Have a personal or library account? Click to login
CiteOpinion: Evidence-based Evaluation Tool for Academic Contributions of Research Papers Based on Citing Sentences Cover

CiteOpinion: Evidence-based Evaluation Tool for Academic Contributions of Research Papers Based on Citing Sentences

Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. Brooks, T.A. (1985). Private acts and public objects: An investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36(4), 223–229.
  2. Garfield, E. (1964). Can citation indexing be automated? In the Proceedings of the Symposyumon Statistical Association, Washington DC, 8490. http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/V1p084y1962-73.pdf
  3. Howard, J., & Ruder, S. (2018). Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification. In the Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1801.06146.pdf
  4. Lei, S.W., Chen, H.H., Huang, Y., & Lu, W. (2016). Research on automatic recognition of academic citation context. Library and Information Service, 60(17), 78–87. DOI:10.13266/j.issn.0252-3116.2016.17.012
  5. Liu, S.B., & Chen, C.M. (2013). The differences between latent topics in abstracts and citation contexts of citing papers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(3), 627–639.
  6. Liu, S.B., Wang, B., Tang, D.L., Ma, X., & Ding, K. (2015). Research on paper influence based on citation context: A case study of the Nobel Prize winner’s paper. Library and Information Service, 59(24), 109–114.
  7. Liu Y., & Cui L.(2014). The information value of citation context in paper content analysis. Library and Information Service, 58(6), 101–104.
  8. Ma, F., & Wu, Y.S. (2009). A survey study on motivations for citation: A case study on periodicals research and library and information science community in China. Chinese Journal of Library and Information Science, 2(3), 28–43.
  9. Mohammad, S., Dorr, B., Egan, M., Hassan, A., & Zajic, D.M. (2009). Using citations to generate surveys of scientific paradigms. In the Proceedings of Human Language Technologies: The 2009 Annual Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics. Boulder: Association for Computational Linguistics, 584–592.
  10. Pei, J.J., & Le, X.Q. (2019). Identifying coordinate text blocks in discourses. Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery, 3(5), 51–56. DOI: 10.11925/infotech.2096-3467.2018.1380
  11. Small, H. (2011). Interpreting maps of science using citation context sentiments: A preliminary investigation. Scientometrics, 87(2), 373–388.
  12. Spiegel-RÖsing, I. (1977). Science studies: Bibliometric and content analysis. Social Studies of Science, 7(1), 97–113.
  13. Teufel, S., Siddharthan, A., & Tidhar, D. (2006). Automatic classification of citation function. In the Proceedings of the 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Sydney: Association for Computational Linguistics, 103–110.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 26 - 41
Submitted on: Nov 8, 2019
Accepted on: Nov 28, 2019
Published on: Dec 27, 2019
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Xiaoqiu Le, Jingdan Chu, Siyi Deng, Qihang Jiao, Jingjing Pei, Liya Zhu, Junliang Yao, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.