Library and Information Science Papers Discussed on Twitter: A new Network-based Approach for Measuring Public Attention
References
- Bornmann, L. (2015). Alternative metrics in scientometrics: A meta-analysis of research into three altmetrics. Scientometrics, 103(3), 1123–1144. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1565-y.
- Bornmann, L., & Haunschild, R. (2016). How to normalize Twitter counts? A first attempt based on journals in the Twitter Index. Scientometrics, 107(3), 1405–1422. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1893-6.
- Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., & Adams, J. (2019). Do altmetrics assess societal impact in a comparable way to case studies? An empirical test of the convergent validity of altmetrics based on data from the UK research excellence framework (REF). Journal of Informetrics, 13(1), 325–340. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2019.01.008.
- Bornmann, L., Haunschild, R., & Marx, W. (2016). Policy documents as sources for measuring societal impact: How often is climate change research mentioned in policy-related documents? Scientometrics, 109(3), 1477–1495. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-2115-y.
- Haunschild, R., Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2019). Library and Information Science papers as topics on Twitter: A network approach to measuring public attention. Paper presented at the ISSI 2019—17th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Rome, Italy.
- Haunschild, R., Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Hellsten, I., & Marx, W. (2019). Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags. Journal of Informetrics, 13(2), 695–707. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2019.03.008.
- Haunschild, R., Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Hellsten, I., & Marx, W. (2020). Corrigendum to “Does the public discuss other topics on climate change than researchers? A comparison of explorative networks based on author keywords and hashtags” [J. Informetrics 13 (2019) 695–707]. Journal of Informetrics, 14(1), February 2020, 101020. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2020.101020
- Hellsten, I., & Leydesdorff, L. (2020). Automated analysis of actor–topic networks on twitter: New approaches to the analysis of socio-semantic networks. JASIST, 71(1), 3–15. doi: 10.1002/asi.24207
- R Core Team. (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (Version 3.6.0). Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org/
- Robinson-Garcia, N., Costas, R., Isett, K., Melkers, J., & Hicks, D. (2017). The unbearable emptiness of tweeting—About journal articles. PLOS ONE, 12(8), e0183551. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183551.
- Thelwall, M. (2018). Early Mendeley readers correlate with later citation counts. Scientometrics, 115(3), 1231–1240. doi: 10.1007/s11192-018-2715-9.
- Wouters. P., Zahedi, Z., & Costas, R. (2019) Social media metrics for new research evaluation. In: Glänzel W., Moed H.F., Schmoch U., Thelwall M. (eds) Springer Handbook of Science and Technology Indicators. Springer Handbooks. Springer, Cham, pp 687–713.
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 17
Submitted on: Jan 21, 2020
Accepted on: May 20, 2020
Published on: Jul 3, 2020
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year
Keywords:
Related subjects:
© 2020 Robin Haunschild, Loet Leydesdorff, Lutz Bornmann, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.