Holovatch, Y., & Berche, B. (2013a). Absolute and specific measures of research group excellence. Scientometrics, 95, 115–127.
- Mryglod, O., Kenna, R., Holovatch, Y., & Berche, B. (2013b). Comparison of a citation-based indicator and peer review for absolute and specific measures of research-group excellence. Scientometrics, 97, 767–777.
- Ostertagova, E., Ostertag, O., & Kováč, J. (2014). Methodology and application of the Kruskal-Wallis test. Applied mechanics and materials, 611, 115-120.
- Robinson, D. B. T., Hopkins, L., Brown, C., Abdelrahman, T., Powell, A. G., Egan, R. J., & Lewis, W. G. (2019a). Relative value of adapted novel bibliometrics in evaluating surgical academic impact and reach. World Journal of Surgery, 43, 967–972.
- Robinson, D. B. T., Hopkins, L., Brown, C., Abdelrahman, T., Powell, A. G., Egan, R. J., & Lewis, W. G. (2019b). Relative value of adapted novel bibliometrics in evaluating surgical academic impact and reach. World Journal of Surgery, 43, 967–972.
- Rodríguez‐Navarro, A. (2011). Measuring research excellence: Number of nobel prize achievements versus conventional bibliometric indicators. Journal of Documentation, 67(4), 582–600.
- Rosenfeld, A. (2023). Is DBLP a good computer science journals database? Computer, 56(3), 101–108.
- Rotem, N., Yair, G., & Shustak, E. (2021a). Dropping out of master’s degrees: Objective predictors and subjective reasons. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(5), 1070–1084.
- Rotem, N., Yair, G., & Shustak, E. (2021b). Open the gates wider: affirmative action and dropping out. Higher Education, 81(3), 551–566.
- Sahudin, Z., Mustaffa, A. H., Abdullah, H., Pramono, S. E., Wijaya, A., & Melati, I. S. (2023). Determinants of academic research productivity in malaysia: An integration of theory of planned behaviour and social capital theory. Asian Journal of University Education, 19(3), 486–505.
- Salmi, J. (2011). The road to academic excellence: Lessons of experience. The road to academic excellence: The making of world-class research universities, 323–347.
- Sedgwick, P. (2012). Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Bmj, 345.
- Serenko, A., Marrone, M., & Dumay, J. (2022). Scientometric portraits of recognized scientists: A structured literature review. Scientometrics, 127(8), 4827–4846.
- Shapiro, S. S. & Wilk, M. B. (1965). An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52(3-4), 591–611.
- Singh, P., Piryani, R., Singh, V. K., & Pinto, D. (2020). Revisiting subject classification in academic databases: A comparison of the classification accuracy of web of science, scopus & dimensions. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 39(2), 2471–2476.
- Sziklai, B. R. (2021). Ranking institutions within a discipline: The steep mountain of academic excellence. Journal of Informetrics, 15(2),101133.
- Taheri, S. & Aliakbary, S. (2022). Research trend prediction in computer science publications: a deep neural network approach. Scientometrics, 127(2), 849–869.
- Taylor, D. R., Venable, G. T., Jones, G. M., Lepard, J. R., Roberts, M. L., Saleh, N., … & Klimo, P. (2015). Five-year institutional bibliometric profiles for 103 US neurosurgical residency programs. Journal of neurosurgery, 123(3), 547–560.
- Tijssen, R., Visser, M., & van Leeuwen, T. (2002). Benchmarking international scientific excellence: Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference? Scientometrics, 54(3), 381–397.
- Transtrum, M. K., & Sethna, J. P. (2012). Improvements to the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for nonlinear leastsquares minimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1201.5885.
- Van den Besselaar, P. & Sandström, U. (2019). Measuring researcher independence using bibliometric data: A proposal for a new performance indicator. PloS one, 14(3): e0202712.
- Vinkler, P. (2010). The evaluation of research by scientometric indicators. Elsevier.
- Wang, J. (2013). Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation. Scientometrics, 94(3), 851–872.
- Wildgaard, L., Schneider, J. W., & Larsen, B. (2014). A review of the characteristics of 108 author-level bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 101, 125–158.
Language: English
Page range: 78 - 91
Submitted on: Mar 3, 2025
Accepted on: Jun 17, 2025
Published on: Jul 10, 2025
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:
© 2025 Ariel Rosenfeld, Ariel Alexi, Liel Mushiev, Teddy Lazebnik, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.