Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Disclosing and Evaluating Artistic Research Cover
Open Access
|Aug 2019

References

  1. Barre, R. (2010). Towards socially robust S&T indicators: Indicators as debatable devices, enabling collective learning. Research Evaluation, 19(3), 227–231.
  2. Biggs, M., & Karlsson, H. (2011). Evaluating quality in artistic research. In Biggs, M. & Karlsson, H. (Eds.) The Routledge companion to research in the arts (pp. 405–424). London, UK: Routledge.
  3. Borgdorff, H. A. H. (2012). The conflict of the faculties: Perspectives on artistic research and academia. Leiden, NE: Leiden University Press.
  4. Engels, T. C., & Guns, R. (2018). The Flemish performance-based research funding system: A unique variant of the Norwegian model. Journal of Data and Information Science, 3(4), 44–59.
  5. Flemish Community. (2014). Besluit van de Vlaamse regering betreffende de codificatie van de decretale bepalingen betreffende het Hoger Onderwijs (Higher Education Codex). Retrieved from http://data-onderwijs.vlaanderen.be/edulex/inhoudstafel.aspx?docid=14650
  6. Gielen, P. (2013). Artistic praxis and the neoliberalization of the educational space. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 47(1), 58–71.
  7. Hellström, T. (2010). Evaluation of artistic research. Research Evaluation, 19(5), 306–316.
  8. Jewesbury, D. (2009). Some problems with ‘research’ in UK Fine Art institutions. Art & Research, 2(2), 1–3.
  9. Klein, J. (2010). What is artistic research?. Journal for Artistic Research. Retrieved from https://www.jar-online.net/what-artistic-research
  10. Laermans, R. (2018). Onderzoekskunst? Retrieved from https://www.dewitteraaf.be/artikel/detail/nl/4579
  11. Lesage, D. (2009). Who’s afraid of artistic research? On measuring artistic research output. Art & Research, 2(2), 1–10.
  12. Lewandowska, K., & Stano, P. M. (2018). Evaluation of research in the arts: Evidence from Poland. Research Evaluation, 27(4), 323–334.
  13. Nelson, R. (2013). Practice as research in the arts: Principles, protocols, pedagogies, resistances. London, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
  14. O’Riley, T. (2011). A discrete continuity: On the relation between research and art practice. Journal of Research Practice, 7(1), P1.
  15. Paltridge, B., Starfield, S., Ravelli, L., & Nicholson, S. (2011). Doctoral writing in the visual and performing arts: Issues and debates. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 30(2), 242–255.
  16. Rust, C. (2007). Unstated contributions: How artistic inquiry can inform inter-disciplinary research. International Journal of Design, 1(3), 69–76.
  17. Schwarzenbach, J., & Hackett, P. (2015). Transatlantic reflections on the practice-based PhD in fine art. London, UK: Routledge.
  18. Sheikh, S. (2009). Objects of study or commodification of knowledge? Remarks on artistic research. Art & Research, 2(2), 1–8.
  19. Sivertsen, G. (2018). An attempt to create an indicator for performance-based funding for artistic research in Norway. In Ysebaert, W. & Van Kerckhoven, B. (Eds.) Evaluating art and design research: Reflections, evaluation practices and research presentations (pp. 93–109). Brussels, BE: VUB Press.
  20. Sullivan, G. (2006). Research acts in art practice. Studies in Art Education, 48(1), 19–35.
  21. Vanhaesebrouck, K. (2018). Measuring artistic research, or the real agenda behind Bologna in higher arts education. In Ysebaert, W. & Van Kerckhoven, B. (Eds.) Evaluating art and design research: Reflections, evaluation practices and research presentations (pp. 16–22). Brussels, BE: VUB Press.
  22. Wilson, J. (2016). The white cube in the black box: Assessing artistic research quality in multidisciplinary academic panels. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(8), 1223–1236.
  23. Wissler, R. (1997). Artistic practice and research: Towards a community of judgment. In Double Dialogues: The Arts and their Theoretical Paradigms Conference Proceedings (pp. 88–105). Melbourne, AU: Theatreworks.
  24. Ysebaert, W. & Martens, B. (2018). The ECOOM-VUB stakeholder-driven evaluation design for art and design research outcomes. In Ysebaert, W. & Van Kerckhoven, B. (Eds.) Evaluating art and design research: Reflections, evaluation practices and research presentations (pp. 93–109). Brussels, BE: VUB Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 35 - 54
Submitted on: Jun 7, 2019
Accepted on: Jul 22, 2019
Published on: Aug 30, 2019
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Florian Vanlee, Walter Ysebaert, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.