Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Historical Bibliometrics Using Google Scholar: The Case of Roman Law, 1727–2016

Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. Ardanuy, J., Urbano, C., & Quintana, L. (2009). A citation analysis of Catalan literary studies (1974–2003): Towards a bibliometrics of humanities studies in minority languages. Scientometrics, 81(2), 347–366.
  2. Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2017). Skewness of citation impact data and covariates of citation distributions: A large-scale empirical analysis based on Web of Science data. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 164–175.
  3. Colavizza, G. (2018). Understanding the history of the humanities from a bibliometric perspective: Expansion, conjunctures, and traditions in the last decades of venetian historiography (1950–2013). History of Humanities, 3(2), 377–406.
  4. De Solla Price, D.J. (1986). Little science, big science. . . and beyond. Columbia University Press, New York.
  5. Fanelli, D., & Larivière, V. (2016). Researchers’ individual publication rate has not increased in a century. PLoS One, 11(3), e0149504.
  6. Grafton, A. (1999). The footnote: A curious history. Harvard University Press.
  7. Gusenbauer, M. (2019). Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics, 118(1), 177–214.
  8. Halevi, G., Moed, H., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2017). Suitability of Google Scholar as a source of scientific information and as a source of data for scientific evaluation—Review of the literature. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 823–834.
  9. Hammarfelt, B. (2012). Harvesting footnotes in a rural field: Citation patterns in Swedish literary studies. Journal of Documentation, 68(4), 536–558.
  10. Harzing, A.-W.K., & Van der Wal, R. (2008). Google Scholar as a new source for citation analysis. Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 8(1), 61–73.
  11. Hérubel, J.-P.V.M. (1999). Historical bibliometrics: Its purpose and significance to the history of disciplines. Libraries & Culture, 34(4), 380–388.
  12. Imbert, J. (1984). Passé, présent et avenir du doctorat en droit en France, Revue d’histoire des Facultés de droit, 1, 11–35. https://univ-droit.fr/docs/recherche/rhfd/pdf/01-1984/01-1984-p011-035.pdf
  13. Jacsó, P. (2010). Metadata mega mess in Google Scholar. Online Information Review, 34(1), 175–191.
  14. Kulczycki, E., Engels, T., Pölönen, J., Bruun, K., Duskova, M., Guns, R., Nowotniak, R., Petr, M., Sivertsen, G., Starčič, A., & Zuccala, A. (2018). Publication patterns in the social sciences and humanities: Evidence from eight European countries. Scientometrics, 11(1), 463–486.
  15. Kulczycki, E., Guns, R., Pölönen, J., Engels, T.C.E., Rozkosz, E.A., Zuccala, A.A., Bruun, K., Eskola, O., Starčič, A.I., Petr, M., & Sivertsen, G. (2020). Multilingual publishing in the social sciences and humanities: A seven-country european study. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2020, 1–15. doi: 10.1002/asi.24336
  16. Larivière, V., Gingras, Y., & Archambault, É. (2009). The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900–2007. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 858–862.
  17. Nederhof, A.J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81–100.
  18. Orestano, R. (1987). Introduzione allo studio del diritto romano. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  19. Persson, O., Danell, R., & Schneider, J.W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. In F. Åström, R. Danell, B. Larsen & J. Schneider (eds.), Celebrating scholarly communication studies: A festschrift for Olle Persson at his 60th birthday. International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, 9–24.
  20. Pichonnaz, P. (2014). Bibliométrie en droit: Quelques réflexions sur les enjeux et l’impact sur la littérature juridique future. Revue de droit suisse/Zeitschrift für Schweizer Recht, 133, 377–98.
  21. Prins, A.A., Costas, R., van Leeuwen, T.N., & Wouters, P.F. (2016). Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data. Research Evaluation, 25(3), 264–270.
  22. Pölönen, J. (2016). Framing “Law and Society” in the Roman World. In P. J. du Plessis, C. Ando, & Kaius Tuori (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Roman Law and Society (pp. 8–20). Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198728689.013.2
  23. Scharnhorst, A., & Garfield, E. (2010). Tracing scientific influence. arXiv Preprint arXiv:1010.3525.
  24. Scheidel, W. (1997). Continuity and change in classical scholarship: A quantitative survey, 1924 to 1992. Ancient Society, 28, 265–89.
  25. Stein, P. (1999). Roman law in European history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  26. van Leeuwen, T. (2013). Bibliometric research evaluations, Web of Science and the Social Sciences and Humanities: A problematic relationship?. Bibliometrie - Praxis und Forschung, 2. http://www.bibliometrie-pf.de/article/view/173. doi: 10.5283/bpf.173
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2020-0024 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 18 - 32
Submitted on: Jan 28, 2020
Accepted on: Jun 11, 2020
Published on: Jul 3, 2020
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2020 Janne Pölönen, Björn Hammarfelt, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.