References
- Baccini, A., & Barabesi, L. (2010). Interlocking editorship. A network analysis of the links between economic journals. Scientometrics, 82(2), 365–389.
- Baccini, A., & Barabesi, L. (2011). Seats at the table: The network of the editorial boards in information and library science. Journal of Informetrics, 5(2), 382–391.
- Baccini, A., Barabesi, L., Khelfaoui, M., & Gingras, Y. (2020). Intellectual and social similarity among scholarly journals: An exploratory comparison of the networks of editors, authors and co-citations. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 277–289.
- Baker, S. (2023). China overtakes United States on contribution to research in Nature Index. Nature Index (May 19, 2023), available at: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-01705-7
- Bakker, P., & Rigter, H. (1985). Editors of medical journals: Who and from where. Scientometrics, 7(1-2), 11–22.
- Bedeian, A.G., Van Fleet, D. D., & Hyman III, H. H. (2009). Scientific achievement and editorial board membership. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 211–238.
- Bennett, J.C. (2004). The Anglosphere Challenge: Why the English-Speaking Nations Will Lead the Way in the Twenty-First Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
- Besancenot, D., Huynh, K.V., & Faria, J. R. (2012). Search and research: The influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality. Theory and Decision, 73(4), 687–702.
- Bornmann, L., Daniel, H. D. (2007). Gatekeepers of science-Effects of external reviewers’ attributes on the assessments of fellowship applications. Journal of Informetrics, 1(1), 83–91.
- Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (1989). Some data on the distribution of journal publication types in the science citation index database. Scientometrics, 15(5-6), 325–330.
- Braun, T., & Dióspatonyi, I. (2005a). Gatekeeping indicators exemplified by the main players in the international gatekeeping orchestration of analytical chemistry journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(8), 854–860.
- Braun, T., & Dióspatonyi, I. (2005b). World flash on basic research: The counting of core journal gatekeepers as science indicators really counts. The scientific scope of action and strength of nations. Scientometrics, 62(3), 297–319.
- Braun, T., Zsindely, S., Dióspatonyi, I., & Zádor, E. (2007). Gatekeeping patterns in nano-titled journals. Scientometrics, 70(3), 651–667.
- Brinn, T., & Jones, M. J. (2007). Editorial boards in accounting: The power and the glory. Accounting Forum, 31(1), 1–25.
- Campanario, J.M. (1998). Peer review for journals as it stands today - Part 1. Science Communication, 19(3), 181–211.
- Chenette, E. (2021). A new Editor-in-Chief for PLOS ONE. PLOS (March 11, 2021), available at: https://everyone.plos.org/2021/03/11/a-new-editor-in-chief-for-plos-one/
- Crane D. (1967). The gatekeepers in science: Some factors affecting the selection of articles for scientific journals. The American Sociologist, 2(4), 195–201.
- Csomós, G., & Lengyel, B. (2022). Geographies of the global co-editor network in oncology. PLOS ONE, 17(3), e0265652
- Csomós, G., & Farkas, J. Z. (2023). Understanding the increasing market share of the academic publisher “Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute” in the publication output of Central and Eastern European countries: a case study of Hungary. Scientometrics, 128(1), 803–824.
- Dhanani, A., & Jones, M. J. (2017). Editorial boards of accounting journals: gender diversity and internationalization. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 30(5), 1008–1040.
- Dow, R. F. (2000). Editorial gatekeepers confronted by the electronic journal. College and Research Libraries, 61(2), 146–154.
- García, J. A., Rodriguez-Sánchez, R., & Fdez-Valdivia, J. (2015). The author–editor game. Scientometrics, 104(1), 361–380.
- Gomez, C.J., Herman, A.C., & Parigi, P. (2022). Leading countries in global science increasingly receive more citations than other countries doing similar research. Nature Human Behaviour, 6(7), 919–929.
- Goyanes, M. (2020). Editorial boards in communication sciences journals: Plurality or standardization?. International Communication Gazette, 82(4), 342–364.
- Goyanes, M., & Demeter, M. (2020). How the Geographic Diversity of Editorial Boards Affects What is Published in JCR-Ranked Communication Journals. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(4), 1123–1148.
- Goyanes, M., & de-Marcos, L. (2020). Academic influence and invisible colleges through editorial board interlocking in communication sciences: a social network analysis of leading journals. Scientometrics, 123(2), 791–811.
- Hagve, M. (2020). The money behind academic publishing. Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening, 140(11), 1–5.
- Harzing, A. W., & Metz, I. (2013). Practicing what We Preach: The Geographic Diversity of Editorial Boards. Management International Review, 53(2), 169–187.
- Heinze, T., Jappe, A., & Pithan, D. (2019). From North American hegemony to global competition for scientific leadership? Insights from the Nobel population. PLOS ONE, 14(4), e0213916
- Hodgson, G.M., & Rothman, H. (1999). The editors and authors of economics journals: A case of institutional oligopoly?. Economic Journal, 109(453), 165–186.
- Hojat, M., Gonnella, J. S., & Caelleigh, A. S. (2003). Impartial judgment by the gatekeepers of science: fallibility and accountability in the peer review process. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 8(1), 75–96.
- Larivière, V, Haustein, S., & Mongeon, P. (2015). The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLoS ONE, 10(6), e0127502
- Marginson, S. (2020). All things are in flux’: China in global science. Higher Education, 83(4), 881–910.
- Marginson, S., & Xu, X. (2023). Hegemony and Inequality in Global Science: Problems of the Center-Periphery Model. Comparative Education Review, 67(1), 31–52.
- Mervis, J. (2022). U.S. science no longer leads the world. Here’s how top advisers say the nation should respond. Science. ScienceInsider (January 21, 2022). available at: https://www. science.org/content/article/u-s-science-no-longer-leads-world-here-s-how-top-advisers-say-nation-should-respond
- Metz, I., & Harzing, A. W. (2012). An update of gender diversity in editorial boards: A longitudinal study of management journals. Personnel Review, 41(3), 283–300.
- Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106(1), 213–228.
- Nishikawa-Pacher, A. (2020). Who are the 100 largest scientific publishers by journal count? A webscraping approach. Journal of Documentation, 78(7), 450–463.
- Paasi, A. (2005). Globalisation, academic capitalism, and the uneven geographies of international journal publishing spaces. Environment and Planning A, 37(5), 769–789.
- Petersen, J., Hattke, F., & Vogel, R. (2017). Editorial governance and journal impact: a study of management and business journals. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1593–1614.
- Schubert, A. (2017). Power positions in cardiology publications. Scientometrics, 112(3), 1721–1743.
- Siler, K., Lee, K., & Bero, L. (2015). Measuring the effectiveness of scientific gatekeeping. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(2), 360–365.
- Teixeira, E.K., & Oliveira, M. (2018). Editorial board interlocking in knowledge management and intellectual capital research field. Scientometrics, 117(3), 1853–1869.
- Tutarel, O. (2004). Composition of the editorial boards of leading medical education journals. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 4, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-4-3