Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The F-measure for Research Priority Cover
By: Ronald Rousseau  
Open Access
|Mar 2018

References

  1. Aksnes, D.W., van Leeuwen, T.N., & Sivertsen, G. (2014). The effect of booming countries on changes in the relative specialization index (RSI) on country level. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1391–1401.10.1007/s11192-014-1245-3
  2. Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalisation and ‘revealed’ comparative advantage. Manchester School of Economic & Social Studies, 33, 99–123.10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x
  3. Bhattacharya, S. (1997). Cross-national comparison of frontier areas of research in physics using bibliometric indicators. Scientometrics, 40(3), 385–405.10.1007/BF02459288
  4. Bouyssou, D., & Marchant, T. (2011). Ranking scientists and departments in a consistent manner. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(9), 1761–1769.10.1002/asi.21544
  5. Chen, G., & Xiao, L. (2016). Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 212–223.10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.006
  6. Egghe, L., & Rousseau, R. (2002). A general framework for general impact indicators. The Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science / La revue canadienne des sciences de l’information et de bibliothéconomie, 27(1), 29–48.
  7. Engels, T.C.E., Ossenblok, T.L.B., & Spruyt, E.H.J. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009. Scientometrics, 93(2), 373–390.10.1007/s11192-012-0680-2
  8. Frame, J.D. (1977). Mainstream research in Latin America and the Caribbean. Interciencia, 2, 143–148.
  9. Glänzel, W. (2000). Science in Scandinavia: A bibliometric approach. Scientometrics, 48(2), 121–150.10.1023/A:1005640604267
  10. Guan, J.C., & Gao, X. (2008). Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 357–379.10.1007/s11192-007-1871-0
  11. Hu, X.J., & Rousseau, R. (2009). A comparative study of the difference in research performance in biomedical fields among selected Western and Asian countries. Scientometrics, 81(2), 475–491.10.1007/s11192-008-2202-9
  12. Lamirel, J.C. (2012). A new approach for automatizing the analysis of research topics dynamics: Application to optoelectronics research. Scientometrics, 93(1), 155–166.
  13. Li, F., Miao, Y.J., & Ding, J. (2015). Tracking the development of disciplinary structure in China’s top research universities (1998–2013). Research Evaluation, 24(3), 312–324.10.1093/reseval/rvv013
  14. Manning, C.D., Raghavan, P., & Schütze, H. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge: University Press.
  15. Nagpaul, P.S., & Sharma, L. (1995). Science in the eighties: A typology of countries based on inter-field priorities. Scientometrics, 34(2), 263–283.10.1007/BF02020424
  16. Ramakrishnan, J., & Thavamani, K. (2015). Indian contributions to the field of leptospirosis (2006–2013): A bibliometric study. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, 9(2), 235–249.10.1080/09737766.2015.1069962
  17. Rousseau, R. (2012). Thoughts about the activity index and its formal analogues. ISSI Newsletter, 8(4), 73–75.
  18. Rousseau, R., & Yang, L.Y. (2012). Reflections on the activity index and related indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 6(3), 413–421.10.1016/j.joi.2012.01.004
  19. Sangam, S.L., Arali, U.B., Patil, C.G., & Rousseau, R. (2017). Growth of the hepatitis literature over the period 1976–2015: What can the relative priority index teach us? Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Webometrics, Informetrics, and Scientometrics (WIS) and 18th COLLNET Meeting, July 2017, Canterbury.
  20. Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact. Scientometrics, 9(5–6), 281–291.10.1007/BF02017249
  21. Stare, J., & Kejžar, N. (2014). On standardization of the activity index. Journal of Informetrics, 8(3), 503–507.10.1016/j.joi.2014.04.004
  22. Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2008). A structural analysis of publication profiles for the classification of European research institutes. Scientometrics, 74(2), 223–236.10.1007/s11192-008-0214-0
  23. Vinkler, P. (2010). The evaluation of research by Scientometric indicators. Oxford: Chandos.
  24. Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Glänzel, W. (2011). Document-type country profiles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 62(7), 1403–1411.10.1002/asi.21537
  25. Zhou, P., Thijs, B., & Glänzel, W. (2009). Regional analysis on Chinese scientific output. Scientometrics, 81(3), 839–857.10.1007/s11192-008-2255-9
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jdis-2018-0001 | Journal eISSN: 2543-683X | Journal ISSN: 2096-157X
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 18
Submitted on: Nov 1, 2017
Accepted on: Dec 25, 2017
Published on: Mar 13, 2018
Published by: Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2018 Ronald Rousseau, published by Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Science Library
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.