Table 1
Summary statistics
| Uganda | Kenya | Nigeria | Burkina Faso | Senegal | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Received Remittances (= if yes) | Not Received Remittances (= if yes) | Received Remittances (= if yes) | Not Received Remittances (= if yes) | Received Remittances (= if yes) | Not Received Remittances (= if yes) | Received Remittances (= if yes) | Not Received Remittances (= if yes) | Received Remittances (= if yes) | Not Received Remittances (= if yes) | |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | |
| Female household head (=1 if yes) | 0.375 (0.485) | 0.282 (0.45) | 0.425 (0.495) | 0.221 (0.415) | 0.167 (0.374) | 0.074 (0.262) | 0.089 (0.285) | 0.051 (0.221) | 0.431 (0.496) | 0.186 (0.389) |
| Head is paid employee (=1 if yes) | 0.243 (0.43) | 0.254 (0.435) | 0.238 (0.426) | 0.408 (0.492) | 0.214 (0.41) | 0.297 (0.457) | 0.021 (0.143) | 0.033 (0.178) | 0.107 (0.31) | 0.217 (0.413) |
| Head is self-employed (=1 if yes) | 0.546 (0.499) | 0.631 (0.483) | 0.381 (0.486) | 0.383 (0.486) | 0.576 (0.494) | 0.626 (0.484) | 0.904 (0.294) | 0.935 (0.247) | 0.485 (0.5) | 0.533 (0.499) |
| Head has secondary education (=1 if yes) | 0.336 (0.473) | 0.326 (0.469) | 0.262 (0.44) | 0.296 (0.457) | 0.236 (0.425) | 0.214 (0.41) | 0.034 (0.181) | 0.036 (0.187) | 0.142 (0.349) | 0.15 (0.357) |
| Head has above secondary education (=1 if yes) | 0.418 (0.494) | 0.373 (0.484) | 0.251 (0.434) | 0.261 (0.439) | 0.521 (0.5) | 0.545 (0.498) | 0.012 (0.108) | 0.006 (0.078) | 0.055 (0.228) | 0.11 (0.313) |
| Head's age 45–60 years (=1 if yes) | 0.352 (0.478) | 0.224 (0.417) | 0.284 (0.451) | 0.301 (0.459) | 0.433 (0.496) | 0.365 (0.482) | 0.336 (0.473) | 0.306 (0.461) | 0.308 (0.462) | 0.386 (0.487) |
| Head's age >60 years (=1 if yes) | 0.204 (0.404) | 0.112 (0.315) | 0.316 (0.465) | 0.149 (0.356) | 0.284 (0.451) | 0.114 (0.318) | 0.318 (0.466) | 0.157 (0.364) | 0.336 (0.473) | 0.255 (0.436) |
| Log household income | 7.6 (1.091) | 7.181 (1.09) | 7.974 (1.102) | 7.755 (1.253) | 8.574 (0.902) | 8.321 (0.876) | 7.661 (0.787) | 7.591 (0.852) | 8.829 (0.731) | 8.612 (0.813) |
| Number of children in the household | 2.299 (1.998) | 2.045 (1.929) | 1.432 (1.54) | 1.47 (1.614) | 6.057 (3.183) | 6.039 (3.436) | 1.529 (1.545) | 1.492 (1.417) | 4.277 (3.631) | 3.18 (2.934) |
| Number of elderly in household | 0.332 (0.584) | 0.175 (0.433) | 0.583 (0.747) | 0.344 (0.637) | 0.504 (0.722) | 0.253 (0.562) | 0.67 (0.847) | 0.416 (0.675) | 0.703 (0.753) | 0.515 (0.709) |
| Household is in urban area (=1 if yes) | 0.51 (0.501) | 0.487 (0.5) | 0.423 (0.494) | 0.54 (0.499) | 0.456 (0.498) | 0.513 (0.5) | 0.067 (0.25) | 0.058 (0.235) | 0.631 (0.483) | 0.692 (0.462) |
| Remittances amount (in USD) | 776.47 (2,391.68) | 0 (0) | 2,170.59 (10,769.82) | 0 (0) | 1,847.85 (6,819.30) | 0 (0) | 181.86 (427.82) | 0 (0) | 1,890.90 (2,752.23) | 0 (0) |
| Domestic migration network (%) | −1.915 (7.992) | −2.849 (8.077) | 0.106 (0.169) | 0.152 (0.218) | 0.129 (0.082) | 0.108 (0.081) | 0.109 (0.031) | 0.103 (0.023) | 3.486 (2.122) | 3.67 (2.014) |
| International migration network (%) | – – | – – | 0.037 (0.045) | 0.045 (0.052) | – – | – – | 0.356 (0.17) | 0.329 (0.163) | 0.101 (0.116) | 0.128 (0.122) |
| Education investment (in USD) | 481.154 (769.14) | 269.02 (585.13) | 464.76 (965.26) | 375.07 (911.61) | 607.35 (944.09) | 360.37 (709.12) | 71.07 (134.21) | 50.86 (109.27) | 143.80 (209.14) | 106.97 (190.90) |
| Health investment (in USD) | 89.89 (131.07) | 48.15 (83.14) | 181.44 (420.75) | 128.95 (363.64) | 157.03 (236.93) | 100.82 (177.72) | 81.46 (116.24) | 74.74 (111.63) | 203.65 (299.5) | 145.53 (244.77) |
| Physical capital investment (in USD) | 91.94 (437.17) | 28.83 (232.32) | 142.41 (745.31) | 56.58 (384.57) | 211.58 (821.46) | 123.18 (591.59) | 19.33 (70.58) | 14.077 (51.69) | 34.77 (134.67) | 18.77 (92.35) |
| Social capital investment (in USD) | 30.01 (72.08) | 17.19 (53.70) | 100.34 (411.34) | 67.70 (327.98) | 186.17 (603.84) | 112.51 (432.07) | 52.20 (92.62) | 57.22 (95.56) | 269.08 (412.80) | 217.64 (346.22) |
| Number of observations | 304 | 1,299 | 789 | 1,032 | 842 | 1,188 | 764 | 1,131 | 839 | 866 |
[i] Notes: This table presents the mean and standard deviation of the key variables.
[ii] Standard deviations are presented in parentheses.
Table 2
First stage regression estimates
| Uganda | Kenya | Nigeria | Burkina Faso | Senegal | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
| Domestic migration network | 0.004*** (0.001) | −0.445*** (0.090) | 0.646*** (0.130) | 2.411*** (0.436) | – – |
| International migration network | – – | 0.632* (0.356) | – – | 0.312*** (0.068) | −0.535*** (0.113) |
| Household head is female (=1 if yes) | 0.082*** (0.023) | 0.230*** (0.025) | 0.172*** (0.034) | 0.151*** (0.047) | 0.288*** (0.026) |
| Head paid employee (=1 if yes) | −0.078** (0.040) | −0.143*** (0.032) | −0.200*** (0.039) | −0.227*** (0.082) | −0.118*** |
| (0.041) | |||||
| Head self-employed (=1 if yes) | −0.096*** (0.034) | −0.085*** (0.029) | −0.137*** (0.034) | −0.078 (0.055) | −0.078*** (0.030) |
| Head has secondary education (=1 if yes) | 0.061** (0.024) | 0.014 (0.027) | 0.039 (0.031) | 0.058 (0.064) | 0.046 (0.035) |
| Head has above secondary education (=1 if yes) | 0.076** (0.030) | 0.040 (0.032) | 0.018 (0.030) | 0.177 (0.131) | −0.022 (0.048) |
| Head's age 45–60 (=1 if yes) | 0.111*** (0.026) | 0.022 (0.026) | 0.123*** (0.024) | 0.114*** (0.025) | −0.065** (0.026) |
| Head's age is >60 (=1 if yes) | 0.073 (0.060) | 0.125*** (0.045) | 0.212*** (0.044) | 0.212*** (0.037) | −0.017 (0.038) |
| Log household income (in USD) | 0.057*** (0.010) | 0.071*** (0.011) | 0.085*** (0.013) | 0.024* (0.014) | 0.099*** (0.017) |
| Number of children in household | 0.010* (0.005) | −0.001 (0.007) | −0.004 (0.003) | 0.015* (0.008) | 0.017*** (0.004) |
| Number of elderly in household | 0.080* (0.041) | 0.036 (0.026) | 0.026 (0.024) | 0.039** (0.018) | 0.060*** (0.022) |
| Household is in urban area (=1 if yes) | −0.002 (0.024) | −0.070*** (0.025) | −0.066*** (0.023) | −0.075 (0.052) | −0.077*** (0.027) |
| Constant | −0.285*** (0.072) | −0.109 (0.082) | −0.324*** (0.108) | −0.201 (0.137) | −0.364** (0.135) |
| Observations | 1,603 | 1,821 | 2,029 | 1,895 | 1,705 |
| F-statistics (test of excluded instrument) | 7.24 | 16.11 | 24.68 | 20.58 | 22.45 |
| SW Chi-squared statistics (underidentification test) | 7.3 | 32.47 | 24.84 | 41.47 | 22.62 |
| SW F-statistics (weak identification test) | 7.24 | 16.11 | 24.67 | 20.58 | 22.45 |
| Cragg-Donald Wald F-statistic (weak identification test) | 7.78 | 14.68 | 24.44 | 20.06 | 23.19 |
| Hansen's J-statistic (overidentification test of instruments) | – | 0.382 | – | 2.87 | – |
Notes: This table presents the first stage estimates of our instrumental variable estimation. Robust standard errors are presented in parentheses. The SW F-statistics is a test of weak identification with a null hypothesis that the endogenous regressor is weakly identified. The Hansen's J-statistics are the test statistics from the Sargan–Hansen test of overidentifying restrictions. The joint null hypothesis is that the instruments are the valid instruments. The outcome variable in all columns is an indicator that equals one if a household received remittances.
SW, Sanderson–Windmeijer.
Table 3
Effect of remittances on household investment decision
| Probit | Recursive biprobit | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human capital | Physical capital (=1 if yes) | Social capital (=1 if yes) | Human capital | Physical capital (=1 if yes) | Social capital (=1 if yes) | |||
| Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | |||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
| Panel-A: Uganda | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.049* (0.028) | −0.016 (0.027) | 0.025 (0.020) | 0.051* (0.028) | 0.021 (0.023) | 0.002 (0.054) | 0.017* (0.009) | 0.030* (0.017) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.684 | 0.792 | 0.119 | 0.299 | 0.684 | 0.792 | 0.119 | 0.299 |
| Observations | 1,603 | 1,603 | ||||||
| Panel-B: Kenya | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.021 (0.022) | 0.014 (0.022) | 0.053*** (0.016) | 0.015 (0.024) | 0.174*** (0.014) | 0.182*** (0.007) | 0.106*** (0.028) | 0.169*** (0.011) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.594 | 0.676 | 0.141 | 0.418 | 0.594 | 0.676 | 0.141 | 0.418 |
| Observations | 1,821 | 1,821 | ||||||
| Panel-C: Nigeria | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.052** (0.020) | 0.021 (0.020) | 0.047*** (0.018) | 0.042* (0.022) | 0.170*** (0.017) | −0.059** (0.025) | 0.113*** (0.022) | −0.172*** (0.005) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.729 | 0.764 | 0.185 | 0.374 | 0.729 | 0.764 | 0.185 | 0.374 |
| Observations | 2,029 | 2,029 | ||||||
| Panel-D: Burkina Faso | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.096*** (0.022) | 0.016 (0.016) | 0.000 (0.020) | 0.011 (0.023) | 0.157*** (0.024) | 0.186*** (0.017) | −0.180*** (0.020) | 0.148*** (0.019) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.645 | 0.875 | 0.231 | 0.649 | 0.645 | 0.875 | 0.231 | 0.649 |
| Observations | 1,895 | 1,895 | ||||||
| Panel-E: Senegal | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.086*** (0.023) | −0.002 (0.020) | 0.031** (0.015) | −0.048** (0.023) | 0.189*** (0.051) | 0.033 (0.056) | 0.016 (0.055) | 0.209*** (0.013) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.672 | 0.825 | 0.096 | 0.734 | 0.672 | 0.825 | 0.096 | 0.734 |
| Observations | 1,705 | 1,705 | ||||||
Notes: This table reports the average marginal effects from the probit and recursive bivariate probit models. Robust standard errors are presented in parentheses. The variable of interest, received remittances, is an indicator that takes one if a household received remittances, and zero otherwise. Outcome variables are also indicator variables that equal one if a household made capital investment, and zero otherwise. Control variables are female household head, head is a paid employee, head is self-employed, head has secondary education, head has above secondary education, head's age is 45–60 years, head's age is above 60 years, log household income, number of children in the household, number of elderly in the household, and location is urban.
Table 4
Alternative estimates of the effect of remittances on household investment decision
| OLS | 2SLS | Imperfect IV | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human capital | Physical capital (=1 if yes) | Social capital (=1 if yes) | Human capital | Physical capital (=1 if yes) | Social capital (=1 if yes) | Human capital | Physical capital (=1 if yes) | Social capital (=1 if yes) | ||||
| Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | |||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) | (12) | |
| Panel-A: Uganda | ||||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.051** | −0.017 | 0.028 | 0.053* | 1.673** | 0.656 | 0.102 | 1.317** | [0.051, 1.673] | [0.051, 0.656] | [0.035, 0.102] | [0.180, 1.317] |
| (0.025) | (0.026) | (0.022) | (0.031) | (0.684) | (0.468) | (0.262) | (0.619) | (0.002, 3.014) | (−0.043, 1.572) | (−0.029, 0.616) | (0.082, 2.530) | |
| Observations | 1,603 | 1,603 | 1,603 | |||||||||
| Panel-B: Kenya | ||||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.029 | 0.016 | 0.056*** | 0.015 | 0.694*** | 0.649*** | 0.471*** | 1.192*** | (0.722, 0.842) | (0.853, 1.754) | (0.499, 0.625) | (1.436, 2.520) |
| (0.022) | (0.022) | (0.017) | (0.024) | (0.219) | (0.232) | (0.129) | (0.270) | (0.211, 1.792) | (0.293, 3.281) | (0.185, 1.246) | (0.705, 4.498) | |
| Observations | 1,821 | 1,821 | 1,821 | |||||||||
| Panel-C: Nigeria | ||||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.051** | 0.020 | 0.049*** | 0.042* | 0.791*** | −0.387** | 0.708*** | −0.872*** | (0.051, 0.791) | (−0.387, 0.020) | (0.049, 0.708) | (−0.872, 0.042) |
| (0.020) | (0.020) | (0.019) | (0.023) | (0.232) | (0.195) | (0.226) | (0.277) | (0.012, 1.246) | (−0.786, 0.060) | (0.013, 1.150) | (−1.415, 0.087) | |
| Observations | 2,029 | |||||||||||
| Panel-D: Burkina Faso | ||||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.097*** | 0.017 | −0.001 | 0.012 | 0.530*** | 0.501*** | −0.415*** | 1.145*** | (0.361, 0.777) | (0.256, 0.858) | (−1.338, −1.078) | (0.012, 0.675) |
| (0.022) | (0.016) | (0.020) | (0.023) | (0.160) | (0.131) | (0.144) | (0.233) | (0.049, 1.441) | (−0.018, 1.470) | (−2.485, −0.101) | (−0.033, 1.352) | |
| Observations | 1,895 | 1,895 | 1,895 | |||||||||
| Panel-E: Senegal | ||||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.087*** | 0.004 | 0.028* | −0.047** | 0.161 | 0.203 | −0.164 | 0.196 | (0.087, 0.161) | (0.018, 0.203) | (−0.164, 0.028) | (−0.047, 0.196) |
| (0.023) | (0.020) | (0.016) | (0.023) | (0.192) | (0.172) | (0.119) | (0.206) | (0.041, 0.538) | (−0.040, 0.539) | (−0.398, 0.058) | (−0.091, 0.600) | |
| Observations | 1,705 | 1,705 | 1,705 | |||||||||
Notes: This table reports the estimates of OLS, 2SLS, and IIV estimation. Robust standard errors are presented in parentheses. IIV estimation bounds are reported in square brackets and corresponding confidence intervals are reported in parentheses. The variable of interest, received remittances, is an indicator that takes one if a household received remittances, and zero otherwise. Outcome variables are also indicator variables that equal one if a household made capital investment, and zero otherwise. Control variables are female household head, head is paid employee, head is self-employed, head has secondary education, head has above secondary education, head's age is 45–60 years, head's age is >60 years, log household income, number of children in the household, number of elderly in the household, and location is urban.
IIV, imperfect instrumental variable; IV, instrumental variables; OLS, ordinary linear regression.
Table 5
Effect of cash remittances on household investment decision
| Probit | IV-probit | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human capital | Physical capital (=1 if yes) | Social capital (=1 if yes) | Human capital | Physical capital (=1 if yes) | Social capital (=1 if yes) | |||
| Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | |||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
| Panel-A: Uganda | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | 0.008 (0.005) | −0.003 (0.005) | 0.004 (0.003) | 0.009* (0.005) | 0.137*** (0.015) | 0.102** (0.046) | 0.019 (0.049) | 0.120*** (0.015) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.684 | 0.792 | 0.119 | 0.299 | 0.684 | 0.792 | 0.119 | 0.299 |
| Observations | 1,603 | 1,603 | ||||||
| Panel-B: Kenya | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | 0.000 (0.003) | 0.002 (0.004) | 0.006** (0.002) | −0.000 (0.004) | 0.072*** (0.010) | 0.079*** (0.011) | 0.072*** (0.008) | 0.085*** (0.002) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.594 | 0.676 | 0.141 | 0.418 | 0.594 | 0.676 | 0.141 | 0.418 |
| Observations | 1,821 | 1,821 | ||||||
| Panel-C: Nigeria | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | 0.008** (0.003) | 0.002 (0.003) | 0.006** (0.003) | 0.003 (0.004) | 0.073*** (0.010) | −0.044** (0.017) | 0.066*** (0.009) | −0.073*** (0.009) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.729 | 0.764 | 0.185 | 0.374 | 0.729 | 0.764 | 0.185 | 0.374 |
| Observations | 2,029 | 2,029 | ||||||
| Panel-D: Burkina Faso | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | 0.020*** (0.005) | 0.005 (0.004) | −0.001 (0.004) | −0.001 (0.005) | 0.099*** (0.015) | 0.113*** (0.011) | −0.096*** (0.019) | 0.119*** (0.003) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.645 | 0.875 | 0.231 | 0.649 | 0.645 | 0.875 | 0.231 | 0.649 |
| Observations | 1,895 | 1,895 | ||||||
| Panel-E: Senegal | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | 0.012*** (0.003) | 0.001 (0.003) | 0.005** (0.002) | −0.010*** (0.003) | 0.022 (0.024) | 0.024 (0.021) | −0.021 (0.020) | 0.021 (0.024) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.672 | 0.825 | 0.096 | 0.734 | 0.672 | 0.825 | 0.096 | 0.734 |
| Observations | 1,705 | 1,705 | ||||||
Notes: This table reports the average marginal effects for probit and IV-probit models. Robust standard errors are presented in parentheses. The variable of interest is the amount of cash remittances received (in log scale) in the last 12 months. Outcome variables are also indicator variables that equal one if a household made capital investment, and zero otherwise. Control variables are female household head, head is paid employee, head is self-employed, head has secondary education, head has above secondary education, head's age is 45–60 years, head's age is >60 years, log household income, number of children in the household, number of elderly in the household, and location is urban.
IV, instrumental variables.
Table 6
Effect of remittances amount on household investment expenditure
| OLS | 2SLS | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human capital | Log (Physical capital expenditure) | Log (Social capital expenditure) | Human capital | Log (Physical capital expenditure) | Log (Social capital expenditure) | |||
| Log (Education expenditure) | Log (Health expenditure) | Log (Education expenditure) | Log (Health expenditure) | |||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
| Panel-A: Uganda | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | 0.053* (0.029) | 0.028 (0.023) | 0.035 (0.022) | 0.041* (0.024) | 1.469** (0.638) | 0.779* (0.401) | 0.093 (0.242) | 0.759* (0.388) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 3.408 | 2.791 | 0.466 | 0.981 | 3.408 | 2.791 | 0.466 | 0.981 |
| Observations | 1,603 | 1,603 | ||||||
| Panel-B: Kenya | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | 0.023 (0.022) | 0.025 (0.018) | 0.044*** (0.015) | 0.002 (0.017) | 0.686*** (0.253) | 0.188 (0.183) | 0.540*** (0.153) | 0.624*** (0.204) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 3.115 | 2.742 | 0.680 | 1.556 | 3.115 | 2.742 | 0.680 | 1.556 |
| Observations | 1,821 | 1,821 | ||||||
| Panel-C: Nigeria | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | 0.070*** (0.019) | 0.032* (0.017) | 0.042** (0.017) | 0.025 (0.019) | 0.633*** (0.162) | −0.498*** (0.144) | 0.504*** (0.151) | −0.522*** (0.162) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 3.989 | 3.312 | 0.976 | 1.763 | 3.989 | 3.312 | 0.976 | 1.763 |
| Observations | 2,029 | 2,029 | ||||||
| Panel-D: Burkina Faso | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | 0.087*** (0.020) | 0.033** (0.016) | 0.007 (0.018) | −0.037* (0.021) | 0.500*** (0.159) | 0.508*** (0.147) | −0.275** (0.127) | 0.428** (0.169) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 2.361 | 3.376 | 0.820 | 2.454 | 2.361 | 3.376 | 0.820 | 2.454 |
| Observations | 1,895 | 1,895 | ||||||
| Panel-E: Senegal | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | 0.071*** (0.017) | 0.023 (0.015) | 0.025** (0.012) | −0.039** (0.019) | −0.232 (0.149) | 0.192 (0.122) | −0.111 (0.082) | −0.037 (0.150) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 3.112 | 3.867 | 0.484 | 3.790 | 3.112 | 3.867 | 0.484 | 3.790 |
| Observations | 1,705 | 1,705 | ||||||
Notes:
This table reports OLS and 2SLS estimates. Robust standard errors are presented in parentheses. Outcome variables are capital investment expenditure in US dollars (in log scale) in the past 12 months. The variable of interest is the amount of cash remittances received in US dollars (in log scale) in last 12 months. Outcome variables are also indicator variables that equal one if a household made capital investment, and zero otherwise. Control variables are female household head, head is a paid employee, head is self-employed, head has secondary education, head has above secondary education, head's age is 45–60 years, head's age is >60 years, log household income, number of children in the household, number of elderly in the household, and location is urban.
OLS, ordinary linear regression.
Table 7
Effect of remittances on household investment decision conditional on having a migrant
| Household with a migrant | Household with no migrant | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human Capital | Physical Capital (=1 if yes) | Social Capital (=1 if yes) | Human Capital | Physical Capital (=1 if yes) | Social Capital (=1 if yes) | |||
| Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | |||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
| Panel-A: Uganda | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.143*** (0.014) | 0.113* (0.064) | 0.044** (0.018) | 0.096*** (0.017) | 0.010 (0.011) | −0.014*** (0.002) | −0.010 (0.006) | −0.005*** (0.001) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.736 | 0.798 | 0.131 | 0.327 | 0.641 | 0.786 | 0.108 | 0.276 |
| Mean received remittances | 0.356 | 0.054 | ||||||
| Observations | 719 | 884 | ||||||
| Panel-B: Kenya | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.246*** (0.052) | 0.269*** (0.025) | 0.232*** (0.089) | 0.311*** (0.013) | −0.014*** (0.002) | 0.008 (0.051) | 0.013* (0.007) | 0.013 (0.034) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.610 | 0.692 | 0.153 | 0.436 | 0.566 | 0.649 | 0.119 | 0.389 |
| Mean received remittances | 0.622 | 0.104 | ||||||
| Observations | 1,158 | 1,158 | ||||||
| Panel-C: Nigeria | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.163** (0.067) | −0.125*** (0.048) | 0.242*** (0.050) | −0.247*** (0.040) | 0.047* (0.025) | −0.010*** (0.003) | 0.022*** (0.005) | −0.036*** (0.005) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.773 | 0.756 | 0.191 | 0.347 | 0.659 | 0.777 | 0.177 | 0.418 |
| Mean received remittances | 0.579 | 0.151 | ||||||
| Observations | 1,253 | 776 | ||||||
| Panel-D: Burkina Faso | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.206*** (0.048) | 0.253*** (0.015) | −0.216*** (0.056) | 0.242*** (0.027) | 0.053** (0.027) | 0.056 (0.046) | −0.062* (0.034) | 0.057*** (0.011) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.696 | 0.878 | 0.231 | 0.654 | 0.568 | 0.871 | 0.229 | 0.641 |
| Mean received remittances | 0.542 | 0.193 | ||||||
| Observations | 1,142 | 753 | ||||||
| Panel-E: Senegal | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | −0.006 (0.145) | 0.069 (0.147) | 0.184 (0.123) | 0.318*** (0.052) | −0.012 (0.011) | 0.032*** (0.012) | 0.007 (0.006) | −0.014 (0.009) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.727 | 0.838 | 0.109 | 0.738 | 0.581 | 0.803 | 0.073 | 0.728 |
| Mean received remittances | 0.745 | 0.072 | ||||||
| Observations | 1,065 | 640 | ||||||
Notes: This table reports the average marginal effects for recursive bivariate probit models. Columns 1–4 show estimates for households with a migrant household member and columns 5–8 show estimates for households with no migrant household member. Robust standard errors are presented in parentheses. The variable of interest, received remittances, is an indicator that takes one if a household received remittances, and zero otherwise. Outcome variables are also indicator variables that equal one if a household made capital investment, and zero otherwise. Control variables are female household head, head is a paid employee, head is self-employed, head has secondary education, head has above secondary education, head's age is 45–60 years, head's age is >60 years, log household income, number of children in the household, number of elderly in the household, and location is urban.
Table 8
Effect of remittances on household investment decision by remittance source
| Internal remittances | Within-Africa remittances | Out-of-Africa remittances | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human capital | Physical capital (=1 if yes) | Social capital (=1 if yes) | Human capital | Physical capital (=1 if yes) | Social capital (=1 if yes) | Human capital | Physical capital (=1 if yes) | Social capital (=1 if yes) | ||||
| Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | |||||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) | (12) | |
| Panel-A: Uganda | ||||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.011 (0.011) | −0.013* (0.008) | −0.025 (0.044) | 0.009 (0.018) | 0.006 (0.007) | 0.009 (0.020) | 0.002 (0.001) | −0.002*** (0.000) | −0.006*** (0.002) | −0.002 (0.009) | 0.004*** (0.001) | 0.010*** (0.002) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.677 | 0.790 | 0.115 | 0.291 | 0.661 | 0.791 | 0.111 | 0.285 | 0.661 | 0.788 | 0.114 | 0.290 |
| Observations | 1,482 | 1,343 | 1,365 | |||||||||
| Panel-B: Kenya | ||||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.083*** (0.009) | 0.095*** (0.014) | 0.061** (0.030) | 0.073*** (0.007) | 0.021*** (0.006) | 0.028*** (0.009) | 0.005*** (0.002) | 0.016*** (0.003) | 0.038 (0.038) | 0.066 (0.048) | 0.021*** (0.006) | 0.009 (0.082) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.581 | 0.654 | 0.137 | 0.409 | 0.572 | 0.648 | 0.112 | 0.393 | 0.573 | 0.657 | 0.114 | 0.381 |
| Observations | 1,363 | 1,114 | 1,259 | |||||||||
| Panel-C: Nigeria | ||||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.127*** (0.006) | 0.073 (0.317) | 0.071*** (0.014) | −0.084*** (0.006) | −0.003** (0.001) | 0.002*** (0.000) | 0.001 (0.001) | 0.002 (0.002) | 0.037** (0.018) | 0.015 (0.025) | 0.004 (0.021) | 0.013 (0.022) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.722 | 0.759 | 0.184 | 0.385 | 0.706 | 0.750 | 0.159 | 0.346 | 0.715 | 0.753 | 0.167 | 0.343 |
| Observations | 1,646 | 1,224 | 1,355 | |||||||||
| Panel-D: Burkina Faso | ||||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.082*** (0.018) | 0.122*** (0.009) | −0.095*** (0.013) | 0.053*** (0.002) | 0.081*** (0.022) | 0.114*** (0.009) | −0.041*** (0.005) | 0.051*** (0.004) | 0.002 (0.005) | 0.002*** (0.001) | 0.000** (0.000) | 0.002 (0.019) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.619 | 0.875 | 0.228 | 0.642 | 0.624 | 0.867 | 0.226 | 0.640 | 0.602 | 0.867 | 0.227 | 0.643 |
| Observations | 1,445 | 1,458 | 1,142 | |||||||||
| Panel-E: Senegal | ||||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.052** (0.025) | −0.006 (0.022) | −0.033 (0.049) | 0.003 (0.037) | 0.014 (0.022) | −0.001 (0.018) | −0.039* (0.024) | 0.027 (0.035) | −0.017 (0.037) | 0.067 (0.056) | 0.003 (0.073) | 0.121*** (0.006) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.636 | 0.813 | 0.083 | 0.740 | 0.622 | 0.810 | 0.091 | 0.736 | 0.648 | 0.815 | 0.092 | 0.732 |
| Observations | 1,144 | 1,018 | 1,234 | |||||||||
Notes:
This table reports the average marginal effects for recursive bivariate probit models. Robust standard errors are presented in parentheses. The variable of interest, received remittances, is an indicator that takes one if a household received remittances, and zero otherwise. Outcome variables are also indicator variables that equal one if a household made capital investment, and zero otherwise. Control variables are female household head, head is a paid employee, head is self-employed, head has secondary education, head has above secondary education, head's age is 45–60 years, head's age is >60 years, log household income, number of children in the household, number of elderly in the household, and location is urban.
Table 9
Substitutability of investments
| Invested on physical capital or social capital | Invested on human capital or social capital | Invested on human capital or physical capital | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human capital | Physical capital (=1 if yes) | Social capital (=1 if yes) | ||
| Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | |||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | |
| Panel-A: Uganda | ||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.022 (0.036) | 0.074 (0.066) | 0.018** (0.008) | 0.032 (0.021) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.769 | 0.872 | 0.124 | 0.314 |
| Observations | 576 | 576 | 1,480 | 1,468 |
| Panel-B: Kenya | ||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.064 (0.068) | 0.022 (0.115) | 0.108*** (0.026) | 0.177*** (0.016) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.672 | 0.811 | 0.152 | 0.470 |
| Observations | 882 | 882 | 1,545 | 1,516 |
| Panel-C: Nigeria | ||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.177*** (0.033) | −0.049* (0.027) | 0.131*** (0.024) | −0.179*** (0.005) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.758 | 0.844 | 0.184 | 0.391 |
| Observations | 986 | 986 | 1,874 | 1,884 |
| Panel-D: Burkina Faso | ||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.155*** (0.029) | 0.197*** (0.018) | −0.181*** (0.018) | 0.147*** (0.017) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.672 | 0.901 | 0.235 | 0.661 |
| Observations | 1,331 | 1,331 | 1,834 | 1,800 |
| Panel-E: Senegal | ||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.011 (0.066) | −0.006 (0.052) | 0.018 (0.058) | 0.208*** (0.023) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.678 | 0.853 | 0.099 | 0.748 |
| Observations | 1,282 | 1,282 | 1,651 | 1,584 |
Notes: This table reports the average marginal effects for recursive bivariate probit models. Robust standard errors are presented in parentheses. The variable of interest, received remittances, is an indicator that takes one if a household received remittances, and zero otherwise. Outcome variables are also indicator variables that equal one if a household made capital investment, and zero otherwise. Control variables are female household head, head is a paid employee, head is self-employed, head has secondary education, head has above secondary education, head's age is 45–60 years, head's age is >60 years, log household income, number of children in the household, number of elderly in the household, and location is urban. Estimates of columns 1 and 2 are conditional on households investing on physical or social capital. Similarly, estimates of column 3 are conditional on households investing on human or social capital. Finally, column 4 is conditional human or physical capital investment.
Table 10
Mechanisms of the effect
| Income effect | Labor substitution | Migration expectation | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Above median consumption expenditure (=1 if yes) | Own radio (=1 if yes) | Own mobile phone (=1 if yes) | Proportion of adult household member working | Proportion of children aged 6–15 working | Proportion of children aged 6–15 in school | |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | |
| Panel-A: Uganda | ||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.045*** (0.003) | −0.013 (0.021) | 0.006 (0.020) | −0.234 (0.266) | −0.094 (0.237) | 0.305 (0.464) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.303 | 0.778 | 0.569 | 0.676 | 0.080 | 0.871 |
| Observations | 1,603 | 1,603 | 1,603 | 1,603 | 963 | 963 |
| Panel-B: Kenya | ||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.154*** (0.011) | 0.136*** (0.051) | 0.001 (0.069) | −0.298*** (0.105) | 0.058 (0.039) | 0.308 (0.930) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.253 | 0.848 | 0.801 | 0.541 | 0.004 | 0.832 |
| Observations | 1,821 | 1,821 | 1,821 | 1,821 | 901 | 901 |
| Panel-C: Nigeria | ||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.070*** (0.024) | 0.196*** (0.016) | 0.171*** (0.011) | 0.665*** (0.172) | −0.073 (0.057) | 0.984*** (0.274) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.339 | 0.876 | 0.5783 | 0.595 | 0.031 | 0.705 |
| Observations | 2,030 | 2,030 | 2,030 | 2,030 | 1,245 | 1,245 |
| Panel-D: Burkina Faso | ||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | −0.132** (0.062) | 0.149*** (0.044) | 0.104*** (0.030) | 0.278*** (0.094) | −1.001*** (0.221) | 0.802*** (0.205) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.322 | 0.062 | 0.403 | 0.764 | 0.412 | 0.452 |
| Observations | 1,895 | 1,895 | 1,895 | 1,895 | 1,633 | 1,633 |
| Panel-E: Senegal | ||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.179*** (0.009) | 0.110** (0.045) | 0.117* (0.064) | −0.205* (0.117) | 0.342 (0.247) | −0.606* (0.353) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.678 | 0.823 | 0.850 | 0.541 | 0.294 | 0.684 |
| Observations | 1,705 | 1,705 | 1,705 | 1,705 | 1,296 | 1,296 |
Notes: Columns 1–3 report the average marginal effects for recursive bivariate probit models and columns 4–6 report the estimates of 2SLS regression. Robust standard errors are presented in parentheses. The variable of interest, received remittances, is an indicator that takes one if a household received remittances, and zero otherwise. Control variables are female household head, head is a paid employee, head is self-employed, head has secondary education, head has above secondary education, head's age is 45–60 years, head's age is >60 years, log household income, number of children in the household, number of elderly in the household, and location is urban.
Table A1
Correlation of treatment and outcome variables
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | Log (cash remittances) | Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | Physical capital (=1 if yes) | Social capital (=1 if yes) | Log (education expenditure) | Log (health expenditure) | Log (physical capital expenditure) | Log (social capital expenditure) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | |
| Panel-A: Uganda | ||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 1 | |||||||||
| Log (cash remittances) | 0.943 | 1 | ||||||||
| Education (=1 if yes) | 0.120 | 0.108 | 1 | |||||||
| Health (=1 if yes) | 0.017 | 0.015 | 0.120 | 1 | ||||||
| Physical capital (=1 if yes) | 0.049 | 0.047 | 0.088 | 0.050 | 1 | |||||
| Social capital (=1 if yes) | 0.074 | 0.068 | 0.113 | 0.167 | 0.153 | 1 | ||||
| Log (education expenditure) | 0.161 | 0.171 | 0.865 | 0.141 | 0.082 | 0.129 | 1 | |||
| Log (health expenditure) | 0.112 | 0.122 | 0.175 | 0.797 | 0.085 | 0.188 | 0.282 | 1 | ||
| Log (physical capital expenditure) | 0.087 | 0.094 | 0.091 | 0.039 | 0.878 | 0.131 | 0.123 | 0.120 | 1 | |
| Log (social capital expenditure) | 0.102 | 0.114 | 0.143 | 0.142 | 0.175 | 0.887 | 0.206 | 0.232 | 0.190 | 1 |
| Panel-B: Kenya | ||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 1 | |||||||||
| Log (cash remittances) | 0.937 | 1 | ||||||||
| Education (=1 if yes) | 0.056 | 0.047 | 1 | |||||||
| Health (=1 if yes) | 0.08 | 0.078 | 0.225 | 1 | ||||||
| Physical capital (=1 if yes) | 0.099 | 0.09 | 0.106 | 0.054 | 1 | |||||
| Social capital (=1 if yes) | 0.065 | 0.044 | 0.138 | 0.297 | 0.093 | 1 | ||||
| Log (education expenditure) | 0.072 | 0.101 | 0.881 | 0.204 | 0.06 | 0.106 | 1 | |||
| Log (health expenditure) | 0.114 | 0.158 | 0.203 | 0.812 | 0.047 | 0.229 | 0.266 | 1 | ||
| Log (physical capital expenditure) | 0.098 | 0.114 | 0.095 | 0.048 | 0.918 | 0.07 | 0.078 | 0.064 | 1 | |
| Log (social capital expenditure) | 0.076 | 0.085 | 0.147 | 0.273 | 0.08 | 0.865 | 0.158 | 0.304 | 0.082 | 1 |
| Panel-C: Nigeria | ||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 1 | |||||||||
| Log (cash remittances) | 0.941 | 1 | ||||||||
| Education (=1 if yes) | 0.066 | 0.085 | 1 | |||||||
| Health (=1 if yes) | 0.031 | 0.019 | 0.126 | 1 | ||||||
| Physical capital (=1 if yes) | 0.076 | 0.068 | −0.011 | 0.002 | 1 | |||||
| Social capital (=1 if yes) | 0.056 | 0.031 | 0.076 | 0.266 | 0.021 | 1 | ||||
| Log (education expenditure) | 0.129 | 0.183 | 0.875 | 0.081 | 0.006 | 0.035 | 1 | |||
| Log (health expenditure) | 0.102 | 0.118 | 0.122 | 0.845 | 0.031 | 0.272 | 0.157 | 1 | ||
| Log (physical capital expenditure) | 0.081 | 0.09 | 0.001 | 0.014 | 0.923 | 0.038 | 0.044 | 0.056 | 1 | |
| Log (social capital expenditure) | 0.074 | 0.069 | 0.051 | 0.225 | 0.044 | 0.92 | 0.055 | 0.274 | 0.074 | 1 |
| Panel-D: Burkina Faso | ||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 1 | |||||||||
| Log (cash remittances) | 0.928 | 1 | ||||||||
| Education (=1 if yes) | 0.117 | 0.123 | 1 | |||||||
| Health (=1 if yes) | 0.03 | 0.048 | 0.088 | 1 | ||||||
| Physical capital (=1 if yes) | 0.012 | 0.009 | 0.026 | 0.047 | 1 | |||||
| Social capital (=1 if yes) | 0.021 | 0.015 | 0.098 | 0.128 | 0.137 | 1 | ||||
| Log (education expenditure) | 0.126 | 0.154 | 0.861 | 0.105 | 0.053 | 0.085 | 1 | |||
| Log (health expenditure) | 0.038 | 0.091 | 0.116 | 0.76 | 0.059 | 0.135 | 0.202 | 1 | ||
| Log (physical capital expenditure) | 0.028 | 0.033 | 0.055 | 0.062 | 0.939 | 0.134 | 0.096 | 0.106 | 1 | |
| Log (social capital expenditure) | −0.019 | 0.002 | 0.135 | 0.131 | 0.158 | 0.877 | 0.166 | 0.225 | 0.182 | 1 |
| Panel-E: Senegal | ||||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 1 | |||||||||
| Log (cash remittances) | 0.961 | 1 | ||||||||
| Education (=1 if yes) | 0.148 | 0.154 | 1 | |||||||
| Health (=1 if yes) | 0.058 | 0.075 | 0.096 | 1 | ||||||
| Physical capital (=1 if yes) | 0.047 | 0.045 | −0.002 | 0.029 | 1 | |||||
| Social capital (=1 if yes) | −0.003 | −0.016 | 0.027 | 0.115 | 0.06 | 1 | ||||
| Log (education expenditure) | 0.157 | 0.178 | 0.92 | 0.082 | 0.005 | 0.008 | 1 | |||
| Log (health expenditure) | 0.106 | 0.145 | 0.114 | 0.86 | 0.015 | 0.096 | 0.146 | 1 | ||
| Log (physical capital expenditure) | 0.056 | 0.058 | 0.004 | 0.028 | 0.971 | 0.056 | 0.018 | 0.023 | 1 | |
| Log (social capital expenditure) | 0.031 | 0.038 | 0.074 | 0.156 | 0.033 | 0.916 | 0.087 | 0.196 | 0.035 | 1 |
[i] Notes: Number of observations in Panel-A, 1,603; in Panel-B, 1,821; in Panel-C, 2,030; in Panel-D, 1,895; and in Panel-E, 1,705.
Table A2
Descriptive statistics by sources of remittances
| Uganda | Kenya | Nigeria | Burkina Faso | Senegal | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Internal | African | Out-of-Africa | Internal | African | Out-of-Africa | Internal | African | Out-of-Africa | Internal | African | Out-of-Africa | Internal | African | Out-of-Africa | |
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | (9) | (10) | (11) | (12) | (13) | (14) | (15) | |
| Log (cash remittances) | 4.621 (1.402) | 5.534 (1.624) | 6.686 (1.407) | 5.097 (1.457) | 6.232 (1.682) | 7.013 (1.428) | 5.458 (1.586) | 6.262 (1.11) | 7.069 (1.441) | 3.844 (1.218) | 4.427 (1.255) | 5.51 (1.435) | 6.13 (1.208) | 6.293 (1.33) | 7.295 (1.319) |
| Log (education expenditure) | 4.187 (2.393) | 4.525 (2.616) | 4.469 (3.011) | 3.003 (2.745) | 3.078 (3.02) | 3.511 (3.18) | 4.153 (2.73) | 4.128 (2.611) | 5.152 (2.861) | 2.545 (2.049) | 2.587 (1.933) | 3.738 (1.667) | 3.202 (2.095) | 3.221 (2.184) | 3.793 (2.38) |
| Log (health expenditure) | 3.116 (1.88) | 3.405 (1.813) | 3.361 (2.197) | 2.465 (2.03) | 2.845 (2.243) | 3.442 (2.621) | 3.433 (2.155) | 3.128 (2.476) | 3.795 (2.435) | 3.479 (1.582) | 3.329 (1.673) | 4.057 (2.177) | 3.851 (1.968) | 3.825 (1.935) | 4.328 (2.129) |
| Log (physical capital expenditure) | 0.675 (1.856) | 0.406 (1.27) | 0.898 (2.188) | 0.994 (2.1) | 0.745 (2.077) | 0.701 (1.904) | 1.259 (2.409) | 0.677 (1.958) | 1.291 (2.61) | 0.876 (1.677) | 0.785 (1.547) | 1.129 (2.027) | 0.402 (1.369) | 0.722 (1.804) | 0.639 (1.82) |
| Log (social capital expenditure) | 1.184 (1.768) | 1.326 (1.943) | 1.812 (2.239) | 1.571 (1.952) | 1.643 (2.252) | 1.416 (2.227) | 2.154 (2.516) | 0.952 (2.238) | 1.528 (2.534) | 2.329 (1.991) | 2.329 (2.045) | 4.046 (2.051) | 3.762 (2.401) | 3.675 (2.395) | 4.023 (2.664) |
| Observations | 183 | 44 | 66 | 331 | 82 | 227 | 459 | 37 | 168 | 314 | 327 | 11 | 278 | 152 | 368 |
[i] Notes: This table presents the mean and standard deviation of the key variables. Standard deviations are presented in parentheses.
Table A3
Effect of remittances on household investment decision
| Probit | Recursive biprobit | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human capital | Physical capital (=1 if yes) | Social capital (=1 if yes) | Human capital | Physical capital (=1 if yes) | Social capital (=1 if yes) | |||
| Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | Education (=1 if yes) | Health (=1 if yes) | |||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
| Panel-A: Uganda | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.198* (0.114) | −0.058 (0.097) | 0.137 (0.106) | 0.157* (0.088) | 0.478 (0.489) | 0.047 (1.021) | 0.730 (0.881) | 0.572 (0.452) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.684 | 0.792 | 0.119 | 0.299 | 0.684 | 0.792 | 0.119 | 0.299 |
| Observations | 1,603 | 1,603 | ||||||
| Panel-B: Kenya | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.067 (0.070) | 0.043 (0.068) | 0.259*** (0.080) | 0.041 (0.065) | 1.311*** (0.125) | 1.414*** (0.102) | 1.447*** (0.251) | 1.332*** (0.095) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.594 | 0.676 | 0.141 | 0.418 | 0.594 | 0.676 | 0.141 | 0.418 |
| Observations | 1,821 | 1,821 | ||||||
| Panel-C: Nigeria | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.174** (0.068) | 0.070 (0.068) | 0.186*** (0.070) | 0.116* (0.062) | 1.205*** (0.137) | −0.632* (0.337) | 1.416*** (0.183) | −1.251*** (0.073) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.729 | 0.764 | 0.185 | 0.374 | 0.729 | 0.764 | 0.185 | 0.374 |
| Observations | 2,029 | 2,029 | ||||||
| Panel-D: Burkina Faso | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.282*** (0.065) | 0.080 (0.080) | 0.000 (0.067) | 0.032 (0.063) | 1.149*** (0.221) | 1.316*** (0.125) | −1.178*** (0.207) | 1.401*** (0.055) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.645 | 0.875 | 0.231 | 0.649 | 0.645 | 0.875 | 0.231 | 0.649 |
| Observations | 1,895 | 1,895 | ||||||
| Panel-E: Senegal | ||||||||
| Received remittances (=1 if yes) | 0.262*** (0.071) | −0.008 (0.081) | 0.192** (0.094) | −0.150** (0.071) | 1.204*** (0.383) | 0.270 (0.417) | 0.198 (0.760) | 1.202*** (0.140) |
| Mean of the outcome variable | 0.672 | 0.825 | 0.096 | 0.734 | 0.672 | 0.825 | 0.096 | 0.734 |
| Observations | 1,705 | 1,705 | ||||||
Notes: This table reports the coefficients of our probit and recursive bivariate probit models. Robust standard errors are presented in parentheses. The variable of interest, received remittances, is an indicator that takes one if a household received remittances, and zero otherwise. Outcome variables are also indicator variables that equal one if a household made capital investment, and zero otherwise. Control variables are female household head, head is a paid employee, head is self-employed, head has secondary education, head has above secondary education, head's age is 45–60 years, head's age is >60 years, log household income, number of children in the household, number of elderly in the household, and location is urban.
Table A4
Non-linear effect of remittances amount on household investment expenditure
| 2SLS | 2SLS | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Human capital | Log (Physical capital expenditure) | Log (Social capital expenditure) | Human capital | Log (Physical capital expenditure) | Log (Social capital expenditure) | |||
| Log (Education expenditure) | Log (Health expenditure) | Log (Education expenditure) | Log (Health expenditure) | |||||
| (1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | (6) | (7) | (8) | |
| Panel-A: Uganda | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | 6.938 (4.588) | 0.530 (2.355) | −3.109 (2.093) | −3.317 (3.466) | 3.916 (2.970) | 2.155 (1.729) | 0.177 (0.699) | 1.956 (1.604) |
| Log (Cash remittances) squared | −0.986 (0.809) | 0.045 (0.408) | 0.577 (0.366) | 0.735 (0.620) | ||||
| Log (Cash remittances) × High remittance | −2.933 (2.719) | −1.214 (1.656) | 0.205 (0.824) | −1.627 (1.560) | ||||
| Observations | 1,603 | 1,603 | ||||||
| Panel-B: Kenya | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | 0.867 (1.595) | 1.584 (1.356) | 0.904 (1.005) | 3.852* (2.028) | 0.996* (0.527) | −0.057 (0.315) | 0.507* (0.262) | 0.311 (0.283) |
| Log (Cash remittances) squared | −0.032 (0.281) | −0.248 (0.240) | −0.065 (0.177) | −0.573 (0.358) | ||||
| Log (Cash remittances) × High remittance | −0.931 (0.584) | 0.001 (0.416) | 0.470 (0.466) | −0.707* (0.426) | ||||
| Observations | 1,821 | 1,821 | ||||||
| Panel-C: Nigeria | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | 6.736 (4.127) | 0.171 (1.493) | 6.679* (4.012) | 4.603 (2.884) | 0.787*** (0.203) | −0.579*** (0.178) | 0.517*** (0.181) | −0.596*** (0.197) |
| Log (Cash remittances) squared | −0.821 (0.540) | −0.090 (0.197) | −0.831 (0.525) | −0.689* (0.383) | ||||
| Log (Cash remittances) × High remittance | −0.162 (1.672) | −1.911 (2.561) | 3.061 (3.495) | −2.348 (2.895) | ||||
| Observations | 2,029 | 2,029 | ||||||
| Panel-D: Burkina Faso | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | −1.690 (2.917) | −3.570 (4.115) | 2.952 (3.347) | 3.977 (3.135) | 0.588*** (0.212) | 0.517*** (0.182) | −0.248 (0.153) | 0.573*** (0.215) |
| Log (Cash remittances) squared | 0.463 (0.614) | 0.863 (0.863) | −0.682 (0.704) | −0.751 (0.662) | ||||
| Log (Cash remittances) × High remittance | 2.096 (2.325) | 0.060 (1.659) | 0.565 (1.551) | 0.300 (1.624) | ||||
| Observations | 1,895 | 1,895 | ||||||
| Panel-E: Senegal | ||||||||
| Log (Cash remittances) | 2.999 (2.592) | −1.285 (1.823) | −5.129 (3.366) | −7.571 (4.902) | −0.753 (0.525) | 0.428 (0.335) | −0.293 (0.239) | −0.112 (0.369) |
| Log (Cash remittances) squared | −0.415 (0.348) | 0.190 (0.244) | 0.645 (0.448) | 0.969 (0.655) | ||||
| Log (Cash remittances) × High remittance | 8.061 (6.029) | −3.989 (3.602) | 2.626 (2.747) | 1.752 (4.266) | ||||
| Observations | 1,705 | 1,705 | ||||||
Notes: This table reports 2SLS estimates. Robust standard errors are presented in parentheses. Outcome variables are capital investment expenditure in US dollar (in log scale) in past 12 months. The variable of interest is amount of cash remittances received in US dollar (in log scale) in last 12 months. Columns 1–4 includes amount of cash remittances received in US dollar (in log scale) squared. Columns 5–8 includes an indicator of high remittance (above district-level average remittances) and an interaction between cash remittances received (in log scale) and high remittances. Control variables are female household head, head is paid employee, head is self-employed, head has secondary education, head has above secondary education, head's age is 45–60 years, head's age is >60 years, log household income, number of children in the household, number of elderly in the household, and location is urban.