Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Intensive Care Based Interventions to Reduce Family Member Stress Disorders: A Systematic Review of the Literature Cover

Intensive Care Based Interventions to Reduce Family Member Stress Disorders: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Open Access
|Aug 2022

Figures & Tables

Fig 1

Study selection process, based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines.

Included Adult Studies with outcome measures by intervention type, Not Passive or Passive

Setting/ YearAuthor Emotional Outcome Tool mean result, control (95% CI) versus experimental (95% CI)Satisfaction Outcomes Mean Results, control (SD) versus experimental (SD)Resource Utilization Mean Results, control (SD) vs experimental (SD)
Adult- Not Passive STAIHADSPHQ-9GAD-7C-DASSIES-r PCL PPPCFSICU-24LOS: ICULOS: HospitalCost of care (thousands)

2018White D, et al 12.1 (11.54- 12.66) vs 11.7 (11.04­12.36) 20.7 (19.53 - 21.87) vs 1.8 (0.7) vs 20.5 (18.981.6 (0.6) 22.02) 8.8 , (8.229.38) vs 8.1 (7.38- 8.82) ' '15.5 (14.23 - 16.77) vs 11.8 (10.7­12.9)

2016Curtis JR, et al 4.7 vs 2.4 (-0.431-0.43)2.7 vs 1.8 (-3.11.32) 30.6 vs 27.1 (-7.12- 0.10) 21.4 vs 17.4 (-0.14- 0.46)32.6 vs 24.1 (0.24- 0.86)ICU: 75.85 vs 51.1 (48.68--0.9) Hospital: 170.7 vs 123.1 (-90.48--4.67)

2007Lautrette A, et al 17 (IQR 11-25) vs 11 (IQR 8-18) 39 (IQR 25-48) vs 27 (IQR 18-42)

2008Kloos J and Daly B39.53 (36.23 - 42.83) vs 40.42 (37.83 - 43.01)

2020Amass T et al 12.31 (10.94- 13.67) vs 13.16 (12.214.13) 27.2 (23.56- 30.84) vs 12.3 (10.94- 13.67)85.44 (87.31- 91.95) vs 89.63 (83.14- 87.74)

Adult - Passive

2004Moreau D, et al Total 21 (ND) vs 22 (ND) Anxiety 13 (ND) vs 9 (ND) Depression 8 (ND) vs 9 (ND)

2016Carson S, et al Anxiety: 6.4 (5.72 - 7.08) vs 7.2 (6.54 - 7.84) Depression: 5 (4.34- 5.66) vs 4.9 (4.29- 5.51) 25.6 (23 - 28.2) vs 20.7 (18.03-23.37)81.1 (78.3- 83.9) vs 84.3 (81.387.3)

2017Chiang V, et al Anxiety: 7.71 (4.92- 10.5) vs 7.23 (4.9-9.56) Depression: 7.94 (4.84- 11.04) vs 6.1 (3.88-8.32)

2016Garrouste- Orgeas M, et al Anxiety: 8 (IQR 4.5 - 12) vs 4 (IQR 1-9) Depression: 5.5 (IQR 1- 11.5) vs 2 (IQR 0- 6) 24 (ND) vs 21 (ND)

Instruments for measurement of stress and emotional affect

Tool NameIntended AssessmentScale RangeScale InterpretationPopulation#QuestionsStyleComments
Parental Stressor Scale (PSS)parent stress, negative feelings about children/ parenting18-90higher score indicates greater stressParents18self-reported

Parenting Stress Index (PSI)parent stress, positive and negative feelings about children/ parenting0-100higher score indicates greater stress, conflictParents101self-reported

Neonatal Index of Parental Satisfaction (NIPS)infant behavior0-7higher score indicates higher levels of satisfactionParents30self-reported

Patient-Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)Depression0-27higher score indicates depression: Stratified according to severity- 0-4 Minimal or none Monitor; may not require treatment 5-9 Mild Use clinical judgment (symptom duration, functional impairment) to determine necessity of treatment 10-14 Moderate 15-19 Moderately severe Warrants active treatment with psychotherapy, medications, or combination 20-27 SevereAdults9self-reported

Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7)Generalized Anxiety Disorder0-21higher score indicates greater likelihood of clinically significant anxiety disorder Score Symptom Severity 5-9 Mild Monitor 10*-14 Moderate Possible clinically significant condition >15 Severe Active treatment probably warrantedAdults7self-reported

Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL)PTSD0-80higher score indicates higher likelihood of PTSD provisional PTSD diagnosis can be made by treating each item rated as 2 = "Moderately" or higher as a symptom endorsed, then following the DSM-5 diagnostic rule which requires at least: 1 B item (questions 1-5), 1 C item (questions 6-7), 2 D items (questions 8-14), 2 E items (questions 15-20). Preliminary validation work is sufficient to make initial cut-point score suggestions, but this information may be subject to change. A PCL-5 cut-point score of 33 appears to be a reasonable valueAdults20self-reportedfor civilians and military (not relevant for our study)

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scales (HADS)Anxiety and Depression0-21 (for each scale-full HADS provides two separate scales)higher score indicates higher likelihood of generalized anxiety or depressionAdults14self-reported

State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)Anxiety and Depression20-80 (for each State and Trait)higher score indicates higher likelihood of anxiety and stressAdults, Care-givers40self-reported20 trait-focused and 20 state-focused questions. Requires 6th grade reading level

Nurse Parent Support Tool (NPST)parent perceptions of support, stress1-5 per itemhigher score indicates higher perceived supportParents21self-reported

Impact of Event Scale (IES)subjective distress caused by traumatic events0-88higher score indicates higher likelihood of PTSDAdults22self-reported

Included Studies with outcome measures by intervention type, Not Passive or Passive

Setting/YearAuthor Emotional Outcome Tool mean result, control (95% Cl) versus experimental (95% Cl) Satisfication Outcomes Mean Results, control (95% Cl) versus experimental (95% Cl)
Pediatric - Not Passive PSS:NICUPSSNIPSSTAIPSI-PNPST

2005Browne J, Talmi A

2017Kadivar M, et al 102.2 (94- 110) VS 137 (132- 142)

1988Curley M 2.66 vs 1.92 (Cl unable to calculate)

2004Melnyk B, et al 39.1 (36-42.2) vs 36(33.7- 38.3)7.4(6.12-8.68) vs 5.6(4.76-6.44)

Pediatric - Passive

2011Franck L, et al2.57 (2.44- 2.7) VS 2.58 (2.44- 2.72)

2015Abdel-Latif M, et al 3.47 (3.3- 3.64) VS 3.47(3.26-3.61)

2015Clarke-Pounder J, et al Anxiety change -4.2 (-6.89-1.51) vs 0.33 (-5.67-6.34)

2013Weiss J, et al2.84(2.61-3.07) VS 2.7 (2.52-4.47) 4.16 (3.97-4.35) vs 4.14 (4.01-4.27)
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2022-0014 | Journal eISSN: 2393-1817 | Journal ISSN: 2393-1809
Language: English
Page range: 145 - 155
Submitted on: Oct 14, 2021
|
Accepted on: Jun 7, 2022
|
Published on: Aug 12, 2022
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year

© 2022 Sarah Love Rhoads, Thomas A. Trikalinos, Mitchell M. Levy, Timothy Amass, published by University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Targu Mures
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.