Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Home Birth in the Opinion of Obstetricians and Midwives: A Survey Cover

Home Birth in the Opinion of Obstetricians and Midwives: A Survey

By: Petya I. Dilova  
Open Access
|Dec 2019

References

  1. 1. Zielinski R, Ackerson K, Kane Low L. Planned home birth: benefits, risks, and opportunities. Int J Womens Health. 2015;7:361-77.10.2147/IJWH.S55561
  2. 2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(1):1-65.
  3. 3. Wiegers TA, Keirse MJ, van der Zee J, Berghs GA. Outcome of planned home and planned hosptial births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in the Netherlands. BMJ. 1996;313(7068):1309-13.10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1309
  4. 4. Anderson RE, Murphy PA. Outcomes of 11,788 planned home births attended by certified nurse-midwives. A retrospective descriptive study. J Nurse Midwifery. 1995;40(6):483-92.10.1016/0091-2182(95)00051-8
  5. 5. Woodcock HC, Read AW, Moore DJ, Stanley FJ, Bower C. Planned homebirths in Western Australia 1981-1987: a descriptive study. Med J Aust. 1990;153(11-12):672-8.10.5694/j.1326-5377.1990.tb126318.x
  6. 6. Janssen PA, Mitton C, Aghajanian J. Costs of planned home vs. Hospital birth in British Columbia attended by registered midwives and physicians. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133524.10.1371/journal.pone.0133524450588226186720
  7. 7. Pang JW, Heffelfinger JD, Huang GJ, Benedetti TJ, Weiss NS. Outcomes of planned home births in Washington state: 1989-1996. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(2):253-9.10.1097/00006250-200208000-00009
  8. 8. Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, Klein MC, Liston RM, Lee SK. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. CMAJ. 2009;181(6-7):377-83.10.1503/cmaj.081869274213719720688
  9. 9. Janssen PA, Holt V, Myers SJ. Licensed midwife-attended, out-of-hospital births in Washington state: are they safe? Birth. 1994;21(3):141-8.10.1111/j.1523-536X.1994.tb00513.x
  10. 10. Janssen PA, Lee SK, Ryan EM, Etches DJ, Farquharson D F, Peacock D, et al. Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia. CMAJ; 2002;166(3):315-23.
  11. 11. Chamberlain G, Wraight A, Crowley P. Birth at home. Pract Midwife. 1999;2(7):35-9.
  12. 12. Mori R, Dougherty M, Whittle M. An estimation of intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births in England and Wales between 1994 and 2003. BJOG. 2008;115(5):554-9.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01669.x18333936
  13. 13. Ackermann-Liebrich U, Voegeli T, Günter-Witt K, Kunz I, Züllig M, Schindler C, et al. Home versus hospital deliveries: follow up study of matched pairs for procedures and outcome. Zurich Study Team. BMJ. 1996;313(7068):1313-8.10.1136/bmj.313.7068.131323527068942694
  14. 14. Lindgren H, Rådestad IJ, Christensson K, Hildingsson IM. Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(7):751-9.10.1080/0001634080219990318607818
  15. 15. van Alten D, Eskes M, Treffers PE. Midwifery in the Netherlands. The Wormerveer study: selection, mode of delivery, perinatal mortality and infant morbidity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96(6):656-62.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03279.x2803988
  16. 16. Gulbransen G, Hilton J, McKay L, Cox A. Home birth in New Zealand 1973-93: incidence and mortality. N Z Med J. 1997;110(1040):87-9.
  17. 17. Sandall J: Place of birth in Europe, birth in Europe in the 21st century Entre Nous [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Nov 29]. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/entrenous
  18. 18. Wax JR, Lucas FL, Lamont M, Pinette MG, Cartin A, Blackstone J. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(3):243.e1-8.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.02820598284
  19. 19. Oxford Pro Bono Publico. The legal regulation of home birth in the Domestic jurisdictions of the council of Europe. Research prepared for the League of human rights, the Czech Republic [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2002 Jul 9] Available from: http://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/here.pdf
  20. 20. NICE. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. Clinical guideline [Internet]. London [cited 2017 Sept 9] Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190.
  21. 21. American college of Nurse-Midwives. Home Birth Transfer Guidelines [Internet].Silver Spring [cited 2017 Oct 29] Available from: http://www.midwife.org.
  22. 22. ACOG. Planned home birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e117-22.10.1097/AOG.000000000000202428333824
  23. 23. Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Technical Working Group, World Health Organization. Birth. 1997;24(2):121-3.10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.tb00352.x
  24. 24. Ministry of Health of Bulgaria. Seventy two percent of the population is opposed to resolving homebirth [Internet].2013 [cited 2017 Oct 15] Available from (in Bulgarian): http://www.mh.government.bg/bg/novini/aktualno/trichetvrti-ot-naselenieto-podkrepia-normativnite.
Language: English
Page range: 24 - 29
Submitted on: Jan 8, 2018
|
Accepted on: Jun 26, 2018
|
Published on: Dec 30, 2019
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Petya I. Dilova, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.