References
- 1. BCBS (January 2013a). Principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. Committee for Banking Supervision. Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs239.pdf
- 2. BCBS (December 2013b). Progress in adopting the principles for effective risk data aggregation and risk reporting. Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs268.htm.
- 3. BCBS (December 2014). Fundamental review of the trading book. Committee for Banking Supervision. Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d305.pdf.
- 4. BCBS (December 2016). Consultative Document Pillar 3 disclosure requirements – consolidated and enhanced framework. Retrieved from http://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d356.pdf.
- 5. CEIOPS Committee of European insurance and occupational pensions supervisors (2009). CEIOPS’ Advice for Level 2 Implementing Measures on Solvency II: Technical Provisions – Article 86 f Standards for Data Quality (former CP 43). Retrieved from https://eiopa.europa.eu/CEIOPS-Archive/Documents/Advices/CEIOPS-L2-Final-Advice-on-TP-Standard-for-data-quality.pdf
- 6. Chartis Research (2016). Spotlight on BCBS 239 - It was never going to happen on time. Research Report.
- 7. Chisholm, M. (2014). The Implementation of Basel Committee BCBS 239: An Industry-Wide Challenge for International Data Management, Proceedings of the 2nd International Data and Information Management Conference (IDIMC), Loughborough, UK.
- 8. Grody, A.D and P. Hughes (2015). The Global Risk Regime – New Roles for Auditors. Working paper Financial InterGroup (UK) Ltd.
- 9. Harreis, H.; Tavakoli, A.; Ho, T.; Machado, J.; Rowshankish, K.; Merrath, P. (2017). Living with BCBS 239, retrieved from http://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/risk/our-insights/living-with-bcbs-239.
- 10. Hughes P., Grody A.D., Toms S. (2010). ‘Risk accounting - a next generation risk management system for financial institutions’, The Capco Institute Journal of Financial Transformation, 29 (1): 43-56.
- 11. IFRS (2016). Financial instruments. International financial reporting standard. Retrieved from: http://www.ifrs.org/current-projects/iasb-projects/financial-instruments-a-replacement-of-ias-39-financial-instruments-recognitio/Pages/Financial-Instruments-Replacement-of-IAS-39.aspx.
- 12. Myers, D. (2013). Dimensions of Data Quality Under the Microscope. Information Management Magazine. Retrieved from: http://www.information-management.com/news/news/dimensions-of-data-quality-under-the-microscope-10024529-1.html
- 13. Popovic, M. (2018). Technological Progress, Globalization, and Secular Stagnation, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 2018, 1, pp. 79-100.
- 14. Thun, C. (2015). Moodys Analytics: AnaCredit Gives Banks an Opportunity to Improve Data Management, but Challenges Remain, Enterprise Risk Solutions.
- 15. Vlahovic, A. (2014). Challenges to the Implementation of a New Framework for Safeguarding Financial Stability, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 2014, 3, pp.19-52.
- 16. Vucinic, M. (2016). Importance of Macroprudential Policy Implementation for Safeguarding Financial Stability, Journal of Central Banking Theory and Practice, 2016, 3, pp. 79-98.