Have a personal or library account? Click to login

University chancellorship and research productivity: An investigation of the number of published articles

Open Access
|Jun 2025

References

  1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Caprasecca, A. (2009). Gender differences in research productivity: A bibliometric analysis of the Italian academic system. Scientometrics, 79, 517-539.
  2. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2016). The combined effects of age and seniority on research performance of full professors. Science and Public Policy, 43(3), 301-319.
  3. Blackburn, R. T., & Lawrence, J. H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation, expectation, satisfaction. Johns Hopkins University Press.
  4. Bonaccorsi, A., & Daraio, C. (2003). Age effects in scientific productivity. Scientometrics, 58(1), 49-90.
  5. Cole, S. (1979). Age and scientific performance. American journal of sociology, 84(4), 958-977.
  6. Dhillon, S. K., Ibrahim, R., & Selamat, A. (2015). Factors associated with scholarly publication productivity among academic staff: Case of a Malaysian public university. Technology in Society, 42, 160-166.
  7. Dundar, H., & Lewis, D. R. (1998). Determinants of research productivity in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 39(6), 607-631.
  8. Fox, M. F. (1983). Publication productivity among scientists: A critical review. Social studies of science, 13(2), 285-305.
  9. Gingras, Y., Lariviere, V., Macaluso, B., & Robitaille, J.-P. (2008). The effects of aging on researchers’ publication and citation patterns. PLoS One, 3(12), e4048.
  10. Goodall, A. H. (2009). Socrates in the boardroom: Why research universities should be led by top scholars. Princeton University Press.
  11. Jia, R., Nie, H., & Xiao, W. (2019). Power and publications in Chinese academia. Journal of Comparative Economics, 47(4), 792-805.
  12. Knorr, K., Mittermeir, R., Aichholzer, G., & Waller, G. (1979). Individual publication productivity as a social position effect in academic and industrial research units. In F. Andrews (Ed.), Scientific productivity: The effectiveness of research groups in six countries. Cambridge University Press.
  13. Kyvik, S. (1990). Age and scientific productivity. Differences between fields of learning. Higher Education, 19(1), 37-55.
  14. Kyvik, S. (1993). Academic staff and scientific production. Higher Education Management, 5(2), 191-202.
  15. Kyvik, S., & Teigen, M. (1996). Child care, research collaboration, and gender differences in scientific productivity. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 21(1), 54-71.
  16. Lima, H., Silva, T. H., Moro, M. M., Santos, R. L., Meira, W., & Laender, A. H. (2015). Assessing the profile of top Brazilian computer science researchers. Scientometrics, 103(3), 879-896.
  17. Oster, S. M., & Hamermesh, D. S. (1998). Aging and productivity among economists. Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 154-156.
  18. Parker, J. N., Allesina, S., & Lortie, C. J. (2013). Characterizing a scientific elite (B): Publication and citation patterns of the most highly cited scientists in environmental science and ecology. Scientometrics, 94, 469-480.
  19. Puuska, H.-M. (2010). Effects of scholar’s gender and professional position on publishing productivity in different publication types. Analysis of a Finnish university. Scientometrics, 82(2), 419-437.
  20. Ramesh Babu, A., & Singh, Y. (1998). Determinants of research productivity. Scientometrics, 43(3), 309-329.
  21. Ramsden, P. (1994). Describing and explaining research productivity. Higher education, 28(2), 207-226.
  22. Rørstad, K., & Aksnes, D. W. (2015). Publication rate expressed by age, gender and academic position–A large-scale analysis of Norwegian academic staff. Journal of informetrics, 9(2), 317-333.
  23. Schilke, O., Reimann, M., & Cook, K. S. (2015). Power decreases trust in social exchange. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(42), 12950-12955.
  24. Shin, J., & Cummings, W. (2010). Multilevel analysis of academic publishing across disciplines: Research preference, collaboration, and time on research. Scientometrics, 85(2), 581-594.
  25. Wahid, N., Warraich, N. F., & Tahira, M. (2022). Factors influencing scholarly publication productivity: A systematic review. Information Discovery and Delivery, 50(1), 22-33.
  26. Wallner, B., Fieder, M., & Iber, K. (2003). Age profile, personnel costs and scientific productivity at the University of Vienna. Scientometrics, 58(1), 143-153.
  27. Way, S. F., Morgan, A. C., Clauset, A., & Larremore, D. B. (2017). The misleading narrative of the canonical faculty productivity trajectory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(44), E9216-E9223.
  28. Williams, H. A. (2001). A critical review of research and statistical methodologies within human resource development quarterly, Academy of Management Journal, and Personnel Psychology, 1995-1999. In Proceedings AHRD 2001 conference (pp.34-3).
  29. Xie, Y., & Shauman, K. A. (1998). Sex differences in research productivity: New evidence about an old puzzle. American sociological review, 63, 847-870.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2025-0023 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 119 - 130
Submitted on: May 28, 2024
Accepted on: Mar 18, 2025
Published on: Jun 13, 2025
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Amir Amani, Mohammad Reza Armat, Samaneh Mollazadeh, Reza Salarinia, Mitra Salehi, Sonia Fathi-karkan, Akbar Solati, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.