Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Acttra SWD Bait Formulation Against Drosophila Suzukii and its Compatibility with Berry Pollination by the Honey Bee, Apis Mellifera Cover

Acttra SWD Bait Formulation Against Drosophila Suzukii and its Compatibility with Berry Pollination by the Honey Bee, Apis Mellifera

Journal of Apicultural Science
Volume 65 (2021): Issue 2 (December 2021)
By: Ricardo Alberto Toledo-Hernández,  Mónica Pulido-Enríquez,  Francisco Landeros-Pedro,  Douglas Rodríguez and  Daniel Sánchez  
Open Access
|Dec 2021

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

(A) Location of experimental honey bee colonies and feeding stations (FS1 and FS2) in the plantation. (B) Experimental setup of experiment 1. Training phase, foragers are trained to collect sucrose from both feeders (grey circles). Basal phase, foragers visiting each feeder were counted. Exposure phase, the FS2 was removed and a new one containing Acttra/Entrust was offered (black circle). Returning phase consisted of putting back sucrose solution in FS2. Each phase, except training, lasted 20 min.
(A) Location of experimental honey bee colonies and feeding stations (FS1 and FS2) in the plantation. (B) Experimental setup of experiment 1. Training phase, foragers are trained to collect sucrose from both feeders (grey circles). Basal phase, foragers visiting each feeder were counted. Exposure phase, the FS2 was removed and a new one containing Acttra/Entrust was offered (black circle). Returning phase consisted of putting back sucrose solution in FS2. Each phase, except training, lasted 20 min.

Fig. 2

Apis mellifera exposed to drops of each treatment (A) and foragers with their abdomen colored red after feeding on the treatment containing natural colorant (B and C); foragers that did not consume colored food are also shown (D and E).
Apis mellifera exposed to drops of each treatment (A) and foragers with their abdomen colored red after feeding on the treatment containing natural colorant (B and C); foragers that did not consume colored food are also shown (D and E).

Fig. 3

Mean mortality (± standard error) of foragers exposed to each treatment in experiment 2 (see text for further details). Treatments were not significantly different at α=0.05.
Mean mortality (± standard error) of foragers exposed to each treatment in experiment 2 (see text for further details). Treatments were not significantly different at α=0.05.

Fig. 4

Mean mortality (± standard error) of honey bee foragers in experiment 3 (see text for further details). The same letter indicates no significant difference (Tukey’s HSD test, α=0.05).
Mean mortality (± standard error) of honey bee foragers in experiment 3 (see text for further details). The same letter indicates no significant difference (Tukey’s HSD test, α=0.05).

Active ingredientTrade nameManufacturerClassificationApplication dates
Nitrogen and aminoacidsAlgacellAgroplasma Ferticell SA de CVFertilizers and amendment1 and 5 Feb
AminoacidsAmino PlantOrganic Extract PlantFertilizers25 Jan, 1 and 26 Feb, 5 March
Garlic, neem and cinnamonAranovaZare AgrhosBotanical extracts used as insect repellents26 Feb, 24 March
AzadiracthinAza-direct 1.2 CEGowan mexicana S.A.P.I. DE CVInsecticide1 Feb, 15 March, 21 Apr, 4 May
FenhexamidElevatArysta Lifecience México, S.A. DE C.V.Fungicide25 Jan
Seaweed EckloniaKelpAlgas y Bioderivados Marinos, S.A. de C.V.Fertilizers and amendment26 Jan
Chrysanthemum extractsKillwalcBioCampo, S.A. de C.V.Botanical extracts used as insect repellents/pesticides1 and 26 Feb, 5 March, 14 Apr
Nitrogen and organic compoundsMaxigrowCosmoflorFertilizer1 Feb
AzoxystrobinMaxtrobynHelm de México, S.A.Fungicide1 Feb
Conidia of Isaria fumosoroseaPAE-SINAgrobiologicos del noreste S.A. DE C.V.Biopesticide9 March, 2 May
Ciprodinil and fludioxonilSwitch 62.5 WGSyngenta Agro, S.A. DE C.V.Fungicide18 Feb
Conidia of Hirrsutella thompsoniiThompzarZare AgrhosBiopesticide26 Feb, 5 March,
Conidia of Verticillium lecanniVERTI-SINAgrobiologicos del noreste S.A. DE C.V.Biopesticide9 and 30 March
NitrogenWiserganicWISErg CorporationFertilizers and amendment1 and 26 Feb, 5 March
SiloxaneXtenderFertilizantes e Insumos Agrícolas S.A. de C.V.Adjuvant25 Jan, 18 Feb
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2021-0019 | Journal eISSN: 2299-4831 | Journal ISSN: 1643-4439
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 279 - 290
Submitted on: Mar 15, 2021
Accepted on: Aug 6, 2021
Published on: Dec 28, 2021
Published by: Research Institute of Horticulture
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year
Keywords:
Apidae,
Attract and Kill,
pesticide,
safety,
semiochemical
Related subjects:
Life sciences,
Zoology,
Life sciences, other

© 2021 Ricardo Alberto Toledo-Hernández, Mónica Pulido-Enríquez, Francisco Landeros-Pedro, Douglas Rodríguez, Daniel Sánchez, published by Research Institute of Horticulture
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 65 (2021): Issue 2 (December 2021)Next article