Artificial Intelligence: The Next Blockbuster Drug in Critical Care?

Azamfirei, Razvan

doi:10.2478/jccm-2023-0017

References

1. Lewis JF, Brackenbury A. Role of exogenous surfactant in acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(4 Suppl):S324–8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000057911.19145.9F.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
2. Zarychanski R, Abou-Setta AM, Turgeon AF, et al. Association of hydroxyethyl starch administration with mortality and acute kidney injury in critically ill patients requiring volume resuscitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2013;309(7):678–88. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.430.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
3. Savel RH, Munro CL. Evidence-based backlash: the tale of drotrecogin alfa. Am J Crit Care. 2012;21(2):81–3. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2012903.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
4. Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network, Brower RG, Matthay MA, et al. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(18):1301–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
5. Feretzakis G, Karlis G, Loupelis E, et al. Using Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Hospital Admission at the Emergency Department. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2022;8(2):107–16. doi: 10.2478/jccm-2022-0003.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
6. Lundberg SM, Nair B, Vavilala MS, et al. Explainable machine-learning predictions for the prevention of hypoxaemia during surgery. Nat Biomed Eng. 2018;2(10):749–60. doi: 10.1038/s41551-018-0304-0.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
7. Lyons PG, Hofford MR, Yu SC, et al. Factors Associated With Variability in the Performance of a Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model Across 9 Networked Hospitals in the US. JAMA Intern Med. 2023. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.7182.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
8. Vela D, Sharp A, Zhang R, et al. Temporal quality degradation in AI models. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):11654. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15245-z.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
9. Varoquaux G, Cheplygina V. Machine learning for medical imaging: methodological failures and recommendations for the future. NPJ Digit Med. 2022;5(1):48. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00592-y.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
10. Mazurowski MA. Artificial Intelligence May Cause a Significant Disruption to the Radiology Workforce. J Am Coll Radiol. 2019;16(8):1077–82. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.01.026.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
11. Krittanawong C. The rise of artificial intelligence and the uncertain future for physicians. Eur J Intern Med. 2018;48:e13–e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2017.06.017.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
12. Lee P, Bubeck S, Petro J. Benefits, Limits, and Risks of GPT-4 as an AI Chatbot for Medicine. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(13):1233–9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsr2214184.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
13. Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: Potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digit Health. 2023;2(2):e0000198. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
14. Salvagno M, Taccone FS, Gerli AG. Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Crit Care. 2023;27(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
15. Ayers JW, Poliak A, Dredze M, et al. Comparing Physician and Artificial Intelligence Chatbot Responses to Patient Questions Posted to a Public Social Media Forum. JAMA Intern Med. 2023. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.1838.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
16. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, et al. Attention is All you Need. In: Guyon I, Luxburg UV, Bengio S, Wallach H, Fergus R, Vishwanathan S, et al., editors.2017.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
17. Liu H, Ning R, Teng Z, et al. Evaluating the Logical Reasoning Ability of ChatGPT and GPT-4. arXiv preprint arXiv:230403439. 2023.
Search in Google Scholar Back to article
18. Wong A, Otles E, Donnelly JP, et al. External Validation of a Widely Implemented Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model in Hospitalized Patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2021;181(8):1065–70. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.2626.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
19. Smith H. Clinical AI: opacity, accountability, responsibility and liability. Ai & Society. 2020;36(2):535–45. doi: 10.1007/s00146-020-01019-6.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
20. Daneshjou R, Smith MP, Sun MD, Rotemberg V, Zou J. Lack of Transparency and Potential Bias in Artificial Intelligence Data Sets and Algorithms: A Scoping Review. JAMA Dermatol. 2021;157(11):1362–9. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2021.3129.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article
21. Noseworthy PA, Attia ZI, Brewer LC, et al. Assessing and Mitigating Bias in Medical Artificial Intelligence: The Effects of Race and Ethnicity on a Deep Learning Model for ECG Analysis. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13(3):e007988. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007988.
Open DOI Search in Google Scholar Back to article

Artificial Intelligence: The Next Blockbuster Drug in Critical Care?

References

Paradigm

My account