Have a personal or library account? Click to login
A heteroscedastic Bayesian model for method comparison data Cover

A heteroscedastic Bayesian model for method comparison data

Journal of Applied Mathematics, Statistics and Informatics
Volume 18 (2022): Issue 2 (December 2022)
By:
Open Access
|Jan 2023

References

  1. [1] ALTMAN, D.G., AND BLAND, J.M. 1983. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. <em>The Statistician</em>. 32, 307-317.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  2. [2] ANDREW, G., CARLIN, J.B., STERN, H.S., et al. 2004. Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edition. Chapman &amp; Hall/CRC.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  3. [3] ARAVIND, K.R., AND NAWARATHNA, L.S. 2017. A statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of heteroscedastic clinical measurements using the copula method. <em>J Med Stat Inform</em>. 5:3. <a href="https://doi.org/10.7243/2053-7662-5-3" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.7243/2053-7662-5-3</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  4. [4] BILIĆ-ZULLE, L. 2011. Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression. <em>Biochemia Medica</em>. 21(1):49-52. <a href="https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2011.010." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.11613/BM.2011.010.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  5. [5] BLAND, J.M., AND ALTMAN, D.G. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 307—310.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  6. [6] BLAND, J.M., AND ALTMAN, D.G. 1999. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. <em>Statistical Methods in Medical Research</em>. 8(2): 135–160. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1177/096228029900800204.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  7. [7] BOSCARDIN, W.J., AND GELMAN, A. 1994. Bayesian Computation for Parametric Models of Heteroscedasticity in the Linear Model. <em>In Advances in Econometrics</em>. 11, A87-10.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  8. [8] BOSCARDIN, W.J., GELMAN, A. 1996. Bayesian Computation for parametric Models of Heteroscedasticity in the Linear Model. <em>In Advances in Econometrics</em>, Volume 11 (Part A), edited by Hill, R. C. Connecticut: JAI Press Inc.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  9. [9] CARSTENSEN, B. 2010. Comparing methods of measurement: Extending the LoA by regression. <em>Statistics in Medicine</em>. 29: 401-410. doi: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3769" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/sim.3769</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  10. [10] CHINCHILLI, V.M., MARTEL, J.K., KUMANYIKA, S., AND LLOYD, T. 1996. A weighted concordance correlation coefficient for repeated measurement designs. <em>Biometrics</em>. 52:341–353.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  11. [11] CHOUDHARY, P.K., AND NAGARAJA, H.N. 2007. Tests for assessment of agreement using probability criteria. <em>Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference</em>.137:279–290.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  12. [12] CHOUDHARY, P.K. 2009. Interrater agreement. <em>In Methods and Applications of Statistics in the Life and Health Sciences,</em> BALAKRISHNAN N et. al. (ed.). John Wiley: New York. 461–480.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  13. [13] CHOUDHARY, P.K., AND YIN, K. 2010. Bayesian and Frequentist Methodologies for Analyzing Method Comparison Studies With Multiple Methods. <em>Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research</em>. 2:122-132. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1198/sbr.2010.08096." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1198/sbr.2010.08096.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  14. [14] DE WAAL, E.E., WAPPLER, F., AND BUHRE, W.F. 2009. Cardiac output monitoring. <em>Curr Opin Anaesthesiol</em>. 22: 71–7.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  15. [15] EDILBERTO, C., AND JORGE, A. 2009. Regression Models with Heteroscedasticity using Bayesian Approach. <em>Revista Colombiana de Estadística</em>.32
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  16. [16] GALEA-ROJAS, M., DE CASTILHO, M.V., AND BOLFARINE, H., et al. 2003. Detection of analytical bias. <em>Analyst</em>. 128: 1073–1081.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  17. [17] GARDNER, M.J., AND ALTMAN, D.G. 1986. Confidence intervals rather than P values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. <em>Br Med J</em> (Clin Res Ed). 292:746–50.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  18. [18] HANNEMAN, S.K. 2018. Design, analysis, and interpretation of method-comparison studies. <em>AACN advanced critical care</em>. 19(2): 223–234. <a href="https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AACN.0000318125.41512.a3." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1097/01.AACN.0000318125.41512.a3.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  19. [19] KASS, R.E., AND WASSERMAN, L. 1996. The Selection of Prior Distributions by Formal Rules. <em>Journal of the American Statistical Association.</em> 91:435, 1343-1370.<a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1996.10477003" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/01621459.1996.10477003</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  20. [20] LIN, L., HEDAYAT, A.S., WU, W. 2007. A Unified Approach for Assessing Agreement for Continuous and Categorical Data. <em>Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics</em>, 17:4, 629-652, DOI: <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/10543400701376498" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1080/10543400701376498</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
  21. [21] LIN, L. 1989. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. <em>Biometrics</em>. 45:255–268. Corrections: 2000,56, 324–325.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  22. [22] LIN, L. 2000. Total deviation index for measuring individual agreement with applications in laboratory performance and bioequivalence. <em>Statistics in Medicine</em>. 19:255–270.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  23. [23] LIN, L.I., HEDAYAT, A.S., SINHA, B., AND YANG, M. 2002. Statistical methods in assessing agreement: models, issues, and tools. <em>Journal of the American Statistical Association</em>.97:257–270.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  24. [24] LINNET, K. 1998. Performance of Deming regression analysis in case of misspecified analytical error ratio in method comparison studies. <em>Clinical Chemistry</em>. 44(5):1024-1031.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  25. [25] MONTENIJ, L.J., BUHRE, W.F., JANSEN, J.R. et al. 2016. methodology of method comparison studies evaluating the validity of cardiac output monitors: a stepwise approach and checklist. <em>British Journal of Anaesthesia</em>. 116 (6): 750–8.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  26. [26] NAWARATHNA, L.S., CHOUDHARY, P.K. 2013. Measuring Agreement in Method Comparison Studies with Heteroscedastic Measurements. <em>Statistics in Medicine</em>. 32(29): 5156-5171. <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="<a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5955" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5955</a>">https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.5955</ext-link>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  27. [27] NAWARATHNA, L.S., CHOUDHARY, P. 2015. A heteroscedastic measurement error model for method comparison data with replicate measurements. <em>Statistics in Medicine</em>. 34(7), 1242-1258.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  28. [28] O’HAGAN, ANTHONY, FORSTER, et al 2004. <em>Reading in Bayesian Inference</em>. Volume 2b of Kendall’s Advanced Theory of Statistics, second edition. Arnold, London.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  29. [29] PETER, B. 2001. A Brief Introduction to Monte Carlo Simulation. <em>Clinical pharmacokinetics</em>.40: 15-22. <a href="https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200140010-00002." target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.2165/00003088-200140010-00002.</a>
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  30. [30] PEYTON, P.J., AND CHONG, S.W. 2010. Minimally invasive measurement of cardiac output during surgery and critical care: a meta-analysis of accuracy and precision. <em>Anesthesiology</em>. 113:1220–35.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  31. [31] STUDENMUND, A.H. 1991. <em>Reading using Econometrics: A practical guide.</em>2nd Ed. ISBN 0-673-52125-7.
    Search in Google ScholarBack to article
  32. [32] TIM, P.M., IAN, R.W., AND MICHAEL, J.C. 2019. Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods. <em>Statistics in Medicine</em>. 38:2074–2102. doi. <pub-id pub-id-type="doi"><a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.8086" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer" class="text-signal-blue hover:underline">10.1002/sim.8086</a></pub-id>
    Open DOISearch in Google ScholarBack to article
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jamsi-2022-0012 | Journal eISSN: 1339-0015 | Journal ISSN: 1336-9180
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 57 - 75
Published on: Jan 19, 2023
Published by: Sciendo
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year
Keywords:
Agreement,
Bayesian modelling,
Concordance Correlation,
Heteroscedastic Measurements,
Total deviation index
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Information technology,
Mathematics,
Logic and set theory,
Probability and statistics,
Applied mathematics

© 2023 S. M. M. Lakmali, L. S. Nawarathna, P. Wijekoon, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Previous articleVolume 18 (2022): Issue 2 (December 2022)Next article