Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Awake Prone Decubitus Positioning in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis Cover

Awake Prone Decubitus Positioning in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis

Open Access
|May 2023

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

PRISMA Flow Diagram of the Study Select
PRISMA Flow Diagram of the Study Select

Fig. 2.

Overall Incidence of ETI (A) and Mortality (B) Among Pronated Patients: MetaAnalysis Results
Overall Incidence of ETI (A) and Mortality (B) Among Pronated Patients: MetaAnalysis Results

Fig. 3.

RR of ETI (A) and Mortality (B) Among Pronated vs. NonPronated Patients: MetaAnalysis Results
RR of ETI (A) and Mortality (B) Among Pronated vs. NonPronated Patients: MetaAnalysis Results

Characteristics of the Studies and Patients included_

Reference ID, study, and yearCountryStudy designRating scales (NOS for observational studies and Jadad scale for RCTs)Total NPronated N/nonpronated NSettingAgeMale n (%)Mean BMI (kg/m2) ± SD or median (IQR) or n (%)Median APACHE II score (IQR) or mean ±SDMedium SOFA score (IQR)Oxygen therapy interface
1 DueñasCastell et al., 2021 (42)ColombiaRetrospective cohort study8212212GW, ER, or ICU63 (median) IQR: 48.873142 (67%)BMI >30: 11/212 (n/N) (5.2%) Overall: 4 (35.25)NC or VMK with a reservoir
2 Kaur et al., 2021 (37)USARCT3125125 Premature pronation: 92 Delayed pronation: 33 62 (mean) ± 11.9 (SD)79 (63.2%)30 (mean) ± 5 (SD) Overall: 3 (24.5)HFNC
3 Ehrmann et al., 2021 (46)Canada, France, Ireland, Mexico, USA, and SpainRCT31121564/557GW, ER, IMCU, or ICU61.1 (mean)746 (66.5%)29.7 (mean) ±4.6 (SD) Int.: 29.7 ±4.6 Con.: 29.7 ±4.6 HFNC or NIMV
4 PerezNieto et al., 2021 (43)Mexico and EcuadorRetrospective cohort study7827505/322GW, ER, or ICU54.3 (mean) ± 14.2 (SD)600 (72.6%)BMI >30: 119 (14.4%) Int.: BMI >30: 74 (14.7%) Con.: BMI >30: 45 (14%) NC, HFNC, or VMK with reservoir
5 Tonelli et al., 2021 (32)ItalyRetrospective cohort study711438/76Respiratory ICU67 (median) IQR: 328080 (70%)27.5 (median) IQR: 1937 Int.: 26 (1936) Con.: 28 (2037)Overall: 10 (422) Int.: 11 (422) Con.: 10 (420)Overall: 4 (27) Int.: 4 (27) Con.: 4 (26)NIMV, HFNC, and CPAP
6 Jayakumar et al., 2021 (45)IndiaRCT36030/30ICU56.05 (mean)50 (83.3%)27 (mean) Int.: 28.2 ±5.7 Con.: 25.8 ± 2.6Int.: 9.5 ±3.6 Con.:8.6±3.1 NC, MV, VMK with reservoir, HFNC, or NIMV
7 Downing et al., 2021 (38)USARetrospective cohort study89797GW, ER, or ICU54 (mean) ± 14 (SD)60 (61.8%)31 (mean) BMI <30: 41 (42%) BMI 3040: 37 (38%) BMI >40: 19 (19%) NC, HFNC, or NIMV
8 Cherian et al., 2021 (39)USARetrospective cohort study65959IMCU or ICU54.5 (median)39 (66%)BMI <30: 22 (37.2%) BMI >30: 37 (62.7%) HFNC or NIMV
9 Rosen et al., 2021 (33) SwedenRCT37536/3965.48 (median)55 (73.3%)28.52 (median)Int.: 28 (2530) Con.: 29 (2733) HFNC or NIMV
10 Ferrando et al., 2020 (34)SpainProspective cohort study819955/144ICU62.17 (median)147 (73.8%)27.16 (median) Int.: 26.8 (24.831.2)/49 Con.: 27.3 (25.129.4)/120Int.: 8.5 (613) /46 Con.: 11(814) /107Int.:4(44)/46 Con.: 4 (45) /116HFNC
11 Padrao et al., 2020 (44)BrazilRetrospective cohort study716657/109ER58.1 (mean) ± 14.1 (SD)112 (67%)BMI >30: 89 (54%) Int.: BMI >30: 33 (58%) Con.: BMI >30: 89 (54%) NC, MV, or VMK with reservoir
12 Coppo et al., 2020 (35)ItalyProspective cohort study75646GW, ER, or HDU57.4 (mean) ± 7.4 (SD)44 (79%)27.5 (mean) ±3.7 (SD) CPAP, VM, or VMK with reservoir
13 Jagan et al., 2020 (40)USARetrospective cohort study710540/65 62.06 (mean)57 (54.2%)29.25 (median) Int.: 31.3 (26.437.5) Con.: 28 (24.934.4)Int.: 7 (49) Con.: 10 (716)Int.: 2 (23) Con.: 4 (25)
14 Prud’homme et al., 2021 (36)FranceRetrospective cohort study89648/48Outside the ICU61.5 (mean)68 (70.8%)27.5 (mean) Int.: 27 ±5 Con.: 28 ±5 NC or HFNC
15 Nauka et al., 2021 (41)USARetrospective casecontrol study6600164ICU61.2 (mean) ± 13.1 (SD)372 (62%)29.3 (median) IQR: 25.833.9 Overall: 1 (04)NC, VMK with reservoir, or HFNC

Oxygenation Characteristics

Reference ID, study, and yearInitial PaO2/FiO2 ratioFinal PaO2/FiO2 ratioInitial SpO2/FiO2 ratioFinal SpO2/FiO2 ratioInitial SpO2 (%)Final SpO2 (%)Initial PaO2(mmHg)Final PaO2(mmHg)Initial ROX index (points)Final ROX index% of responders
1. DueñasCastell et al., 2021Survivors: 201.1 Nonsurvivors: 134.1Survivors: 252.6 Nonsurvivors: 172.4 Overall: 92 (8896) Survivors: 94 (9097) Nonsurvivors: 88 (8092)Overall: 96 (9298)Survivors: 97 (9599) Nonsurvivors: 91 (8595) Overall: 5.12 (4.17.25) Survivors: 5.7 (4.7510.2) Nonsurvivors: 4.1 (3.034.6)
2. Kaur et al., 2021 Premature pronation: 147.98 Delayed pronation: 134.57Premature pronation: 163.2 (IQR: 132.8211) Delayed pronation: 141.4 (IQR: 105172.5) Premature pronation: 5.98 Delayed pronation: 4.79Premature pronation: 7.24 (59.93) Delayed pronation: 5 (3.86.95)
3. Ehrmann et al., 2021 PP: 147.9 (SD 43.9) SC: 148.6 (SD 43.1)
4. PerezNieto et al., 2021 Overall: 189.5 (SD 81.6) PP: 182.39 (SD 81.91) SC: 201.1 (SD 89.8)PP: 217.42 (SD 81.9)
5. Tonelli et al., 2021Overall: 149 (78272) PP: 141 (73223) SC: 153 (84232)
6. Jayakumar et al., 2021PP: 201.4 ± 118.8 SC: 185.6 ± 126.1P/F ratio after 2 hours: PP: 198.5 ± 87.6 SC: 171.7 ± 100.6
7. Downing et al., 2021Intubated (median): 180 IQR: 96, 238) Not intubated: 286 (IQR 221, 329)After 24 h (median): Intubated: 109 (IQR 73, 174) Not intubated: 255 (IQR 280, 363) Intubated: 9.9 (IQR 4, 13.5) Not intubated: 15.9 (IQR 11.5, 20.4After 24 hours: Intubated: 4.6 (IQR 3.0, 7.9) Not intubated: 15.7 (IQR 8.2, 18.5)
8. Cherian et al., 2021 Overall: 164.6 Intubated: 100 (95155) Nonintubated: 206 (100293)Four hours after the pronation: Overall: 157.5 Intubated: 99 (94141) Nonintubated: Overall: 6.44 Intubated:4 (36) Not intubated: 8 (410)Overall: 6.44 Intubated: 4 (36) Not intubated: 8 (413)
9. Rosén et al., 2021Overall: 115.51 PP: 115.51 (86.25130.5) SC: 115.51 (93.75129.76) Overall: 154.1 PP: 151 (131174) SC: 157 (136175) Overall: 93.52 PP 93 (9194) SC: 94 (9295) Overall: 67.5 PP 66 (57.7572.75) SC: 69 (61.575)
10. Ferrando et al., 2020Overall: 114.8 PP: 125 (99187) SC: 111 (83144)Overall: 95.54 PP: 103 (80125) SC: 92.5 (77125.5) Overall: 90 PP: 90 (8892) SC: 90 (8894)Overall: 88.72 PP: 88 (8490) SC: 89 (8692)
11. Padrao et al., 2020 SpO2/FiO2, median (P25, P75): PP: 196 (128, 254)Median (P25, P75): PP: 224 (159, 307)Median (P25, P75): Overall: 92.5 (90, 94) PP: 92 (88, 93) SC: 93 (91, 95)Median (P25, P75): PP: 94 (92, 96) Median (P25, P75): PP: 5.7 (3.9, 7.7)Median (P25, P75): PP: 7.7 (5.4, 11)10% increase in the SpO2/FiO2: same/51 (51%) 10% decrease in the RR: 35/51 (69%) Either: 41/51 (80%)
12. Coppo et al., 2020SP1 (before pronation): 180.5 (76.6)PP1 (pronated): 285.5 (112.9) SP2 (resupination): 192.9 (100.9) SP1: 97.2% (2.0)PP1: 98.2% (2.2) SP2: 97.1%(2.0)SP1: 117.1 (47.4)PP1: 200.4 (110.9) SP2: 121.4 (69.6) Increase in the PaO2/FiO2 of SP1 to SP2 23 patients responded to pronation (50%)
14. Prud’homme et al., 2021 Overall: 289 PP: 279+/84 SC: 299 +/45
15. Nauka et al., 2021 Worse prior to pronation: Cases: 93 (9197) Controls: 98 (95294)Worse after pronation: Cases: 93 (8996) Controls: 97 (95104)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2023-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2393-1817 | Journal ISSN: 2393-1809
Language: English
Page range: 73 - 86
Submitted on: Mar 1, 2023
|
Accepted on: Apr 26, 2023
|
Published on: May 8, 2023
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Agustin García, Rita Galeiras, Sonia Pertega-Díaz, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.