Beyond surface correlations: Reference behavior mediates the disruptiveness-citation relationship
By:
References
- Arts, S., Melluso, N., & Veugelers, R. (2025). Beyond citations: Measuring novel scientific ideas and their impact in publication text. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1162/rest_a_01561
- Bloom, N., Jones, C. I., Van Reenen, J., & Webb, M. (2020). Are ideas getting harder to find? American Economic Review, 110(4), 1104-1144. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20180338
- Bornmann, L., Devarakonda, S., Tekles, A., & Chacko, G. (2020a). Are disruption index indicators convergently valid? The comparison of several indicator variants with assessments by peers. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 1242-1259. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00068
- Bornmann, L., Devarakonda, S., Tekles, A., & Chacko, G. (2020b). Disruptive papers published in scientometrics: Meaningful results by using an improved variant of the disruption index originally proposed by Wu, Wang, and Evans (2019). Scientometrics, 123(2), 1149-1155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03406-8
- Chai, S., & Menon, A. (2019). Breakthrough recognition: Bias against novelty and competition for attention. Research Policy, 48(3), 733-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.006
- Chu, J. S. G., & Evans, J. A. (2021). Slowed canonical progress in large fields of science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(41), e2021636118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2021636118
- Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Boerner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojevic, S., Petersen, A. M., Radicchi, F., Sinatra, R., Uzzi, B., Vespignani, A., Waltman, L., Wang, D., & Barabasi, A.-L. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379), eaao0185. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao0185
- Foster, J. G., Rzhetsky, A., & Evans, J. A. (2015). Tradition and innovation in scientists’ research strategies. American Sociological Review, 80(5), 875-908. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122415601618
- Funk, R. J., & Owen-Smith, J. (2017). A dynamic network measure of technological change. Management Science, 63(3), 791-817. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2366
- Jones, B. F. (2009). The burden of knowledge and the “death of the renaissance man”: Is innovation getting harder? The Review of Economic Studies, 76(1), 283-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00531.x
- Jones, B. F., & Weinberg, B. A. (2011). Age dynamics in scientific creativity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(47), 18910-18914. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1102895108
- Jones, B. F., Wuchty, S., & Uzzi, B. (2008). Multi-university research teams: Shifting impact, geography, and stratification in science. Science, 322(5905), 1259-1262. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1158357
- Leibel, C., & Bornmann, L. (2024). What do we know about the disruption index in scientometrics? An overview of the literature. Scientometrics, 129, 601–639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04873-5
- Li, H., Tessone, C. J., & Zeng, A. (2024). Productive scientists are associated with lower disruption in scientific publishing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121(21), e2322462121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2322462121
- Li, L., Lin, Y., & Wu, L. (2024). Displacing science. arXiv.https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2402.16839
- Lin, Y., Evans, J. A., & Wu, L. (2022). New directions in science emerge from disconnection and discord. Journal of Informetrics, 16(1), 101234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101234
- Lin, Y., Frey, C. B., & Wu, L. (2023). Remote collaboration fuses fewer breakthrough ideas. Nature, 623(7989), 987-991. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06767-1
- Liu, X., Bu, Y., Li, M., & Li, J. (2024). Monodisciplinary collaboration disrupts science more than multidisciplinary collaboration. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 75(1), 59-78. https://doi. org/10.1002/asi.24840
- Macher, J. T., Rutzer, C., & Weder, R. (2024). Is there a secular decline in disruptive patents? Correcting for measurement bias. Research Policy, 53(5), 104992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.104992
- Park, M., Leahey, E., & Funk, R. J. (2023). Papers and patents are becoming less disruptive over time. Nature, 613(7942), 138-144. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05543-x
- Petersen, A. M., Arroyave, F., & Pammolli, F. (2024). The disruption index is biased by citation inflation. Quantitative Science Studies, 5(4), 936-953. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00333
- Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(45), 17268-17272. https://doi.org/doi:10.1073/pnas.0806977105
- Ruan, X., Lyu, D., Gong, K., Cheng, Y., & Li, J. (2021). Rethinking the disruption index as a measure of scientific and technological advances. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 172, 121071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121071
- Uzzi, B., Mukherjee, S., Stringer, M., & Jones, B. (2013). Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science, 342(6157), 468-472. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1240474
- Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
- Wang, J. (2013). Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation. Scientometrics, 94(3), 851-872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9
- Wang, J., Veugelers, R., & Stephan, P. (2017). Bias against novelty in science: A cautionary tale for users of bibliometric indicators. Research Policy, 46(8), 1416-1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.06.006
- Wu, L. F., Wang, D. S., & Evans, J. A. (2019). Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology. Nature, 566(7744), 378–382. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-0941-9
- Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
- Yang, A. J. (2024). Unveiling the impact and dual innovation of funded research. Journal of Informetrics, 18(1), 101480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2023.101480
- Yang, A. J. (2025). Unraveling topic switching and innovation in science. Information Processing & Management, 62(4), 104171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104171
- Yang, A. J., & Deng, S. (2024). Dynamic patterns of the disruptive and consolidating knowledge flows in Nobel-winning scientific breakthroughs. Quantitative Science Studies, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00323
- Yang, A. J., Deng, S., Wang, H., Zhang, Y., & Yang, W. (2023). Disruptive coefficient and 2-step disruptive coefficient: Novel measures for identifying vital nodes in complex networks. Journal of Informetrics, 17(3), 101411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2023.101411
- Yang, A. J., Gong, H., Wang, Y., Zhang, C., & Deng, S. (2024). Rescaling the disruption index reveals the universality of disruption distributions in science. Scientometrics, 129(1), 561-580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04889-x
- Yang, A. J., Hu, H., Zhao, Y., Wang, H., & Deng, S. (2023). From consolidation to disruption: A novel way to measure the impact of scientists and identify laureates. Information Processing & Management, 60(5), 103420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2023.103420
- Yang, A. J., Xu, H., Ding, Y., & Liu, M. (2024). Unveiling the dynamics of team age structure and its impact on scientific innovation. Scientometrics, 129, 6127–6148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-024-04987-4
- Yang, A. J., Yan, X., Hu, H., Hu, H., Kong, J., & Deng, S. (2025). Are disruptive papers more likely to impact technology and society? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 76(3), 563-579. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24947
- Yang, Y., Tian, T. Y., Woodruff, T. K., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2022). Gender-diverse teams produce more novel and higher-impact scientific ideas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(36), e2200841119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2200841119
- Zeng, A., Fan, Y., Di, Z., Wang, Y., & Havlin, S. (2023). Disruptive papers in science are losing impact. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2305.03589
- Zeng, A., Shen, Z. S., Zhou, J. L., Wu, J. S., Fan, Y., Wang, Y. G., & Stanley, H. E. (2017). The science of science: From the perspective of complex systems. Physics Reports, 714, 1-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. physrep.2017.10.001
Language: English
Page range: 7 - 31
Submitted on: Feb 9, 2025
Accepted on: Apr 24, 2025
Published on: May 28, 2025
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2025 Alex J. Yang, Fanming Wang, Yujie Shi, Yiqin Zhang, Hao Wang, Sanhong Deng, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.