Have a personal or library account? Click to login
The New Era of Capital Regulation Complexity Cover
By: Lukas Pfeifer  
Open Access
|Sep 2023

References

  1. Andersen, H. (2011). Procyclical implications of Basel II: Can the cyclicality of capital requirements be contained? Journal of Financial Stability, 7(3):138–154.
  2. BCBS (2001). The Internal Ratings-Based Approach. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision.
  3. Behn, M., Haselmann, R., Wachtel, P. (2016). Procyclical capital regulation and lending. Journal of Finance, 71(2):919–956.
  4. BIS (2017). Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms, Bank for International Settlements. ISBN 978-92-9259-022-2.
  5. Borio, C. (2014). The Financial Cycle and Macroeconomics: What Have We Learnt? Journal of Banking & Finance, 45:182–198.
  6. Brei, M. and Gambacorta, L. (2016). Are bank capital ratios pro-cyclical? New evidence and perspectives, Economic Policy, 31(86): 357–403.
  7. Brož, V. and Pfeifer, L. (2021). Are the risk weights of banks in the Czech Republic procyclical? Evidence from wavelet analysis, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 2021, 1, pp. 113-139.
  8. CNB (2020). Financial Stability Report 2019/2020, Czech National Bank. ISBN 978-80-87225-95-0.
  9. CRD V (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/878 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 amending Directive 2013/36/EU as regards exempted entities, financial holding companies, mixed financial holding companies, remuneration, supervisory measures and powers and capital conservation measures, available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019L0878
  10. CRR II (2019). Regulation (EU) 2019/876 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 amending Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 as regards the leverage ratio, the net stable funding ratio, requirements for own funds and eligible liabilities, counterparty credit risk, market risk, exposures to central counterparties, exposures to collective investment undertakings, large exposures, reporting and disclosure requirements, and Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, available at: https://eurlex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019R08763
  11. Dahl, D., Meyer, A. and Neely, M. (2016). Bank size, compliance costs and compliance performance in community banking, working paper, In Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis manuscript, available at: https://www.stlouisfed.org/publications/regional-economist/july-2016/scale-matters-community-banks-and-compliance-costs
  12. Danmarks Nationalbank (2018). Minimum leverage ratio requirement may overrule buffer requirements, in Analysis, Financial stability, 2nd half 2018, Low interest rates and ample lending capacity put pressure on credit standards, available at: https://www.nationalbanken.dk/en/publications/Pages/2018/11/Low-interest-rates-and-ample-lending-capacity-put-pressure-on-credit-standards.aspx
  13. Drumond, I. (2009). Bank Capital Requirements, Business Cycle Fluctuations And The Basel Accords: A Synthesis. Journal of Economic Surveys, 23(5):798–830.
  14. EBA (2017). Guidelines on PD estimation, LGD estimation and the treatment of defaulted exposures. European Banking Authority. Available at: https://www.eba.europa.eu/eba-publishes-final-guidelines-on-the-estimation-of-risk-parameters-under-the-irb-approach
  15. ECB (2020). ECB Banking Supervision provides temporary capital and operational relief in reaction to coronavirus, 12 March 2020, available at: https://www.bankingsupervision.europa.eu/press/pr/date/2020/html/ssm.pr200312~43351ac3ac.en.html
  16. EBA (2022). EBA Advice on the Review of the Macroprudential Framework. Response to the Commission´s July 2021, Call for Advice, available at: https://www.eba.europa.eu/sites/default/documents/files/document_library/Publications/Other%20publications/2022/1031866/EBA%20advice%20on%20the%20review%20of%20the%20macroprudential%20framework.pdf
  17. Engel, C. (2016). Macroprudential policy under high capital mobility – policy implications from an academic perspective, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Vol. 42, pp. 162-172.
  18. ESRB (2015). The ESRB handbook on operationalising macroprudential policy in the banking sector, Addendum: Macroprudential leverage ratios, European Systemic Risk Board, June 2015.
  19. ESRB (2021). Report of the Analytical Task Force on the overlap between capital buffers and minimum requirements. December 2021.
  20. ESRB (2022). Review of the EU Macroprudential Framework for the Banking Sector: A Concept Note, available at: https://www.esrb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/reports/esrb.reviewmacropruframework.220331~65e86a81aa.en.pdf
  21. Finansinspektionen (2016): Leverage ratio as a minimum requirement reduces banks’ buffers, FI Analysis 7, available at: https://fi.se/en/published/reports/fi-analysis/
  22. Gai, P., Kemp, M., Sánchez Serrano, A. and Schabel, I. (2019). Regulatory complexity and the quest for robust regulation. ESRB, Report of the Advisory Scientific Committee No 8/June 2019.
  23. Haldane, A. G. (2011). Capital Discipline. Speech at the American Economic Association Meeting, Denver, 9 January 2011.
  24. Hayek, F. von (1974). The pretence of knowledge, lecture to the memory of Alfred Nobel, 11 December.
  25. Heid, F. (2007). The Cyclical Effects of the Basel II Capital Requirements. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(12):3885–3900.
  26. Holub, L., Konečný, T., Pfeifer, L., Brož, V. (2020). The CNB’s approach to releasing the countercyclical capital buffer, CNB, Thematic article on financial stability 3/2020.
  27. Lowe (2002). Credit risk measurement and procyclicality. BIS Working 116, Bank for International Settlement.
  28. Kay, J. (2015). Other people’s money: masters of the universe or servants of the people?, Profile Books, London.
  29. Pfeifer, L., Holub, L., Pikhart, Z., Hodula, M. (2017). Leverage Ratio and its Impact on the Resilience of the Banking Sector and Efficiency of Macroprudential Policy, Czech Journal of Economics & Finance, 67 (4).
  30. Pfeifer, L. and Pikhart, Z. (2019). Leverage Ratio and its Potential For Enhancing the Effectiveness of Capital Regulation. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 8(2), 129-146.
  31. Pfeifer, L. and Hodula, M. (2020). New kid on the block: Leverage ratio and its implications for banking regulation, European Journal of Finance, 27 (10), 1009-1028.
  32. Malovaná, S. (2018). The pro-cyclicality of risk weights for credit exposures in the Czech Republic, CNB WP 12/2018.
  33. Mariathasan, M. and Merrouche, O. (2014). The manipulation of Basel risk-weights. Journal Financial Intermediation, 23:300–321.
  34. Montes, C. P., Artigas, C. T., Cristófoli, M. E., San Segundo, N. L. (2016). The Impact of the IRB Approach on the Risk Weights of European Banks. Journal of Financial Stability 39, 147-166.
  35. Resti, A. (2016). Banks’ Internal Rating Models - Time for a Change? The “System of Floors” as Proposed by the Basel Committee. European Parliament, ISBN 978-92-846-0197-4.
  36. Rogoff, K. (2012). Ending the financial arms race, Project Syndicate, September.
  37. Singh, S. and Sarma, M. (2020). Financial Structure and Stability: An Empirical Exploration. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 9(s1), 9-32.
  38. Stigler, G. (1971). The theory of economic regulation, Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Vol. 2, No 1, pp. 3-21.
Language: English
Page range: 179 - 197
Submitted on: Oct 16, 2022
Accepted on: Feb 23, 2023
Published on: Sep 5, 2023
Published by: Central Bank of Montenegro
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2023 Lukas Pfeifer, published by Central Bank of Montenegro
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.