Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Discipline Impact Factor: Some of Its History, Some of the Author's Experience of Its Application, the Continuing Reasons for Its Use and… Next Beyond Cover

Discipline Impact Factor: Some of Its History, Some of the Author's Experience of Its Application, the Continuing Reasons for Its Use and… Next Beyond

Open Access
|Jul 2020

References

  1. Bensman, S.J. (2007). Garfield and the impact factor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41(1), 93–155. doi: 10.1002/aris.2007.1440410110
  2. Black, Jr. G.W. (1983). Core journal lists for behaviorally disordered children. Behavioral & Social Sciences Librarian, 3(1), 31–38. doi: 10.1300/J103v03n01_04
  3. Bornmann, L. (2014). Is there currently a scientific revolution in scientometrics? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(3), 647–648. doi: 10.1002/asi.23073
  4. Cole, S., & Cole, J.R. (1967). Scientific output and recognition: A study in the operation of the reward system in science. American Sociological Review, 32(3), 377–390.
  5. Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 108–111. doi: 10.1126/science.122.3159.108
  6. Garfield, E., & Malin, M.E. (1968). Can Nobel Prize winners be predicted? Paper presented at 135th Annual Meeting, American Association for the Advancement of Science, Dallas, Texas, December 26–31, S.l. Retrieved from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/nobelpredicted.pdf.
  7. Garfield, E. (1970). What is a significant journal? Current Contents, (18), 5–6.
  8. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178 (4060), 471–479.
  9. Garfield, E. (1982a). Journal Citation Studies. 35. Veterinary journals: What they cite and vice versa. Current Contents, (13), 5–13. Retrieved from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v5p464y1981-82.pdf.
  10. Garfield, E. (1982b). Journal Citation Studies. 39. Earth sciences journals: What they cite and what cites them. Current Contents, (52), 5–14. Retrieved from http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v5p791y1981-82.pdf.
  11. Garfield, E. (2003) Quality of impact factor of general medical journals—PRADVA wins hands down. Retrieved from http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/bmjfeb192003.html.
  12. Gould, A.L. (1981). Verifying a citation: Reference use of OCLC and RLIN. Reference Services Review, 9(4), 51–60. doi: 10.1108/eb048731
  13. Gove, P.B., Ed. (1993). Webster's third new international dictionary of the english language. Unabridged. Utilizing all the experience and resources of more than one hundred years of Merriam-Webster dictionaries. Cologne, Köneman.
  14. Hirst, G., & Talent, N. (1977). Computer science journals—an iterated citation analysis. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication. PC-20(4), 233–238.
  15. Hirst, G. (1978). Discipline impact factor—a method for determining core journal list. Journal of American Society for Information Science, 29(4), 171–172. doi: 10.1002/asi.4630290403
  16. ISO 5127:2017 (en): Information and documentation—Foundation and vocabulary. In ISO Online Browsing Platform (OBP) (Entry 3.10.3.10). Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#search.
  17. Korennoi, A.A., & Osetrov, V.D. (1981). Citation networks of scientific journals as information models of intra- and inter-scientific communications. Nauchno-tekhnicheskaya informatsiya [Scientific and Technical Information], Ser. 1, (10), 26–30. (in Russian)
  18. Kurtz, M.J., & Bollen, J. (2010) Usage bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44 (1), 3–64. doi: 10.1002/aris.2010.1440440108.
  19. Kushkowski, J.D., Gerhard, K.H., & Dobson, C. (1998). A method for building core journals lists in interdisciplinary subject areas. Journal of Documentation, 54(4), 477–488. doi: 10.1108/eum0000000007179
  20. Lazarev, V.S., & Nikolaichik, V.V. (1979). Distribution of information on hematology in scientific journals. In Sovremennye aspekty gematologii [Modern aspects of hematology] (pp. 128–133). Minsk, Nauka i tekhnika Publ. (in Russian)
  21. Lazarev, V.S. (1980). Perfection of information service of coagulation researchers. In 1 Ukrainskii s”ezd gematologov i transfuziologov (10—12 dekabrya 1980 g., Khar’kov): tezisy dokladov [1st Ukrainian congress of hematologists and transfusiologists: abstracts (December 10–12, 1980, at Kharkov)]. (pp. 20–21). Kiev. (in Russian)
  22. Lazarev, V.S. (1988). The study of the thematic structure of documentary flows for management decision-making on the organization of scientific medical research. In Puti povysheniya effektivnosti ispol’zovaniya nauchno-informatsionnogo potentsiala meditsinskoi nauki i prakticheskogo zdravookhraneniya: tez. Resp. nauch. konf. (g. Poltava, 15–16 sentyabrya 1988 g.) [“Ways to improve the efficiency of scientific and information potential of medical science and practical health”: Abstracts of the Republican scientific conference (Poltava City, Sept. 15—16, 1998)] (pp. 75–77). Kiev. (in Russian).
  23. Lazarev, V.S. (1996). On chaos in bibliometric terminology. Scientometrics, 35(2), 271–277. doi: 10.1007/BF02018485
  24. Lazarev, V.S. (1998). On the role of bibliometrics in the knowledge society: Bibliometric quicksand or bibliometric challenge? Newsletter to European Health Librarians, (44), 17–18. Retrieved from https://rep.bntu.by/bitstream/handle/data/25422/17%e2%80%9318.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.
  25. Lazarev, V.S., & Skalaban, A.V. (2016). The world major scientific periodicals to be used by researchers of renewable energy, local and secondary energy resources. Energetika. Proceedings of CIS Higher Education Institutions and Power Engineering Associations, 59(5), 488–502 (in Russian, with English abstract). doi: 10.21122/1029-7448-2016-59-5-488-502
  26. Lazarev, V.S., Skalaban, A.V., Yurik, I.V., Lis, P.A., & Kachan, D.A. (2017). Selection of serial periodicals to support researchers (based on the example of scientific work on nuclear power). Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 44(3), 196–206. doi: 10.3103/s0147688217030066
  27. Lazarev, V.S., & Yurik, I.V. (2018). Selection of periodicals to support nanotechnology research. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 45(2), 87–99. doi: 10.3103/S0147688218020065
  28. Lazarev, V.S. (2019a). Insufficient definitions or a vaguely grasped notion? On definitions of “impact”. Scholarly Research and Information, 2(1), 63–78. doi:10.24108/2658-3143-2019-2-1-63-78 (in Russian, with English synopsis)
  29. Lazarev, V.S. (2019b). The property that is factually being evaluated when they say they evaluate Impact. Scholarly Research and Information, 2(2), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.24108/2658-3143-2019-2-2-129-138 (in Russian, with English synopsis)
  30. Lazarev, V.S. (2019c). On the possibilities of evaluating properties of scientific documents on the basis of their citations count (Or again: What property is reflected by citations count par excellence, after all?). Part 1: Value. University Library at a New Stage of Social Communications Development. Conference Proceedings, (4), 28–36. doi: https://doi.org/10.15802/unilib/2019_187405. Retrieved from http://unilibnsd.diit.edu.ua/article/view/187405.
  31. Lazarev, V.S., Yurik, I.V., Lis, P.A., Kachan, D.A., & Dydik, N.S. (2019). Some methodological aspects of selection serials to be included in the information environment for researchers in a technical or natural science (by example of optoelectronics and optical systems), Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), 2185. Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2185.
  32. MacRoberts, M.H., & MacRoberts, B.R. (1996). Problems of citation analysis. Scientometrics, 36(3), 435–444. doi: 10.1007/BF02129604
  33. Markusova, V.A. (1973). On the formal method of assessing the importance of journals. Nauchnotekhnicheskaya informatsiya [Scientific and Technical Information], Ser. 1, (10), 8–18. (in Russian)
  34. Nicolaisen, J. (2007). Citation analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 41(1), 609–641. doi: 10.1002/aris.2007.1440410120
  35. Patton, R.M., Stahl, C.G., & Wells, J.C. (2016). Measuring scientific impact beyond citation counts. D-Lib Magazine, 22(9/10). doi: 10.1045/september2016-patton. Retrieved from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september16/patton/09patton.html
  36. Price, D.J. de S. (1970). Citation measures of hard science, soft science, technology and nonscience, in Nelson, C.E., Pollock, D.K. (Eds.). Communication among Scientists and Engineers. Lexington, Mass.: Heath Lexington, 1970, 3–22.
  37. Waltman, L., van Eck, N.J., & Wouters, P. (2013). Counting publications and citations: Is more always better? Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 635–641. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2013.04.001
  38. Yan, E.J., & Zhu, Y. (2015). Identifying entities from scientific publications: A comparison of vocabulary and model-based methods. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 455–465. doi: 10.1016/j.joi.2015.04.003
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2020-0015 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 197 - 209
Submitted on: Feb 1, 2020
Accepted on: Apr 23, 2020
Published on: Jul 3, 2020
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 times per year

© 2020 Vladimir S. Lazarev, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.