References
- Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C.A. (2011). National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level. Scientometrics, 86(2), 347–364.10.1007/s11192-010-0297-2
- Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C.A. (2016). Refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications, as used in the Italian national research assessment exercise (VQR 2011–2014). Scientometrics, 109(3), 1–13.
- Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., & Di Costa, F. (2011). National research assessment exercises: A comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings. Scientometrics, 89: 929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0459-x.10.1007/s11192-011-0459-x
- Adam, D. (2002). Citation analysis: The counting house. Nature, 415(415), 726–729.10.1038/415726a
- Akademik Teşvik Ödeneği Yönetmeliği (By-law of Payment of Academic Incentive). (2015). Resmî Gazete. Retrieved from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2015/12/20151218-4.pdf.
- Albarrán, P., Crespo, J.A., Ortuño, I., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2011). The skewness of science in 219 subfields and a number of aggregates. Scientometrics, 88(2), 385–397.10.1007/s11192-011-0407-9
- Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance— An international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6), 822–834.10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003
- Butler, L. (2003). Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Research Policy, 32(1), 143–155.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00007-0
- Butler, L. (2004). What happens when funding is linked to publication counts? In H.F. Moed et al., (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (pp. 389–405). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
- Butler, L. (2017). Response to van den Besselaar et al.: What happens when the Australian context is misunderstood. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 919–922.10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.017
- Casadevall, A., & Fang, F.C. (2012). Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania. mBio, 5(2). Retrieved on April 28, 2017, from http://mbio.asm.org/content/5/2/e00064-14.full.pdf.
- Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. Data Collection Checklist. (2002). Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2pygx2N.
- De Boer, H., Jongbloed, B.W.A., Benneworth, S., Cremonini, L. Kolster, R., Kottmann, A., … & Vossensteyn, J.J. (2015). Performance-based Funding and Performance Agreements in Fourteen Higher Education Systems. Enschede: University of Twente. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274954335_Performance-based_funding_and_Performance_Agreements_in_fourteen_Higher_Education_Systems_Report_for_the_Ministry_of_Education_Culture_and_Science.
- European Commission (2010). Assessing Europe’s University-Based Research. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2oNukmM.
- Franzoni, C., Scellato, G., & Stephan, P. (2011). Changing incentives to publish. Science, 33(6043), 702–703.
- Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(4060), 471–479.507970110.1126/science.178.4060.471
- Geuna, A., & Martin, B. (2003). University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison. Minerva, 41(4), 277–304.10.1023/B:MINE.0000005155.70870.bd
- Good, B., Vermeulen, N., Tiefenthaler, B., & Arnold, E. (2015). Counting quality? The Czech performance-based research funding system. Research Evaluation, 24(2), 91–105.10.1093/reseval/rvu035
- Glänzel, W., & Moed, H.F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171–193.10.1023/A:1014848323806
- Herbst, M. (2007). Financing public universities: The case of performance funding. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Heywood, J.S., Wei, X., & Ye, G. (2011). Piece rates for professors. Economics Letters, 113(3), 285–287.10.1016/j.econlet.2011.08.005
- Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261.10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007
- Hicks, D. (2017). What year? Difficulties in identifying the effect of policy on university output. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 933–936.10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.020
- Interrupted time series analysis. (2013). Retrieved on April 28, 2017, from http://bit.ly/2qtEx48.
- Kamalski, J. et al. (2017). World of Research 2015: Revealing Patterns and Archetypes in Scientific Research. Elsevier Analytic Services. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2pMTWjE.
- Larivière, V., Kiermer, V., MacCallum, C., … & Curry, S. (2016). A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions. Retrieved from http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/09/11/062109.full.pdf.
- McDowall, D., McCleary, R., Meidinger, E.E., & Hay, R.A. (1980). Interrupted Time Series Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.
- Osuna, C., Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2011). Overturning some assumptions about the effects of evaluation systems on publication performance. Scientometrics, 86(3), 575–592.10.1007/s11192-010-0312-7
- Önder, C., Şevkli, M., Altinok, T., & Tavukçuoğlu, C. (2008). Institutional change and scientific research: A preliminary bibliometric analysis of institutional influences on Turkey’s recent social science publications. Scientometrics, 76(3), 543–560.10.1007/s11192-007-1878-6
- Schneider, J.W. (2009). An outline of the bibliometric indicator used for performance-based funding of research institutions in Norway. European Political Science, 8(3), 364–378.10.1057/eps.2009.19
- Seglen, P.O. (1997, February 5). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314(7079), 498–502. Retrieved from http://www.dcscience.net/seglen97.pdf.
- Shao, J., & Shen, H. (2012). Research assessment: The overemphasized impact factor in China. Research Evaluation, 21(3), 199–203.10.1093/reseval/rvs011
- TÜBİTAK Türkiye Adresli Uluslararasi Bilimsel Yayinlari Teşvik (UBYT) Programi Uygulama Usul ve Esaslari. (2016). Retrieved from http://cabim.ulakbim.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2015/09/2016-Y%C4%B1l%C4%B1-UBYT-Program%C4%B1-Uygulama-Esaslar%C4%B1.pdf.
- Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2017). Does China need to rethink its metrics- and citations-based research reward policies?Scientometrics, 112(3), 1853–1857.10.1007/s11192-017-2430-y
- Tonta, Y. (2014). Use and misuse of bibliometric measures for assessment of academic performance, tenure and publication support. In the 77th Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science and Technology, October 31 - November 5, 2014, Seattle, WA. http://bit.ly/2ghe6Ph.
- Tonta, Y. (2015). Support programs to increase the number of scientific publications using bibliometric measures: The Turkish case. In A.A. Salah et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 29 June to 4 July, 2015 (pp. 767–777). Istanbul: Boğaziçi University.
- Tonta, Y (2017a). Does monetary support increase the number of scientific papers? An interrupted time series analysis. Paper presented at ISSI 2017: 16th International Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, 16–20 October 2017, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2kXc9cJ.
- Tonta, Y. (2017b). TÜBİTAK Tüurkiye Adresli Uluslararasi Bilimsel Yayinlari Teşvik (UBYT) Programinin Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara: TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM. Retrieved from http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~tonta/yayinlar/tonta-tubitak-ubyt-programinin-degerlendirilmesi.pdf.
- van den Besselaar, P., Heyman, U., & Sandström, U. (2017). Perverse effects of output-based research funding? Butler’s Australian case revisited. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 905–918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.016.10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.016
- van Raan, A.F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133–143.10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6
- Wouters, P., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., Rushforth, A. & Franssen, T. (2015). The metric tide literature review: Supplementary report I to the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/IHliqle.
- Yuret, T. (2017). Do researchers pay attention to publication subsidies? Journal of Informetrics, 11(2), 423–434.10.1016/j.joi.2017.02.010
- Yurtsever, E., Gülgöz, S., Yedekçioğlu, Ö.A., & Tonta, M. (2001). Sosyal Bilimler Atif Dizini’nde (SSCI) Türkiye 1970–1999 (Turkey in Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI): 1970–1999). Ankara: Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi.
- Yurtsever, E., Gülgöz, S., Yedekçioğlu, Ö.A., & Tonta, M. (2002). Sağlik Bilimleri, Mühendislik ve Temel Bilimlerde Türkiye’nin Uluslararasi Atif Dizinindeki Yeri 1973–1999 (Turkey’s Place in Health Sciences, Engineering and Basic Sciences in International Citation Index). Ankara: Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi.
- Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Sivertsen, G. (2017). Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen’s work on journal impact and research evaluation. PLoS ONE, 12(3), e0174205. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0174205.2835084910.1371/journal.pone.0174205