Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Application of Herbal Essential Oil Extract Mixture for Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.) Against Nosema ceranae and Nosema apis Cover

Application of Herbal Essential Oil Extract Mixture for Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.) Against Nosema ceranae and Nosema apis

Open Access
|Jun 2021

Figures & Tables

Fig. 1

Experimental design of the cage experiment.
Experimental design of the cage experiment.

Fig. 2

HEOEM application method in the cage experiment by spraying the syrup on 190 adult bees in the 225 cm2 surface area of the experimental cages using a 30-ml glass spray bottle.
HEOEM application method in the cage experiment by spraying the syrup on 190 adult bees in the 225 cm2 surface area of the experimental cages using a 30-ml glass spray bottle.

Fig. 3

Experimental design of the field study.
Experimental design of the field study.

Fig. 4

The average numbers of Nosema spp. spores/bee during cage experiment in all groups.
The average numbers of Nosema spp. spores/bee during cage experiment in all groups.

Fig. 5

Comparative results of the average number of Nosema spp. spores in the apiaries differentiated by application method. *MVSN: Mean values of spore numbers at the beginning of the field study. SW:Mean values of the final spore numbers after the application of spraying with water at the end of the field study SS:Mean values of the final spore numbers after the application of spraying with syrup at the end of the field study FS:Mean values of the final spore numbers after the application of feeding with syrup at the end of the field study **Missing data belong to SS in 2,3,8,9th apiaries could not be shown because of robbing behaviour. All of the experiments’ data on individual basis are presented in supplementary table online.
Comparative results of the average number of Nosema spp. spores in the apiaries differentiated by application method. *MVSN: Mean values of spore numbers at the beginning of the field study. SW:Mean values of the final spore numbers after the application of spraying with water at the end of the field study SS:Mean values of the final spore numbers after the application of spraying with syrup at the end of the field study FS:Mean values of the final spore numbers after the application of feeding with syrup at the end of the field study **Missing data belong to SS in 2,3,8,9th apiaries could not be shown because of robbing behaviour. All of the experiments’ data on individual basis are presented in supplementary table online.

Plant properties and bioactivities considered in preparing HEOEM

SpeciesMajor componentsBioactivitiesReferences
Rumex acetosellaOxalate (binoxalate) of potassium, tannic acid, and nitrogenous matterRefrigerant, asidic and diuretichttps://www.henriettes-herb.com/eclectic/kings/rumex-acet.html
Achillea millefoliumArtemisia ketone, camphor, linalyl acetate and 1,8-cineoleAnti-inflammatory and disinfectantGhanbari et al., 2017
Plantago lanceolataFlavonoids, alkaloids, terpenoids, phenolic compounds (caffeic acid derivatives), iridoid glycosides, fatty acids, polysaccharides and vitaminsAnti-inflammatory antimicrobial activity, antioxidant and cytotoxic activity, anti-tumoural activity and antispasmodicBajer et al., 2016
Salvia officinalisCis-thujone, camphor, cineole, humulene, trans-thujone, camphene, pinene, limonene, bornyl acetate and linaloolAntibacterial, antioxidant, antimicrobial, insecticidal and allelopathic activities antitumoral antidiabetic and antioxidantKhedher et al., 2017
Thymus vulgarisGeraniol, linalool, gamma-terpineol, carvacrol, thymol and trans-thujan-4-ol/terpinen-4-ol, p-cymene, γ-terpinene and thymolAntimicrobial, antitussive, antibroncholitic, antispasmodic, anthelmintic, carminative, antiseptic, antioxidant, diureticBorugă et al., 2014
Rosmarinus officinalisRosmarinic acid, caffeic acid, ursolic acid, betulinic acid, carnosic acid and carnosol, camphor, 1,8-cineole, α-pinene, borneol, camphene, β-pinene and limoneneAntibacterial, antiviral, antioxidant and anti-inflammator, antidiabetic anti-inflammatory, antitumor and antioxidantAndrade et al., 2018
Laurus nobilis1,8-cineole, sabinene, and linaloolAntibacterial, antioxidant, antifungal, cytotoxicCaputo et al., 2017

Differences between groups regarding application doses classified by Duncan test

SubgroupsSubset for alpha = .05The number of Nosema spp. spores/bee±SE

CagesN (Sampling days)a*b*c*d**e
ExpNa(2)8428703±21.3
ExpNc(2)8471887±24.2
ExpNa(1)8 518812±28.1
ExpNc(1)8 639750±24.6
PCNa8 3337500±126.3
PCNc8 3750000±131.7
NCNa8 41519226±336.3
NCNc8 40621143±321.8

Comparison of numbers of Nosema spp_ spores following varying HEOEM application methods analysed by Duncan test

SubgroupsSubset for alpha = .05The number of Nosema spp. spores/bee (×106)±SE

Appl. methodsN (apiaries)a*b*c*d*
SW91.23±0.1
SS9 2.27±0.4
FS9 2.60±0.2
PC9 4.48±0.2
MVSN9 10.26±1.8

Number of dead bees and final mortality rates (%) during the cage experiments

Sampling DaysTotal number of dead beesFinal mortality rates(%)

CagesCage number36912151821 (190 newly emerged bees at the beginning point x10 cages)
ExpNa(1)1–10515334863859334218.0
ExpNa(2)1–10515172934516421511.3
PCNa1–206151120275313234.7
NCNa1–21112031599511733487.8
ExpNc(1)1–1081432398510816545123.7
ExpNc(2)1–108112933518110231516.5
PCNc1–2013152230487019852.1
NCNc1–2152546597010559380100
Native1–2158101210156116.0
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2021-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2299-4831 | Journal ISSN: 1643-4439
Language: English
Page range: 163 - 175
Submitted on: Jul 22, 2020
Accepted on: Feb 23, 2021
Published on: Jun 24, 2021
Published by: Research Institute of Horticulture
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2021 Asli Özkırım, Billur Küçüközmen, published by Research Institute of Horticulture
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.