References
- Ahmadpoor, M., & Jones, B.F. (2017). The dual frontier: Patented inventions and prior scientific advance. Science, 357(6351), 583–587.
- Akune, Y., Lin, C.H., Abrahams, J.L., Zhang, J.Y., Packer, N.H., Aoki-Kinoshita, K.F., & Campbella, M.P. (2016). Comprehensive analysis of the N-glycan biosynthetic pathway using bioinformatics to generate UniCorn: A theoretical N-glycan structure database. Carbohydrate Research, 431, 56–63.
- Bartel, D.P. (2004). MicroRNAs: Genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function. Cell, 116(2), 281–297.
- Bertoli-Barsotti, L., & Tommaso, L. (2019). How mean rank and mean size may determine the generalised Lorenz curve: With application to citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 387–396.
- Bonaccorsi, A. (2007). Explaining poor performance of European science: Institutions versus policies, Science and Public Policy, 34, 303–316.
- Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.D. (2006). Selecting scientific excellence through committee peer review—A citation analysis of publications previously published to approval or rejection of post-doctoral research fellowship applicants. Scientometrics, 68(3), 427–440.
- Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64, 45–80.
- Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2014). How to evaluate individual researchers working in the natural and life sciences meaningfully? A proposal of methods based on percentiles of citations. Scientometrics, 98(1), 487–509.
- Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2015). Growth rates of modern science: A bibliometric analysis based on the number of publications and cited references. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 66(11), 2215–2222.
- Bornmann, L., Wagner, C., & Leydesdorff, L. (2015). BRICS countries and scientific excellence: A bibliometric analysis of most frequently cited papers. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 66(7), 1507–1513.
- Boyack, K.W., Eck, N.J., Colavizza, G., & Waltman, L. (2018). Characterizing in-text citations in scientific articles: A large-scale analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 12(1), 59–73.
- Casanova, L., Cornelius, P.K., & Dutta, S. (2018). Financing entrepreneurship and innovation in emerging markets. Salt Lake city: Academic Press, 185–218.
- Cbinsights. (2020). The Global Unicorn Club Current Private Companies Valued At $1B+ (including whisper valuations). Retrieved from https://www.cbinsights.com/research-unicorn-companies.
- Citation Thresholds. (2020). archive.sciencewatch.com/ [Online]. Retrieved from: http://archive.sciencewatch.com/about/met/thresholds/
- Comins, J.A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Citation algorithms for identifying research milestones driving biomedical innovation. Scientometrics, 110(3), 1495–1504.
- Csajbók, E., Berhidi A., Vasas, L., & Schubert, András. (2007). Hirsch-index for countries based on essential science indicators data. Scientometrics, 73(1), 91–117.
- Cugurullo, F., Datta, A., & Shaban, A. (2016). Mega-urbanization in the global south: Fast cities and new urban utopias of the postcolonial state. New York: Routledge, 23(3), 66–80.
- Davis, R.A., & Cunningham, P.S. (1990). Creative thought in neurosurgical research: The value of citation analysis. Neurosurgery, 26(2), 345–353.
- de Solla Price, D.J. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515.
- Elbarouni, B., Ducas, J., Friesen, D., & Zhang, H. (2017). The uninterrupted anticoagulation in coronary catheterization (unicorn) registry. A single center experience. Canadian Journal of Cardiology, 33(10), S144–S145.
- Essential Science Indicators. (2020). clarivate.com. Retrieved from: https://clarivate.com/products/essential-science-indicators/.
- Fu, H.Z., Chuang, K.Y., Wang, M.H., & Ho, Y.A. (2011). Characteristics of research in China assessed with essential science indicators. Scientometrics, 88(5), 841–862.
- Karakülah, G., Arslan, N., Yandım, C., & Suner, A. (2019). TEffect R: An R package for studying the potential effects of transposable elements on gene expression with linear regression model. Peer J, 7, 6–20.
- Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation: Journals can be ranked by frequency and impact of citations for science policy studies. Science, 178(4060), 471.
- Garfield, E. (1979). Citation Indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology and humanities. New York: Wiley.
- Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 1(4), 359–375.
- Garfield, E. (1979). Trends in biochemical literature. Trends in biochemical literature, 4(12), N290.
- Garfield, E. (1991). A citation analysis of Austrian medical-research and wiener-klinishe wochenschrift. Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift, 103(11), 318–325.
- Garfield, E., Malin, M.V., & Small, H. (1978). Citation data as science indicators. In Y. Elkana, J. Lederberg, R.K. Merton, A. Thackray, & H. Zuckerman (Eds.), Toward a metric of science: The advent of science indicators, 179–207. New York: Wiley.
- González-Betancor, S.M., & Dorta-González, P. (2017). An indicator of the impact of journals based on the percentage of their highly cited publications. Online Information Review, 41, 398–411.
- Glänzel, W., & Meyer, M. (2003). Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of ‘reverse’ citation relations. Scientometrics, 58(2), 415–428.
- Grimwade, A., & Garfield, E. (2002). The Scientist on the Web. Scientist, 16(16), 10.
- Guerrero-Bote, V.P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2012). A further step forward in measuring journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR2 indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 674–688.
- Harzing, A.W. (2015). Health warning: Might contain multiple personalities—The problem of homonyms in Thomson Reuters essential science indicators. Scientometrics, 105(3), 2259–2270.
- Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F.M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(3), 511–515.
- Hemmelgarn, B.J., Setser, M.E., & Shelton, IV.F.E. (2004). Surgical stapling instrument for laparoscopic and endoscopic clinical procedure has firing device that has a distally presented cutting edge longitudinally received between the elongated channel and the anvil. EP 1479349-A1, 2004-11-24. Retrieved from https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/042229108/publication/EP1479349A1?q=EP1479349A1
- Highly Cited Papers. (2020). archive.sciencewatch.com. Retrieved from http://archive.sciencewatch.com/about/met/core-hcp.
- Hirsch, J.E. (2010). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output that takes into account the effect of multiple co-authorship. Scientometrics, 85(3), 741–754.
- Huang, M., Zolnoori, M., & Balls-Berry, J.E. (2019). Technological innovations in disease management: Text mining us patent data from 1995 to 2017. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 21(4), 1–7.
- Kuan, C.H., Chen, D.Z., & Huang, M.H. (2019). Bibliographically coupled patents: Their temporal pattern and combined relevance. Journal of Informetrics, 13(4), 100978.
- Kuan, C.H., & Cheng, H.J. (2014). Do we miscount patent citations? An empirical study on the impact of overlooking the citations to a patent's pre-grant publication. International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 1034–1037.
- Laengle, S., Merigo, J.M., Miranda, J., Słowiński, R., Bomze, I., Borgonovo, E., Dysone, R.G., Oliveira, J.F., & Teunterg, R. (2017). Forty years of the European Journal of Operational Research: A bibliometric overview. European Journal of Operational Research, 262(3), 803–816.
- Lander, E.S., Lauren, L.M., Birren, B., Chad, N., Michael, C.Z., Baldwin, J., Devon, K., Dewar, K., Doyle, M., & Fitzhugh, W. (2001). Initial sequencing and analysis of the human genome. Nature, 409(6822), 860–921.
- Leydesdorff, L. (2004). The evalution of research and the scietometric research program: Histroical evlution and redefinitons of the relationship. Studies in Science of Science, 22(3), 225–232.
- Lee, E. (2013). Welcome to the unicorn club: Learning from billion-dollar startups. Retrieved from https://techcrunch.com/2013/11/02/welcome-to-the-unicorn-club/
- Merigo, J.M., & Yang, J.B. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of operations research and management science. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 73, 37–48.
- Meyer, M. (2000). What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometric, 49(1), 93–123.
- Moed, H.F., Colledge L., Reedijk, J., Moya-Anegon, Felix., Guerrero-Bote, V., Plume, Andrew, & Amin, M. (2012). Citation-based metrics are appropriate tools in journal assessment provided that they are accurate and used in an informed way. Scientometrics, 92(2), 367–376.
- Moed, H.F., Luwei, M., & Nederhof, A.J. (2002). Towards research performance in the humanities. Library Trends, 50(3), 498–520.
- Moral-Munoz, J.A., Lucena-Anton, D., Perez-Cabezas, V., Carmona-Barrientos, I., González-Medina, G., & Ruiz-Molinero, C. (2018). Highly cited papers in Microbiology: Identification and conceptual analysis. Fems Microbiology Letters, 365, 20.
- Narin, F. (1994). Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147–155.
- Perez-Cabezas, V., Ruiz-Molinero, C., Carmona-Barrientos, I., Herrera-Viedma, E., Cobo, M.J., & Moral-Munoz, J.A. (2018). Highly cited papers in rheumatology: Identification and conceptual analysis. Scientometrics, 116 (1), 555–568.
- Persson, O. (1986). Online bibliometrics-a research tool for every man. Scientometrics, 10(1–2), 69–75.
- Ponomareva, l.V., Williams, D.E., Hackettb C.J., Schnell, J.D., & Haak, L.L. (2014), Predicting highly cited papers: A Method for Early Detection of Candidate Breakthroughs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81, 49–55.
- Price, D.S. (1963). Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
- Radicchi, F., Fortuno, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(45), 17268–17272.
- Rebentisch, H., Thompson, C., Côté-Royc, L., & Moserc, S. (2020). Unicorn planning: Lessons from the rise and fall of an American ‘smart’ mega-development. Cities, 101, 102686–102692.
- Research areas. (2020). images.webofknowledge.com. Retrieved from: http://images.webofknowledge.com//WOKRS535R52/help/zh_CN/WOS/hp_research_areas_easca.html.
- Rodriguez-Navarro, A. (2016). Research assessment based on infrequent achievements: A comparison of the United States and Europe in terms of highly cited papers and Nobel Prizes. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 67(3), 731–740.
- Ruiz-Trillo, I., Burger, G., Holland, P.W.H., King, N., Lang, B.F., Roger, A.J., & Gray, M.W. (2007). The origins of multicellularity: A multi-taxon genome initiative. Trends in Genetics, 23(3), 113–118.
- Schneider, C., Rasband, W.S., & Eliceiri, K.W. (2012). NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nature Methods, 9(7), 671–675.
- Shelton, IV.F.E. (2006). Surgical instrument e.g. endo-cutter for use during fastening of buttress pads to tissue, comprises staple applying assembly attached to elongate shaft, which includes opposing tissue compression surfaces. EP 1621141-A2, 2006-02-01. Retrieved from https://worldwide.espacenet.com/patent/search/family/035285352/publication/EP1621141A2?q=EP1621141A2
- Silva, M.R. (2016). Journal impact factors for the year-after the next can be objectively predicted. Medical Express, 3(5), M160506.
- Takahashi, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2006). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell, 126(4), 663–676.
- Takahashi, K. Tanabe, K., Ohnuki, M., Narita, M., Ichisaka, T., Tomoda, K., & Yamanaka, S. (2007). Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell, 131(5), 861–872.
- Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, Glen., Nei, M., & Kumar, S. MEGA5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 28(10), 2731–2739.
- The Lancet Digital Health. (2019). Unicorns and cowboys in digital health: The importance of public perception. The Lancet Digital Health, 1(7), e319.
- Tijssen, R.J.W. (2001). Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30(1), 35–54.
- Wang, G.Y., Hu, G.Y., Li, C.F., & Tangd, L. (2018). Long live the scientists: Tracking the scientific fame of great minds in physics. Journal of Informetrics, 12(4), 1089–1098.
- White, H.D. (2015). Co-cited author retrieval and relevance theory: Examples from the humanities. Scientometrics, 102(3), 2275–2299.
- Wharton, G.A., Sood, H.S., Sissons, A., & Mossialos, E. (2019). Virtual primary care: Fragmentation or integration? The Lancet Digital Health, 1(7), e330–e331.
- White, H.D., Boell, S.K., & Yu, H. (2009). Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of Book Publications in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Journal of The American Society for Information Science & Technology, 60(6), 1083–1096.
- Wikipedia. (2020). Unicorn From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicorn.
- Wikipedia. (2020). Unicorn (finance) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unicorn_(finance).
- Ye, S.Q., Xing, R., Liu, J., & Xing, F.Y. (2013). Bibliometric analysis of Nobelists’ awards and landmark papers in physiology or medicine during 1983–2012. Annals of Medicine, 45(8), 532–538.
- Zeng, C.J., Qi, E. P, Li, S.S. Stanley, H.E., & Ye, F.Y. (2017). Statistical characteristics of breakthrough discoveries in science using the metaphor of black and white swans. Physica A, 487, 40–46.
- Zhang, H.H., Zuccala, A.A. & Ye, F.Y. (2019). Tracing the ‘Swan-groups’ of Physics and Economics in the Key Publications of Nobel Laureates, Scientometrics, 119, 425–436.
- Zhang, J.A., Vogeley, M.S., & Chen, C.M. (2011). Scientometrics of big science: A case study of research in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Scientometrics, 86(1), 1–14.
- Zou, C., & Peterson, J.B. (2016). Quantifying the scientific output of new researchers using the zp-index. Scientometrics, 106(3), 901–916.