Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Minimum Representative Size in Comparing Research Performance of Universities: the Case of Medicine Faculties in Romania Cover

Minimum Representative Size in Comparing Research Performance of Universities: the Case of Medicine Faculties in Romania

Open Access
|Sep 2018

References

  1. ARWU (2018). Ranking Methodology of Academic Ranking of World Universities—2017. Retrieved from: http://www.shanghairanking.com/ARWU-Methodology-2017.html
  2. CWTS (2018). CWTS Leiden Ranking. Retrieved from: http://www.leidenranking.com/information/indicators
  3. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practise of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69, 131–152.
  4. Egghe, L. (2008). Modelling successive h-indices. Scientometrics, 77, 377–387.
  5. Hazelkorn, E. (2011). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: the battle for world-class excellence. Houndmills Basingstoke Hampshire; New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  6. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572.
  7. Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 16, 317–323.
  8. Molinari, J. F., & Molinari, A. (2008). A new methodology for ranking scientific institutions. Scientometrics. Retrieved from: https://akademiai.com/doi/abs/10.1007/s11192-007-1853-2
  9. MS (2009). Ordin nr. 1509/2008 privind aprobarea Nomenclatorului de specialităi medicale, medico-dentare şi farmaceutice pentru reeauă de asistenă medicală. Retrieved from: https://www.eshg.org/fileadmin/www.eshg.org/documents/countries/Roman
  10. Proteasa, V., Păunescu, M., & Miroiu, A. (2017). An extension of the characteristics scales and scores: Isolating interinstitutional from intra-institutional variance in highly skewed real population distributions. In 16th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, ISSI 2017 (pp. 1192–1203).
  11. QS (2016). QS World University Rankings. Retrieved from: https://www.topuniversities.com/qs-world-university-rankings/methodol.
  12. Seglen, P. O. (1992). The skewness of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science; New York, N.Y., 43.
  13. Shen, Z., Yang, L., Di, Z., & Wu, J. (2017). How large is large enough? In 16th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, ISSI 2017 (pp.302–313).
  14. Tol, R. S. J. (2008). A rational, successive g-index applied to economics departments in Ireland. Journal of Informetrics, 2, 149–155.
  15. Wasserman, L. (2004). All of Statistics. Springer New York.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2018-0013 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 32 - 42
Submitted on: Jun 27, 2018
Accepted on: Aug 27, 2018
Published on: Sep 27, 2018
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services

© 2018 Xiaoling Liu, Mihai Păunescu, Viorel Proteasa, Jinshan Wu, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.