Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Does the Effectiveness of Monetary Policy Depend on the Choice of Policy Instrument? Empirical Evidence from South Korea Cover

Does the Effectiveness of Monetary Policy Depend on the Choice of Policy Instrument? Empirical Evidence from South Korea

Open Access
|May 2023

References

  1. 1. Aleem, A., and Lahiani, A. (2014) “Monetary Policy Credibility and Exchange Rate Pass-Through: Some evidence from Emerging Countries,” Economic Modelling, Vol. 43, pp. 21-29.
  2. 2. Bank of Korea (2017). “Executive Summary of Monetary Policy Report,” Monetary Policy Department publication, July.
  3. 3. Bank of Korea (2002). “Monetary Policy in Korea,” Monetary Policy Department publication, December.
  4. 4. Bernanke, B., Boivin, J. and Eliasz, P. (2005) “Measuring the Effects of Monetary Policy: A Factor-Augmented Vector Autoregressive (FAVAR) Approach,” The Quarterly journal of economics, Vol.120, No.1, pp. 387-422.
  5. 5. Bernanke, B., and Mishkin, F. (1997) “Inflation Targeting: A New Framework for Monetary Policy?,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 97–116.
  6. 6. Clarida, R., Galí, J. and Gertler, M. (1999). “The Science of Monetary Policy: A New Keynesian Perspective,” Journal of Economic Literature, Vol. XXXVII, pp. 1661–1707.
  7. 7. Demirbas, E., & Can, N. (2022). Impact of Reserve Option Mechanism on Exchange Rate Volatility During the FED’s Tapering Period. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 11(3), 155-178.
  8. 8. Favero, C., M. Marcellino, and F. Neglia. (2005) “Principal Components at Work: The Empirical Analysis of Monetary Policy with Large Data Sets,” Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol.20, pp. 603–620.
  9. 9. Geweke, J. (1977) “The Dynamic Factor Analysis of Economic Time Series.” in: D. Aigner and A. Goldberger, eds. Latent Variables in Socio-Economic Models. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
  10. 10. Güler, A. (2021). Does monetary policy credibility help in anchoring inflation expectations? Evidence from six inflation targeting emerging economies. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 10(1), 93-111.
  11. 11. Han, S., Lee, D. and Yun. D. (2014) “Analysis of Changes in the Transmission of the Policy Rate to Bank Lending Rates following Shifts in Lending Market Conditions,” Bank of Korea Working Paper.
  12. 12. Hoffmaister, A. W. (2001) “Inflation Targeting in Korea: An Empirical Exploration,” IMF Staff Papers, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp. 317-343.
  13. 13. Killian, L. (1998) “Small Sample Confidence Intervals for Impulse Response Functions,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 80, No. 2, pp. 218-230.
  14. 14. Kim, H. E. (2007) “The Interest Rate Channel of Monetary Transmission in the Low Inflation era in Korea,” Economic Papers, Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 1-36.
  15. 15. Kim K., Kim, B. and Suh, Y. (2009) “Opening to Capital Flows and Implications from Korea,” Economic Papers, Vol.12, No.1, pp. 74-112.
  16. 16. Kim, S. and Park, Y. (2006) “Inflation Targeting in Korea: a Model of Success?,” BIS Papers No. 31, pp. 140-164.
  17. 17. Krušković, B. D. (2022). Central bank intervention in the inflation targeting. Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 11(1), 67-85.
  18. 18. Lim, H. (2003) “Asset Price Movements and Monetary Policy in South Korea,” BIS Papers No. 19, pp. 313-337.
  19. 19. Obstfeld, M. (2014) “Never Say Never: Commentary on a Policymaker’s Reflections,” IMF Economic Review, Vol. 62, No. 4, pp. 656-693.
  20. 20. Oh, J. (1999) “Inflation Targeting, Monetary Transmission Mechanism and Policy Rules in Korea,” Economic Papers, Vol.2, No.1, pp. 102-146.
  21. 21. Rousseau, P. and Kim, J. (2007). “Credit Markets and the Propagation of Korea’s 1997 Financial Crisis,” Southern Economic Journal, Vol. 74, No. 2, pp. 524–545.
  22. 22. Sargent, T. J. and Sims, C. A. (1977) “Business cycle modeling without pretending to have too much a priori economic theory” New methods in business cycle research, Vol.1, pp. 145-168.
  23. 23. Senbet, D. (2008) “Measuring the impact and international transmission of monetary policy: a factor-augmented vector autoregressive (FAVAR) approach,” European Journal of Economics, Finance and Administrative Sciences, Vol.13, pp. 121-143.
  24. 24. Sims, C. A. (1980) “Macroeconomics and reality,” Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, Vol.48, No.1, pp. 1-48.
  25. 25. Sohn, W. and Eom, Y. (2007) “Monetary Policy and the Stock Market: Intraday Transaction Data Analysis,” Economic Analysis, Vol.12, No.3, pp. 37-72.
  26. 26. Sohn, W., Sung, B. and Kwon, H. (2006) “The Financial Markets’ Responses to Monetary Policy Announcements,” Economic Papers, Vol.9, No.1, pp. 102-142.
  27. 27. Stock, J. and Watson, M. (2005) “Implications of Dynamic Factor Models for VAR Analysis.” NBER Working Paper No. 11467.
  28. 28. Yie, M. (2008) “The Cost Channel Effect of Monetary Policy in Korea,” Bank of Korea Working Paper No. 340.
  29. 29. Zuniga, M. C. (2011) “International monetary transmission, a Factor- Augmented Vector Autoregressive (FAVAR) approach: the cases of Mexico and Brazil,” Business and Economics Journal, 1-16.
Language: English
Page range: 239 - 265
Submitted on: Jun 5, 2022
Accepted on: Nov 21, 2022
Published on: May 24, 2023
Published by: Central Bank of Montenegro
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2023 Martha Cruz Zuniga, Dawit Senbet, published by Central Bank of Montenegro
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.