Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Prospects of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Application in Banking Risk Management Cover

Prospects of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Application in Banking Risk Management

Open Access
|Sep 2021

References

  1. 1. Addo, P.M., Guegan, D. and Hassani B. (2018). Credit Risk Analysis Using Machine and Deep Learning Models. Risks, 6: 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks602003810.3390/risks6020038
  2. 2. Aldasoro, I., Gambacorta, L., Giudici P. and Leach T. (2020). Operational and cyber risks in the financial sector. Bank for International Settlements, BIS Working Papers No 840, February 2020
  3. 3. Adrian, T. (2018). Risk Management and Regulation. International Monetary Fund, Departmental Paper No. 18/1310.5089/9781484343913.087
  4. 4. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2000). Principles for the Management of Credit Risk, June 2006, Bank for International Settlements.
  5. 5. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2006). International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards – A revised Framework, June 2006, Bank for International Settlements.
  6. 6. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2017). Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms, December 2017, Bank for International Settlements.
  7. 7. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2019a). Basel III Monitoring Report, October 2019. Bank for International Settlements.
  8. 8. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2019b). Seventeenth progress report on adoption of the Basel regulatory framework, October 2019. Bank for International Settlements.
  9. 9. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2019c). The Basel Framework, Bank for International Settlements.
  10. 10. Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2020). “Governors and Heads of Supervision announce deferral of Basel III implementation to increase operational capacity of banks and supervisors to respond to Covid-19”, Press release, 27 March 2020, Retrieved from: https://www.bis.org/press/p200327.htm [Accessed 30 May 2020].
  11. 11. European Central Bank (2018). ECB Guide to the internal liquidity adequacy assessment process (ILAAP), November 2018
  12. 12. European Central Bank (2020). Supervisory Banking Statistics, Second quarter 2020, October 2020.
  13. 13. Fabris, N., (2020). Financial stability and climate change, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Volume 9, No. 3: pp. 27-43, https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2020-003410.2478/jcbtp-2020-0034
  14. 14. Financial Stability Board (2017). Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Financial Services, Market Developments and Financial Stability Implications. November 2017, Retrieved from: http://www.fsb.org/2017/11/artificial-intelligence-and-machine-learning-in-financial-service/ [Accessed 29 May 2020].
  15. 15. Grubišić, Z., Kamenković, S. and Kaličanin, T. (2021). Comparative Analysis of the Banking Sector Competitiveness in Serbia and Montenegro, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Volume 10, No. 1: 75-91, https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2021-000410.2478/jcbtp-2021-0004
  16. 16. Jacobs, M., (2018). The validation of machine-learning models for the stress testing of credit risk, Journal of Risk Management in Financial Institutions, Volume 11, number 3.10.20944/preprints201803.0157.v1
  17. 17. Kolanovic, M. and Krishnamachari, R., (2017), “Big Data and AI Strategies: Machine Learning and Alternative Data Approach to Investing,” JP Morgan, May 2017, Retrieved from: https://faculty.sites.uci.edu/pjorion/files/2018/05/JPM-2017-MachineLearningInvestments.pdf [Accessed 18 October 2020].
  18. 18. Leo, M., Sharma, S. and Maddulety, K. (2019). Machine Learning in Banking Risk Management: A Literature Review, Risks 7: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks701002910.3390/risks7010029
  19. 19. Lessmann, S., Baesens, B., Seow, H. and Thomas, L.C., (2015). Benchmarking state-of-the-art classification algorithms for credit scoring: An update of research, European Journal of Operational Research, 2015, vol. 247, issue 1, 124-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.03010.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.030
  20. 20. Milojević, N., (2014). Optimal banking and other financial business for the economic growth of Serbia, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Volume 3, No. 2: 61-83, https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2014-001110.2478/jcbtp-2014-0011
  21. 21. Milojević, N., (2016). Contemporary Challenges in the Banking Risk Management, Business Economics, Year X, No. 2/2016, Vol. XIX: 66-85, https://doi.org/10.5937/poseko10-1341810.5937/poseko10-13418
  22. 22. Milojević, N. and Redzepagic, S. (2020a). Current Trends and Future Progress in the Banking Risk and Capital Management: Worldwide Experience and Republic of Serbia Case Study, Economic Analysis, 2020, Vol. 53, No. 2: 79-94, https://doi.org/10.28934/ea.20.53.2.pp79-94
  23. 23. Milojević, N. and Redzepagic, S. (2020b). Prospects of the Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Application in the Banking Risk Management, Paper presented at the International Scientific Conference: Global Economic Trends – Challenges and Opportunities, November 30, 2020, Belgrade Banking Academy – Faculty of Banking, Belgrade, Published book of abstracts.
  24. 24. Panagiotis, A., Efthymios, K., Anastasios-Taxiarchis, K. and Athanasios, P. (2020). GARCH Modelling of High-capitalization Cryptocurrencies' Impacts During Bearish Markets, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, Volume 9, No. 3: pp. 87-106, https://doi.org/10.2478/jcbtp-2020-003810.2478/jcbtp-2020-0038
Language: English
Page range: 41 - 57
Submitted on: Jul 4, 2020
Accepted on: Nov 27, 2020
Published on: Sep 6, 2021
Published by: Central Bank of Montenegro
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 3 issues per year

© 2021 Nenad Milojević, Srdjan Redzepagic, published by Central Bank of Montenegro
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.