Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Maternal Inheritance in Hybrids of Three Honey Bee Subspecies Cover

Maternal Inheritance in Hybrids of Three Honey Bee Subspecies

Open Access
|Jun 2019

References

  1. Ałpatow, W.W. (1948). Parody miedonosnoj pczeły. Sredi Prirody, 4, Moskwa.
  2. De la Rúa, P., Jaffe, R., Dall’Ollio, R., Muñoz, I., Serrano, J. (2009). Biodiversity, conservation and current threats to European honeybees. Apidologie, 40, 263-284. DOI: 10.1051/apido/200902710.1051/apido/2009027
  3. Francoy, T.M., Wittmann, D., Drauschke, M., Müller, S., Steinhage, V., Bezerra-Laure, M.A.F., … Gonçalves, L.S. (2008). Identification of Africanized honey bees through wing morphometrics: two fast and efficient procedures. Apidologie, 39(5), 488-494. DOI: 10.1051/apido:200802810.1051/apido:2008028
  4. Francoy, T.M., Gonçalves, L.S., & De Jong, D. (2012). Rapid morphological changes in populations of hybrids between Africanized and European honey bees. Genetics and Molecular Research, 11(3), 3349-3356. http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/201210.4238/2012
  5. Gerula, D., Tofilski, A., Węgrzynowicz, P., & Skowronek, W. (2009). Computer-assisted discrimination of honeybee subspecies used for breeding in Poland. Journal of Apicultural Science, 53(2), 105-114.
  6. Gromisz, M., Bornus, L., Bobrzecki, J., Bojarczuk, C., Kalinowski, J., Król, A. … Zaremba, J. (1974). Ocena morfologiczna mieszańców międzyrasowych pszczoły miodnej. Pszczelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe, 18, 77-89.
  7. Gromisz, M. (1981). Morfologiczna ocena populacji rojów w pasiekach zarodowych. Pszczelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe, 25, 51-66.
  8. Guzmán-Novoa, E., & Page Jr, R. E. (1994). Genetic dominance and worker interactions affect honeybee colony defense. Behavioral Ecology, 5(1), 91-97.10.1093/beheco/5.1.91
  9. Guzmán-Novoa, E., Hunt, G. J., Uribe, J. L., Smith, C., Arechavaleta-Velasco, M. E. (2002). Confirmation of QTL effects and evidence of genetic dominance of honeybee defensive behavior: results of colony and individual behavioral assays. Behavior Genetics, 32(2), 95-102.10.1023/A:1015245605670
  10. Kandemir, İ., Özkan, A., & Fuchs, S. (2011) Reevaluation of honeybee (Apis mellifera) microtaxonomy: a geometric morphometric approach. Apidologie, 42(5), 618-627. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-011-0063-310.1007/s13592-011-0063-3
  11. Miguel, I., Baylac, M., Iriondo, M., Manzano, C., Garnery, L., Estonba, A. (2011). Both geometric morphometric and microsatellite data consistently support the differentiation of the Apis mellifera M evolutionary branch. Apidologie, 42, 150-161. DOI: 10.1051/apido/201004810.1051/apido/2010048
  12. Moritz, R.F. (1985). Heritability of the postcapping stage in Apis mellifera and its relation to varroatosis resistance. Journal of Heredity, 76, 267–270.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110090
  13. Nawrocka A., Kandemir I., Fuchs S., Tofilski A. (2018). Computer software for identification of honey bee subspecies and evolutionary lineages. Apidologie, 49(2), 172-184. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-017-0538-y10.1007/s13592-017-0538-y
  14. Oleksa, A., & Tofilski, A. (2015). Wing geometric morphometrics and microsatellite analysis provide similar discrimination of honey bee subspecies. Apidologie, 46(1), 49-60. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-014-0300-710.1007/s13592-014-0300-7
  15. Page, R. E., & Robinson, G. E. (1991). The genetics of division of labour in honey bee colonies. In Advances in insect physiology (Vol. 23, pp. 117-169). Academic Press.10.1016/S0065-2806(08)60093-4
  16. Paleolog, J. (2009). Behavioural characteristics of honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies containing mix of workers of divergent behavioural traits. Animal Science Papers and Reports, 27(3), 237-248.
  17. Paleolog, J., Borsuk, G., & Olszewski, K. (2003). Pollen hoarding effectiveness and strategies as affected by worker bee genotype II. Genetic diversity within a colony. Journal of Apicultural Science, 47(2), 13-17.
  18. Rinderer, TE., Daly, HV., Sylvester, HA., Collins, AM., Buco, S.M., Hellmich, R.L., Danka, R.G. (1990). Morphometric differences among Africanized and European honey bees and their F1 hybrids (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 83(3), 346-351. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/83.3.34610.1093/aesa/83.3.346
  19. Rohlf, F.J., & Slice, D. (1990). Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Biology, 39, 40-59.10.2307/2992207
  20. Schneider, S.S., Leamy, L.J., Lewis, L.A., & De Grandi-Hoffman, G. (2003). The influence of hybridization between African and European honeybees, Apis mellifera, on asymmetries in wing size and shape. Evolution, 57(10), 2350-2364.10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00247.x14628923
  21. StatSoft Inc (2017). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), wersion 13. www.statsoft.com
  22. Tofilski, A. (2008). Using geometric morphometrics and standard morphometry to discriminate three honeybee subspecies. Apidologie, 39, 558-563. DOI: 10.1051/apido:200803710.1051/apido:2008037
  23. Unger, P., & Guzman-Novoa, E. (2010). Maternal effects on the hygienic behavior of Russian x Ontario hybrid honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Heredity, 101(1), 91-96. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esp09210.1093/jhered/esp09219889722
  24. Wolf, J. B., & Wade, M. J. (2009). What are maternal effects (and what are they not)?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364(1520), 1107-1115. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.023810.1098/rstb.2008.0238266668019324615
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jas-2019-0010 | Journal eISSN: 2299-4831 | Journal ISSN: 1643-4439
Language: English
Page range: 131 - 138
Submitted on: Sep 10, 2018
Accepted on: Mar 18, 2019
Published on: Jun 26, 2019
Published by: Research Institute of Horticulture
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2019 Paweł Węgrzynowicz, Dariusz Gerula, Adam Tofilski, Beata Panasiuk, Małgorzata Bieńkowska, published by Research Institute of Horticulture
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.