Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The notion of dominant terminology in bibliometric research Cover

The notion of dominant terminology in bibliometric research

By: Yves Fassin and  Ronald Rousseau  
Open Access
|Sep 2023

References

  1. Abernathy, W. J., & Utterback, J. M. (1978). Patterns of industrial innovation. Technology Review, 80(7), 40–47.
  2. Abraham, R. H. (1996). Webometry: measuring the complexity of the World Wide Web. Visual Math Institute. University of California at Santa Cruz. Available at: http://www.ralph-abraham.org/vita/redwood/vienna.html
  3. Abraham, R. H. (1997). Webometry, measuring the complexity of the World Wide Web. World Futures, 50, 1997, 785–791.
  4. Abrahamson, E. (1991). Managerial fads and fashions: The diffusion and rejection of innovations. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 586–612.
  5. Almind, T. C., & Ingwersen, P. (1997). Informetric analyses on the World Wide Web: methodological approaches to ‘webometrics’. Journal of Documentation, 53(4), 404–426.
  6. Anderson, P., & Tushman, M. L. (1990). Technological discontinuities and dominant designs: A cyclical model of technological change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(4), 604–633. Reprinted in: Organizational Innovation (2018) (pp. 373-402). Routledge.
  7. Batagelj, V. & Mrvar, A. (1998). Pajek – Program for Large Network Analysis. Connections, 21(2), 47–57.
  8. Bossy, M.J. (1995). The last of the litter: “Netometrics”. Solaris, 2. http://gabriel.gallezot.free.fr/ Solaris/d02/2bossy.html
  9. Cecere, G., Corrocher, N., & Battaglia, R. D. (2015). Innovation and competition in the smartphone industry: Is there a dominant design? Telecommunications Policy, 39(3–4), 162–175.
  10. Chakrabarti, S., Joshi, M. M., Punera, K., & Pennock, D. M. (2002). The structure of broad topics on the Web. Proceedings of the WWW2002 Conference. http://www2002.org/CDROM/ refereed/338/
  11. Chen, C. M. (2003). Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Quest for Knowledge Visualization. London: Springer-Verlag.
  12. Chepelev, L., Giannopoulos, A., Tang, A., Mitsouras, D., & Rybicki, F. J. (2017). Medical 3D printing: methods to standardize terminology and report trends. 3D Printing in Medicine, 3, 1–9.
  13. de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A. & Batagelj, V. (2005). Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Fassin, Y. (2021). Research on Covid-19: a disruptive phenomenon for bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5305–5319.
  15. Fassin, Y., & Rousseau, R. (2023). Use of bibliometrics-related terms, their evolution, and the growth of metrics in science. Journal of Scientometric Research, 12(2), 1–16.
  16. Fassin, Y., Werner, A., Van Rossem, A., Signori, S., Garriga, E., von Weltzien Hoivik, H., & Schlierer, H. J. (2015). CSR and related terms in SME owner-managers’ mental models in six European countries: national context matters. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 433–456.
  17. Hagedoorn, J., Carayannis, E., & Alexander, J. (2001). Strange bedfellows in the personal computer industry: technology alliances between IBM and Apple. Research Policy, 30(5), 837–849.
  18. Murmann, J. P., & Frenken, K. (2006). Toward a systematic framework for research on dominant designs, technological innovations, and industrial change. Research Policy, 35(7), 925–952.
  19. Otlet, P. (1934). Traité de Documentation, le Livre sur le Livre. Brussels: D. Van Keerberghen & Sons.
  20. Pagel, M., Beaumont, M., Meade, A., Verkerk, A., & Calude, A. (2019). Dominant words rise to the top by positive frequency-dependent selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(15), 7397–7402
  21. Peek, H. B. (2010). The emergence of the compact disc. IEEE Communications Magazine, 48(1), 10–17.
  22. Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P., Neylon, C. (2010). Alt-metrics: a manifesto. Available from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/
  23. Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348–349.
  24. Rousseau, R., & Fassin, Y. (2022). The number of articles dealing with metrics grows faster than the Web of Science itself. In N. Robinson-Garcia, D. Torres-Salinas, & W. Arroyo-Machado (Eds.), 26th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, STI 2022. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6959277
  25. Rousseau, R., & Ye, F.Y. (2013). A multi-metric approach for research evaluations. Chinese Science Bulletin, 58(26), 3288–3290.
  26. Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Rangaswamy, A. (2006). The emergence of dominant designs. Journal of Marketing, 70(2), 1–17.
  27. Stamp, J. (2013). Fact or Fiction? The legend of the QWERTY keyboard. Smithsonian Magazine. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/arts-culture/fact-of-fiction-the-legend-of-the-qwerty- keyboard-49863249/
  28. Thelwall, M., Devonport, T. J., Makita, M., Russell, K., & Ferguson, L. (2022). Academic LGBTQ+ terminology 1900-2021: Increasing variety, increasing inclusivity? Journal of Homosexuality, 25pp.
  29. Utterback, J. M. (1994). Mastering the Dynamics of Innovation. Harvard Business School Press. ISBN 0-87584-342-5
  30. Utterback, J. M., & Abernathy, W. J. (1975). A dynamic model of product and process innovation. Omega, 3(6), 639–656.
  31. van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. (2007). VOS: a new method for visualizing similarities between objects. In: R. Decker & H.-J. Lenz (Eds.), Advances in Data Analysis: Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the German Classification Society (pp. 299–306). Heidelberg: Springer.
  32. van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2023-0020 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 7
Submitted on: Jun 26, 2023
Accepted on: Aug 23, 2023
Published on: Sep 13, 2023
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Yves Fassin, Ronald Rousseau, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.