Perceptions and recommendations about research integrity and publishing ethics: A survey among Chinese researchers on training, challenges and responsibilities
References
- Alam, S. (2024). Trends in research integrity concerns and the evolving role of the publisher. Insights the UKSG Journal, 37, 13. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.663
- Alam, S., & Wilson, L. (2023). Perspectives from a publishing ethics and research integrity team for required improvements. Journal of Data and Information Science, 8(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0018
- Candal-Pedreira, C., Ross, J. S., Ruano-Ravina, A., Egilman, D. S., Fernández, E., & Pérez-Ríos, M. (2022). Retracted papers originating from paper mills: Cross sectional study. BMJ, e071517. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-071517
- China’s Supreme People’s Court. (2025, January). 最高法发布以高质量审判服务保障科技创新的意见— Opinions of the Supreme People’s Court on Serving and Safeguarding Technological Innovation with High-Quality Trials”. https://ipc.court.gov.cn/zh-cn/news/view-3828.html
- COPE COUNCIL. (2023, April). How to recognise potential authorship problems. Cope Flowcharts and Infographics. https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.2.22
- COPE, & STM. (2022). Paper Mills—Research report from COPE & STM. Committee on Publication Ethics and STM. https://doi.org/10.24318/jtbG8IHL
- CPC Central Committee & State Council. (2018). Opinions on Further Promoting Research Integrity. General Offices of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and the State Council. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2018-05/30/content_5294886.htm
- CPC Central Committee & State Council. (2019). Opinions on Further Promoting the Spirit of Scientists and Strengthening the Style of Work and Study Style. General Offices of the Communist Party of China Central Committee and the State Council. https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2019-06/11/content_5399239.htm
- Crean, D., Gordijn, B., & Kearns, A. J. (2024). Impact and assessment of research integrity teaching: A systematic literature review. Science and Engineering Ethics, 30(4), 30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-024-00493-1
- Evans, N., Buljan, I., Valenti, E., Bouter, L., Marušić, A., De Vries, R., Widdershoven, G., & the EnTIRE consortium. (2022). Stakeholders’ experiences of research integrity support in universities: A qualitative study in three european countries. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28(5), 43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00390-5
- Goddiksen, M. P., Johansen, M. W., Armond, A. C., Clavien, C., Hogan, L., Kovács, N., Merit, M. T., Olsson, I. A. S., Quinn, U., Santos, J. B., Santos, R., Schöpfer, C., Varga, O., Wall, P. J., Sandøe, P., & Lund, T. B. (2023). “The person in power told me to”—European PhD students’ perspectives on guest authorship and good authorship practice. PLOS ONE, 18(1), e0280018. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0280018
- Han, S., Li, K., Gao, S., Zhang, Y., Yang, X., Li, C., Wang, Y., Li, L., Zhao, Y., & Wang, Z. (2023). Research misconduct knowledge and associated factors among nurses in China: A national cross-sectional survey. Applied Nursing Research, 69, 151658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2022.151658
- Li, M., & Shen, Z. (2024). Science map of academic misconduct. The Innovation, 5(2), 100593. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.xinn.2024.100593
- Misconduct. (n.d.). Author Services. Retrieved 29 October 2024, from https://authorservices.taylorandfrancis.com/editorial-policies/misconduct/
- Nagarkar, S. (2024). “Research paper mills”: A factory outlet for dubious research. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 9(3), 222–227. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2024.025
- Pérez-Neri, I., Pineda, C., & Sandoval, H. (2022). Threats to scholarly research integrity arising from paper mills: A rapid scoping review. Clinical Rheumatology, 41(7), 2241–2248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-022-06198-9
- Pizzolato, D., Abdi, S., & Dierickx, K. (2020). Collecting and characterizing existing and freely accessible research integrity educational resources. Accountability in Research, 27(4), 195–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/089896 21.2020.1736571
- Pizzolato, D., & Dierickx, K. (2021). Stakeholders’ perspectives on research integrity training practices: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics, 22(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-021-00637-z
- Springer Nature, & Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China. (2020). The blue book the pitfall of using third party editing agencies in scholarly publishing.
- Tang, L. (2022). A role for funders in fostering China’s research integrity. Science, 375(6584), 979–981. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abm7992
- United2Act. (n.d.). Retrieved 26 February 2025, from https://united2act.org/
- Van Noorden, R. (2023). More than 10,000 research papers were retracted in 2023—A new record. Nature, 624(7992), 479–481. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-03974-8
- Yu, L., Miao, M., Liu, W., Zhang, B., & Zhang, P. (2021). Scientific misconduct and associated factors: A survey of researchers in three Chinese tertiary hospitals. Accountability in Research, 28(2), 95–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2020.1809386
- Zhu, H., Jia, Y., & Leung, S. (2024). Citations of microrna biomarker articles that were retracted: A systematic review. JAMA Network Open, 7(3), e243173. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.3173
Language: English
Page range: 131 - 160
Submitted on: Nov 15, 2024
Accepted on: Apr 28, 2025
Published on: May 28, 2025
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Related subjects:
© 2025 Sabina Alam, Victoria Babbit, Jason Hu, Ying Lou, Zhesi Shen, Laura Wilson, Zhengyi Zhou, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.