Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The Use of Simulation and Deep Learning Models in the Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Case Report Cover

The Use of Simulation and Deep Learning Models in the Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Case Report

Open Access
|Jun 2023

References

  1. Kaller R, Mureșan AV, Popa DG, Arbănași EM, Russu E. Fatal Aortoduodenal Fistula Caused by a Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm – a Case Report. Journal of Cardiovascular Emergencies. 2021;7:129–132. doi: 10.2478/jce-2021-0015.
  2. Arbănași EM, Russu E, Mureșan AV, Arbănași EM. Late Rupture of a Thrombosed Aortic Abdominal Aneurysm – a Case Report. Journal Of Cardiovascular Emergencies. 2021;7:84–87. doi: 10.2478/jce-2021-0012.
  3. Mărginean L, Mureșan AV, Arbănași EM, et al. Transarterial Embolization of Ruptured Pancreaticoduodenal Artery Pseudoaneurysm Related to Chronic Pancreatitis. Diagnostics. 2023;13:1090. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13061090.
  4. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. 2003;362:103–110. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13860-3.
  5. Rinkel GJE. Intracranial aneurysm screening: indications and advice for practice. Lancet Neurol. 2005;4:122–128. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(05)00993-2.
  6. Arbănași EM, Mureșan AV, Coșarcă CM, et al. Computed Tomography Angiography Markers and Intraluminal Thrombus Morphology as Predictors of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Rupture. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022;19:15961. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315961.
  7. Filep RC, Constantin C, Arbănași EM, Mureșan AV, Russu E, Mărginean L. Endovascular treatment of an aneurysm associated with fenestration of the supraclinoid internal carotid artery: Case report and review of the literature. Frontiers in Neurology. 2022;13:966642. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.966642.
  8. Connolly ES, Rabinstein AA, Carhuapoma JR, et al. Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2012;43:1711–1737. doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3182587839.
  9. Kadirvel R, Ding YH, Dai D, Rezek I, Lewis DA, Kallmes DF. Cellular mechanisms of aneurysm occlusion after treatment with a flow diverter. Radiology. 2014;270:394–399. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13130796.
  10. 10.Chen J, Zhang Y, Tian Z, et al. Relationship between haemodynamic changes and outcomes of intracranial aneurysms after implantation of the pipeline embolisation device: a single centre study. Interv Neuroradiol. 2019;25:671–680. doi: 10.1177/1591019919849673.
  11. 11.Briganti F, Leone G, Marseglia M, et al. Endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverter devices: A systematic review. Neuroradiol J. 2015;28:365–375. doi: 10.1177/1971400915602803.
  12. 12.Becske T, Kallmes DF, Saatci I, et al. Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial. Radiology. 2013;267:858–868. doi: 10.1148/radiol.13120099.
  13. 13.Lee KS, Zhang JJY, Nguyen V, et al. The evolution of intracranial aneurysm treatment techniques and future directions. Neurosurg Rev. 2022;45:1–25. doi: 10.1007/s10143-021-01543-z.
  14. 14.Mantilla D, Ferreira-Prada CA, Galvis M, et al. Clinical impact of Sim & Size® simulation software in the treatment of patients with cerebral aneurysms with flow-diverter Pipeline stents. Interv Neuroradiol. 2023;29:47–55. doi: 10.1177/15910199211068668.
  15. 15.Chiu AH, Nadarajah M, Wenderoth JD. Cost analysis of intracranial aneurysmal repair by endovascular coiling versus flow diversion: at what size should we use which method? J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2013;57:423–426. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12040.
  16. 16.Shapiro M, Raz E, Becske T, Nelson PK. Variable porosity of the pipeline embolization device in straight and curved vessels: a guide for optimal deployment strategy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014;35:727–733. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3742.
  17. 17.Chueh JY, Wakhloo AK, Gounis MJ. Neurovascular modeling: small-batch manufacturing of silicone vascular replicas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009;30:1159–1164. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1543.
  18. 18.Ionita CN, Mokin M, Varble N, et al. Challenges and limitations of patient-specific vascular phantom fabrication using 3D Polyjet printing. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2014;9038:90380M. doi: 10.1117/12.2042266.
  19. 19.Sarrami-Foroushani A, Lassila T, Gooya A, Geers AJ, Frangi AF. Uncertainty quantification of wall shear stress in intracranial aneurysms using a data-driven statistical model of systemic blood flow variability. J Biomech. 2016;49:3815–3823. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.10.005.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jce-2023-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2457-5518 | Journal ISSN: 2457-550X
Language: English
Page range: 32 - 37
Submitted on: Jun 5, 2023
|
Accepted on: Jun 17, 2023
|
Published on: Jun 30, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Lucian Mărginean, Vlad Vunvulea, Claudiu Constantin Ciucanu, Tudor Jovin, Bogdan Andrei Suciu, published by Asociatia Transilvana de Terapie Transvasculara si Transplant KARDIOMED
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.