Table 1
Analyzes of pine honey (PH) and citrus honey (CH)*
| PH | CH | |
|---|---|---|
| Color (mm) | 63.0 | 8.0 |
| Moisture (%) | 16.6 | 18.1 |
| HMF (mg/kg) | 1.4 | 7.0 |
| Acidity (meq. g/kg) | 13.2 | 5.0 |
| pH | 4.7 | 3.9 |
| Proline (mg/kg) | 436 | 325 |
| Conductivity (mS/cm) | 1.08 | 0.15 |
| Diastase Number (DN) | 15.6 | 5.0 |
| Fructose (%) | 32.5 | 37.6 |
| Glucose (%) | 26.4 | 30.4 |
| Fructose/Glucose | 1.23 | 1.24 |
| Fructose+Glucose (%) | 58.9 | 68.0 |
| Sucrose (%) | 0.0 | 3.1 |
| Maltose (%) | 2.6 | 1.9 |
| Turanose (%) | 1.9 | 1.3 |
| Erlose (%) | 1.4 | 1.9 |
| Isomaltose (%) | 1.8 | 0.3 |
| Maltotriose (%) | 0 | 0 |
| Melezitose | 0 | 0 |
| Total Disaccharide (%) | 9.4 | 7.5 |
| Higher Sugars (%) | 8.7 | 1.5 |
| C13 Honey (δ C13 ‰) | −24.5 | −25.2 |
| C13 Protein (δ C13 ‰) | −24.7 | −24.9 |
| C13 Difference(δ C13 ‰) | −0.2 | 0.3 |
| C4 Sugar (%) | 1.3 | 0 |
| Naphthalene (ppb) | ODL | ODL |
| Sulfonamid group (ppb) | ODL | ODL |
| Tetracycline group (ppb) | ODL | ODL |
| Strepto group (ppb) | ODL | ODL |
| Fluoroquinolone group (ppb) | ODL | ODL |
| Macrolide group (ppb) | ODL | ODL |
| Chloramphenicol group (ppb) | ODL | ODL |
| Nitrofuran group (ppb) | ODL | ODL |
| Starch/Pollen (%) | 1.8 | 1.3 |
| Polen (%) | Dense | 38 |

Fig. 1
The effect of aw on the time of visible yeast formation (tYF) (a) and the corresponding moisture content (MCYF) (b) in pine honey (PH) and citrus honey (CH).

Fig. 2
Sorption isotherm (SI) of pine honey (PH) (a) and citrus honey (CH) (b) and the fit of GAB Eq. (Eq. 2) to them.

Fig. 3
Desorption part (a) and adsorption part (b) of sorption isotherm (SI) of pine honey (PH) and citrus honey (CH).
Table 2
Constants of GAB equation (C, k, m0), indicators for its fitting performance (R2, RE, DE) and mean net sorption energy in the monolayer (Qs, mono) and multilayer (Qs, multi) water region for the static sorption of honey
| Pine1 | Citrus1 | Clover2 | Colza3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| aw-range | 0.1–0.9 | 0.1–0.9 | 0.3–0.8 | 0.2–0.9 |
| C | 2.96 | 4.73 | 4.64 | 5.29 |
| k | 0.9881 | 0.9936 | 0.9861 | 0.8356 |
| m0, % db | 9.93 | 10.63 | 10.62 | 10.26 |
| aw <=> m0 | 0.35–0.40 | 0.30–0.35 | 0.30–0.35 | 0.35–0.40 |
| R2 | 0.9871 | 0.9860 | 0.9924 | 0.9906 |
| RE* (%) | 4.73 | 4.33 | 0.51 | 8.30 |
| DE* | Random | Random | Random | Random |
| Qs, mono, kJ/kg | 211 | 239 | 235 | 239 |
| Qs, multi, kJ/kg | 84 | 113 | 111 | 116 |

Fig. 4
Effect of moisture content (EMC) on net heat of sorption (Qs) for pine honey (PH) and citrus honey (CH).