Skip to main content
Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Awake Prone Decubitus Positioning in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis Cover

Awake Prone Decubitus Positioning in COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and MetaAnalysis

Open Access
|May 2023

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1.

PRISMA Flow Diagram of the Study Select

Table 1.

Characteristics of the Studies and Patients included.

Reference ID, study, and yearCountryStudy designRating scales (NOS for observational studies and Jadad scale for RCTs)Total NPronated N/nonpronated NSettingAgeMale n (%)Mean BMI (kg/m2) ± SD or median (IQR) or n (%)Median APACHE II score (IQR) or mean ±SDMedium SOFA score (IQR)Oxygen therapy interface
1 DueñasCastell et al., 2021 (42)ColombiaRetrospective cohort study8212212GW, ER, or ICU63 (median) IQR: 48.873142 (67%)BMI >30: 11/212 (n/N) (5.2%)Overall: 4 (35.25)NC or VMK with a reservoir
2 Kaur et al., 2021 (37)USARCT3125125 Premature pronation: 92 Delayed pronation: 3362 (mean) ± 11.9 (SD)79 (63.2%)30 (mean) ± 5 (SD)Overall: 3 (24.5)HFNC
3 Ehrmann et al., 2021 (46)Canada, France, Ireland, Mexico, USA, and SpainRCT31121564/557GW, ER, IMCU, or ICU61.1 (mean)746 (66.5%)29.7 (mean) ±4.6 (SD) Int.: 29.7 ±4.6 Con.: 29.7 ±4.6HFNC or NIMV
4 PerezNieto et al., 2021 (43)Mexico and EcuadorRetrospective cohort study7827505/322GW, ER, or ICU54.3 (mean) ± 14.2 (SD)600 (72.6%)BMI >30: 119 (14.4%) Int.: BMI >30: 74 (14.7%) Con.: BMI >30: 45 (14%)NC, HFNC, or VMK with reservoir
5 Tonelli et al., 2021 (32)ItalyRetrospective cohort study711438/76Respiratory ICU67 (median) IQR: 328080 (70%)27.5 (median) IQR: 1937 Int.: 26 (1936) Con.: 28 (2037)Overall: 10 (422) Int.: 11 (422) Con.: 10 (420)Overall: 4 (27) Int.: 4 (27) Con.: 4 (26)NIMV, HFNC, and CPAP
6 Jayakumar et al., 2021 (45)IndiaRCT36030/30ICU56.05 (mean)50 (83.3%)27 (mean) Int.: 28.2 ±5.7 Con.: 25.8 ± 2.6Int.: 9.5 ±3.6 Con.:8.6±3.1NC, MV, VMK with reservoir, HFNC, or NIMV
7 Downing et al., 2021 (38)USARetrospective cohort study89797GW, ER, or ICU54 (mean) ± 14 (SD)60 (61.8%)31 (mean) BMI <30: 41 (42%) BMI 3040: 37 (38%) BMI >40: 19 (19%)NC, HFNC, or NIMV
8 Cherian et al., 2021 (39)USARetrospective cohort study65959IMCU or ICU54.5 (median)39 (66%)BMI <30: 22 (37.2%) BMI >30: 37 (62.7%)HFNC or NIMV
9 Rosen et al., 2021 (33)SwedenRCT37536/3965.48 (median)55 (73.3%)28.52 (median)Int.: 28 (2530) Con.: 29 (2733)HFNC or NIMV
10 Ferrando et al., 2020 (34)SpainProspective cohort study819955/144ICU62.17 (median)147 (73.8%)27.16 (median) Int.: 26.8 (24.831.2)/49 Con.: 27.3 (25.129.4)/120Int.: 8.5 (613) /46 Con.: 11(814) /107Int.:4(44)/46 Con.: 4 (45) /116HFNC
11 Padrao et al., 2020 (44)BrazilRetrospective cohort study716657/109ER58.1 (mean) ± 14.1 (SD)112 (67%)BMI >30: 89 (54%) Int.: BMI >30: 33 (58%) Con.: BMI >30: 89 (54%)NC, MV, or VMK with reservoir
12 Coppo et al., 2020 (35)ItalyProspective cohort study75646GW, ER, or HDU57.4 (mean) ± 7.4 (SD)44 (79%)27.5 (mean) ±3.7 (SD)CPAP, VM, or VMK with reservoir
13 Jagan et al., 2020 (40)USARetrospective cohort study710540/6562.06 (mean)57 (54.2%)29.25 (median) Int.: 31.3 (26.437.5) Con.: 28 (24.934.4)Int.: 7 (49) Con.: 10 (716)Int.: 2 (23) Con.: 4 (25)
14 Prud’homme et al., 2021 (36)FranceRetrospective cohort study89648/48Outside the ICU61.5 (mean)68 (70.8%)27.5 (mean) Int.: 27 ±5 Con.: 28 ±5NC or HFNC
15 Nauka et al., 2021 (41)USARetrospective casecontrol study6600164ICU61.2 (mean) ± 13.1 (SD)372 (62%)29.3 (median) IQR: 25.833.9Overall: 1 (04)NC, VMK with reservoir, or HFNC

[i] con., control; CPAP: continuous positive airway pressure; ER, emergency room; GW, general ward; HDU, high dependency unit; HFNC, highflow nasal cannula; ICU, intensive care unit; IMCU, intermediate care unit; int., intervention; NC, nasal cannula; VMK, ventimask; VMK with reservoir, ventimask with reservoir.

Table 2.

Oxygenation Characteristics

Reference ID, study, and yearInitial PaO2/FiO2 ratioFinal PaO2/FiO2 ratioInitial SpO2/FiO2 ratioFinal SpO2/FiO2 ratioInitial SpO2 (%)Final SpO2 (%)Initial PaO2(mmHg)Final PaO2(mmHg)Initial ROX index (points)Final ROX index% of responders
1. DueñasCastell et al., 2021Survivors: 201.1 Nonsurvivors: 134.1Survivors: 252.6 Nonsurvivors: 172.4Overall: 92 (8896) Survivors: 94 (9097) Nonsurvivors: 88 (8092)Overall: 96 (9298)Survivors: 97 (9599) Nonsurvivors: 91 (8595)Overall: 5.12 (4.17.25) Survivors: 5.7 (4.7510.2) Nonsurvivors: 4.1 (3.034.6)
2. Kaur et al., 2021Premature pronation: 147.98 Delayed pronation: 134.57Premature pronation: 163.2 (IQR: 132.8211) Delayed pronation: 141.4 (IQR: 105172.5)Premature pronation: 5.98 Delayed pronation: 4.79Premature pronation: 7.24 (59.93) Delayed pronation: 5 (3.86.95)
3. Ehrmann et al., 2021PP: 147.9 (SD 43.9) SC: 148.6 (SD 43.1)
4. PerezNieto et al., 2021Overall: 189.5 (SD 81.6) PP: 182.39 (SD 81.91) SC: 201.1 (SD 89.8)PP: 217.42 (SD 81.9)
5. Tonelli et al., 2021Overall: 149 (78272) PP: 141 (73223) SC: 153 (84232)
6. Jayakumar et al., 2021PP: 201.4 ± 118.8 SC: 185.6 ± 126.1P/F ratio after 2 hours: PP: 198.5 ± 87.6 SC: 171.7 ± 100.6
7. Downing et al., 2021Intubated (median): 180 IQR: 96, 238) Not intubated: 286 (IQR 221, 329)After 24 h (median): Intubated: 109 (IQR 73, 174) Not intubated: 255 (IQR 280, 363)Intubated: 9.9 (IQR 4, 13.5) Not intubated: 15.9 (IQR 11.5, 20.4After 24 hours: Intubated: 4.6 (IQR 3.0, 7.9) Not intubated: 15.7 (IQR 8.2, 18.5)
8. Cherian et al., 2021Overall: 164.6 Intubated: 100 (95155) Nonintubated: 206 (100293)Four hours after the pronation: Overall: 157.5 Intubated: 99 (94141) Nonintubated:Overall: 6.44 Intubated:4 (36) Not intubated: 8 (410)Overall: 6.44 Intubated: 4 (36) Not intubated: 8 (413)
9. Rosén et al., 2021Overall: 115.51 PP: 115.51 (86.25130.5) SC: 115.51 (93.75129.76)Overall: 154.1 PP: 151 (131174) SC: 157 (136175)Overall: 93.52 PP 93 (9194) SC: 94 (9295)Overall: 67.5 PP 66 (57.7572.75) SC: 69 (61.575)
10. Ferrando et al., 2020Overall: 114.8 PP: 125 (99187) SC: 111 (83144)Overall: 95.54 PP: 103 (80125) SC: 92.5 (77125.5)Overall: 90 PP: 90 (8892) SC: 90 (8894)Overall: 88.72 PP: 88 (8490) SC: 89 (8692)
11. Padrao et al., 2020SpO2/FiO2, median (P25, P75): PP: 196 (128, 254)Median (P25, P75): PP: 224 (159, 307)Median (P25, P75): Overall: 92.5 (90, 94) PP: 92 (88, 93) SC: 93 (91, 95)Median (P25, P75): PP: 94 (92, 96)Median (P25, P75): PP: 5.7 (3.9, 7.7)Median (P25, P75): PP: 7.7 (5.4, 11)10% increase in the SpO2/FiO2: same/51 (51%) 10% decrease in the RR: 35/51 (69%) Either: 41/51 (80%)
12. Coppo et al., 2020SP1 (before pronation): 180.5 (76.6)PP1 (pronated): 285.5 (112.9) SP2 (resupination): 192.9 (100.9)SP1: 97.2% (2.0)PP1: 98.2% (2.2) SP2: 97.1%(2.0)SP1: 117.1 (47.4)PP1: 200.4 (110.9) SP2: 121.4 (69.6)Increase in the PaO2/FiO2 of SP1 to SP2 23 patients responded to pronation (50%)
14. Prud’homme et al., 2021Overall: 289 PP: 279+/84 SC: 299 +/45
15. Nauka et al., 2021Worse prior to pronation: Cases: 93 (9197) Controls: 98 (95294)Worse after pronation: Cases: 93 (8996) Controls: 97 (95104)

[i] PP: group of pronated patients. RR: respiratory rate. SC: group treated with the standard of care.

Fig. 2.

Overall Incidence of ETI (A) and Mortality (B) Among Pronated Patients: MetaAnalysis Results

Fig. 3.

RR of ETI (A) and Mortality (B) Among Pronated vs. NonPronated Patients: MetaAnalysis Results

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2023-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2393-1817 | Journal ISSN: 2393-1809
Language: English
Page range: 73 - 86
Submitted on: Mar 1, 2023
Accepted on: Apr 26, 2023
Published on: May 8, 2023
Published by: University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2023 Agustin García, Rita Galeiras, Sonia Pertega-Díaz, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.