Substantiality: A Construct Indicating Research Excellence to Measure University Research Performance
By:
References
- Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E. et al. (2010). hg-index: A new index to characterize the scientific output of researchers based on the h- and g-indices. Scientometrics, 82, 391–400.
- Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T.N., & Bordons M. (2010). A bibliometric classificatory approach for the study and assessment of research performance at the individual level: The effects of age on productivity and impact. JASIST, 61, 1564–1581.
- Hayati, Z., & Ebrahimy, S. (2009). Correlation between quality and quantity in scientific production: A case study of Iranian organizations from 1997 to 2006. Scientometrics, 80, 625–636.
- Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L. et al. (2015). Bibliometrics: The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520, 429–431.
- Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572.
- Hirsch, J.E. (2007). Does the h index have predictive power? Proceeding of the National Academy of Science of the United States of America, 104, 19193–19198.
- Jin, B., Liang, L., Rousseau, R., et al. (2007). The R- and AR-indices: Complementing the h-index. Chinese Science Bulletin, 52, 855–863.
- Kosten, J. (2016). A classification of the use of research indicators. Scientometrics, 108, 457–464.
- Kutlača, D., Babić D., Živković L., et al. (2015). Analysis of quantitative and qualitative indicators of SEE countries scientific output. Scientometrics, 102, 247–265.
- Okubo, Y. (1997). “Bibliometric Indicators and Analysis of Research Systems: Methods and Examples,” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 1997/1, OECD Publishing.
- Porter, M.E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76, 77–90.
- Prathap, G. (2011). Quasity, when quantity has a quality all of its own—Toward a theory of performance. Scientometrics, 88, 555–562.
- Russell, J., & Rousseau, R. (2009). “Bibliometrics and institutional evaluation,” Science and Technology Policy - Volume II, UNESCO, 42–64.
- Sahel, J. (2011). Quality versus quantity: Assessing individual research performance. Scienve and. Translational Medicine, 3, 84cm13.
- Shirabe, M. (2019). Measurement of research capacity using disciplinary agglomeration indicators: National university “rankings” in Japan. In Proceedings of the 17th international society of scientometrics and informetrics conference, 316–321.
- Vinkler, P. (1988). An attempt of surveying and classifying bibliometric indicators for scientometric purposes. Scientometrics, 13, 239–259.
- Wilsdon, J. (2015) The Metric Tide: Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management, Sage Publications.
- Yokogawa, T., Nishino, J., & Mizuno, Y. (1995). Macroscopic understanding of the situations in GO. Proceedings of 1995 IEEE international conference on fuzzy systems, 31–32.
- Ye, F.Y., & Rousseau, R. (2010). Probing the h-core: An investigation of the tail—core ratio for rank distributions. Scientometrics, 84, 431–439.
Language: English
Page range: 76 - 89
Submitted on: Mar 3, 2021
Accepted on: Jul 6, 2021
Published on: Jul 25, 2021
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2021 Masashi Shirabe, Amane Koizumi, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.