Have a personal or library account? Click to login
Biologically Inspired Feature Detection Using Cascaded Correlations of off and on Channels Cover

Biologically Inspired Feature Detection Using Cascaded Correlations of off and on Channels

Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing Research
Volume 3 (2013): Issue 1 (January 2013)
By: Steven D. Wiederman and  David C. O’Carroll  
Open Access
|Dec 2014

References

  1. [1] A. Borst, and T. Euler, “Seeing things in motion: Models, circuits, and mechanisms,” Neuron, vol. 71, pp. 974-994, 2011.10.1016/j.neuron.2011.08.031
    Search in Google Scholar
  2. [2] N. Franceschini, J.M. Pichon, C. Blanes, and J.M. Brady, “From insect vision to robot vision [and discussion],” Philos. T. R. Soc. Lon. B vol. 337, pp. 283-294, 1992.10.1098/rstb.1992.0106
    Search in Google Scholar
  3. [3] M.V. Srinivasan, et al., “Robot navigation inspired by principles of insect vision,” Robot. Auton. Syst. vol. 26, pp. 203-216, 1999.10.1016/S0921-8890(98)00069-4
    Search in Google Scholar
  4. [4] P.S. Corbet, Dragonflies: Behavior and Ecology of Odonata, Ithaca: Cornell Univ Press, 1999
    Search in Google Scholar
  5. [5] S.D. Wiederman and D.C O’Carroll, “Selective attention in an insect visual neuron” Curr Biol, Vol 23, pp156-161, 201310.1016/j.cub.2012.11.04823260469
    Search in Google Scholar
  6. [6] S.D. Wiederman, P.A. Shoemaker, and D.C O’Carroll, “A model for the detection of moving targets in visual clutter inspired by insect physiology” PLoS ONE vol. 3 pp. e2784, 2008.10.1371/journal.pone.0002784246473118665213
    Search in Google Scholar
  7. [7] S.D. Wiederman, S.D. Wiederman, R.S.A. Brinkworth and D.C. O’Carroll “Bio-inspired small target discrimination in high dynamic range natural scenes” 3rd International Conference on Bio-Inspired Computing: Theories and Applications. pp 109-116, 200810.1109/BICTA.2008.4656712
    Search in Google Scholar
  8. [8] S.D. Wiederman, R.S.A. Brinkworth and D.C. O’Carroll, “Performance of a bio-inspired model for the robust detection of moving targets in high dynamic range natural scenes,” J. Comput. Theor. Nanos. vol. 7, pp. 911-920, 2010.10.1166/jctn.2010.1438
    Search in Google Scholar
  9. [9] D. O’Carroll, “Feature-detecting neurons in dragonflies,” Nature vol. 362, pp. 541-543,1993.10.1038/362541a0
    Search in Google Scholar
  10. [10] K. Nordstrm, D.M. Bolzon and D.C. O’Carroll. “Spatial facilitation by a high-performance dragonfly target-detecting neuron,” Biol. Lett. vol. 7, pp. 588-592, 2011.10.1098/rsbl.2010.1152313021521270026
    Search in Google Scholar
  11. [11] B. Hassenstein and W. Reichardt, “Analyse der zeit-, reihenfolgen- und vorzeichenauswertung bei der bewegungsperzeption des rsselkfers Chlorophanus,” Z. Naturf., vol. 11b, pp. 513-524, 1956.10.1515/znb-1956-9-1004
    Search in Google Scholar
  12. [12] H.G. Krapp, and R. Hengstenberg, “Estimation of self-motion by optic flow processing in single visual interneurons,” Nature, vol. 384, pp. 463-466, 1996.10.1038/384463a08945473
    Search in Google Scholar
  13. [13] B. R. H. Geurten, K. Nordstrm, J. D. H. Sprayberry, D.M. Bolzon, and D.C. O’Carroll, “Neural mechanisms underlying target detection in a dragonfly centrifugal neuron,” J. Exp. Biol., vol. 210, pp. 3277-3284, 2007.
    Search in Google Scholar
  14. [14] K. Nordstrm, P.D. Barnett, and D.C. O Carroll, “Insect detection of small targets moving in visual clutter,” PLoS Biol. vol. 4, pp. 378-386, 2006.10.1371/journal.pbio.0040054136009816448249
    Search in Google Scholar
  15. [15] K. Nordstrm, and D.C. O’Carroll, “Feature detection and the hypercomplex property in insects,” Trends Neurosci. 32:383-391, 2009.10.1016/j.tins.2009.03.00419541374
    Search in Google Scholar
  16. [16] P.D. Barnett, K. Nordstrm, and D.C. O’Carroll, “Retinotopic organization of small-field-targetdetecting neurons in the insect visual system,” Curr. Biol. vol. 17, pp. 569-578, 2007.10.1016/j.cub.2007.02.03917363248
    Search in Google Scholar
  17. [17] R. Dror, D.C. O’Carroll, S.B. Laughlin, “The role of natural image statistics in biological motion estimation”. Lect Notes Comput Sc, vol. 1811, pp 492-501, 200010.1007/3-540-45482-9_50
    Search in Google Scholar
  18. [18] S.D. Wiederman, P.A. Shoemaker & D.C. O’Carroll, “Biologically inspired small target detection mechanisms” IEEE Proc of the 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information (ISSNIP) pp. 269-273, 2007.10.1109/ISSNIP.2007.4496855
    Search in Google Scholar
  19. [19] D. Osorio, “Mechanisms of early visual processing in the medulla of the locust optic lobe - How self-inhibition, spatial-pooling, and signal rectification contribute to the properties of transient cells”. Visual Neurosci. vol. 7, pp. 345-3, 1991.10.1017/S0952523800004831
    Search in Google Scholar
  20. [20] N. Jansonius, and J. Hateren, “Fast temporal adaptation of on-off units in the first optic chiasm of the blowfly,” J. Comp. Physiol. A vol. 168, pp. 631-637, 1991.10.1007/BF002243531920162
    Search in Google Scholar
  21. [21] D.M. Bolzon, K. Nordstrom, D.C. O’Carroll “Local and large-range inhibition in feature detection” J Neurosci vol. 29 pp 14143-14150 200910.1523/JNEUROSCI.2857-09.2009666507519906963
    Search in Google Scholar
  22. [22] S.D. Wiederman SD and D.C. O’Carroll, “Discrimination of features in natural scenes by a dragonfly neuron,” J. Neurosci. vol. 31, pp. 7141-7144, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  23. [23] J. Zanker, “Modelling human motion perception. II. Beyond Fourier motion stimuli,” Naturwissenschaften vol. 81, pp. 200-209, 1994.10.1007/BF011385448022499
    Search in Google Scholar
  24. [24] J.R. Dunbier, S.D. Wiederman, P.A. Shoemaker, and D.C. O’Carroll, “Modelling the temporal response properties of an insect small target motion detector”, Proc. 7th Int. Conf. on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing, pp. 125-130, 2011.10.1109/ISSNIP.2011.6146600
    Search in Google Scholar
  25. [25] J.R. Dunbier, S.D. Wiederman, P.A. Shoemaker and D.C. O’Carroll, “Facilitation of dragonfly target-detecting neurons by slow moving features on continuous paths,” Front. Neural Circuits. vol. 6, pp. 79, 2012.10.3389/fncir.2012.00079
    Search in Google Scholar
  26. [26] S.D. Wiederman, D.C. O’Carroll, “Biomimetic Target Detection: modeling 2nd order correlation of OFF and ON channels”. Proc. of the IEEE, Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence for Multimedia, Signal and Vision Processing, Singapore (in press).
    Search in Google Scholar
  27. [27] K. Nordstrm, and D.C. O’Carroll, “Small object detection neurons in female hoverflies,” P. Roy. Soc. B-Biol. Sci. vol. 273, pp.1211-1216, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  28. [28] S.D. Wiederman, R.S.A. Brinkworth and D.C. O’Carroll, “Bio-inspired target detection in natural scenes: optimal thresholds and ego-motion,” Proc. of the SPIE, Biosensing, vol. 7035, pp. 70350Z, 2008.
    Search in Google Scholar
  29. [29] H. Eichner, M. Joesch, B. Schnell, D.F. Reiff, and A. Borst “Internal structure of the fly elementary motion detector,” Neuron vol. 70, pp. 1155-1164, 2011.
    Search in Google Scholar
  30. [30] R.A. Harris, D.C. O’Carroll and S.B. Laughlin, “Contrast gain reduction in fly motion adaptation” Neuron, vol 28 pp 595. 200010.1016/S0896-6273(00)00136-7
    Search in Google Scholar
  31. [31] J.C. Theobald, B.J. Duistermars, D.L. Ringach and M.A. Frye, “Flies see second-order ?motion,” Curr. Biol. vol. 18, pp. R464-R465, 2008.10.1016/j.cub.2008.03.05018522814
    Search in Google Scholar
  32. [32] E. L. Mah, R. S. Brinkworth, and D. C. O’Carroll, ”An elaborated electronic prototype of a biological photoreceptor,” Biol Cybern vol. 98, pp. 357-369, 2008.10.1007/s00422-008-0222-418327606
    Search in Google Scholar
  33. [33] M. Juusola, R. O. Uusitalo, and M. Weckstrom, ”Transfer of graded potentials at the photoreceptor interneuron synapse,” J Gen Physiol vol. 105, pp. 117-148, 1995.10.1085/jgp.105.1.11722169277537323
    Search in Google Scholar
  34. [34] A. C. James, ”Nonlinear operator network models of processing in the fly lamina,” in Nonlinear Vision, N. B, Ed. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 1992, pp. 39-74.10.1201/9781351075060-2
    Search in Google Scholar
  35. [35] M. V. Srinivasan and R. G. Guy, ”Spectral properties of movement perception in the dronefly Eristalis,” J Comp Physiol A vol. 166, pp. 287-295, 1990.10.1007/BF00204803
    Search in Google Scholar
  36. [36] D. G. Stavenga, ”Angular and spectral sensitivity of fly photoreceptors. I. Integrated facet lens and rhabdomere optics,” J Comp Physiol A vol. 189, pp. 1-17, 2003.10.1007/s00359-002-0370-212548425
    Search in Google Scholar
  37. [37] A. D. Straw, E. J. Warrant, and D. C. O’Carroll, ”A ‘bright zone’ in male hoverfly (Eristalis tenax) eyes and associated faster motion detection and increased contrast sensitivity,” J Exp Biol vol. 209, pp. 4339-4354, 2006.
    Search in Google Scholar
  38. [38] J. H. van Hateren and H. P. Snippe, ”Information theoretical evaluation of parametric models of gain control in blowfly photoreceptor cells,” Vision Res vol. 41, pp. 1851-1865, 2001.
    Search in Google Scholar
  39. [39] R.S.A. Brinkworth and D. C. O’Carroll, ” Robust Models for Optic Flow Coding in Natural Scenes Inspired by Insect Biology” PLoS Comput Biol vol 5, (11), e1000555. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000555, 2009.10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000555276664119893631
    Search in Google Scholar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jaiscr-2014-0001
Journal RSS Feed
Language: English
Page range: 5 - 14
Published on: Dec 30, 2014
Published by: SAN University
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 4 issues per year
Related subjects:
Computer sciences,
Databases and data mining,
Artificial intelligence

© 2014 Steven D. Wiederman, David C. O’Carroll, published by SAN University
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Volume 3 (2013): Issue 1 (January 2013)Next article