Have a personal or library account? Click to login

Performance Evaluation of Mike Nam Rainfall-Runoff (R-R) Model in Daily Flow Simulation (Case Study: Gonbad Catchment in Hamedan)

Open Access
|Jun 2020

References

  1. Amir, M. S. I. I., Khan, M. M. K., Rasul, M.G., Sharma, R. H., & Akram, F. (2013), Automatic multi-objective calibration of a rainfall runoff model for the Fitzroy Catchment, Queensland, Australia International Journal of Environmental Science and Developmen, 4(3): 10.7763/IJESD.2013.V4.361.
  2. Bergström, S. (1995). The HBV model. In: Singh, V.P. (Ed.).Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Colorado, pp. 443-476.
  3. Danish Hydraulic Institute. MIKE 11: A Modeling System for Rivers and Channels reference manual, 2009, 278-325.
  4. DHI S. (2004), MIKE 11 User & Reference Manual, Danish Hydraulic Institute, Denmark.
  5. Doulgeris, C., Georgiou, P., Papadimos, D., & Papamichail, D. (2011), Evaluating three different model setups in the MIKE 11 NAM model. InAdvances in the Research of Aquatic Environment, pp. 241-249.10.1007/978-3-642-19902-8_28
  6. Golmohammadi, G., Prasher, S., Madani, A. and Rudra, R. (2014). Evaluating Three Hydrological Distributed Watershed Models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT. Journal of Hydrology. 1: 20-39. doi:10.3390/hydrology1010020.10.3390/hydrology1010020
  7. Graham, D.N. and Butts, M. B. (2005). Flexible, integrated watershed modelling with MIKE SHE. In Watershed Models, Eds. V.P. Singh & D.K.Frevert.1: 245-272.
  8. Gupta HV, Sorooshian S, Yapo PO. (1999). Status of automatic calibration for hydrologic models: comparison with multilevel expert calibration. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 4(2): 135–143.
  9. Hafezparast, M., Araghinejad, S., Fatemi, S. E., Bressers, H. A. (2013), conceptual rainfall-runoff model using the auto calibrated NAM Models in the Sarisoo River, Hydrology, 4(1), 1-6.10.4172/2157-7587.1000148
  10. Havnø, K., Madsen, M. N. and Dørge, J. (1995). “MIKE 11 - A generalized river modelling package,” in Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, V. P. Singh, Ed. Water Resources Publications, Colorado, 1995, pp.733-782.
  11. Kumar, P., Lohani, A.K., and Nemai, A.K. (2019) Rainfall Runoff Modeling using Mike 11 Nam Model. Current World Environment, Vol. 14, No. (1) 2019, Pg. 27-36 ISSN: 0973-4929, https://www.cwejournal.org/pdf/vol14no1/Vol14_No1_p_27-36.pdf
  12. Madsen, H. (2000). Automatic calibration of a conceptual rainfall–runoff model using multiple objectives. Journal of Hydrology 235 (2000) 276–288 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002216940000279110.1016/S0022-1694(00)00279-1
  13. Moriasi, D. N., Arnold, J. G., Van Liew, M. W., Bingner, R. L., Harmel, R. D., Veith T. L. (2007). Model Evaluation Guidelines for Systematic Quantification of Accuracy in Watershed Simulations. American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers ISSN 0001−2351. Vol. 50(3): 885−900. Https://www.researchgate.net/publication/43261199_Model_Evaluation_Guidelines_for_Systematic_Quantification_of_Accuracy_in_Watershed_Simulations.
  14. Nash JE, Sutcliffe J. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I – a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10(3 282–290).10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
  15. Odiyo, J. O., Phangisa, J. I., & Makungo, R. (2012), Rainfall– runoff modelling for estimating Latonyanda River flow contributions to Luvuvhu River downstream of Alcatchmenti Dam. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 50, 5-13.10.1016/j.pce.2012.09.007
  16. Refsgaard J. C. and Knudsen J. (1996). Operational validation and inter comparison of different types of hydrological models. Water Resources Research [online]. 32(7). pp. 2189-2202. Available: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/96WR00896/pdf
  17. Sharma, K. D., Sorooshian, S. and Wheater, H., (2008). Hydrological Modelling in Arid and Semi-Arid Areas. New York: Cambridge University Press. 223 p. ISBN-13 978-0-511-37710-5.
  18. Sugawara, M. (1995). Tank model. In: Singh, V.P. (Ed.). Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, Water Resources Publications, Colorado, pp. 165–214.
  19. Tokar, A.S. and P.A. Johnson, (1999), Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. J. Hydrol. Eng., 4(1): 232-239.10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1999)4:3(232)
  20. Zhaohua, D., Amatya, D., Sun. G., Tretctin, C., LI. CH. and LI, H. (2010). A comparison of MIKE SHE and DRAINMOD for modeling forested wetland hydrology in Costal South Calorina, USA. XVIIth World Congress of the International Commission of Agricultural Engineering (CIGR) Hosted by the Canadian Society for Bioengineering (CSBE/SCGAB) Québec City, Canada June, pp. 13-17.
Language: English
Page range: 1 - 6
Submitted on: Mar 2, 2020
Accepted on: Apr 19, 2020
Published on: Jun 5, 2020
Published by: University of Oradea, Civil Engineering and Architecture Faculty
In partnership with: Paradigm Publishing Services
Publication frequency: 2 times per year

© 2020 Yasamin Sajadi Bami, Jahangir Porhemmat, Hossein Sedghi, Navid Jalalkamali, published by University of Oradea, Civil Engineering and Architecture Faculty
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.