Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Content Characteristics of Knowledge Integration in the eHealth Field: An Analysis Based on Citation Contexts Cover

Content Characteristics of Knowledge Integration in the eHealth Field: An Analysis Based on Citation Contexts

By: Shiyun Wang,  Jin Mao,  Jing Tang and  Yujie Cao  
Open Access
|Mar 2021

Figures & Tables

Figure 1

The knowledge amount distribution for each knowledge type from 1999 to 2018. The panel on the left (a) shows the total number of AKPs for each knowledge type over the period, and the inside subgraph in (a) presents the number of eHealth papers in our dataset between 1999 and 2018. The panel on the right (b) shows the proportion of knowledge amount of each knowledge type in each year.
The knowledge amount distribution for each knowledge type from 1999 to 2018. The panel on the left (a) shows the total number of AKPs for each knowledge type over the period, and the inside subgraph in (a) presents the number of eHealth papers in our dataset between 1999 and 2018. The panel on the right (b) shows the proportion of knowledge amount of each knowledge type in each year.

Figure 2

The number of references with the AKPs. (a), The total number of references with the AKPs for each knowledge type from 1999 to 2018. (b), The proportion of references with the corresponding type of AKPs in each year. The ratio of references for each knowledge type in every year was calculated by the references with the corresponding type of knowledge divided by the total number of references with AKPs in that year. Notably, one reference may contain different types of knowledge.
The number of references with the AKPs. (a), The total number of references with the AKPs for each knowledge type from 1999 to 2018. (b), The proportion of references with the corresponding type of AKPs in each year. The ratio of references for each knowledge type in every year was calculated by the references with the corresponding type of knowledge divided by the total number of references with AKPs in that year. Notably, one reference may contain different types of knowledge.

Figure 3

The number of source disciplines of the AKPs. (a), The total number of distinct source disciplines with AKPs between 1999 and 2018. (b), The proportion of distinct source disciplines with AKPs for each knowledge type in each year. The ratio of disciplines for each knowledge type in every year was calculated by the distinct disciplines containing the corresponding type of knowledge divided by the total number of distinct disciplines with AKPs in that year. Notably, one distinct discipline may contain different types of knowledge.
The number of source disciplines of the AKPs. (a), The total number of distinct source disciplines with AKPs between 1999 and 2018. (b), The proportion of distinct source disciplines with AKPs for each knowledge type in each year. The ratio of disciplines for each knowledge type in every year was calculated by the distinct disciplines containing the corresponding type of knowledge divided by the total number of distinct disciplines with AKPs in that year. Notably, one distinct discipline may contain different types of knowledge.

Figure 4

The average citation interval of AKPs for each knowledge type.
The average citation interval of AKPs for each knowledge type.

Figure 5

The co-occurrence frequency of knowledge types within citation context and its ratio to the sum of the two knowledge types. The heatmap was drawn based on the ratio value.
The co-occurrence frequency of knowledge types within citation context and its ratio to the sum of the two knowledge types. The heatmap was drawn based on the ratio value.

Top 10 source disciplines for each knowledge type_

Research SubjectEntityTechnologyResearch MethodologyDataTheory
Health Care Sciences & ServicesHealth Care Sciences & ServicesHealth Care Sciences & ServicesHealth Care Sciences & ServicesHealth Care Sciences & ServicesPublic, Environmental & Occupational Health
Medical InformaticsMedical InformaticsMedical InformaticsMedical InformaticsMedical InformaticsHealth Care Sciences & Services
Public, Environmental & OccupationalPublic, Environmental & OccupationalPublic, Environmental & OccupationalPublic, Environmental & OccupationalPublic, Environmental & OccupationalMedical Informatics
Health Medicine, General & InternalHealth Medicine, General & InternalHealth Medicine, General & InternalHealth PsychiatryHealth Medicine, General & InternalPsychology, Multidisciplinary
PsychiatryPsychiatryComputer Science, Information SystemsMedicine, General & InternalInformation Science & Library ScienceManagement
Psychology, ClinicalNursingInformation Science & Library SciencePsychology, ClinicalComputer Science, Information SystemsPsychology, Applied
Substance AbusePsychology, ClinicalComputer Science, Interdisciplinary ApplicationSubstance AbuseComputer Science, Interdisciplinary ApplicationPsychology, Social
Health Policy & ServicesHealth Policy & ServicesPsychiatryHealth Policy & ServicesHealth Policy & ServicesPsychology
NursingSubstance AbusePsychology, ClinicalPsychologyMultidisciplinary SciencesPsychology, Clinical
Endocrinology & MetabolismComputer Science, Information SystemsSubstance AbusePsychology, MultidisciplinaryPsychiatryComputer Science, Information Systems

The knowledge classification schema for AKPs_

CategoryDescriptionLiterature sources
Research Subjectsubject terms related to research problems, such as diseases and research areas.Heffernan & Teufel, 2018; Kondo et al., 2009
Theorytheory related phrases, e.g., specific names of theories, and frameworksWang & Zhang, 2018; Pettigrew & McKechnie, 2001
Research Methodologyresearch methodology, including research methods, scales, guidelines, evaluation indicators, etc.Sahragard & Meihami, 2016; Heffernan & Teufel, 2018; Mesbah et al., 2017; Radoulov, 2008;
Technology Entitytechniques, devices, and systems people or organizations that are involved in any aspect of the researchGupta & Manning, 2011; Tsai et al., 2013 Bahadoran et al., 2019
Dataphrases related to datasets, data sources, and data materialWang & Zhang, 2018; Sahragard & Meihami, 2016; Mesbah et al., 2017; Radoulov, 2008
Othersother phrases that are not included in the above categories, e.g., geolocations, projects, etc.Kondo et al., 2009

Annotation example of each knowledge category_

AKPsCitation sentencesKnowledge type
chronic illnessFor effective medical care of chronic illness, such as Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), adequate and sustainable self-management initiated by patients is importantResearch Subject
social cognitive theoryThe intervention, including both the SMS text messaging and individual counseling session, was modeled after national treatment guidelines, and guided by Social Cognitive Theory and the stages of change modelTheory
qualitative research methodologyIn recent years, qualitative research methodology has become more recognized and valued in diabetes behavioral research because it helps answer questions that quantative research might not, by exploring patient motivations, perceptions, and expectationsResearch Methodology
SMS text messagingConsistent with the literature, SMS text messaging was an appropriate and accepted tool to deliver health promotion contentTechnology
heart failure patientDe Vries et al (2013) evaluated the actual use and goals of telemonitoring systems, whereas Seto et al (2012) developed a randomized trial of mobile phone-based telemonitoring systems to examine the experience of heart failure patients with these systemsEntity
bacteriology datumPDA-based technologies were used to develop a PDA-based electronic system to collect, verify, and upload bacteriology data into an electronic medical record system; develop a wireless clinical care management system; and develop a data collection/entry system for public surveillance data collectionData
low riskFree et al found that while mHealth studies have been conducted many are of poor quality, few have a low risk of bias, and very few have found clinically significant benefits of the interventionsOthers

Integration characteristics of different knowledge types_

Knowledge typeKnowledge amountDistinct AKPsReferencesSource disciplinesKnowledge integration densityAverage citation interval
Research Subject104,98815,32451,6221872.035.91
Entity25,2131,66518,2191501.385.33
Technology17,9451,88513,2561571.354.22
Research Methodology9,0992,0796,7731441.347.74
Data3,2972962,8221241.175.11
Theory1,315225921881.4310.55
Others84,3104,29044,3461901.905.50

Brief information of our dataset_

Statistical itemsValue
Citing papers3,221
Citation sentences119,598
References101,751
In-text citations199,461
AKPs246,167
Distinct AKPs25,764
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2021-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 58 - 74
Submitted on: Nov 1, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 5, 2021
Published on: Mar 2, 2021
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2021 Shiyun Wang, Jin Mao, Jing Tang, Yujie Cao, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.