Table 1
Log hourly wages 2005/2006 and 2014/2015, by gender.
| Variable | 2005/06 | 2014/15 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With imputation | Without imputation | With imputation | Without imputation | |||||
| Mean | s.e | Mean | s.e | Mean | s.e. | Mean | s.e. | |
| All | 3.632 | (0.004) | 3.658 | (0.004) | 4.213 | (0.003) | 4.228 | (0.003) |
| Male | 3.724 | (0.005) | 3.736 | (0.005) | 4.314 | (0.004) | 4.320 | (0.004) |
| Female | 3.537 | (0.005) | 3.572 | (0.006) | 4.114 | (0.004) | 4.134 | (0.004) |
[i] Notes: Number of observations: 2005/2006 38,522 2014/2015 41,893 without imputation and 43,022 and 45,063 with imputation in 2005 and 2015 respectevely.
[ii] Source: Compiled by authors based on ECH 2005, 2006 and 2014,2015 data.
Table 2
Descriptive statistics
| Variable | 2005/06 | 2014/15 | Di · 2005 – 2015 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| With imputation | Without imputation | With imputation | Without imputation | With imputation | Without imputation | |
| A: Men | ||||||
| Age | 40.388 | 40.510 | 40.281 | 40.418 | −0.108 | −0.093 |
| Education | ||||||
| 6 years or less | 0.290 | 0.286 | 0.212 | 0.209 | −0.079 | −0.077 |
| 7 to 9 years | 0.327 | 0.325 | 0.289 | 0.288 | −0.038 | −0.037 |
| 10 to 12 years | 0.243 | 0.246 | 0.331 | 0.333 | 0.088 | 0.087 |
| 13 to 16 years | 0.067 | 0.067 | 0.084 | 0.084 | 0.018 | 0.017 |
| 16 and more years | 0.074 | 0.076 | 0.084 | 0.085 | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Non – married | 0.276 | 0.261 | 0.304 | 0.291 | 0.028 | 0.030 |
| Resto of the country | 0.492 | 0.491 | 0.473 | 0.473 | −0.019 | −0.018 |
| Not registered | 0.231 | 0.208 | 0.096 | 0.088 | −0.134 | −0.121 |
| B: Women | ||||||
| Age | 40.902 | 41.244 | 40.887 | 41.149 | −0.015 | −0.095 |
| Education | ||||||
| 6 years or less | 0.261 | 0.250 | 0.185 | 0.177 | −0.076 | −0.073 |
| 7 to 9 years | 0.270 | 0.262 | 0.233 | 0.225 | −0.037 | −0.037 |
| 10 to 12 years | 0.270 | 0.275 | 0.352 | 0.357 | 0.082 | 0.082 |
| 13 to 16 years | 0.097 | 0.101 | 0.107 | 0.111 | 0.010 | 0.010 |
| 16 and more years | 0.102 | 0.112 | 0.122 | 0.129 | 0.020 | 0.017 |
| Non – married | 0.430 | 0.437 | 0.391 | 0.391 | −0.038 | −0.045 |
| Rest of the country | 0.455 | 0.440 | 0.466 | 0.461 | 0.010 | 0.021 |
| Not registered | 0.327 | 0.282 | 0.136 | 0.115 | −0.191 | −0.167 |
[i] Notes: Number of observations: 2005/2006 38,522 2014/2015 41,893 without imputation and 43,022 and 45,063 with imputation in 2005 and 2015 respectevely.
[ii] Source: Compiled by authors based on ECH 2005, 2006 and 2014,2015 data.

Figure 1
Log hourly wage change between 2005 and 2015, by gender
Note: i. Solid lines are point estimates, dashed lines indicate the lower and upper bound of the 95 confidence interval. Bootstrapped standard errors are calculated (200 replicates) within each 10 imputed data sets and then Rubin’s rules are applied. ii. Wages are expressed in real terms, 2010 prices.

Figure 2
Occupational category by gender
Note: Percentage of private workers by occupational category and gender in 2005 and 2015.

Figure 3
Information Task Content measure by Occupational Category
Note: Compiled by authors based on ECH-INE and National Center for O*NET Development. Blue bars correspond to men and violet ones to women.

Figure 4
Automation Task Content measure by Occupational Category
Note: Compiled by authors based on ECH-INE and National Center for O*NET Development. Blue bars correspond to men and violet ones to women.
Table 3
Average O*NET Indexes by Major Occupation Group 2005
| A: WITH IMPUTATION | 2005 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEN | WOMEN | |||
| O*Net Indexes | Information | Automation | Information | Automation |
| Overall Mean | 0.596 | 0.739 | 0.602 | 0.732 |
| Standard Deviation | 0.118 | 0.062 | 0.112 | 0.061 |
| Manager, Professionals, Technicians | 0.788 | 0.702 | 0.771 | 0.676 |
| Clerical support and sale workers | 0.666 | 0.738 | 0.672 | 0.744 |
| Plant and machines operators and assemblers | 0.546 | 0.772 | 0.518 | 0.803 |
| Agricultural, construction and transport workers | 0.543 | 0.744 | 0.522 | 0.747 |
| Service workers | 0.530 | 0.713 | 0.531 | 0.726 |
| B: WITHOUT IMPUTATION | ||||
| Overall Mean | 0.598 | 0.739 | 0.607 | 0.732 |
| Standard Deviation | 0.119 | 0.062 | 0.114 | 0.061 |
| Manager, Professionals, Technicians | 0.789 | 0.701 | 0.771 | 0.676 |
| Clerical support and sale workers | 0.667 | 0.738 | 0.675 | 0.747 |
| Plant and machines operators and assemblers | 0.547 | 0.772 | 0.518 | 0.804 |
| Agricultural, construction and transport workers | 0.544 | 0.744 | 0.531 | 0.750 |
| Service workers | 0.530 | 0.712 | 0.531 | 0.726 |
[i] Source: Compiled by authors based on ECH 2005, 2006 and 2014, 2015 data and O*NET.
[ii] Note: The information content index is computed as where k = work activities: Getting information, Processing information, Analyzing data or information, Interacting with computers, Documenting/Recording information. The automation content is defined as where l = work context: Degree of automation, Importance of repeating same tasks, Structured versus unstructured work (reverse), Pace determined by speed of equipment, Spend time making repetitive motions. Task measures are normalized to range between zero and one.
Table 4
Avarage O*NET Indexes by Major Occupation Group 2015
| A: WITH IMPUTATION | 2015 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEN | WOMEN | |||
| O*Net Indexes | Information | Automation | Information | Automation |
| Overall Mean | 0.608 | 0.738 | 0.621 | 0.732 |
| Standard Deviation | 0.117 | 0.063 | 0.114 | 0.061 |
| Manager, Professionals, Technicians | 0.799 | 0.706 | 0.776 | 0.685 |
| Clerical support and sale workers | 0.670 | 0.744 | 0.668 | 0.746 |
| Plant and machines operators and assemblers | 0.552 | 0.772 | 0.518 | 0.802 |
| Agricultural, construction and transport workers | 0.559 | 0.738 | 0.561 | 0.757 |
| Service workers | 0.536 | 0.713 | 0.545 | 0.725 |
| B: WITHOUT IMPUTATION | ||||
| Overall Mean | 0.610 | 0.738 | 0.625 | 0.732 |
| Standard Deviation | 0.117 | 0.063 | 0.115 | 0.062 |
| Manager, Professionals, Technicians | 0.799 | 0.706 | 0.777 | 0.685 |
| Clerical support and sale workers | 0.671 | 0.744 | 0.671 | 0.748 |
| Plant and machines operators and assemblers | 0.552 | 0.772 | 0.519 | 0.804 |
| Agricultural, construction and transport workers | 0.560 | 0.737 | 0.576 | 0.761 |
| Service workers | 0.536 | 0.712 | 0.544 | 0.725 |
[i] Source: Compiled by authors based on ECH 2005, 2006 and 2014, 2015 data and O*NET.
[ii] Note: The information content index is computed as where where k = work activities: Getting information, Processing information, Analyzing data or information, Interacting with computers, Documenting/Recording information. The automation content is de ned as where l = work context: Degree of automation, Importance of repeating same tasks, Structured versus unstructured work (reverse), Pace determined by speed of equipment, Spend time making repetitive motions. Task measures are normalized to range between zero and one.
Table 5
Percentage of Workers in the Top Quartile of Task Content Indexes by Major Occupation Group in 2005/2006 – 2014/2015 (with self selection correction)
| Task Content Indexes | Percentage of workers | Technology | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Information | Automation | |||||
| 2005 | Men | Women | Men | Women | Men | Women |
| Overall | 100 | 100 | 20 | 25 | 26 | 23 |
| Manager, Professionals, Technicians | 13 | 12 | 87 | 84 | 0 | 0 |
| Clerical support and sale workers | 19 | 31 | 45 | 49 | 48 | 56 |
| Plant and machines operators and assemblers | 20 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 51 | 75 |
| Agricultural, construction and transport workers | 36 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 27 |
| Service workers | 13 | 48 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 2015 | ||||||
| Overall | 100 | 100 | 21 | 29 | 23 | 16 |
| Manager, Professionals, Technicians | 13 | 15 | 87 | 82 | 1 | 0 |
| Clerical support and sale workers | 20 | 36 | 44 | 48 | 23 | 30 |
| Plant and machines operators and assemblers | 20 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 49 | 69 |
| Agricultural, construction and transport workers | 33 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 24 | 38 |
| Service workers | 14 | 42 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
[i] Note: The numbers in each of the task content indexes columns indicate the percentage of workers in each major occupation by gender, which fall in the top 75 per cent of their category.
Table 6
Unconditional Quantile Partial Effects on Log Wages (2005 – 2015) - RIF Regression
| Year | 2005/06 | 2014/15 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covariates/Quantile | 10 | 50 | 90 | 10 | 50 | 90 |
| Female | −0.141*** (0.005) | −0.158*** (0.003) | −0.327*** (0.004) | −0.203*** (0.002) | −0.237*** (0.002) | −0.272*** (0.002) |
| Task content indexes (1st. quartile omitted) | ||||||
| Information content Q2 | 0.136*** (0.009) | 0.105*** (0.009) | 0.080*** (0.006) | −0.001 (0.005) | −0.059*** (0.003) | 0.047*** (0.003) |
| Information content Q3 | 0.105*** (0.008) | 0.220*** (0.008) | 0.061*** (0.006) | 0.005 (0.004) | 0.004*** (0.001) | −0.118*** (0.002) |
| Information content Q4 | 0.185*** (0.008) | 0.543*** (0.008) | 1.013*** (0.011) | 0.071*** (0.004) | 0.230*** (0.002) | 0.514*** (0.005) |
| Automation content Q2 | −0.010 (0.009) | 0.011 (0.009) | −0.112*** (0.005) | 0.045*** (0.001) | 0.002 (0.002) | −0.151*** (0.005) |
| Automation content Q3 | 0.205*** (0.009) | 0.281*** (0.009) | −0.125*** (0.008) | 0.101*** (0.002) | 0.11*** (0.002) | −0.093*** (0.003) |
| Automation content Q4 | 0.088*** (0.008) | 0.037*** (0.008) | −0.304*** (0.007) | 0.1*** (0.003) | 0.045*** (0.003) | −0.412*** (0.004) |
| Education (6 years or less omitted) | ||||||
| From 7 to 9 years | 0.167*** (0.009) | 0.141*** (0.004) | 0.093*** (0.004) | 0.148*** (0.004) | 0.105*** (0.002) | 0.064*** (0.002) |
| From 10 to 12 years | 0.243*** (0.008) | 0.278*** (0.005) | 0.356*** (0.008) | 0.281*** (0.004) | 0.294*** (0.002) | 0.267*** (0.003) |
| From 13 to 15 years | 0.243*** (0.008) | 0.278*** (0.005) | 0.356*** (0.008) | 0.281*** (0.004) | 0.294*** (0.002) | 0.267*** (0.003) |
| 16 and more years | 0.296*** (0.009) | 0.525*** (0.008) | 0.978*** (0.015) | 0.359*** (0.005) | 0.566*** (0.004) | 0.765*** (0.006) |
| Experience (15<Experience<20 omitted) | ||||||
| Experience<5 | 0.042*** (0.012) | −0.079*** (0.014) | −1.581*** (0.034) | 0.020*** (0.004) | −0.099*** (0.009) | −1.067*** (0.017) |
| 5<experience<10 | 0.023** (0.010) | −0.130*** (0.005) | −0.670*** (0.009) | −0.017*** (0.004) | −0.119*** (0.003) | −0.436*** (0.007) |
| 10<experience<15 | −0.051*** (0.009) | −0.116*** (0.004) | −0.153*** (0.007) | −0.046*** (0.004) | −0.088*** (0.003) | −0.128*** (0.003) |
| 20<experience<25 | 0.035*** (0.009) | 0.102*** (0.004) | 0.118*** (0.006) | 0.031*** (0.003) | 0.031*** (0.004) | 0.074*** (0.005) |
| 25<experience<30 | 0.075*** (0.008) | 0.144*** (0.003) | 0.213*** (0.007) | 0.034*** (0.004) | 0.067*** (0.003) | 0.132*** (0.003) |
| 30<experience<35 | 0.056*** (0.008) | 0.16*** (0.005) | 0.232*** (0.007) | 0.049*** (0.004) | 0.089*** (0.003) | 0.202*** (0.004) |
| 35<experience<40 | 0.113*** (0.010) | 0.176*** (0.006) | 0.222*** (0.005) | 0.055*** (0.005) | 0.086*** (0.003) | 0.195*** (0.003) |
| Experience>40 | 0.046*** (0.008) | 0.208*** (0.004) | 0.225*** (0.006) | 0.048*** (0.004) | 0.094*** (0.003) | 0.167*** (0.004 |
| Nonmarried | −0.073*** (0.005) | −0.131*** (0.004) | −0.149*** (0.003) | −0.050*** (0.002) | −0.101*** (0.002) | −0.101*** (0.001) |
| Region | −0.190*** (0.003) | −0.161*** (0.003) | −0.150*** (0.004) | −0.086*** (0.002) | −0.060*** (0.001) | −0.059*** (0.001) |
| Informal | −0.438*** (0.007) | −0.244*** (0.005) | −0.0220*** (0.006) | −0.506*** (0.008) | −0.196*** (0.003) | 0.001 (0.003) |
| Constant | 2.750*** (0.013) | 3.334*** (0.005) | 4.358*** (0.007) | 3.450*** (0.007) | 4.008*** (0.004) | 4.834*** (0.003) |
Table 7
Unconditional Quantile Partial Effects on Male Log Wages (2005 – 2015) - RIF Regression
| Year | 2005/06 | 2014/15 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covariates/Quantile | 10 | 50 | 90 | 10 | 50 | 90 |
| Task content indexes (1st. quartile omitted) | ||||||
| Information content Q2 | 0.071*** (0.005) | 0.087*** (0.005) | −0.075*** (0.007) | −0.022** (0.009) | 0.010*** (0.003) | 0.111*** (0.004) |
| Information content Q3 | 0.031*** (0.006) | 0.081*** (0.004) | 0.007 (0.007) | 0.005 (0.005) | −0.035*** (0.002) | −0.133*** (0.003) |
| Information content Q4 | 0.14*** (0.006) | 0.45*** (0.006) | 1.112*** (0.011) | 0.026*** (0.006) | 0.163*** (0.002) | 0.474*** (0.008) |
| Automation content Q2 | −0.259*** (0.007) | −0.147*** (0.004) | −0.171*** (0.007) | −0.050*** (0.003) | −0.035*** (0.002) | −0.096*** (0.004) |
| Automation content Q3 | 0.124*** (0.008) | 0.227*** (0.010) | −0.142*** (0.010) | 0.057*** (0.003) | 0.129*** (0.003) | −0.014*** (0.004) |
| Automation content Q4 | 0.009* (0.005) | −0.019*** (0.005) | 0.008 (0.008) | 0.003 (0.003) | −0.02*** (0.003) | −0.326*** (0.003) |
| Education (6 years or less omitted) | ||||||
| From 7 to 9 years | 0.193*** (0.007) | 0.164*** (0.004) | 0.101*** (0.007) | 0.173*** (0.005) | 0.112*** (0.002) | 0.096*** (0.003) |
| From 10 to 12 years | 0.274*** (0.007) | 0.331*** (0.005) | 0.460*** (0.010) | 0.269*** (0.004) | 0.311*** (0.002) | 0.345*** (0.004) |
| From 13 to 15 years | 0.328*** (0.012) | 0.535*** (0.009) | 1.257*** (0.031) | 0.353*** (0.006) | 0.524*** (0.005) | 0.899*** (0.008) |
| 16 and more years | 0.312*** (0.005) | 0.649*** (0.007) | 2.751*** (0.032) | 0.403*** (0.006) | 0.691*** (0.004) | 1.953*** (0.012) |
| Experience (15<Experience<20 omitted) | ||||||
| Experience<5 | −0.024** (0.011) | −0.090*** (0.015) | −2.119*** (0.044) | 0.054*** (0.006) | −0.077*** (0.015) | −1.350*** (0.036) |
| 5<experience<10 | 0.008 (0.012) | −0.129*** (0.011) | −0.916*** (0.017) | −0.013*** (0.004) | −0.128*** (0.005) | −0.516*** (0.009) |
| 10<experience<15 | −0.112*** (0.013) | −0.138*** (0.006) | −0.156*** (0.010) | −0.039*** (0.004) | −0.072*** (0.003) | −0.147*** (0.006) |
| 20<experience<25 | 0.046*** (0.009) | 0.108*** (0.007) | 0.131*** (0.008) | 0.053*** (0.004) | 0.06*** (0.003) | 0.096*** (0.005) |
| 25<experience<30 | 0.075*** (0.007) | 0.147*** (0.004) | 0.26*** (0.008) | 0.065*** (0.003) | 0.094*** (0.004) | 0.156*** (0.005) |
| 30<experience<35 | 0.074*** (0.008) | 0.159*** (0.006) | 0.192*** (0.010) | 0.073*** (0.003) | 0.128*** (0.001) | 0.204*** (0.005) |
| 35<experience<40 | 0.096*** (0.010) | 0.153*** (0.007) | 0.202*** (0.008) | 0.092*** (0.004) | 0.129*** (0.004) | 0.243*** (0.005) |
| Experience>40 | 0.052*** (0.012) | 0.165*** (0.005) | 0.235*** (0.011) | 0.091*** (0.005) | 0.091*** (0.003) | 0.192*** (0.007) |
| Nonmarried | −0.083*** (0.008) | −0.159*** (0.003) | −0.158*** (0.004) | −0.071*** (0.002) | −0.111*** (0.002) | −0.134*** (0.003) |
| Region | −0.108*** (0.004) | −0.097*** (0.004) | −0.147*** (0.007) | −0.054*** (0.004) | −0.016*** (0.002) | −0.029*** (0.002) |
| Informal | −0.484*** (0.011) | −0.325*** (0.006) | −0.017* (0.010) | −0.515*** (0.008) | −0.255*** (0.004) | 0.008 (0.006) |
| Constant | 2.853*** (0.008) | 3.458*** (0.007) | 4.327*** (0.011) | 3.504*** (0.007) | 4.021*** (0.004) | 4.725*** (0.007) |
Table 8
Unconditional Quantile Partial Effects on Female Log Wages (2005 – 2015) - RIF Regression
| Year | 2005/06 | 2014/15 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covariates/Quantile | 10 | 50 | 90 | 10 | 50 | 90 |
| Task content indexes (1st. quartile omitted) | ||||||
| Information content Q2 | 0.132*** (0.019) | 0.069*** (0.005) | −0.018** (0.007) | 0.065*** (0.009) | 0.004 (0.006) | 0.025*** (0.006) |
| Information content Q3 | 0.136*** (0.020) | 0.384*** (0.011) | 0.010 (0.010) | 0.008 (0.008) | 0.103*** (0.004) | −0.107*** (0.006) |
| Information content Q4 | 0.602*** (0.016) | 0.607*** (0.007) | 0.886*** (0.008) | 0.103*** (0.008) | 0.374*** (0.005) | 0.587*** (0.005) |
| Automation content Q2 | 0.162*** (0.013) | 0.169*** (0.005) | −0.068*** (0.006) | 0.078*** (0.008) | 0.098*** (0.005) | −0.143*** (0.009) |
| Automation content Q3 | 0.171*** (0.024) | 0.178*** (0.010) | −0.186*** (0.014) | 0.143*** (0.006) | 0.186*** (0.005) | −0.211*** (0.007) |
| Automation content Q4 | 0.096*** (0.018) | 0.041*** (0.006) | 0.012 (0.011) | 0.006 (0.005) | 0.106*** (0.006) | −0.487*** (0.009) |
| Education (6 years or less omitted) | ||||||
| From 7 to 9 years | 0.176*** (0.015) | 0.115*** (0.011) | 0.043*** (0.008) | 0.133*** (0.007) | 0.07*** (0.003) | 0.019*** (0.005) |
| From 10 to 12 years | 0.285*** (0.017) | 0.248*** (0.011) | 0.18*** (0.011) | 0.31*** (0.008) | 0.313*** (0.004) | 0.138*** (0.004) |
| From 13 to 15 years | 0.352*** (0.018) | 0.492*** (0.012) | 0.705*** (0.021) | 0.39*** (0.010) | 0.581*** (0.005) | 0.599*** (0.009) |
| 16 and more years | 0.364*** (0.018) | 0.648*** (0.011) | 1.857*** (0.020) | 0.424*** (0.010) | 0.74*** (0.004) | 1.712*** (0.013) |
| Experience (15<Experience<20 omitted) | ||||||
| Experience<5 | 0.138*** (0.027) | −0.03* (0.016) | −1.239*** (0.056) | 0.053*** (0.004) | −0.082*** (0.009) | −0.957*** (0.040) |
| 5<experience<10 | 0.054*** (0.021) | −0.09*** (0.007) | −0.499*** (0.018) | 0.017** (0.007) | −0.095*** (0.005) | −0.372*** (0.010) |
| 10<experience<15 | −0.003 (0.021) | −0.074*** (0.006) | −0.159*** (0.009) | −0.011 (0.009) | −0.081*** (0.005) | −0.112*** (0.006) |
| 20<experience<25 | 0.048*** (0.017) | 0.08*** (0.008) | 0.102*** (0.007) | 0.066*** (0.008) | 0.012* (0.007) | 0.044*** (0.009) |
| 25<experience<30 | 0.105*** (0.020) | 0.118*** (0.009) | 0.117*** (0.006) | 0.056*** (0.007) | 0.056*** (0.008) | 0.085*** (0.006) |
| 30<experience<35 | 0.092*** (0.015) | 0.121*** (0.009) | 0.16*** (0.009) | 0.079*** (0.008) | 0.066*** (0.007) | 0.183*** (0.009) |
| 35<experience<40 | 0.134*** (0.018) | 0.149*** (0.006) | 0.154*** (0.005) | 0.078*** (0.011) | 0.06*** (0.007) | 0.137*** (0.008) |
| Experience>40 | 0.08*** (0.018) | 0.196*** (0.008) | 0.163*** (0.009) | 0.048*** (0.005) | 0.048*** (0.006) | 0.098*** (0.005) |
| Nonmarried | −0.082*** (0.009) | −0.078*** (0.004) | −0.105*** (0.004) | −0.04*** (0.003) | −0.066*** (0.002) | −0.076*** (0.003) |
| Region | −0.266*** (0.008) | −0.228*** (0.005) | −0.164*** (0.005) | −0.1*** (0.003) | −0.109*** (0.002) | −0.094*** (0.002) |
| Informal | −0.451*** (0.022) | −0.156*** (0.008) | −0.085*** (0.007) | −0.525*** (0.021) | −0.131*** (0.006) | −0.01** (0.005) |
| Constant | 2.508*** (0.036) | 3.107*** (0.008) | 4.251*** (0.008) | 3.179*** (0.013) | 3.63*** (0.007) | 4.706*** (0.011) |

Figure 5
Unconditional Quantile Partial Effects: Occupational Task. Forth vs First Quartile of Task Content. Dependent variable: log hourly wages. 2005 and 2015.
Notes: i. Figures show the UQPE of the task indexes for the upper quartile when the bottom quartile is omitted. ii. Information/Automation covariates are defined as category variables that indicate the degree of information/automation task content of the job. Four quartiles are considered. iii. 2005 in red, 2015 in blue. Solid lines are point estimates, dashed lines indicate the lower and upper bound of the 95 confidence interval. Bootstrapped standard errors are calculated (200 replicates) within each 10 imputed data sets and then Rubin’s rules are applied.

Figure 6
Unconditional Quantile Partial Effects: Selected Education Covariates (Dummy 6 Years of Schooling omitted). Dependent variable: log hourly wages. 2005 and 2015.
Notes: i. Figures show the UQPE of educational dummies, six years of education or less is omitted. ii. 2005 in red, 2015 in blue. Solid lines are point estimates, dashed lines indicate the lower and upper bound of the 95 confidence interval. Bootstrapped standard errors are calculated (200 replicates) within each 10 imputed data sets and then Rubin’s rules are applied.

Figure 7
Aggregated decomposition of log hourly wages changes, 2005 and 2015.
Notes: i. Figures show the total change of wages by gender, as well as the aggregated decomposition into the structure and the composition effect. RIF-regression method is used to perform the decomposition. Covariates include: Information, Automation, Education, Experience, Informal worker, Region and Marital status. ii. Solid lines are point estimates, dashed lines indicate the lower and upper bound of the 95 confidence interval. Bootstrapped standard errors are calculated (200 replicates) within each 10 imputed data sets and then Rubin’s rules are applied.
Table 9
Aggregate Decomposition of wage change between 2005 and 2015
| 90–10 | 90–50 | 50–10 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. All | |||
| Total Change | −0.453*** (0.004) | −0.255*** (0.002) | −0.197*** (0.002) |
| Composition | −0.066*** (0.003) | −0.067*** (0.002) | 0.001 (0.002) |
| Structure | −0.387*** (0.003) | −0.188*** (0.002) | −0.198*** (0.003) |
| B. Males | |||
| Total Change | −0.582*** (0.005) | −0.34*** (0.002) | −0.242*** (0.004) |
| Composition | −0.02*** (0.002) | −0.015*** (0.002) | −0.005*** (0.002) |
| Structure | −0.562*** (0.005) | −0.326*** (0.002) | −0.236*** (0.004) |
| C. Females | |||
| Total Change | −0.418*** (0.012) | −0.184*** (0.004) | −0.233*** (0.009) |
| Composition | −0.052*** (0.01) | −0.038*** (0.006) | −0.014** (0.006) |
| Structure | −0.365*** (0.01) | −0.146*** (0.006) | −0.219*** (0.008) |
Table 10
Detailed Decomposition of the composition effect, based on Unconditional Quantile Partial Effects
| Inequality measure | All | Males | Females | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90-10 | 90-50 | 50-10 | 90-10 | 90-50 | 50-10 | 90-10 | 90-50 | 50-10 | |
| Female | −0.002*** (0.00007) | −0.002*** (0.00005) | −0.00016*** (0.00004) | ||||||
| Information | 0.018*** (0.0009) | 0.000 (0.0007) | 0.018*** (0.0005) | 0.001 (0.0008) | −0.005*** (0.0008) | 0.006*** (0.0006) | 0.040*** (0.002) | 0.003*** (0.001) | 0.037*** (0.001) |
| Automation | −0.041*** (0.00146) | −0.048*** (0.00087) | 0.007*** (0.0015) | 0.012*** (0.0008) | 0.00667*** (0.001) | 0.006*** (0.0009) | −0.036*** (0.006) | −0.03539*** (0.005) | −0.00058 (0.005) |
| Education | 0.042*** (0.001) | 0.032*** (0.0007) | 0.011*** (0.0005) | 0.057*** (0.0018) | 0.045*** (0.0014) | 0.013*** (0.0012) | 0.019*** (0.001) | 0.015*** (0.001) | 0.004*** (0.001) |
| Experience | −0.020*** (0.0003) | −0.015*** (0.0003) | −0.005*** (0.0002) | −0.025*** (0.00054) | −0.020*** (0.00051) | −0.005*** (0.0003) | −0.013*** (0.001) | −0.010*** (0.001) | −0.003*** (0.001) |
| Other | −0.064*** (0.002) | −0.035*** (0.001) | −0.030*** (0.001) | −0.065*** (0.0018) | −0.041*** (0.0015) | −0.024*** (0.0013) | −0.062*** (0.004) | −0.010*** (0.002) | −0.051*** (0.003) |
| Total Composition Effect | −0.066*** (0.003) | −0.067*** (0.002) | 0.001 (0.002) | −0.020*** (0.0024) | −0.015*** (0.0022) | −0.005*** (0.0015) | −0.052*** (0.01) | −0.038*** (0.006) | −0.014** (0.006) |
Table 11
Detailed Decomposition of the structure effect, wage variation between 2005 and 2015, based on Unconditional Quantile Partial Effects
| Inequality measure | All | Males | Females | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90-10 | 90-50 | 50-10 | 90-10 | 90-50 | 50-10 | 90-10 | 90-50 | 50-10 | |
| Female | 0.063*** (0.0043) | 0.072*** (0.0032) | −0.00909*** (0.0024) | ||||||
| Information | −0.112*** (0.0086) | −0.015** (0.0058) | −0.09663*** (0.0071) | −0.159*** (0.008) | −0.08*** (0.006) | −0.079*** (0.005) | −0.062*** (0.018) | 0.012 (0.01) | −0.074*** (0.017) |
| Automation | −0.021** (0.01) | 0.012*** (0.0047) | −0.03344*** (0.0078) | −0.060*** (0.007) | −0.009 (0.006) | −0.051*** (0.005) | −0.034** (0.016) | −0.060*** (0.009) | 0.026** (0.013) |
| Education | −0.121*** (0.0082) | −0.103*** (0.0057) | −0.01804*** (0.0049) | −0.136*** (0.013) | −0.114*** (0.009) | −0.021** (0.009) | −0.052*** (0.014) | −0.073*** (0.01) | 0.021 (0.014) |
| Experience | 0.013** (0.0053) | 0.046*** (0.0057) | −0.0334*** (0.0068) | 0.006 (0.008) | 0.037*** (0.008) | −0.031*** (0.008) | 0.021 (0.014) | 0.052*** (0.009) | −0.031*** (0.012) |
| Other | 0.015*** (0.0044) | −0.003 (0.0035) | 0.01813*** (0.0044) | 0.040*** (0.005) | 0.005 (0.003) | 0.035*** (0.004) | −0.023** (0.011) | −0.008 (0.006) | −0.014 (0.01) |
| Constant | −0.224*** (0.0176) | −0.198*** (0.0075) | −0.02593 (0.0177) | −0.253*** (0.014) | −0.165*** (0.014) | −0.089*** (0.012) | −0.216*** (0.043) | −0.068*** (0.015) | −0.148*** (0.037) |
| Total Structure Effect | −0.387*** (0.0033) | −0.188*** (0.0016) | −0.1984*** (0.0026) | −0.562*** (0.005) | −0.326*** (0.002) | −0.236*** (0.004) | −0.365*** (0.01) | −0.146*** (0.006) | −0.219*** (0.008) |

Figure 8
Log-hourly wages gender gap, 2005 and 2015.
Notes: i. The gender gap is calculated by subtracting men’s wages minus women’s wages. ii. Solid lines are point estimates, dashed lines indicate the lower and upper bound of the 95 confidence interval. Bootstrapped standard errors are calculated (200 replicates) within each 10 imputed data sets and then Rubin’s rules are applied. iii. Estimates of the gender gap without correction for self-selection are reported in the Supplementary Appendix.

Figure 9
Log-hourly wages gender gap variation between 2005 and 2015, unconditional and after controlling for observed characteristics. With correction for selection bias.
Notes: i. Figures correspond to the estimation of the variation of the gender gap using an approach analogous to the diff in diff estimator. Unconditional stands for the estimation without any controls. Figure (a) compares the unconditional variation of the gap with respect to that which control for all selected characteristics (Information, Automation, Education, Experience, Informal worker, Region and Marital status). Figures (b) to (e) compares the model with all regressors with those excluding indicated variables. iii. Solid lines are point estimates, dashed lines indicate the lower and upper bound of the 95 confidence interval. Bootstrapped standard errors are calculated (200 replicates) within each 10 imputed data sets and then Rubin’s rules are applied.

Figure 10
Aggregated decomposition of the gender wage gap and the gender gap change.
Notes: i. Figure (a) shows the aggregated composition and structure effects of gender wage gap in 2005 and 2015. Covariates include: Information, Automation, Education, Experience, Informal worker, Region and Marital status. ii. Figure (b) decompose gender wage gap change between 2005 and 2015 into the aggregated composition, structure and interaction effects, as defined in section 6) iii. Solid lines are point estimates, dashed lines indicate the lower and upper bound of the 95 confidence interval. Bootstrapped standard errors are calculated (200 replicates) within each 10 imputed data sets and then Rubin’s rules are applied.

Figure 11
Detailed decomposition of the gender gap change
Notes: Figures show the composition, structure and total effects of covariates Information, Automation and Education to the change of the gender wage gap between 2005 and 2015 as defined in section 6). ii. Solid lines are point estimates, dashed lines indicate the lower and upper bound of the 95 confidence interval. Bootstrapped standard errors are calculated (200 replicates) within each 10 imputed data sets and then Rubin’s rules are applied.
Table A1
Unconditional Quantile Partial Effects on Log Wages (2005 – 2015) - RIF Regression (Without correction for selection bias)
| Year | 2005/06 | 2014/15 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covariates/Quantile | 10 | 50 | 90 | 10 | 50 | 90 |
| Female | −0.141*** (0.001) | −0.166*** (0.001) | −0.337*** (0.002) | −0.210*** (0.001) | −0.234*** (0.0005) | −0.284*** (0.001) |
| Task content indexes (1st. quartile omitted) | ||||||
| Information content Q2 | 0.143*** (0.001) | 0.097*** (0.001) | 0.0190*** (0.001) | 0.009*** (0.001) | −0.089*** (0.001) | −0.033*** (0.001) |
| Information content Q3 | 0.108*** (0.001) | 0.2190*** (0.001) | −0.026*** (0.001) | −0.009*** (0.001) | 0.024*** (0.001) | −0.044*** (0.001) |
| Information content Q4 | 0.166*** (0.001) | 0.512*** (0.001) | 0.988*** (0.003) | 0.109*** (0.001) | 0.336*** (0.001) | 0.578*** (0.001) |
| Automation content Q2 | −0.017*** (0.001) | −0.000 (0.001) | −0.147*** (0.001) | 0.042*** (0.001) | −0.030*** (0.001) | −0.135*** (0.001) |
| Automation content Q3 | 0.192*** (0.001) | 0.217*** (0.001) | −0.390*** (0.002) | 0.089*** (0.001) | 0.100*** (0.001) | −0.014*** (0.001) |
| Automation content Q4 | 0.100*** (0.001) | 0.044*** (0.001) | −0.192*** (0.002) | 0.098*** (0.001) | 0.019*** (0.001) | −0.324*** (0.001) |
| Education (6 years or less omitted) | ||||||
| From 7 to 9 years | 0.166*** (0.001) | 0.145*** (0.001) | 0.097*** (0.001) | 0.150*** (0.001) | 0.103*** (0.001) | 0.055*** (0.001) |
| From 10 to 12 years | 0.235*** (0.001) | 0.280*** (0.001) | 0.363*** (0.001) | 0.268*** (0.001) | 0.259*** (0.001) | 0.215*** (0.001) |
| From 13 to 15 years | 0.235*** (0.001) | 0.280*** (0.001) | 0.363*** (0.001) | 0.268*** (0.001) | 0.259*** (0.001) | 0.215*** (0.001) |
| 16 and more years | 0.280*** (0.001) | 0.541*** (0.001) | 0.954*** (0.004) | 0.331*** (0.001) | 0.49*** (0.001) | 0.659*** (0.002) |
| Experience (15<Experience<20 omitted) | ||||||
| Experience<5 | 0.027*** (0.002) | −0.090*** (0.002) | −1.658*** (0.009) | 0.015*** (0.001) | −0.112*** (0.001) | −1.096*** (0.005) |
| 5<experience<10 | 0.022*** (0.001) | −0.134*** (0.001) | −0.662*** (0.003) | −0.015*** (0.001) | −0.124*** (0.001) | −0.435*** (0.002) |
| 10<experience<15 | −0.057*** (0.001) | −0.123*** (0.001) | −0.154*** (0.001) | −0.046*** (0.001) | −0.089*** (0.001) | −0.13*** (0.001) |
| 20<experience<25 | 0.019*** (0.001) | 0.099*** (0.001) | 0.123*** (0.002) | 0.022*** (0.001) | 0.026*** (0.001) | 0.077*** (0.001) |
| 25<experience<30 | 0.058*** (0.001) | 0.142*** (0.001) | 0.223*** (0.002) | 0.023*** (0.001) | 0.057*** (0.001) | 0.134*** (0.001) |
| 30<experience<35 | 0.050*** (0.002) | 0.160*** (0.001) | 0.234*** (0.002) | 0.034*** (0.001) | 0.077*** (0.001) | 0.198*** (0.001) |
| 35<experience<40 | 0.100*** (0.001) | 0.178*** (0.001) | 0.220*** (0.002) | 0.041*** (0.001) | 0.077*** (0.001) | 0.197*** (0.001) |
| Experience>40 | 0.032*** (0.001) | 0.202*** (0.001) | 0.234*** (0.002) | 0.027*** (0.001) | 0.076*** (0.001) | 0.155*** (0.001) |
| Nonmarried | −0.082*** (0.001) | −0.146*** (0.001) | −0.157*** (0.001) | −0.0550*** (0.001) | −0.099*** (0.0004) | −0.095*** (0.001) |
| Region | −0.198*** (0.001) | −0.159*** (0.001) | −0.150*** (0.001) | −0.088*** (0.001) | −0.058*** (0.0004) | −0.065*** (0.001) |
| Informal | −0.480*** (0.001) | −0.239*** (0.001) | 0.004*** (0.001) | −0.550*** (0.001) | −0.185*** (0.001) | 0.038*** (0.001) |
| Constant | 2.775*** (0.002) | 3.351*** (0.001) | 4.425*** (0.002) | 3.476*** (0.001) | 4.041*** (0.001) | 4.819*** (0.001) |
Table A2
Unconditional Quantile Partial Effects on Male Log Wages (2005 – 2015) - RIF Regression (Without correction for selection bias)
| Year | 2005/06 | 2014/15 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covariates/Quantile | 10 | 50 | 90 | 10 | 50 | 90 |
| Task content indexes (1st. quartile omitted) | ||||||
| Information content Q2 | 0.021*** (0.001) | 0.064*** (0.001) | 0.067*** (0.001) | −0.072*** (0.001) | −0.042*** (0.001) | −0.070*** (0.001) |
| Information content Q3 | 0.033*** (0.001) | 0.030*** (0.002) | 0.001 (0.001) | 0.001 (0.001) | −0.002* (0.001) | −0.023*** (0.001) |
| Information content Q4 | 0.479*** (0.001) | 0.124*** (0.001) | 0.390*** (0.001) | 0.322*** (0.001) | 0.106*** (0.001) | 0.296*** (0.001) |
| Automation content Q2 | −0.199*** (0.001) | −0.281*** (0.002) | −0.160*** (0.001) | −0.066*** (0.001) | −0.072*** (0.001) | −0.049*** (0.001) |
| Automation content Q3 | 0.017*** (0.001) | 0.104*** (0.001) | 0.179*** (0.001) | 0.062*** (0.001) | 0.032*** (0.001) | 0.122*** (0.001) |
| Automation content Q4 | −0.044*** (0.002) | 0.017*** (0.001) | 0.001 (0.001) | 0.001 (0.001) | 0.012*** (0.001) | −0.007*** (0.001) |
| Education (6 years or less omitted) | ||||||
| From 7 to 9 years | 0.162*** (0.001) | 0.188*** (0.001) | 0.167*** (0.001) | 0.118*** (0.001) | 0.175*** (0.001) | 0.106*** (0.001) |
| From 10 to 12 years | 0.336*** (0.001) | 0.272*** (0.002) | 0.332*** (0.001) | 0.27*** (0.001) | 0.258*** (0.001) | 0.272*** (0.001) |
| From 13 to 15 years | 0.619*** (0.002) | 0.317*** (0.002) | 0.543*** (0.002) | 0.487*** (0.001) | 0.307*** (0.001) | 0.435*** (0.001) |
| 16 and more years | 1.070*** (0.002) | 0.321*** (0.002) | 0.678*** (0.002) | 0.88*** (0.001) | 0.334*** (0.001) | 0.573*** (0.001) |
| Experience (15<Experience<20 omitted) | ||||||
| Experience<5 | −0.578*** (0.003) | −0.029*** (0.004) | −0.086*** (0.004) | −0.44*** (0.002) | 0.046*** (0.001) | −0.0850*** (0.002) |
| 5<experience<10 | −0.303*** (0.001) | −0.000 (0.002) | −0.135*** (0.002) | −0.218*** (0.001) | −0.013*** (0.001) | −0.131*** (0.001) |
| 10<experience<15 | −0.133*** (0.001) | −0.100*** (0.002) | −0.146*** (0.001) | −0.087*** (0.001) | −0.039*** (0.001) | −0.079*** (0.001) |
| 20<experience<25 | 0.089*** (0.001) | 0.037*** (0.002) | 0.107*** (0.001) | 0.056*** (0.001) | 0.052*** (0.001) | 0.054*** (0.001) |
| 25<experience<30 | 0.152*** (0.001) | 0.075*** (0.002) | 0.136*** (0.001) | 0.099*** (0.001) | 0.051*** (0.001) | 0.085*** (0.001) |
| 30<experience<35 | 0.156*** (0.001) | 0.075*** (0.002) | 0.155*** (0.001) | 0.133*** (0.001) | 0.064*** (0.001) | 0.116*** (0.001) |
| 35<experience<40 | 0.157*** (0.001) | 0.091*** (0.002) | 0.147*** (0.001) | 0.128*** (0.001) | 0.083*** (0.001) | 0.113*** (0.001) |
| Experience>40 | 0.154*** (0.001) | 0.043*** (0.002) | 0.156*** (0.001) | 0.11*** (0.001) | 0.11*** (0.001) | 0.089*** (0.001) |
| Nonmarried | −0.139*** (0.001) | −0.087*** (0.001) | −0.169*** (0.001) | −0.100*** (0.001) | −0.072*** (0.001) | −0.114*** (0.001) |
| Region | −0.119*** (0.001) | −0.104*** (0.001) | −0.102*** (0.001) | −0.026*** (0.0005) | −0.054*** (0.001) | −0.016*** (0.001) |
| Informal | −0.302*** (0.001) | −0.506*** (0.002) | −0.331*** (0.001) | −0.276*** (0.001) | −0.555*** (0.002) | −0.243*** (0.001) |
| Constant | 3.566*** (0.001) | 2.866*** (0.002) | 3.483*** (0.002) | 4.092*** (0.001) | 3.528*** (0.001) | 4.045*** (0.001) |
Table A3
Unconditional Quantile Partial Effects on Female Log Wages (2005 – 2015) - RIF Regression (Without correction for selection bias)
| Year | 2005/06 | 2014/15 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Covariates/Quantile | 10 | 50 | 90 | 10 | 50 | 90 |
| Task content indexes (1st. quartile omitted) | ||||||
| Information content Q2 | 0.169*** (0.002) | 0.078*** (0.001) | −0.078*** (0.001) | 0.076*** (0.001) | 0.004*** (0.001) | −0.076*** (0.001) |
| Information content Q3 | 0.156*** (0.003) | 0.438*** (0.002) | 0.0030 (0.003) | 0.002 (0.001) | 0.140*** (0.001) | 0.009*** (0.002) |
| Information content Q4 | 0.601*** (0.002) | 0.644*** (0.002) | 0.851*** (0.003) | 0.082*** (0.001) | 0.433*** (0.001) | 0.620*** (0.002) |
| Automation content Q2 | 0.172*** (0.002) | 0.190*** (0.001) | −0.078*** (0.001) | 0.092*** (0.001) | 0.065*** (0.001) | −0.121*** (0.002) |
| Automation content Q3 | 0.175*** (0.002) | 0.130*** (0.001) | −0.481*** (0.003) | 0.141*** (0.001) | 0.162*** (0.001) | −0.105*** (0.001) |
| Automation content Q4 | 0.080*** (0.002) | 0.056*** (0.001) | 0.003 (0.003) | 0.001 (0.001) | 0.066*** (0.001) | −0.446*** (0.002) |
| Education (6 years or less omitted) | ||||||
| From 7 to 9 years | 0.193*** 3241(0.002) | 0.108*** (0.001) | 0.051*** (0.001) | 0.134*** (0.001) | 0.075*** (0.001) | 0.021*** (0.001) |
| From 10 to 12 years | 0.290*** (0.002) | 0.257*** (0.001) | 0.192*** (0.001) | 0.308*** (0.001) | 0.301*** (0.001) | 0.095*** (0.001) |
| From 13 to 15 years | 0.346*** (0.002) | 0.508*** (0.002) | 0.664*** (0.004) | 0.392*** (0.001) | 0.563*** (0.001) | 0.524*** (0.002) |
| 16 and more years | 0.366*** (0.002) | 0.687*** (0.002) | 1.8*** (0.007) | 0.437*** (0.001) | 0.705*** (0.001) | 1.608*** (0.004) |
| Experience (15<Experience<20 omitted) | ||||||
| Experience<5 | 0.112*** (0.003) | −0.045*** (0.003) | −1.325*** (0.011) | 0.042*** (0.001) | −0.093*** (0.001) | −0.980*** (0.007) |
| 5<experience<10 | 0.056*** (0.002) | −0.103*** (0.002) | −0.467*** (0.004) | 0.027*** (0.001) | −0.087*** (0.001) | −0.374*** (0.002) |
| 10<experience<15 | −0.004** (0.002) | −0.075*** (0.001) | −0.15*** (0.002) | −0.004*** (0.001) | −0.081*** (0.001) | −0.120*** (0.002) |
| 20<experience<25 | 0.020*** (0.002) | 0.093*** (0.001) | 0.097*** (0.003) | 0.065*** (0.001) | 0.010*** (0.001) | 0.044*** (0.002) |
| 25<experience<30 | 0.087*** (0.002) | 0.13*** (0.001) | 0.126*** (0.003) | 0.050*** (0.001) | 0.054*** (0.001) | 0.088*** (0.001) |
| 30<experience<35 | 0.078*** (0.002) | 0.126*** (0.001) | 0.182*** (0.003) | 0.059*** (0.001) | 0.056*** (0.001) | 0.188*** (0.002) |
| 35<experience<40 | 0.132*** (0.002) | 0.156*** (0.001) | 0.144*** (0.003) | 0.068*** (0.001) | 0.051*** (0.001) | 0.153*** (0.002) |
| Experience>40 | 0.051*** (0.003) | 0.215*** (0.002) | 0.171*** (0.002) | 0.042*** (0.001) | 0.042*** (0.001) | 0.108*** (0.001) |
| Nonmarried | −0.093*** (0.001) | −0.088*** (0.001) | −0.11*** (0.001) | −0.045*** (0.001) | −0.076*** (0.001) | −0.086*** (0.001) |
| Region | −0.291*** (0.001) | −0.242*** (0.001) | −0.167*** (0.001) | −0.110*** (0.001) | −0.113*** (0.001) | −0.093*** (0.001) |
| Informal | −0.487*** (0.002) | −0.158*** (0.001) | −0.056*** (0.001) | −0.541*** (0.002) | −0.114*** (0.001) | 0.006*** (0.001) |
| Constant | 2.515*** (0.003) | 3.072*** (0.002) | 4.307*** (0.003) | 3.193*** (0.002) | 3.659*** (0.001) | 4.689*** (0.002) |
Table A4
Aggregate Decomposition of wage change between 2005 and 2015 (without selection correction)
| 90-10 | 90-50 | 50-10 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A. All | |||
| Total Change | −0.457*** (0.001) | −0.284*** (0.001) | −0.173*** (0.001) |
| Composition | −0.118*** (0.001) | −0.119*** (0.001) | 0.001 (0.001) |
| Structure | −0.339*** (0.001) | −0.165*** (0.001) | −0.174*** (0.001) |
| B. Males | |||
| Total Change | −0.555*** (0.002) | −0.346*** (0.001) | −0.208*** (0.001) |
| Composition | −0.001 (0.001) | −0.001 (0.001) | 0 (0.001) |
| Structure | −0.553*** (0.002) | −0.345*** (0.001) | −0.208*** (0.001) |
| C. Females | |||
| Total Change | −0.415*** (0.002) | −0.243*** (0.001) | −0.172*** (0.001) |
| Composition | −0.147*** (0.001) | −0.150*** (0.001) | 0.003*** (0.001) |
| Structure | −0.268*** (0.002) | −0.093*** (0.001) | −0.176*** (0.001) |
Table A5
Detailed Decomposition of the composition effect, based on Unconditional Quantile Partial Effects (without selection correction)
| Inequality measure | All | Males | Females | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90-10 | 90-50 | 50-10 | 90-10 | 90-50 | 50-10 | 90-10 | 90-50 | 50-10 | |
| Female | −0.002*** (0.00003) | −0.002*** (0.00003) | −0.00024*** (0.00001) | ||||||
| Information | 0.008*** (0.0004) | −0.022*** (0.0003) | 0.03*** (0.0003) | 0.018*** (0.0005) | 0.01*** (0.0004) | 0.008*** (0.0003) | 0.039*** (0.0008) | −0.039*** (0.0007) | 0.077*** (0.0006) |
| Automation | −0.072*** (0.00033) | −0.073*** (0.00032) | 0.001*** (0.00023) | 0.018*** (0.0003) | 0.00853*** (0.0003) | 0.009*** (0.0002) | −0.117*** (0.0013) | −0.09796*** (0.0011) | −0.019*** (0.0008) |
| Education | 0.043*** (0.0004) | 0.03*** (0.0003) | 0.012*** (0.0002) | 0.057*** (0.0006) | 0.044*** (0.0005) | 0.013*** (0.0002) | 0.018*** (0.0005) | 0.013*** (0.0003) | 0.005*** (0.0003) |
| Experience | −0.02*** (0.0002) | −0.015*** (0.00013) | −0.005*** (0.0001) | −0.025*** (0.00027) | −0.02*** (0.00024) | −0.005*** (0.0001) | −0.014*** (0.00021) | −0.01*** (0.00018) | −0.003*** (0.0001) |
| Other | −0.075*** (0.00034) | −0.038*** (0.00021) | −0.037*** (0.00029) | −0.07*** (0.0004) | −0.043*** (0.0003) | −0.026*** (0.0003) | −0.073*** (0.0006) | −0.016*** (0.0003) | −0.057*** (0.0005) |
| Total Composition Effect | −0.118*** (0.001) | −0.119*** (0.001) | 0.001 (0.001) | −0.001 (0.001) | −0.001 (0.0008) | −0.000 (0.0006) | −0.147*** (0.0015) | −0.150*** (0.0012) | 0.003*** (0.0009) |
Table A6
Detailed Decomposition of the structure effect, wage variation between 2005 and 2015, based on UQPE (without selection correction)
| Inequality measure | All | Males | Females | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 90-10 | 90-50 | 50-10 | 90-10 | 90-50 | 50-10 | 90-10 | 90-50 | 50-10 | |
| Female | 0.066*** (0.0012) | 0.066*** (0.0012) | 0.00048 (0.0007) | ||||||
| Information | −0.048*** (0.0016) | 0.018*** (0.0013) | −0.06594*** (0.0013) | −0.108*** (0.002) | −0.065*** (0.002) | −0.043*** (0.001) | 0.051*** (0.003) | 0.082*** (0.003) | −0.030*** (0.002) |
| Automation | 0.078*** (0.002) | 0.110*** (0.0016) | −0.03173*** (0.0012) | 0.017*** (0.003) | 0.047*** (0.002) | −0.030*** (0.002) | 0.082*** (0.003) | 0.077*** (0.002) | 0.005*** (0.002) |
| Education | −0.151*** (0.0021) | −0.103*** (0.0018) | −0.04793*** (0.0016) | −0.166*** (0.003) | −0.119*** (0.002) | −0.047*** (0.002) | −0.076*** (0.003) | −0.087*** (0.002) | 0.011*** (0.002) |
| Experience | 0.007*** (0.002) | 0.047*** (0.0018) | −0.03913*** (0.0014) | −0.003 (0.003) | 0.028*** (0.002) | −0.031*** (0.002) | 0.009*** (0.003) | 0.059*** (0.003) | −0.051*** (0.002) |
| Other | 0.015*** (0.0012) | −0.006*** (0.0009) | 0.02106*** (0.001) | 0.052*** (0.002) | 0.008*** (0.001) | 0.043*** (0.001) | −0.038*** (0.002) | −0.02*** (0.001) | −0.018*** (0.001) |
| Constant | −0.307*** (0.0042) | −0.297*** (0.0036) | −0.01043*** (0.003) | −0.345*** (0.006) | −0.244*** (0.005) | −0.1*** (0.004) | −0.296*** (0.006) | −0.204*** (0.005) | −0.092*** (0.005) |
| Total Structure Efect | −0.339*** (0.001) | −0.165*** (0.0009) | −0.17362*** (0.0006) | −0.553*** (0.002) | −0.345*** (0.001) | −0.208*** (0.001) | −0.268*** (0.002) | −0.093*** (0.001) | −0.176*** (0.001) |

Figure A1
Unconditional Quantile Partial Effects: Other Covariates. Dependent variable: log hourly wages. 2005 and 2015
Notes: 2005 in red, 2015 in blue. Solid lines are point estimates, dashes lines report the lower and upper bound of the 95th confidence interval.

Figure A2
Log-hourly wages gender gap variation between 2005 and 2015, unconditional and after controlling for observed characteristics. Without correction for selection bias.
Notes: i. Figures correspond to the estimation (not corrected for self selection) of the variation of the gender gap using an approach analogous to the diff in diff estimator. Unconditional stands for the estimation without any controls. Figure (a) compares the unconditional variation of the gap with respect to that which control for all selected characteristics (Information, Automation, Education, Experience, Informal worker, Region and Marital status). Figures (b) to (e) compares the model with all regressors with those excluding indicated variables. iii. Solid lines are point estimates, dashed lines indicate the lower and upper bound of the 95 confidence interval. Bootstrapped standard errors are calculated (200 replicates) within each 10 imputed data sets and then Rubin’s rules are applied.

Figure A3
Unconditional Quantile Partial Effects: Forth vs First Quartile of Information Task Content, two definition of the variable. Dependent variable: log hourly wages. 2005 and 2015.
Notes: i. Figures show the UQPE of the information task using two alternative indexes, as well as using non imputed data for unemployed, for the upper quartile when the bottom quartile is omitted. ii. In red 2005 in blue 2015. iii. Definition 1 gives Cobb-Douglas weight of two-thirds to importance and one-third to level. In definition 2 we calculated this index by giving one-third to the former and two-thirds to the latter.iv. Solid lines are point estimates, dashed lines indicate the lower and upper bound of the 95 confidence interval. Bootstrapped standard errors are calculated (200 replicates) within each 10 imputed data sets and then Rubin’s rules are applied.

Figure A4
Aggregated decomposition of log hourly wages changes, 2005 and 2015.
Notes: i. Figures show the total change of wages by gender, as well as the aggregated decomposition into the structure and the composition effect. RIF-regression method is used to perform the decomposition. Covariates include: Information, Automation, Education, Experience, Informal worker, Region and Marital status. ii. Solid lines are point estimates, dashed lines indicate the lower and upper bound of the 95 confidence interval. Bootstrapped standard errors are calculated (200 replicates) within each 10 imputed data sets and then Rubin’s rules are applied.

Figure A5
Aggregated decomposition of the gender wage gap and the gender gap change.
Notes: i. Figure (a) shows the aggregated composition and structure effects of gender wage gap in 2005 and 2015.
Covariates include: Information, Automation, Education, Experience, Informal worker, Region and Marital status. ii. Figure (b) decompose gender wage gap change between 2005 and 2015 into the aggregated composition, structure and interaction effects, as defined in section 6) iii. Solid lines are point estimates, dashed lines indicate the lower and upper bound of the 95 confidence interval. Bootstrapped standard errors are calculated (200 replicates) within each 10 imputed data sets and then Rubin’s rules are applied.

Figure A6
Detailed decomposition of the gender gap change.