Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Midodrine initiation criteria, dose titration, and adverse effects when administered to treat shock: A systematic review and semi-quantitative analysis Cover

Midodrine initiation criteria, dose titration, and adverse effects when administered to treat shock: A systematic review and semi-quantitative analysis

Open Access
|Jan 2025

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) flow diagram

Patient characteristics and outcomes of included studies

StudySubjectsIllness Severity*Shock TypeRenal Function* (SCr in mg/dL)Level of CareICU LOS, d Hospital LOS, dICU Mortality, n (%) Hospital Mortality, n (%)
Ahmed Ali 2022
  • TICU

  • n=30 MID

  • n=30 Control

NRSpinal
  • MID first day SCr 0.72 ± 0.39

  • Control first day SCr 1.02 ± 0.59

  • p=0.005

  • MID last day SCr 1.04 ± 0.62

  • Control last day SCr 1.39 ± 1.27

  • p=0.276

ICU
  • ICU

  • MID 5.13 ± 1.83

  • Control 9.03 ± 3.74

  • p<0.001

  • Hospital—NR

NR
Costa-Pinto 2022
  • MICU

  • n=32 MID

  • n=30 Control

  • APACHE III

  • MID 49.5 (41, 56.25)

  • Control 48.5 (38.25, 58)

  • p=0.76

Septic; post-op
  • MID SCr 0.82 (0.66, 1.17)

  • Control SCr 0.83 (0.64, 1.00)

  • p=0.53

ICU
  • ICU

  • MID 2.08 (1.06, 3.08)

  • Control 2.46 (1.6, 3.89)

  • p=0.14

  • Hospital

  • MID 9 (5.75, 25.25)

  • Control 7.5 (6, 14.5)

  • p=0.92

  • ICU

  • MID 1 (3.1%)

  • Control 0 (0%)

  • p>0.99

  • Hospital

  • MID 3 (9.4%)

  • Control 2 (6.7%)

  • p>0.99

Davoudi-Monfared 2021
  • General ICU

  • n=15 MID

  • n=13 Control

  • APACHE II

  • MID 17.06 ± 3.15

  • Control 16.15 ± 4.01

  • p=0.10

  • SOFA

  • MID 7.5 ± 2.17

  • Control 8.3 ± 2.25

  • p=0.99

Septic
  • MID SCr 1.2 (0.9,1.7)

  • Control SCr 1.3 (0.85, 1.95)

  • p=0.95

ICU
  • ICU

  • MID 8 (4, 15)

  • Control 12 (4.5, 20)

  • p=0.55

  • Hospital—NR

  • ICU—NR

  • Hospital (28-d)

  • MID 8 (55.4%)

  • Control 9 (69.2%)

  • p=0.32

Hussein El Adly 2022
  • General ICU

  • n=30 MID

  • n=30 Control

  • APACHE II**

  • MID 24 (13–39)

  • Control 21.5 (7–39)

  • SOFA**

  • MID 11.5 (13–39)

  • Control 9 (3–20)

SepticNRICU
  • ICU

  • Control 11.9 ± 7

  • MID 11.5 ± 6.8

  • p=0.876

  • Hospital—NR

  • ICU

  • Control 22 (73.3%)

  • MID 13 (43.4%)

  • p=0.018

  • Hospital—NR

Kim 2021
  • ICU to Floor

  • n=19 MID

  • n=132 Control

NRNRNRFloor (post-ICU)
  • ICU

  • MID 4.1 ± 3.8

  • Hospital

  • MID 13.3 ± 12.2

  • ICU—NR

  • Hospital

  • Association between MID and mortality: OR 7.5 (1.3–44.5);

  • p=0.03

Lal 2021
  • MICU

  • n=17 MID

  • n=15 Placebo

  • SOFA

  • MID 6.8 ± 3.3

  • Placebo 6.3 ± 2.6

  • p=0.64

Septic
  • MID SCr 2.0 ± 0.9

  • Placebo SCr 1.4 ± 0.6

  • p=0.03

ICU
  • ICU

  • MID 2.29 (1.5, 3.9)

  • Placebo 2.45 (1.6, 3.2)

  • p=0.36

  • Hospital

  • MID 7 (3.5, 10.5)

  • Placebo 7 (4, 12)

  • p=0.41

NR
Levine 2013
  • SICU

  • n=20 MID

  • APACHE II

  • MID 18 ± 6

Post-opMID SCr 0.74 ± 0.28ICU
  • ICU time from MID initiation to discharge 4 (3, 6)

  • Hospital time from MID initiation to discharge 8.5 (5, 16)

  • ICU

  • 1 (5%)

  • Hospital

  • 1 (5%)

Macielak 2021
  • General ICU

  • n=33 MID

  • Floor

  • n=11 MID

NRNRMID SCr 1.56 (0.85, 2.33)Any
  • ICU

  • 12 (5, 27)

  • Hospital—NR

  • ICU—NR

  • Hospital

  • 13 (29.5%)

Poveromo 2016
  • MICU, SICU, CVICU, NICU, TICU

  • n=94 MID

  • n= 94 Control

  • APACHE IV

  • MID 59 (44, 83)

  • Control 82 (66, 93)

  • p=0.02

Cardiogenic; Spinal; Post-op; SepticNRICU
  • ICU

  • MID 5.5 (3, 14.8)

  • Control 5 (3, 10)

  • p=0.29

  • Hospital

  • MID 12 (8, 21.8)

  • Control 9.5 (5, 16)

  • p<0.01

  • ICU—NR

  • Hospital

  • MID 8 (8.5%)

  • Control 21 (22.3%)

  • P=0.01

Rizvi 2018
  • MICU, SICU, CTICU, TICU, NICU, CICU

  • n=1119 MID

  • n=456 no IVP

  • n=663 yes

  • IVP

  • APACHE III

  • MID (no IVP) 76 (62, 93)

  • MID (yes IVP) 78 (62, 96)

Cardiogenic; Spinal; Septic
  • SCr before MID: 1.96

  • SCr 24 h after MID: 1.94

  • p=0.3

ICU
  • ICU

  • MID (no IVP) 4 (2, 9)

  • MID (yes IVP) 6 (3, 14)

  • Hospital

  • MID (no IVP) 15 (8, 31)

  • MID (yes IVP) 18 (8, 37)

  • ICU

  • MID (no IVP) 35 (8%)

  • MID (yes IVP) 74 (11%)

  • Hospital

  • MID (no IVP) 77 (17%)

  • MID (yes IVP) 129 (19%)

Rizvi 2019
  • MICU, SICU, CTICU, TICU, NICU, CICU

  • n=1010 MID

  • APACHE III

  • MID 78 ± 25.6

Cardiogenic; SepticNRICU
  • ICU

  • MID continued at ICU discharge 8.5d ± 10.7

  • MID stopped at ICU discharge 10.6 ± 13.4

  • Hospital—NR

  • ICU—NR

  • Hospital

  • MID continued at ICU discharge

  • HR 0.45 (0.30–0.68), p<0.001

  • 1-year

  • MID continued at ICU discharge

  • HR 1.56 (1.23–1.99) p<0.001

Santer 2020
  • SICU, MICU

  • n=66 MID

  • n=66 Placebo

  • APACHE II

  • MID 14.7 ± 5.5

  • Placebo 14.8 ± 5.9

Septic; Post-op; Other
  • MID SCr 0.8 (0.6, 1.0)

  • Placebo SCr 0.9 (0.6, 1.3)

ICU
  • ICU

  • MID 6 (5, 8)

  • Placebo 6 (4, 8)

  • p=0.46

  • Hospital

  • MID 11 (9, 21)

  • Placebo 14 (9, 22)

  • p=0.45

NR
Tremblay 2020
  • CTICU

  • n=74 MID

  • n=74 Control

  • Euroscore II

  • MID 1.94 (1, 2.91)

  • Control 2.08 (1.31, 4)

  • p=0.088

Vasoplegia after cardiac surgery
  • Acute kidney injury:

  • MID 11 (14.9%)

  • Control 10 (13.5%)

  • p=0.462

ICU
  • ICU

  • MID 4.13 (2.83, 6.08)

  • Control 2.83 (2, 4.13)

  • p=0.001

  • Hospital—NR

  • ICU—NR

  • Hospital

  • MID 10 (13.5%)

  • Control 1 (1.4%)

  • p=0.036

Whitson 2016
  • MICU

  • n=135 MID

  • n=140 Control

  • APACHE IV

  • MID 82.6 ± 26.4

  • Control 84.3 ± 26.8

  • p=0.55

Septic
  • Change in SCr:

  • MID 0.5 ± 1.3

  • Control 0.8 ± 1.6

  • p=0.048

ICU
  • ICU

  • MID 7.5 ± 5.9

  • Control 9.4 ± 6.7

  • p=0.017

  • Hospital

  • MID 21.9 ± 14.4

  • Control 24.2 ± 14.3

  • p=0.3

  • ICU

  • MID 15 (11.1%)

  • Control 26 (18.6%)

  • p=0.08

  • Hospital

  • MID 31 (23%)

  • Control 32 (25.7%)

  • p=0.6

Wood 2022
  • SICU, MICU

  • n=19 MID

  • n=42 Control

  • APACHE II

  • MID 15 (12, 17)

  • Control 18.5 (17, 25)

Septic, Post-op, OtherNRICU or step down unit
  • ICU

  • MID 7 (6, 13)

  • Control 6 (5, 6)

  • p=0.0058

  • Hospital

  • MID 26 (14, 51)

  • Control 14 (10, 17)

  • p=0.022

NR

Design of included studies

StudyDesignCountryInclusion CriteriaExclusion CriteriaPrimary Outcome
Ahmed Ali 2022RCT; blinding unclear; single centerEgyptSpinal shock in the ICU; age ≥18 years; hemodynamically stable on low-dose NE (<8 mcg/min) monotherapyAnuric or oliguric; CKD; allergyTotal duration of IVP
Costa-Pinto 2022Pilot RCT; open-label; multicenterAustralia and New ZealandAdmitted to the ICU; age ≥18 years; clinically stable with hypotension for >24 hours requiring low-dose IVP (≤10 mcg/min of NE or ≤100 mcg/min of metaraminol) monotherapyLactate >4 mmol/L; renal failure; hemorrhagic, obstructive, or cardiogenic shock; liver failure; severe heart disease; acute brain pathology; pregnancy; thyrotoxicosis; bradycardia (HR <50 bpm), NPO or fed via jejunal tube; allergyTime from randomization to discontinuation of IVP
Davoudi-Monfared 2021Pilot RCT; open-label, single-centerIranSeptic shock (MAP <65 mmHg and lactate ≥2 mg/dL despite fluid resuscitation) in the ICU; age ≥18 years; requiring IVP≥24 hours since septic shock onset; CKD (GFR <30 mL/min); neurogenic bladder and urination disorders; PAD; scleroderma, bradycardia (HR <60 bpm); MID PTALactate clearance at 4, 24 and 48 hours
Hussein El Adly 2022RCT; open label; single-centerEgyptSeptic shock in the ICU; age 18–80 years; hypotension (SBP <90 mmHg and MAP <65 mmHg) for >24 hours requiring IVPHypovolemic shock; HF (EF <30%); CKD (SCr >2 mg/dL); thyrotoxicosis; pheochromocytoma; CMO; DDI (MAOIs, alpha-1 blockers, TCAs); orthostatic hypotension; bradycardia (HR <50 bpm); MID PTA; NPO; allergyTotal duration of IVP; duration of IVP wean; cumulative dose of IVP
Kim 2021Retrospective cohort study; single centerUSAPatients admitted to ICU from ED then transferred to floorICU mortality; admitted to ICU due to diabetic ketoacidosis or tissue plasminogen activator administrationICU readmission; rapid response team activation; hospital LOS; in-hospital mortality; 30 day hospital readmission
Lal 2021Pilot RCT; double-blinded; multicenterUSA; United Arab EmiratesSeptic shock (MAP <70 mmHg and SBP <130 mmHg despite antibiotics and fluids 30 mL/kg) in the ICU; age ≥18 yearsACS or EF <30%; GIB; obstructive or cardiogenic shock; lactate > 4 mmol/L; acute intraabdominal process; transferred from outside facility; cardiac arrest; child-bearing age; thyrotoxicosis; pheochromocytoma; PAD or ischemic bowel; CMO; DDI (MAOIs); bradycardia (HR <40 bpm); MID PTA; NPO; allergyDuration of IVP in the first 24 hours
Levine 2013Prospective cohort study; single-centerUSAAdmitted to the SICU; age ≥18 years; clinically stable (otherwise discharge ready) with hypotension for >24 hours requiring low-dose IVP (phenylephrine <150 mcg/min or NE <8 mcg/min)Hypovolemic shock; adrenal insufficiency; <3 doses of MID; orthostatic hypotension; MID PTATime from MID initiation to discontinuation of IVP; Change in IVP rate before/after MID initiation
Macielak 2021Retrospective cohort study; single centerUSAAge ≥18 years; receiving MID dosed “four times daily” or “every six hours”Incarcerated; pregnancyCharacterization of patients receiving MID “four times daily” or “every six hours”
Poveromo 2016Retrospective cohort study; single-centerUSAAdmitted to the ICU with diagnosis related to cardiovascular, trauma, or sepsis; age ≥18 years; requiring ≥1 IVPICU mortality within 24 hours; duration of IVP <2 hours; <3 doses of MID; MID for indication other than IVP weaningTime from MID initiation to discontinuation of IVP
Rizvi 2018Retrospective case series; single-centerUSAAdmitted to the ICU; age ≥18 years; initiated on MIDMID PTACumulative dose of IVP at MID initiation and 24 hours; MAP at MID initiation and 24 hours
Rizvi 2019Retrospective case series; single-centerUSAAdmitted to the ICU; age ≥18 years; initiated on MIDICU mortality; MID PTAIncidence of MID continuation after ICU discharge
Santer 2020RCT; double-blinded; multicenterUSA, AustraliaAdmitted to the ICU or step-down unit; age ≥18 years; clinically stable with hypotension for >24 hours requiring low-dose (<100 mcg/min phenylephrine, <8 mcg/min of NE, or <60 mcg/min of metaraminol) IVP monotherapyClinical evidence of inadequate tissue oxygenation; adrenal insufficiency; liver failure; CKD (SCr >2 mg/dL); HF (EF <30%); acute urinary retention; pheochromocytoma; thyrotoxicosis; pregnancy; bradycardia (HR <50 bpm); MID PTA; NPO; allergyTime from randomization to discontinuation of IVP
Tremblay 2020Retrospective propensity matched cohort study; single centerCanadaAdmitted to the ICU following cardiac surgery requiring CPB; age ≥18 years; hypotension requiring IVP for >12 hours post-surgeryMID before surgery; mechanical circulatory support before surgery; emergency surgery; transplantation; cirrhosisNumber of days alive and free from ICU at 30 days
Whitson 2016Retrospective cohort study; single-centerUSASeptic shock in the ICU; clinically stable with hypotension for >24 hours requiring IVPNRTotal duration of IVP; ICU LOS
Wood 2022Retrospective case-control; single centerAustraliaAdmitted to ICU or step-down unit; age ≥18; clinically stable with hypotension for >24 hours requiring low-dose (<8 mcg/min of NE or <60 mcg/min of metaraminol) IVP monotherapyClinical evidence of inadequate tissue oxygenation; adrenal insufficiency; liver failure; CKD (SCr >2 mg/dL); HF (EF <30%); acute urinary retention; pheochromocytoma; thyrotoxicosis; pregnancy; bradycardia (HR <50 bpm); NPO; allergyTime from intervention to discontinuation of IVP

Midodrine Use

StudyProtocolProtocol detailsInitial Dose/FrequencyMax Dose/FrequencyTitration vs. Fixed DoseStart Before, With or After PressorsDuration of Midodrine (d)Route of AdminContinued at ICU Discharge n (%)Continued at Hospital Discharge n (%)
Ahmed Ali 2022Yes4 doses of MID, then IVP weaning initiated10 mg every 8 h10 mg every 8 hFixedAfterNRPONoNo
Costa-Pinto 2022Yes
  • MID administered until off IVP for at least 24 h

  • Wean: 7.5 mg every 8 h for 24 h, then 5 mg every 8 h for 24 h, then DC

10 mg every 8 h10 mg every 8 hFixedAfterNRNRYesNR
Davoudi-Monfared 2021YesRandomly assigned to adjunctive MID to facilitate IVP wean10 mg TID10 mg TIDFixedWithUp to 5 dIf conscious, PO; if not, via NGTNRNR
Hussein El Adly 2022YesRandomly assigned to adjunctive midodrine to facilitate IVP wean10 mg TID10 mg TIDFixedAfterNRPO tablet or crushed (via Ryle)NRNR
Kim 2021NoNo protocolNRNRNRNRNRNR19 (12.6)NR
Lal 2021YesIf septic shock without response to antibiotics and fluids, randomized to MID or placebo10 mg every 8 h10 mg every 8 hFixedAfter or monotherapy3 dosesPONoNo
Levine 2013NoNo protocolNR20 mg TIDTitration; no detailsAfter4 (3–7)PONRNR
Macielak 2021NoNo protocolNR20 mg every 6 hTitration
  • After n=23 (52.3%)

  • Continued from home n=18 (40.9%)

  • Monotherapy n=3 (6.8%)

NRNRYesYes
Poveromo 2016NoNo protocolNR10 mg every 4 hTitrationAfter4.4 (3.2, 7.8)NRNRNR
Rizvi 2018NoNo protocolNR30 mg every 8 hTitration
  • After (59%);

  • Before (41%)

NRPONRNR
Rizvi 2019NoNo protocolNR40 mg every 8 hTitration
  • After: 58%

  • Before or monotherapy: 42%

11.8 ± 20.9PO672 (67)311 (34)
Santer 2020YesRandomized to MID or placebo until ICU discharge. DC’ed with stable at goal blood pressure at discretion of clinical team per a standardized weaning protocol (decrease dose every 1–2 d from 20 mg to 10 mg every 8 h, then 5 mg every 8 h, then DC)20 mg every 8 h20 mg every 8 hFixedAfter at least 24 h of IVP1.77 (0.98, 2.97)PONRNo
Tremblay 2020NoNo protocol10 mg TID (for n=61, 82.4%)Only n=2 with doses >10 mg; All TIDMajority fixed. Progressive tapering for n=19 (26%)After at least 12 h of IVP1.67 (0.96, 3.04)NR17 (23)NR
Whitson 2016NoNo protocol10 mg every 8 h40 mg every 8 hTitrationAfter at least 24 h of IVP
  • 6.15

  • For patients who were not discharged on MID (n=117, 86.7%)

NRYes18 (13.3)
Wood 2022NoStarted on MID at discretion of treatment team. If enrolled, MID administered until at least 24 h after DC of IVP20 mg every 8 h20 mg every 8 hFixedAfterNRPONRNR

Intravenous Vasopressor Use

StudyPercent of patients on IVP at MID initiation, n (%)Number of IVP at MID initiationNEE at MID initiationTime to IVP discontinuation (h)Need to restart IVP, n (%)
Ahmed Ali 2022
  • MID 30 (100)

  • Control 30 (100)

1 (NE only)NR; inclusion criteria <8 mcg/min NE
  • MID 79.2 ± 31.7

  • Control 166.3 ± 55.7

  • p<0.001

NR
Costa-Pinto 2022
  • MID 32 (100)

  • Control 30 (100)

1 (NE or metaraminol)NR; inclusion criteria <10 mcg/min NE or <100 mcg/min metaraminol
  • MID 16.5 (7.2, 27.5)

  • Control 19 (12.2, 38.5)

  • p=0.32

  • MID 6 (18.8)

  • Control 4 (13.3)

  • p=0.73

Davoudi-Monfared 2021
  • MID 15 (100)

  • Control 13 (100)

1 (NE only)
  • Midodrine median NEE 0.14 mcg/kg/min

  • Control median NEE 0.13 mcg/kg/min

  • MID 96 (48, 192)

  • Control 120 (72, 264)

  • p=0.36

  • MID 4 (26.7)

  • Control 5 (38.5)

  • p=0.39

Hussein El Adly 2022
  • MID 30 (100)

  • Control 30 (100)

1 (NE only)
  • Midodrine median NEE 0.08, range 0.04–0.21 mcg/kg/min

  • Control median NEE 0.11, range 0.02–0.35 mcg/kg/min

  • MID 26 (14, 106)

  • Control 78.5 (32, 280)

  • p<0.001

  • MID 3 (10%)

  • Control 3 (10%)

Kim 2021All 73 (48.3)NRNRNRNR
Lal 2021
  • MID 11 (52.4)

  • Placebo 10 (47.6)

NRNR
  • Requiring IVP at 12 h:

  • MID 41.2% vs Control 60%

  • p=0.29

NR
Levine 2013MID 20 (100)1 (NE or PE)Midodrine mean NEE 4.1 mcg/minMID 17 (7, 38.4)NR
Macielak 2021MID 23 (52.3)NRMidodrine mean NEE 0.1 mcg/kg/minNRNR
Poveromo 2016
  • MID 94 (100)

  • Control 94 (100)

  • MID: 1 (40.4%), 2 (41.5%), 3+ (18.1%)

  • Control: 1 (62.8%), 2 (24.4%), 3+ (12.8%)

  • Midodrine median NEE 0.05 (0.03, 0.08) mcg/kg/min

  • Control median NEE 0.05 (0.03, 0.08) mcg/kg/min

  • MID 28.8 (12, 67.2)

  • Control: NR

  • MID 42 (44.7)

  • Control: NR

Rizvi 2018MID 663 (59.0)NRMidodrine median NEE 0.24 mcg/kg/minRequiring IVP at 24 h: 48%NR
Rizvi 2019MID 587 (58.1)NRMidodrine median NEE 0.19 mcg/kg/minNRNR
Santer 2020
  • MID 66 (100)

  • Placebo 66 (100)

1 (NE, PE, or metaraminol)
  • Midodrine median NEE 0.03 (0.02, 0.06) mcg/kg/min

  • Control median NEE 0.03 (0.02, 0.06) mcg/kg/min

  • MID 23.5 (10.4, 44)

  • Control 22.5 (10.4, 40)

  • p=0.62

NR
Tremblay 2020
  • MID 74 (100)

  • Control 74 (100)

  • MID: 1 (85.1%), 2 (13.5%), 3 (1.4%)

  • Control: NR

All patients median NEE 0.05 (0.03, 0.09) mcg/kg/minMID 19 (4, 44)MID 16 (21.6)
Whitson 2016
  • MID 135 (100)

  • Control 140 (100)

1 (NE or PE)
  • Midodrine mean NEE 0.09 mcg/kg/min

  • Control mean NEE NR

  • MID 69.6 ± NR

  • Control 91.2 ± NR

  • p<0.001

  • MID 7 (5.2)

  • Control 21 (15)

  • p=0.007

Wood 2022
  • MID 19 (100)

  • Control 42 (100)

1 (NE or metaraminol)
  • Midodrine median NEE 0.05 mcg/kg/min

  • Control median NEE 0.08 mcg/kg/min

  • MID 26 (22, 36)

  • Control 24 (17, 93)

  • p=0.511

NR

Quality appraisal for included studies by study design

Randomized controlled trials
StudyRandomizationAllocation concealmentGroups similar at baselineParticipants blindedStaff delivering treatment blindedGroups treated the same except interventionBlinded outcomes assessorsStandardized outcomes measurementComplete follow-up or differences described, analyzedParticipants analyzed in randomization groupAppropriate statisticsDesign appropriate and deviations from standard accounted for
Ahmed Ali 2022YesNoNoUnclearNoYesUnclearYesYesYesYesYes
Costa-Pinto 2022YesYesYesUnclearNoYesUnclearYesYesYesYesYes
Davoudi-Monfared 2021YesUnclearYesUnclearUnclearYesUnclearYesYesYesYesYes
Hussein El Adly 2022YesYesYesNoNoYesUnclearYesYesYesYesYes
Lal 2021YesYesNoYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes
Santer 2020YesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYesYes

Reported Side Effects

StudyBradycardia DefinitionBradycardia Incidence, n (%)Heart Rate Change (bpm)Bradycardia InterventionsBowel Ischemia n (%)Peripheral Ischemia n (%)Cerebral Ischemia n (%)Allergy n (%)
Ahmed Ali 2022No definitionNA
  • MID Day 1: 117 ± 14.2,

  • MID Mid-study: 103.77 ± 16.65,

  • MID Last Day: 79 ± 16.9

  • Control Day 1: 120.43 ± 14.64

  • Control Mid-study: 97.1 ± 16.65

  • Control Last Day: 96.73 ± 18.75

NANRNRNRNR
Costa-Pinto 2022Bradycardia: ≤50 bpm; Severe bradycardia: <40 bpm
  • Bradycardia within 24 h:

  • MID 10 (31.2)

  • Control 2 (6.7)

  • p=0.02

  • Baseline MID HR: 76 (70, 85)

  • Baseline Control HR: 77.5 (65.5, 85)

  • p=0.61

  • MID HR over 24 h: 69 (62, 82)

  • Control HR over 24 h: 74 (67, 83)

  • p=0.21

None; episodes of bradycardia, except one, were transient and deemed clinically insignificantNRNRNRNO
Davoudi-Monfared 2021<60 bpmNONRNANRNRNRNR
Hussein El Adly 2022<50 bpmNRNRNANRNRNRNR
Kim 2021NRNRNRNANRNRNRNR
Lal 2021<40 bpm and symptomaticNONRNANONONONO
Levine 2013No definitionNR
  • Before MID HR 82 ± 13

  • After MID HR 81 ± 15

  • p=0.66

NANRNRNRNR
Macielak 2021<50 bpmNONRNA1 (2.3)NONRNR
Poveromo 2016<60 bpm for two consecutive readings
  • MID: 12 (12.8)

  • Control: NR

NRNRNRNRNRNR
Rizvi 2018≤50 bpm; ≤40 bpm
  • ≤50 bpm: 172 (15.4)

  • ≤40 bpm: 100 (9)

  • Lowest HR: 39 (33, 44)

  • bpm

NRNone2 (0.18)NRNONR
Rizvi 2019NRNRNRNANRNRNRNR
Santer 2020<40 bpm or ≥20% decrease from a pre-specified goal
  • MID: 5 (7.6)

  • Control: 0 (0)

  • p=0.02

NRNRNRNRNRNR
Tremblay 2020No definitionNRNRNA2 (2.7)NRNRNR
Whitson 2016No definition
  • MID: 1 (0.7)

  • Control: NO

NRMID discontinued and bradycardia resolved.NRNRNRNR
Wood 2022<40 bpm or ≥20% decrease from a pre-specified goal
  • MID: 4 (22)

  • Control: 1 (2.4)

  • p=0.025

No significant changeNRNRNRNRNR

Where midodrine may be consider and avoided

Some Experience – Likely SafeLimited Experience – Use CautionNo Experience – Avoid UseContraindications for Use
Orthostatic hypotensionVasopressor sparingCardiogenic shockPheochromocytoma
Hemodialysis hypotensionMixed shockCerebral vasospasmThyrotoxicosis
Septic ShockRenal failureUnknown enteral absorptionUrinary retention
Vasopressor weaningLactate clearanceMechanical circulatory support
Hepatorenal syndromeBradycardiaDaily dose >120 mg
Fixed dosing regimenDosing every four hours
Hepatic impairment
Titrated dosing regimen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2025-0007 | Journal eISSN: 2393-1817 | Journal ISSN: 2393-1809
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 22
Submitted on: May 15, 2024
Accepted on: Jan 16, 2025
Published on: Jan 31, 2025
Published by: University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2025 Madeleine M. Puissant, Kaitlin J Armstrong, Richard R Riker, Samir Haydar, Tania D Strout, Kathryn E Smith, David B Seder, David J Gagnon, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.