Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Practice and Challenge of International Peer Review: A Case Study of Research Evaluation of CAS Centers for Excellence Cover

Practice and Challenge of International Peer Review: A Case Study of Research Evaluation of CAS Centers for Excellence

By: Fang Xu and  Xiaoxuan Li  
Open Access
|Aug 2019

References

  1. Cheng, J.P., Li, X.X., & Xu, F. (2018). Science-evaluation reform on the road in China. National Science Review, 5(5), 605–605.
  2. Cheng, X. (2019). Tenure-track system activates teachers. Department of Physics, Tsinghua University. Retrieved from http://www.tsinghua.edu.cn/publish/thunews/9914/2011/20111111084759369801776/20111111084759369801776_.html
  3. DaiWai, M.O. (2019). Peer review is a collaborative process. Journal of Neuroscience Nursing, 51(3), 107–107.
  4. De Wit, K., Van Heffen, O., & Verhoeven, J. (1998). Government, higher education and the national economy. Case study of Flanders. doi: 10.13140/2.1.1431.5526
  5. Gunashekar, S., Wooding, S., & Guthrie, S. (2017). How do NIHR peer review panels use bibliometric information to support their decisions? Scientometrics, 112(3), 1813–1835.
  6. ISTIC, Statistical results of Chinese scientific papers in 2017. Retrieved from https://www.istic.ac.cn/ScienceEvaluateArticalShow/tabid/679/Default.aspx?ArticleID=97570
  7. KNAW, VSNU, NOW. (2014). Standard Evaluation Protocol 2015 – 2021, Protocol for Research Assessment in the Netherlands. Amsterdam: Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences. Retrieved from https://www.knaw.nl/nl/actueel/publicaties/standard-evaluation-protocol-2015-2021
  8. Marušić, A., Brezis, E., & Squazzoni, F. (2017). Scientometrics of peer review. Scientometrics, 113(1), 501–502.
  9. Peng, D.L. (2013). The Chinese Academy of Sciences invited international experts to evaluate the Institute of History of Natural Sciences. Studies in the History of Natural Sciences, 32(3), 423–426.
  10. Rousseau, R., Guns, R., Jakaria Rahman, A.I.M., & Engels, T. C.E. (2017). Measuring cognitive distance between publication portfolios. Journal of Informetrics, 11(2), 583–594.
  11. Shuai, L.Y. (2004). Evaluation experience of max planck society. Science and Technology Policy and Development Strategy, (11), 27–33.
  12. Wu, J., Liang, M., & Zheng, Y. (2012). International evaluation of NSFC’s performance by evidence-based design. Science Research Management, 33(6), 137–145.
  13. Xu, F., Liu, W.B., & Li, X.X. (2014). The method and enlightenment of REF research influence evaluation in UK. Science of Science and Management of S.&.T., 35(7), 9–15.
  14. Zhang, J. (2019). Thoughts on long-term international assessment in colleges and departments. Guangming Daily. Retrieved from http://plan.sjtu.edu.cn/info/1004/1004.htm
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2019-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 22 - 34
Submitted on: Jun 9, 2019
Accepted on: Aug 9, 2019
Published on: Aug 30, 2019
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2019 Fang Xu, Xiaoxuan Li, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.