Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Redesigning the Model of Book Evaluation in the Polish Performance-based Research Funding System Cover

Redesigning the Model of Book Evaluation in the Polish Performance-based Research Funding System

Open Access
|Dec 2018

References

  1. Aagaard, K., Bloch, C., & Schneider, J. W. (2015). Impacts of performance-based research funding systems: The case of the Norwegian Publication Indicator. Research Evaluation, 24(2), 106–117. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvv003
  2. Antonowicz, D., Kohoutek, J., Pinheiro, R., & Hladchenko, M. (2017). The roads of ‘excellence’ in Central and Eastern Europe. European Educational Research Journal, 16(5), 547–567. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1177/1474904116683186
  3. Basili, C., & Lanzillo, L. (2018). Research Quality Criteria in the Evaluation of Books. In A. Bonaccorsi (Ed.), The evaluation of research in Social Sciences and Humanities: Lessons from the Italian Experience (pp. 159–184). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  4. Biagetti, M. T., Iacono, A., & Trombone, A. (2018). Is the Diffusion of Books in Library Holdings a Reliable Indicator in Research Assessment? In A. Bonaccorsi (Ed.), The Evaluation of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities: Lessons from the Italian Experience (pp. 321–343). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  5. Giménez-Toledo, E., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., Engels, T. C. E., Guns, R., Kulczycki, E., Ochsner, M., & Zuccala, A. A. (2018). Taking scholarly books into account, part II: A comparison of 19 European countries in evaluation and funding. Submitted to Scientometrics.
  6. Giménez-Toledo, E., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., Engels, T. C. E., Ingwersen, P., Pölönen, J., Sivertsen, G., & Zuccala, A. A. (2016). Taking scholarly books into account: Current developments in five European countries. Scientometrics, 107(2), 685–699. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1886-5
  7. Giménez-Toledo, E., Mañana-Rodríguez, J., & Sivertsen, G. (2017). Scholarly book publishing: Its information sources for evaluation in the social sciences and humanities. Research Evaluation, 26(2), 91–101. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvx007
  8. Giménez Toledo, E. (2016). Assessment of journal & book publishers in the Humanities and Social Sciences in Spain. In M. Ochsner, S. E. Hug, & D. Hans-Dieter (Eds.), Research Assessment in the Humanities: Towards Criteria and Procedures (pp. 91–102). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_8
  9. Korytkowski, P., & Kulczycki, E. (n.d.). Examining how country-level science policy shapes publication patterns: The case of Poland. Submitted to Scientometrics.
  10. Kulczycki, E. (2017a). Assessing publications through a bibliometric indicator: The case of comprehensive evaluation of scientific units in Poland. Research Evaluation, 45(1), 41–52. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvw023
  11. Kulczycki, E. (2017b). Punktoza jako strategia w grze parametrycznej w Polsce. Nauka i Szkolnictwo Wyższe, 1(49), 63–78.
  12. Kulczycki, E. (2018). The diversity of monographs: Changing landscape of book evaluation in Poland. Aslib Journal of Information Management. Retrieved fromhttp://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2018-0062
  13. Kulczycki, E., Korzeń, M., & Korytkowski, P. (2017). Toward an excellence-based research funding system: Evidence from Poland. Journal of Informetrics, 11(1), 282–298. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.01.001
  14. Kulczycki, E., & Rozkosz, E. A. (2017). Does an expert-based evaluation allow us to go beyond the Impact Factor? Experiences from building a ranking of national journals in Poland. Scientometrics, 111(1), 417–442. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2261-x
  15. Mannana-Rodriguez, J., & Giménez-Toledo, E. (2018). Specialization and multidisciplinarity of scholarly book publishers: Differences between Spanish University Presses and other scholarly publishers. Scientometrics, 114(1), 19–30. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2563-z
  16. Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego. (2017). Narodowy Kongres Nauki. 19–20 września 2017 r.
  17. Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego. (2018a). Ewaluacja jakości działalności naukowej – przewodnik. Retrieved from https://www.nauka.gov.pl/g2/oryginal/2018_08/6e48e5dd4e469616354f861c105e25f6.pdf
  18. Ministerstwo Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego. Ustawa z 20 lipca 2018 r. Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce (2018).
  19. Sivertsen, G. (2016). Publication-Based Funding: The Norwegian Model. In M. Ochsner, S. E. Hug, & D. Hans-Dieter (Eds.), Research assessment in the humanities: Towards criteria and procedures (pp. 79–90). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29016-4_7
  20. Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-García, N., Cabezas-Clavijo, Á., & Jiménez-Contreras, E. (2013). Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: Edited books, book series and publisher types in the Book Citation Index. Scientometrics, 98(3), 2113–2127. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1168-4
  21. Verleysen, F. T., & Engels, T. C. E. (2014). Barycenter representation of book publishing internationalization in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 234–240. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.11.008
  22. Verleysen, F. T., Ghesquiere, P., & Engels, T. C. E. (2014). The objectives, design and selection process of the Flemish Academic Bibliographic Database for the Social Sciences and Humanities (VABB-SHW). In W. Blockmans, L. Engwall, & D. Weaire (Eds.), Bibliometrics Use and Abuse in the Review of Research Performance (pp. 117–127). London: Portland Press. Retrieved from http://www.portlandpress.com/pp/books/online/wg87/087/0117/0870117.pdf
  23. Zuccala, A., Breum, M., Bruun, K., & Wunsch, B. T. (2018). Metric assessments of books as families of works. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 69(1), 146–157. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23921
  24. Zuccala, A., & Cornacchia, R. (2016). Data matching, integration, and interoperability for a metric assessment of monographs. Scientometrics, 108(1), 465–484. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1911-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2018-0021 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 61 - 73
Submitted on: Aug 31, 2018
Accepted on: Oct 25, 2018
Published on: Dec 7, 2018
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Emanuel Kulczycki, Przemysław Korytkowski, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.