References
- Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
- Batagelj, V. (2008). SN5 – Network data for Viazards session at INSNA Sunbelt 2008. http://vlado. fmf.uni-lj.si/pub/networks/data/WoS/SN5.zip
- Batagelj, V. (2014). Efficient algorithms for citation network analysis. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0309023
- Batagelj, V. (2017). WoS2Pajek. Networks from Web of Science. Version 1.5 (2017). http://vladowiki.fmf.uni-lj.si/doku.php?id=pajek:wos2pajek
- Batagelj, V. (2020a). On fractional approach to analysis of linked networks. Scientometrics, 123(2), 621-633. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03383-y
- Batagelj, V. (2020b). Nets: Python package for network analysis. https://github.com/bavla/Nets
- Batagelj, V., & Cerinšek, M. (2013). On bibliographic networks. Scientometrics, 96(3), 845-864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0940-1
- Batagelj, V., Doreian, P., Ferligoj, A., & Kejžar, N. (2014). Understanding large temporal networks and spatial networks: Exploration, pattern searching, visualization and network evolution. Wiley.
- Batagelj, V., Ferligoj, A., & Doreian, P. (2020). Bibliometric analysis of the network clustering literature. In P. Doreian, V. Batagelj, & A. Ferligoj (Eds.), Advances in network clustering and blockmodeling. Wiley.
- Batagelj, V., Ferligoj, A., & Squazzoni, F. (2017). The emergence of a field: A network analysis of research on peer review. Scientometrics, 113, 503-532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2522-8
- Batagelj, V., & Maltseva, D. (2020). Temporal bibliographic networks. Journal of Informetrics, 14(1), 101006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101006
- Batagelj, V., & Praprotnik, S. (2016). An algebraic approach to temporal network analysis based on temporal quantities. Social Network Analysis and Mining, 6(1), 1-22. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13278-016-03304
- Bonacich, P. (2004). The invasion of the physicists. Social Networks, 26, 285-288.
- Borgatti, S. P., & Foster, P. C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29(6), 991-1013.
- Boyack, K., Borner, K., & Klavans, R. (2009). Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research. Scientometrics, 79(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0403-5
- Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation: Which citation approach represents the research front most accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(12), 2389-2404.
- Braam, R. R., Moed, H. F., & Van Raan, A. F. (1991). Mapping of science by combined co-citation and word analysis. I. Structural aspects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 233-251.
- Brandes, U., & Pich, C. (2011). Explorative visualization of citation patterns in social network research. Journal of Social Structure, 12(8), 1-19.
- Chen, C. (2005). Measuring the movement of a research paradigm. In Visualization and data analysis 2005 (Vol. 5669, pp. 63-76). SPIE.
- DBLP. (2024). FAQ – How does DBLP handle homonyms and synonyms? dblp.org.
- De Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., & Batagelj, V. (2018). Exploratory social network analysis with Pajek: Revised and expanded edition for updated software (Vol. 46). Cambridge University Press.
- Fortunato, S., Bergstrom, C. T., Borner, K., Evans, J. A., Helbing, D., Milojević, S., … & Barabási, A. L. (2018). Science of science. Science, 359(6379), eaao0185.
- Freeman, L. C. (2004). The development of social network analysis: A study in the sociology of science (1st ed.). Empirical Press.
- Freeman, L. C. (2011). The development of social network analysis – With an emphasis on recent events. In J. Scott & P. J. Carrington (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social network analysis (pp. 26-39). SAGE Publications.
- Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science. Science, 122(3159), 108-111.
- Garfield, E. (1971). Citation indexing, historio-bibliography and the sociology of science. Current Contents, 14(15), M25.
- Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, 178(4060), 471-479.
- Garfield, E., & Merton, R. K. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (Vol. 8). Wiley.
-
Garfield, E. (2004). Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature. Journal of Information Science, 30(2), 119–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504042802
Garfield E. , ( 2004 ). Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature . Journal of Information Science , 30 ( 2 ), 119 – 145 . https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551504042802
- Gauffriau, M., Larsen, P., Maye, I., Roulin-Perriard, A., & von Ins, M. (2007). Publication, cooperation and productivity measures in scientific research. Scientometrics, 73(2), 175-214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1800-2
- Gazni, A., & Didegah, F. (2016). The relationship between authors’ bibliographic coupling and citation exchange: Analyzing disciplinary differences. Scientometrics, 107, 609-626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1856-y
- Gipp, B., & Beel, J. (2009). Citation proximity analysis (CPA): A new approach for identifying related work based on co-citation analysis. In ISSI’09: 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (pp. 571-575).
- Harzing, A. W. (2015). Health warning: Might contain multiple personalities—the problem of homonyms in Thomson Reuters Essential Science Indicators. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2259-2270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1699-y
- Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature News, 520(7548), 429.
- Hidalgo, C. A. (2016). Disconnected, fragmented, or united? A trans-disciplinary review of network science. Applied Network Science, 1(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-016-0010-3
- Hummon, N. P., & Carley, K. (1993). Social networks as normal science. Social Networks, 15(1), 71-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(93)90022-D
- Ioannidis, J. P., Baas, J., Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2019). A standardized citation metrics author database annotated for scientific field. PLoS Biology, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000384
- Kacem, A., Flatt, J. W., & Mayr, P. (2020). Tracking self-citations in academic publishing. Scientometrics, 123(2), 1157-1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03413-9
- Kejžar, N., Černe, S. K., & Batagelj, V. (2010). Network analysis of works on clustering and classification from Web of Science. In Classification as a Tool for Research: Proceedings of the 11th IFCS Biennial Conference and 33rd Annual Conference of the Gesellschaft für Klassifikation eV, Dresden, (pp. 525-536). Berlin, Heidelberg.
- Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
- Lazer, D., Mergel, I., & Friedman, A. (2009). Co-citation of prominent social network articles in sociology journals: The evolving canon. Connections, 29(1), 43-64.
- Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 5-25.
- Leydesdorff, L., Schank, T., Scharnhorst, A., & De Nooy, W. (2008). Animating the development of social networks over time using a dynamic extension of multidimensional scaling. El Profesional de Información, 17(6).
- Lietz, H. (2009). Diagnosing emerging science: The cases of the ‘new science of networks’ and scientometrics. In PRIME-ENID Summer School on Science, Technology and Innovation Indicators and Knowledge Dynamics Visualization.
- MacRoberts, M. H., & MacRoberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: Acritical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40(5), 342-349.
- Maltseva, D., & Batagelj, V. (2019). Social network analysis as a field of invasions: Bibliographic approach to study SNA development. Scientometrics, 121(2), 1085-1128. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-019-03193-x
- Maltseva, D., & Batagelj, V. (2020). Towards a systematic description of the field using keywords analysis: Main topics in social networks. Scientometrics, 123(1), 357-382. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11192-020-03365-0
- Maltseva, D., & Batagelj, V. (2021). Journals publishing social network analysis. Scientometrics, 126(4), 3593-3620. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-03889-z
- Maltseva, D., & Batagelj, V. (2022). Collaboration between authors in the field of social network analysis. Scientometrics, 127, 3437–3470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04364-z
- Marshakova, I. V. (1973). System of document connections based on references. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya, Seriya 2: Informatsionnye Protsessy i Sistemy (6), 3-8.
- Marshakova, I. V. (1981). Citation networks in information science. Scientometrics, 3(1), 13-25.
- Marshakova-Shaikevich, I. (2013). Bibliomertrics – what and how we can evaluate in science. Upravlenie Bol’shimi Sistemami, 44, 210–247.
- McCain, K. W. (1991). Mapping economics through the journal literature: An experiment in journal cocitation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(4), 290–296.
- Meuschke, N., Gipp, B., & Lipinsk, M. (2015). CITREC: An evaluation framework for citation-based similarity measures based on TREC Genomics and PubMed 2015 Proceedings.
- Newman, M. E. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks. II. Shortest paths, weighted networks, and centrality. Physical Review E, 64(1), 016132. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.039906
- OpenAlex. (2024). OpenAlex technical documentation. docs.openalex.org. https://docs.openalex.org
- Otte, E., & Rousseau, R. (2002). Social network analysis: A powerful strategy, also for the information sciences. Journal of Information Science, 28(6), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800601
- Ouvrard, X., Le Goff, J. M., & Marchand-Maillet, S. (2017). Networks of collaborations: Hypergraph modeling and visualisation. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.00115.
- Price, D. J. de Solla. (1963). Little science, big science (Vol. 5). Columbia University Press.
- Price, D. J. de Solla. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 510–515.
- Rice, R. E., Borgman, C. L., Bednarski, D., & Hart, P. J. (1989). Journal-to-journal citation data: Issues of validity and reliability. Scientometrics, 15(3–4), 257–282.
- Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2007). Topological analysis of citation networks to discover the future core articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(6), 872–882. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20529
- Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2008). Detecting emerging research fronts based on topological measures in citation networks of scientific publications. Technovation, 28(11), 758–775.
- Shibata, N., Kajikawa, Y., Takeda, Y., & Matsushima, K. (2009). Comparative study on methods of detecting research fronts using different types of citation. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 571–580.
- Silva, F. N., Tandon, A., Amancio, D. R., Flammini, A., Menczer, F., Milojevic, S., & Fortunato, S. (2020). Recency predicts bursts in the evolution of author citations. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(3), 1298–1308.
- Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.
- Small, H. G. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 8(3), 327–340.
- Small, H. G., & Koenig, M. E. (1977). Journal clustering using a bibliographic coupling method. Information Processing and Management, 13(5), 277–288.
- Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83–106.
- Szomszor, M., Pendlebury, D. A., & Adams, J. (2020). How much is too much? The difference between research influence and self-citation excess. Scientometrics, 123(2), 1119–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03417-5
- TePaske-King, B., & Richert, N. (2001). The identification of authors in the Mathematical Reviews Database. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, (31). https://doi.org/10.29173/istl1861
- Web of Science. (2023). Web of Science Core Collection field tags. https://images.webofknowledge.com/images/help/WOS/hs_wos_fieldtags.html
- White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32(3), 163–171.
- White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author cocitation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49, 327–355.
- Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012a). A framework of studying scholarly networks. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (pp. 917–926). Science-Metrix and OST.
- Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2012b). Scholarly network similarities: How bibliographic coupling networks, citation networks, cocitation networks, topical networks, coauthorship networks, and coword networks relate to each other. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1313–1326.
- Yanhui, S., Lijuan, W., & Junping, Q. (2021). A comparative study of first and all-author bibliographic coupling analysis based on Scientometrics. Scientometrics, 126, 1125–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03798-7
- Zhang, R., & Yuan, J. (2022). Enhanced author bibliographic coupling analysis using semantic and syntactic citation information. Scientometrics, 127(12), 7681–7706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04333-6
- Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2008). Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996–2005: Introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(13), 2070–2086.
- Zhao, D., & Strotmann, A. (2015). Analysis and visualization of citation networks. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.