Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Priorities for Social and Humanities Projects Based on Text Analysis① Cover

Priorities for Social and Humanities Projects Based on Text Analysis①

By: Ülle Must  
Open Access
|Sep 2020

References

  1. de Cheveigné, S., Knoll, B., Bustelo, M., Engebretsen, E., & Sandström, U. (2017). Interim Evaluation: Gender equality as a crosscutting issue in Horizon 2020. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  2. Edler, J., Kuhlmann, S., & Behrens, M. (Ed.) (2003). Changing Governance in European Research and Technology Policy. Possible Trajectories and the European Research Area. In Changing Governance of Research and Technology Policy: The European Research Area. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
  3. Estonian Research Information System (ETIS). Manual for Research Staff. Retrieved from: https://www.etag.ee/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/ENG2_User_manual_long.pdf
  4. Glenisson, P., Glanzel, W., Janssens, F., & De Moor, B. (2005). Combining full text and bibliometric information in mapping scientific disciplines. Information Processing & Management, 41(6), 1548–1572.
  5. Gómez-García, F., Ruano, J., Aguilar-Luque, M., Alcalde-Mellado, P., Gay-Mimbrera, J., Hernández-Romero, J.L., Sanz-Cabanillas, J.L., Maestre-López, B., González-Padilla, M., Carmona-Fernández, P.J., Vélez García-Nieto, A., & Isla-Tejera, B. (2017). Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions. BMC Medical Research Methodology series, 17, 180. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0460-z
  6. Gonçalves, C., Iglesias, E.L., Borrajo, L., Camacho, R., Seara Vieira, A., & Gonçalves, C.T. (2018). LearnSec: A Framework for Full Text Analysis. In: de Cos Juez F. et al. (eds) Hybrid Artificial Intelligent Systems. HAIS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 10870. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92639-1_42
  7. Jonkers, K., & Zacharewicz, T. (2016). Research performance based funding systems: A comparative assessment, publications office of the European Union, Luxembourg. EUR 27837 EN; doi: 10.2791/659483
  8. Kattel, R., & Stamenov, B. (2018). RIO Country Report 2017: Estonia. EUR 29153 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2018, ISBN 978-92-79-81198-2, doi: 10.2760/312784, JRC111256
  9. Milojević, S., Sugimoto, C. R., Yan, E., & Ding, Y. (2011). The cognitive structure of library and information science: Analysis of article title words. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1933–1953.
  10. Must, Ü. (2006). “New” countries in Europe—Research, development and innovation strategies vs bibliometric data. Scientometrics, 66(2), 241–248.
  11. Must, Ü. (2019). Priorities for Social and Humanities Projects Based on Text Analysis. In Proceedings of the ISSI 2019 Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics with a special STI Indicators Conference track. Rome, Sapienza University of Rome 2–5 September 2019, 2, 2555–2556.
  12. Slovenian Current Research Information System (SICRIS). Retrieved from: https://www.sicris.si/public/jqm/cris.aspx?lang=eng&opdescr=home&opt=1
  13. The Community Research and Development Information Service (CORDIS). Retrieved from https://cordis.europa.eu/projects/en
  14. Van den Besselaar, P.A.A. (2016). Predicting panel scores by linguistic analysis. In Peripheries, Frontiers and Beyond: Ismael Rafols et al, Peripheries, Frontiers and Beyond; Proceedings STI 2016 (pp. 1081–1088).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2020-0036 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 116 - 125
Submitted on: Jan 20, 2020
|
Accepted on: Jul 31, 2020
|
Published on: Sep 21, 2020
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2020 Ülle Must, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.