The Compound F2-index and the Compound H-index as Extension of the f2 and h-indexes from a Dynamic Perspective①
By:
References
- Aguilera, R.V., Filatotchev, I., Gospel, H., & Jackson, G. (2008). An organizational approach to comparative corporate governance: Costs, contingencies, and complementarities. Organization science, 19(3), 475–492. doi: 10.1287/orsc.1070.0322
- Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H.-D. (2009). The state of h index research. Is the h index the ideal way to measure research performance? EMBO Reports, 10(1), 2–6. doi: 10.1038/embor.2008.233
- Bornmann, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2018). Count highly-cited papers instead of papers with h citations: use normalized citation counts and compare “like with like”! Scientometrics, 115(2), 1119–1123.
- Bornmann, L., Mutz, R., & Daniel, H.-D. (2008). Are there better indices for evaluation purposes than the h index? A comparison of nine different variants of the h index using data from biomedicine. Journal of the American society for information science and technology, 59(5), 830–837.
- Bouyssou, D., & Marchant, T. (2011). Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1761–1769.
- Costas, R., & Bordons, M. (2007). The h-index: Advantages, limitations and its relation with other bibliometric indicators at the micro level. Journal of Informetrics, 1, 193–203.
- Durisin, B., & Puzone, F. (2009). Maturation of corporate governance research, 1993–2007: An assessment. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 266–291.
- Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69(1), 131–152.
- Fassin, Y. (2018). A new qualitative rating system for scientific publications and a fame Index for academics. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(11), 1396–1399.
- Fassin, Y. (2019). The compound F2-index as extension of the f2-index in a dynamic perspective: An application in corporate governance research. In Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, Rome.
- Hicks, D., Wouters, P., Waltman, L., De Rijcke, S., & Rafols, I. (2015). Bibliometrics: the Leiden Manifesto for research metrics. Nature, 520(7548), 429–431.
- Hirsch, J.E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102, 16569–16572.
- Kosmulski, M. (2006). A new Hirsch-type index saves time and works equally well as the original h-index. ISSI Newsletter, 2(3), 4–6.
- OECD (1999). “Principles of corporate governance”, http://www.encycogov.com/
- Rousseau, R. (2016). Citation data as proxy for quality or scientific influence are at best PAC (Probably Approximately Correct). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 67(12), 3092–3094.
- Waltman, L., & Van Eck, N.J. (2012). The inconsistency of the h-index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(2), 406–415.
Language: English
Page range: 71 - 83
Submitted on: Feb 7, 2020
Accepted on: May 20, 2020
Published on: Jul 3, 2020
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2020 Yves Fassin, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.