Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Damage Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Bridges Under the Ground Motions - a Probabilistic Approach

Open Access
|Dec 2022

References

  1. ATC-13, 1985. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California,” Applied Technology Council, Report. No. 13. Redwood City.
  2. ATC-40, 1996. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings Volume-1 by APPLIED TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 550 Redwood City, California 94065.
  3. Aviram, A., Mackie, K.R., Stojadinović, B., 2008. Guidelines for Nonlinear Analysis of Bridge Structures in California Guidelines for Nonlinear Analysis of Bridge Structures in California”, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, PEER Report 2008/3.
  4. Berry, M.P., Eberhard, M.O., 2007. Performance Modeling Strategies for Modern Reinforced Concrete Bridge Columns.
  5. Contin, A., Mardegan, A., 2016. Different Solutions for Dissipation of Seismic Energy on Multi-Span Bridges, in: Structural Bridge Engineering. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/63821.10.5772/63821
  6. Eurocode-8-Part 3, 2004. Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Pinto P.E. and Franchin P., University of Rome, La Sapienza.
  7. FEMA-356, 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Prepared by American Society of Civil Engineers for the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  8. FEMA, 2009. Quantification of building seismic performance factors,” FEMA P695. Prepared by Applied Technology Council For the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  9. Lavorato, D., Fiorentino, G., Pelle, A., Rasulo, A., Bergami, A.V., Briseghella, B., Nuti, C., 2020. A corrosion model for the interpretation of cyclic behavior of reinforced concrete sections. Struct. Concr. 21. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201900232.10.1002/suco.201900232
  10. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N., Park, R., 1988. Theoretical Stress-Strain Model for Confined Concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 114, 1804–1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
  11. Moehle, J.P., Eberhard, M.O., 2000. Earthquake Damage to Bridges, in: Bridge Engineering Handbook.10.1201/9781420049596.ch34
  12. Muthukumar, S., 2003. A contact element approach with hysteresis damping for the analysis and design of pounding in bridges, PhD thesis.
  13. Park, Y., Ang, A.H. -S., 1985. Mechanistic Seismic Damage Model for Reinforced Concrete. J. Struct. Eng. 111, 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722).10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:4(722)
  14. PEER, 1999. Pacific earthquake engineering research center, strong motion database. [WWW Document]. http:/ngawest2.berkeley.edu/.
  15. Porter, K.A., 2000. Assembly-based vulnerability of buildings and its use in seismic performance evaluation and risk-management decision-making,” Ph.D. thesis, Civil and Environmental Engineering Dept., University Stanford, California.
  16. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M., Kowalsky, M.J., 2007. Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures. IUSS Press, Pavia (in press).
  17. Rodriguez-Marek, A., Cofer, W., 2007. Dynamic Response of Bridges to Near-fault, forward Directivity Ground Motions (Report No. WA-RD 689.1). United States; Federal Highway Administration: Washington, DC, USA, 2007.
  18. Soleimani, F., 2021. Analytical seismic performance and sensitivity evaluation of bridges based on random decision forest framework. Structures 32, 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2021.02.049.10.1016/j.istruc.2021.02.049
  19. Vamvatsikos, D., Cornell, C.A., 2002. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn. 31, 491–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.141.10.1002/eqe.141
  20. Wang, Z., Padgett, J.E., Dueñas-Osorio, L., 2014. Toward a uniform seismic risk design of reinforced concrete bridges: A displacement-based approach. Struct. Saf. 50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.03.009.10.1016/j.strusafe.2014.03.009
  21. Zelaschi, C., Monteiro, R., Pinho, R., 2016. Parametric Characterization of RC Bridges for Seismic Assessment Purposes. Structures 7, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ISTRUC.2016.04.003.10.1016/j.istruc.2016.04.003
Language: English
Page range: 179 - 184
Submitted on: Sep 28, 2022
Accepted on: Oct 3, 2022
Published on: Dec 21, 2022
Published by: University of Oradea, Civil Engineering and Architecture Faculty
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 issues per year

© 2022 M. S. Izhar, M. Umair, M. I. Ansari, published by University of Oradea, Civil Engineering and Architecture Faculty
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.