Table 1
Descriptive statistics
| Farmworker | OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | Unpaid family worker | Student | UNLF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urbana | 0.05 | 0.40 | 0.54 | 0.21 | 0.55 | 0.44 | 0.30 | 0.35 |
| Age | 36.97 | 41.05 | 40.95 | 36.84 | 40.23 | 32.75 | 11.22 | 32.55 |
| Years of education | 4.63 | 6.93 | 9.27 | 4.29 | 9.93 | 7.07 | 5.06 | 3.84 |
| Malea | 0.47 | 0.84 | 0.94 | 0.69 | 0.81 | 0.61 | 0.54 | 0.31 |
| Caste groupsa | (column totals for all caste groups sum up to 1.0) | |||||||
| General | 0.28 | 0.32 | 0.47 | 0.17 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.29 | 0.31 |
| OBC | 0.46 | 0.48 | 0.42 | 0.39 | 0.35 | 0.50 | 0.42 | 0.43 |
| SC/ST | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.11 | 0.44 | 0.27 | 0.17 | 0.29 | 0.26 |
| Hindua | 0.86 | 0.79 | 0.77 | 0.84 | 0.82 | 0.77 | 0.81 | 0.79 |
| Marrieda | 0.74 | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.82 | 0.85 | 0.61 | 0.01 | 0.62 |
| Household poora,b | 0.26 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.36 | 0.10 | 0.18 | 0.31 | 0.33 |
| Monthly per capita household real income | 735.03 | 1002.44 | 2295.59 | 717.36 | 2158.56 | 1127.21 | 851.91 | 941.65 |
| Assets | 11.51 | 14.53 | 18.55 | 10.49 | 17.89 | 15.87 | 13.16 | 13.26 |
| Mean real earnings per hour (standard deviation) | 187.36 | 628.94 | 129.70 | 9.49 | 26.16 | |||
| Annual number of hours worked | 729.60 | 2104.67 | 2328.13 | 1529.99 | 2472.93 | 1163.93 | ||
| Observations | ||||||||
| Total | 67928 | 9202 | 2964 | 58498 | 14225 | 5787 | 64867 | 77895 |
| 2004-2005 | 30037 | 3987 | 1311 | 26437 | 5245 | 2293 | 33126 | 48247 |
| 2011-2012 | 37891 | 5215 | 1653 | 32061 | 8980 | 3494 | 31741 | 29648 |
a Values indicate proportionate shares of the variable among the total population of the different groups.
a Values indicate proportionate shares of the variable among the total population of the different groups.
a Values indicate proportionate shares of the variable among the total population of the different groups.
a Values indicate proportionate shares of the variable among the total population of the different groups.
a Values indicate proportionate shares of the variable among the total population of the different groups.
a Values indicate proportionate shares of the variable among the total population of the different groups.
b The poverty rates are calculated using per capita household consumption and the official poverty lines (Tendulkar Committee poverty lines) (Planning Commission, 2009). Estimated results are calculated using sampling weights (2004-2005). Figures shown are the mean values of the variables, unless otherwise mentioned.
Table 2
Transition probabilities (P-matrix)
| Initial sector | Terminal sector | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farmworker | OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | Unpaid family worker | Student | UNLF | |
| Farmworker | 57.30 | 2.11 | 0.48 | 19.48 | 2.11 | 1.23 | 1.84 | 15.45 |
| OAW | 14.65 | 27.36 | 6.37 | 25.74 | 5.23 | 6.75 | 0.19 | 13.71 |
| Employer | 10.87 | 26.32 | 20.84 | 15.99 | 8.35 | 7.14 | 0.11 | 10.37 |
| Casual worker | 17.37 | 4.42 | 0.85 | 58.08 | 8.09 | 1.10 | 0.16 | 9.92 |
| Regular worker | 6.79 | 3.53 | 1.45 | 20.63 | 52.16 | 0.70 | 0.05 | 14.69 |
| Unpaid family worker | 11.63 | 16.65 | 4.94 | 19.14 | 4.35 | 19.87 | 2.35 | 21.07 |
| Student | 22.71 | 0.82 | 0.29 | 11.92 | 2.93 | 2.72 | 49.90 | 8.72 |
| UNLF | 17.16 | 1.74 | 0.47 | 10.64 | 2.62 | 1.72 | 31.53 | 34.13 |
[i] Notes: All transition probabilities are significant at the 1% level of significance. The test of significance is based on the Sison–Glaz method (Sison and Glaz, 1995). The corresponding 95% multinomial confidence intervals are available in Table A8 in Appendix.
Estimated coefficients are calculated using sampling weights (2004–2005).
OAW = Own-account workers; UNLF = Unemployed and Not in the Labor Force.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
Table 3
Transition probabilities (V-matrix)
| Initial sector | Terminal sector | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farmworker | OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | Unpaid family worker | Student | UNLF | |
| Farmwork | 2.09 | 1.55 | 4.87 | 1.99 | 1.69 | 0.41 | 2.91 | |
| OAW | 1.81 | 12.19 | 3.78 | 2.90 | 5.44 | 0.02 | 1.52 | |
| Employer | 1.23 | 14.07 | 2.16 | 4.25 | 5.28 | 0.01 | 1.05 | |
| Casual worker | 3.72 | 4.46 | 2.82 | 7.77 | 1.54 | 0.04 | 1.90 | |
| Regular worker | 1.28 | 3.12 | 4.20 | 4.60 | 0.86 | 0.01 | 2.47 | |
| Unpaid family worker | 1.30 | 8.79 | 8.56 | 2.55 | 2.19 | 0.28 | 2.11 | |
| Student | 4.07 | 0.69 | 0.80 | 2.54 | 2.36 | 3.18 | 1.40 | |
| UNLF | 2.34 | 1.12 | 0.98 | 1.72 | 1.60 | 1.53 | 4.51 | |
[i] Note: See Notes in Table 2.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
Table 4
Transition probabilities (T-matrix)
| Initial sector | Terminal sector | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farmworker | OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | Unpaid family worker | Student | UNLF | |
| Farmwork | 0.76 | 0.58 | 1.53 | 0.53 | 0.61 | 0.16 | 1.75 | |
| OAW | 0.71 | 5.95 | 1.55 | 1.00 | 2.56 | 0.01 | 1.19 | |
| Employer | 0.50 | 6.92 | 0.91 | 1.52 | 2.58 | 0.01 | 0.86 | |
| Casual worker | 1.20 | 1.74 | 1.13 | 2.20 | 0.60 | 0.02 | 1.23 | |
| Regular worker | 0.49 | 1.45 | 2.00 | 1.84 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 1.90 | |
| Unpaid family worker | 0.52 | 4.24 | 4.23 | 1.06 | 0.76 | 0.14 | 1.68 | |
| Student | 1.35 | 0.28 | 0.33 | 0.88 | 0.68 | 1.26 | 0.93 | |
| UNLF | 0.82 | 0.47 | 0.43 | 0.63 | 0.49 | 0.64 | 2.07 | |
[i] Note: See Notes in Table 2.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
Table 5
Mobility and individual characteristics
| Status of destination | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Status of departure | Farmworker | OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | Unpaid family worker | UNLF and student |
| Farmworker | |||||||
| Urbana | 1.56*** | 1.58** | 1.51*** | 2.70*** | 3.20*** | 2.53*** | |
| Age | 0.98** | 0.97*** | 0.97*** | 0.99*** | 1.01 | 1.05*** | |
| Years of education | 1.05*** | 1.07*** | 0.98** | 1.18*** | 1.01 | 0.98** | |
| Speaks Englishb | 1.14 | 2.08** | 1.01 | 1.28* | 0.7 | 1.1 | |
| Education of father of household head | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.95*** | 0.95*** | 0.98 | 0.99 | |
| Genderc | 3.43*** | 8.75*** | 2.36*** | 1.43*** | 0.57*** | 0.28*** | |
| Other backward castes | 1.52*** | 0.79 | 1.31** | 1.01 | 1.02 | 0.81** | |
| SC/ST | 0.98 | 0.8 | 2.16*** | 1.59* | 1.07 | 0.96 | |
| Religiond | 1.18 | 0.64 | 1.01 | 1.18 | 1.2 | 0.93 | |
| Marital statuse | 1.29 | 1.93** | 1.12 | 0.52*** | 0.22*** | 0.08*** | |
| Assets | 1.04** | 1.17*** | 0.90*** | 1.01 | 1.07*** | 1.03*** | |
| Member of employee union/business groupf | 1.08 | 1.41 | 1.04 | 1.22 | 1.44 | 1.05 | |
| Member of SHGf | 1.17 | 1.67 | 1.12 | 1.62** | 0.75 | 0.98 | |
| Member of savings groupf | 0.93 | 0.78 | 1.03 | 1.17 | 1.06 | 0.96 | |
| Dependency ratio | 1.01 | 0.29** | 1.36 | 1.67 | 1.81** | 2.51*** | |
| Occupational group of the father of the household head (Base: Farmers, service workers, and production workers) | |||||||
| Professional and executive workers | 1.58 | 1.05 | 1.08 | 1.63** | 0.96 | 1.29 | |
| Sales workers | 5.12*** | 2.29 | 1.03 | 2.74** | 5.29*** | 2.01*** | |
| Clerical, service, and production workers | 1.91*** | 1.27 | 1.50** | 1.76*** | 1.51** | 1.37*** | |
| Own-account worker (OAW) | |||||||
| Urbana | 0.15*** | 1.29 | 0.89 | 1.63** | 0.82 | 1.22 | |
| Age | 1.02*** | 0.99** | 0.97*** | 0.96*** | 1.01 | 1.06*** | |
| Years of education | 1.01 | 1.03 | 0.96 | 1.04 | 0.97 | 0.98 | |
| Speaks Englishb | 1.19 | 1.05 | 0.79 | 1.09 | 0.8 | 0.93 | |
| Education of father of household head | 1.02 | 1.05** | 1.02 | 1.01 | 0.98 | 0.98 | |
| Genderc | 0.31*** | 0.97 | 0.94 | 1.19 | 0.36*** | 0.08*** | |
| Dummy for caste affiliation (Base: General category) | |||||||
| Other backward castes | 0.83 | 0.8 | 0.99 | 0.82 | 0.62** | 0.79 | |
| SC/ST | 0.62** | 0.85 | 1.41 | 0.94 | 0.62 | 0.70* | |
| Religiond | 1.28 | 0.69* | 1.18 | 1.05 | 1.40** | 1.23 | |
| Marital statuse | 0.39** | 1.75*** | 0.93 | 0.65 | 0.34*** | 0.15*** | |
| Assets | 0.96*** | 1.05** | 0.91*** | 1.04 | 1.08*** | 1.02 | |
| Member of employee union/business groupf | 1.79 | 1.19 | 1.04 | 0.89 | 1.38 | 0.79 | |
| Member of SHGf | 1.86* | 0.87 | 1.26 | 0.5 | 0.76 | 0.9 | |
| Member of savings groupf | 0.82 | 1.41 | 0.97 | 1.65 | 1.16 | 1.02 | |
| Dependency ratio | 1.22 | 1.8 | 0.72 | 0.58 | 0.9 | 1.14 | |
| Occupational group of the father of the household head (Base: Farmers , service workers, and production workers) | |||||||
| Professional and executive workers | 0.51 | 0.9 | 1.36 | 2.09 | 2.96*** | 1.67 | |
| Sales workers | 0.21*** | 1.26 | 0.56' | 0.66 | 2.36*** | 1.26 | |
| Clerical, service, and production workers | 0.47*** | 1.04 | 1.11 | 1.08 | 2.32*** | 1.16 | |
Notes:
Significance levels: *** 1%; ** 5%, and * 10%.
Additional controls used in the model include 18 dummies for state regions, with Uttar Pradesh as the reference category.
Estimated coefficients are calculated using sampling weights (2004-2005).
Estimated coefficients reported are odds ratios.
Standard errors are clustered by 34 state regions.
SC/ST = Scheduled castes and Scheduled tribes; SHG = self-help group.
Source: Authors' calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
f The variable takes the value 1.0 if anyone in the household is a member of the respective group, and zero otherwise.
f The variable takes the value 1.0 if anyone in the household is a member of the respective group, and zero otherwise.
f The variable takes the value 1.0 if anyone in the household is a member of the respective group, and zero otherwise.
f The variable takes the value 1.0 if anyone in the household is a member of the respective group, and zero otherwise.
Table 6
Mobility and individual characteristics
| Status of destination | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Status of departure | Farm worker | OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | Unpaid family worker | UNLF and student |
| Casual worker | |||||||
| Urbana | 0.15*** | 1.35** | 0.99 | 1.64*** | 1.71** | 1.26 | |
| Age | 1.03*** | 1.02*** | 1.02** | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.08*** | |
| Years of education | 1.03*** | 1.06*** | 1.08*** | 1.16*** | 1.01 | 1.03*** | |
| Speaks Englishb | 0.9 | 1.08 | 0.8 | 1.40*** | 1.32 | 0.99 | |
| Education of father of household head | 1.01 | 1.01 | 0.99 | 1.02** | 1.01 | 1.04 | |
| Genderc | 0.49*** | 1.56** | 4.14*** | 0.83 | 0.41*** | 0.14*** | |
| Dummy for caste affiliation (Base: General category) | |||||||
| Other backward castes | 0.77** | 0.89 | 0.66** | 0.81 | 1.18 | 0.73** | |
| SC/ST | 0.54*** | 0.62*** | 0.58** | 0.65*** | 0.48** | 0.67*** | |
| Religiond | 1.22 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 1.50*** | 0.77 | 1.06 | |
| Marital statuse | 0.84* | 1.13 | 0.94 | 0.99 | 0.56* | 0.18*** | |
| Assets | 1.05*** | 1.11*** | 1.20*** | 1.12*** | 1.10*** | 1.09*** | |
| Member of employee union/business groupf | 0.56*** | 0.8 | 1.66* | 1.56*** | 1.43 | 1.68*** | |
| Member of SHGf | 0.91 | 0.68* | 0.59* | 0.93 | 0.52** | 0.77* | |
| Member of savings groupf | 1.04 | 0.92 | 0.98 | 0.96 | 1.08 | 0.86* | |
| Dependency ratio | 1.38 | 1.09 | 2.24 | 1.61* | 0.25** | 1.22 | |
| Occupational group of the father of the household head (Base: Farmers, service workers, and production workers) | |||||||
| Professional and executive workers | 0.62** | 1.37** | 1.52 | 1.01 | 1.78 | 0.99 | |
| Sales workers | 0.83 | 2.27*** | 2.83*** | 1.02 | 2.17* | 1.25 | |
| Clerical, service and production workers | 0.39*** | 1.03 | 1.38 | 1.07 | 1.76 | 1.07 | |
| Regular worker | |||||||
| Urbana | 0.12*** | 1.28 | 1.08 | 0.95 | 1.08 | 1.19 | |
| Age | 1.11*** | 1.01 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 1.01 | 1.16*** | |
| Years of education | 0.94* | 0.94* | 0.93** | 0.89*** | 1.04 | 0.99 | |
| Speaks Englishb | 0.68 | 0.94 | 0.64 | 1.04 | 0.33*** | 0.85 | |
| Education of father of household head | 0.98 | 1.01 | 1.02 | 1.04 | 1.06 | 0.95*** | |
| Genderc | 0.62** | 4.00*** | 7.95** | 1.75*** | 0.53 | 0.23*** | |
| Dummy for caste affiliation (Base: General category) | |||||||
| Other backward castes | 0.52** | 1.27 | 1.66 | 0.91 | 2.36* | 0.84 | |
| SC/ST | 0.67 | 0.44*** | 0.62 | 0.54*** | 1.65 | 0.70** | |
| Religiond | 0.86 | 0.62 | 1.01 | 0.78** | 1.48 | 0.73 | |
| Marital statuse | 0.20*** | 1.94 | 1.02 | 0.57 | 0.13*** | 0.16*** | |
| Assets | 0.97 | 0.99 | 1.05 | 0.89*** | 1.13*** | 1.02 | |
| Member of employee union/business groupf | 0.62 | 0.7 | 0.41* | 0.60* | 0.4 | 0.78* | |
| Member of SHGf | 1.12 | 1.28 | 0.51 | 1.25 | 0.27 | 1.55* | |
| Member of savings groupf | 2.25*** | 1.7 | 1.46 | 1.11 | 1.01 | 1.14 | |
| Dependency ratio | 3.76*** | 0.63 | 0.99 | 2.12 | 4.89 | 1.19 | |
| Occupational group of the father of the household head (Base: Farmers, service workers, and production workers) | |||||||
| Professional and executive workers | 0.65 | 0.48** | 0.62 | 0.64* | 0.64 | 0.94 | |
| Sales workers | 1.13 | 0.89 | 0.94 | 1.3 | 2.25 | 1.22 | |
| Clerical, service and production workers | 0.49** | 0.89 | 0.73 | 1.11 | 0.79 | 1.25 | |
[i] Notes: See Notes in Table 5.
SC/ST = Scheduled castes and Scheduled tribes; SHG = self-help group.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
Table 7
Fixed-effects regression results
| Fixed-effects regression coefficients | Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference categories | ||||
| OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | |
| OAW | –12.43*** | 5.78*** | 3.63* | |
| Employer | 12.43*** | 18.21*** | 16.06*** | |
| Casual worker | –5.78*** | –18.21*** | –2.15** | |
| Regular worker | –3.63* | –16.06*** | 2.15** | |
[i] Notes: Additional control variables included in the model include age, years of education, education of the father of household head, dummy for urban residence, dummies for knowledge of computer and English usage, occupational dummies, industry dummies, as well as dummies for household headship and being married.
Significance levels: ***1%; **5%; and *10%.
Estimated coefficients are calculated using sampling weights (2004–2005)
Estimations have been conducted using real earnings at 2004–2005 price levels.
Standard errors are clustered by 34 state regions.
The different columns report coefficients for separate regressions with different reference categories.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
Table A1
Multiple jobholdings across sectorsa
| Single job | F and S b | F and W b | S and W b | FSW b | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004–2005 | |||||
| Farmworker | 87.19 | 1.56 | 10.83 | 0.42 | |
| Own-account worker | 65.76 | 26.37 | 4.11 | 3.76 | |
| Employer | 76.84 | 20.28 | 1.93 | 0.95 | |
| Casual worker | 60.11 | 37.40 | 1.12 | 1.36 | |
| Regular worker | 81.07 | 17.38 | 1.11 | 0.44 | |
| Unpaid family worker | 77.98 | 19.33 | 1.64 | 1.05 | |
| 2011–2012 | |||||
| Farmworker | 85.46 | 1.57 | 12.61 | 0.37 | |
| Own-account worker | 66.77 | 23.40 | 4.61 | 5.22 | |
| Employer | 77.59 | 18.19 | 1.79 | 2.43 | |
| Casual worker | 56.83 | 41.06 | 1.11 | 1.00 | |
| Regular worker | 80.91 | 17.32 | 1.12 | 0.65 | |
| Unpaid family worker | 73.68 | 21.82 | 1.46 | 3.03 | |
Table A2
Mobility and individual characteristics
| Status of departure | Status of destination | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farmwork | OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | Unpaid family worker | UNLF and Student | |
| Employer | |||||||
| Urbana | 0.17*** | 1.37 | 1.11 | 1.84** | 0.96 | 1.90** | |
| Age | 1.02 | 1.01 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 1.01 | 1.04*** | |
| Years of education | 0.97 | 0.97 | 0.86*** | 1.02 | 0.89*** | 0.87*** | |
| Speaks Englishb | 0.48 | 0.49*** | 0.72 | 1.19 | 0.78 | 0.86 | |
| Education of father of household head | 0.99 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.05* | 1.04 | 1.11*** | |
| Genderc | 0.09* | 0.82 | 0.46 | 3.81 | 0.07** | 0.05*** | |
| Dummy for caste affiliation (Base: General category) | |||||||
| Other backward castes | 1.02 | 0.96 | 1.08 | 1.35 | 1.91*** | 0.93 | |
| SC/ST | 4.60*** | 3.53*** | 6.27*** | 2.76 | 2.02 | 2.59*** | |
| Religiond | 1.63 | 2.54*** | 1.01 | 1.14 | 1.11 | 1.33 | |
| Marital statuse | 0.33** | 0.58 | 0.43** | 0.29** | 0.18** | 0.43 | |
| Assets | 0.91*** | 0.96 | 0.90** | 0.91 | 1.02 | 1.01 | |
| Member of employee union/ business groupf | 5.16*** | 1.19 | 0.99 | 1.8 | 1.43 | 0.81 | |
| Member of SHGf | 1.18 | 1.05 | 0.52** | 1.24 | 0.27 | 0.15*** | |
| Member of savings groupf | 0.7 | 0.52* | 0.98 | 0.51 | 0.51 | 1.38 | |
| Dependency ratio | 2.49 | 1.35 | 0.55 | 3 | 0.6 | 0.18*** | |
| Occupational group of the father of the household head (Base: Farmers, service workers, and production workers) | |||||||
| Professional and executive workers | 0.27 | 0.49** | 0.39** | 0.49 | 0.57 | 0.26*** | |
| Sales workers | 0.25** | 0.74 | 0.56* | 0.29*** | 1.32 | 0.51*** | |
| Clerical, service and production workers | 0.23*** | 0.57** | 0.62* | 0.56 | 0.43** | 0.39*** | |
| Unpaid family worker | |||||||
| Urbana | 0.12*** | 0.76 | 0.87 | 0.73 | 0.87 | 0.94 | |
| Age | 1.03*** | 0.99 | 1.01 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.05*** | |
| Years of education | 1.01 | 0.98 | 1.08 | 0.97* | 1.19*** | 0.97 | |
| Speaks Englishb | 0.85 | 1.18 | 0.94 | 0.94 | 1.51 | 1.58** | |
| Education of father of household head | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.04 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 1.03 | |
| Genderc | 0.59 | 3.19*** | 6.60*** | 2.96*** | 1.68 | 0.31*** | |
| Dummy for caste affiliation (Base: General category) | |||||||
| Other backward castes | 0.48** | 0.91 | 1.36 | 0.96 | 0.56 | 0.77 | |
| SC/ST | 1.2 | 1.54 | 0.54* | 2.39* | 3.31*** | 2.06 | |
| Religiond | 1.61 | 1.18 | 0.99 | 0.78 | 2.15* | 1.12 | |
| Marital statuse | 0.86 | 2.59*** | 2.13*** | 1.4 | 1.5 | 0.36*** | |
| Assets | 0.92*** | 0.95*** | 1.02 | 0.86*** | 0.95 | 0.94*** | |
| Member of employee union/ business groupf | 1.35 | 0.83 | 1.1 | 0.78 | 0.55 | 1.51 | |
| Member of SHGf | 2.61** | 1.25 | 0.73 | 1.52 | 1.33 | 0.66 | |
| Member of savings groupf | 0.92 | 1.62 | 2.80*** | 2.51** | 1.82 | 1.96** | |
| Dependency ratio | 5.24** | 0.49 | 3.94 | 2.06 | 2.77 | 1.68 | |
| Occupational group of the father of the household head (Base: Farmers, service workers, and production workers) | |||||||
| Professional and executive workers | 0.29*** | 1.5 | 0.66 | 0.72 | 1.39 | 0.6 | |
| Sales workers | 0.14*** | 1.39* | 0.89 | 0.30*** | 0.37** | 0.82 | |
| Clerical, service, and production workers | 0.46*** | 1.12 | 1.13 | 0.81 | 1.22 | 0.44*** | |
[i] Notes: See Notes in Table 5.
SC/ST = Scheduled castes and Scheduled tribes; SHG = self-help group.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
Table A3
Mobility and individual characteristics
| Status of departure | Status of destination | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farmworker | OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | Unpaid family worker | UNLF and Student | |
| Students, unemployed, and not in the labor force | |||||||
| Urbana | 0.14*** | 1.08 | 1.03 | 0.84* | 1.44*** | 0.79*** | |
| Age | 1.00** | 1.01 | 0.99** | 1.01 | 0.99* | 0.99* | |
| Years of education | 1.14*** | 1.23*** | 1.32*** | 1.22*** | 1.39*** | 1.14*** | |
| Speaks Englishb | 0.81** | 0.73** | 0.59** | 0.9 | 1.11 | 0.79 | |
| Education of father of household head | 0.97*** | 0.93*** | 0.93*** | 0.92*** | 0.96*** | 0.95*** | |
| Genderc | 1.33*** | 6.75*** | 19.72*** | 3.21*** | 3.98*** | 2.14*** | |
| Dummy for caste affiliation (Base: General category) | |||||||
| Other backward castes | 1.12 | 1.37** | 0.99 | 1.37*** | 1.14 | 1.32*** | |
| SC/ST | 0.97 | 0.92 | 0.89 | 2.03*** | 1.73*** | 0.97 | |
| Religiond | 1.06 | 0.83* | 0.75 | 0.62*** | 0.92 | 0.83* | |
| Marital statuse | 2.17*** | 4.80*** | 6.39*** | 3.19*** | 1.77*** | 1.43*** | |
| Assets | 0.93*** | 0.93*** | 1.06*** | 0.84*** | 0.93*** | 0.99 | |
| Member of employee union/business groupf | 0.80** | 0.91 | 0.85 | 1.38 | 1.17 | 0.94 | |
| Member of SHGf | 1.05 | 0.91 | 0.35** | 0.98 | 1.1 | 0.57** | |
| Member of savings groupf | 0.96 | 1.17 | 0.96 | 1.01 | 0.82 | 1.02 | |
| Dependency ratio | 0.19*** | 0.13*** | 0.11*** | 0.05*** | 0.12*** | 0.08*** | |
| Occupational group of the father of the household head (Base: Farmers, service workers, and production workers) | |||||||
| Professional and executive workers | 0.84 | 2.01*** | 1.15 | 1.27 | 1.45*** | 1.74*** | |
| Sales workers | 0.52*** | 2.48*** | 2.09*** | 1.02 | 0.9 | 3.09*** | |
| Clerical, service, and production workers | 0.59*** | 1.76*** | 1.23 | 1.27*** | 1.35** | 1.89*** | |
[i] Notes: See Notes in Table 5.
SC/ST = Scheduled castes and Scheduled tribes; SHG = self-help group.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
Table A4
Mobility and poverty
| Status of departure | Status of destination | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farmworker | OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | Unpaid family worker | UNLF and student | |
| Farmworker | |||||||
| Household poor (2005) | 0.33 | 0.30 | 0.13 | 0.46 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.31 |
| Household poor (2011) | 0.17 | 0.16 | 0.02 | 0.31 | 0.13 | 0.13 | 0.22 |
| OAW | |||||||
| Household poor (2005) | 0.29 | 0.28 | 0.17 | 0.34 | 0.17 | 0.23 | 0.27 |
| Household poor (2011) | 0.19 | 0.13 | 0.04 | 0.21 | 0.09 | 0.11 | 0.17 |
| Employer | |||||||
| Household poor (2005) | 0.17 | 0.11 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.11 | 0.08 | 0.11 |
| Household poor (2011) | 0.16 | 0.08 | 0.04 | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.10 | 0.08 |
| Casual worker | |||||||
| Household poor (2005) | 0.53 | 0.45 | 0.31 | 0.49 | 0.29 | 0.48 | 0.40 |
| Household poor (2011) | 0.26 | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.28 | 0.11 | 0.20 | 0.22 |
| Regular worker | |||||||
| Household poor (2005) | 0.25 | 0.13 | 0.10 | 0.25 | 0.09 | 0.14 | 0.10 |
| Household poor (2011) | 0.11 | 0.05 | 0 | 0.16 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.07 |
| Unpaid family worker | |||||||
| Household poor (2005) | 0.39 | 0.24 | 0.19 | 0.35 | 0.26 | 0.16 | 0.23 |
| Household poor (2011) | 0.23 | 0.14 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.19 |
| Students, Unemployed, and Not in the Labor Force | |||||||
| Household poor (2005) | 0.47 | 0.33 | 0.13 | 0.50 | 0.24 | 0.36 | 0.37 |
| Household poor (2011) | 0.21 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.23 | 0.08 | 0.12 | 0.20 |
[i] Notes: The numbers reported are the shares of poor individuals under different groups. See Notesin Table 1.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
Table A5
Persistence in labor market status and individual characteristics
| Farmworker | OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | Unpaid family worker | UNLF and student | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urbana | 0.47*** | 1.25 | 0.86 | 1.1 | 1.14 | 1.48 | 2.15*** |
| Age | 0.99* | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.96*** | 0.94*** | 0.98** | 1.01 |
| Years of education | 1.01 | 1.02 | 1.08** | 0.94*** | 1.07*** | 1.01 | 0.84*** |
| Speaks Englishb | 0.88 | 0.99 | 1.45 | 0.79*** | 1.18* | 0.81 | 1.05 |
| Education of fa ther of household head | 1.02** | 0.99 | 0.97* | 0.98* | 0.99 | 0.99 | 1.05*** |
| Genderc | 0.99 | 2.70*** | 4.12 | 2.41*** | 1.30* | 0.81 | 0.50*** |
| Dummy for caste affiliation (Base: General category) | |||||||
| Other backward castes | 0.99 | 1.19 | 0.91 | 1.27*** | 1.11 | 1.22 | 0.84*** |
| SC/ST | 0.68*** | 1.06 | 0.27*** | 1.66*** | 1.65*** | 0.57 | 0.80*** |
| Religiond | 0.99 | 0.87 | 0.66** | 0.87 | 1.29** | 0.89 | 1.12* |
| Marital statuse | 2.64*** | 2.07*** | 2.80*** | 1.64*** | 3.16*** | 0.85 | 0.47*** |
| Assets | 1.02** | 1.02* | 1.06 | 0.92*** | 1.05*** | 1.08*** | 1.10*** |
| Member of em ployee union/busi ness groupf | 0.9 | 0.88 | 0.69 | 0.87* | 1.52** | 0.93 | 0.96 |
| Member of SHGf | 0.92 | 0.89 | 1.34 | 1.22** | 0.76* | 0.89 | 1.03 |
| Member of savings groupf | 0.99 | 0.93 | 1.49 | 1.05 | 0.76** | 0.52*** | 1.03 |
| Dependency ratio | 0.48*** | 0.85 | 0.93 | 0.70** | 0.39*** | 0.55 | 7.12*** |
| Occupational group of the father of the household head (Base: Farmers, service workers, and production workers) | |||||||
| Professional and executive workers | 0.79* | 0.81 | 2.48*** | 1.12 | 1.41*** | 1.31 | 0.96 |
| Sales workers | 0.50*** | 1.29 | 1.71*** | 0.83 | 0.83 | 1.51*** | 1.09 |
| Clerical, service and production workers | 0.67*** | 1.01 | 2.10*** | 1.28*** | 1.03 | 1.39* | 1.11* |
[i] Notes: See Notes in Table 5.
SC/ST = Scheduled castes and Scheduled tribes; SHG = self-help group.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
Table A6
Mobility and earnings change
| Terminal sector | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial sector | OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker |
| OAW | 14.48 | 47.89 | –16.29 | 3.02 |
| Employer | –5.03 | 22.90 | –85.63 | –12.68 |
| Casual worker | 52.13 | 71.88 | 33.30 | 34.17 |
| Regular worker | 7.57 | 61.07 | 22.40 | 22.40 |
[i] Notes: See Notes in Table 2.
The numbers reported are percentage changes in real earnings associated with changes inthe employment status.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
Table A7
Multiple jobholdings among movers between farm and casual work
| Farmwork to casual work | Casual work to farmwork | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-2005 | 2011-2012 | 2004-2005 | 2011-2012 | |
| Single job | 76.14 | 29.17 | 30.97 | 61.42 |
| F and S | 1.55 | 1.56 | ||
| F and W | 21.33 | 68.79 | 65.55 | 36.10 |
| S and W | 0.43 | 0.89 | ||
| F, S and W | 0.98 | 1.61 | 2.58 | 0.92 |
[i] Notes: See Notes in Table Table A1.
The column totals add up to 100.
Source: Authors calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
Table A8
Multinomial confidence intervals for the transition probabilities
| Terminal sector | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial sector | Farmworker | OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | Unpaid family worker | Student | UNLF |
| Farmworker | 57.29-57.30 | 2.10-2.11 | 0.47-0.48 | 19.47-19.48 | 2.10-2.11 | 1.22-1.23 | 1.83-1.84 | 15.44-15.45 |
| OAW | 14.62-14.67 | 27.34-27.39 | 6.35-6.40 | 25.71-25.76 | 5.21-5.25 | 6.72-6.77 | 0.17-0.22 | 13.69-13.73 |
| Employer | 10.83-10.92 | 26.28-26.36 | 20.80-20.88 | 15.95-16.04 | 8.31-8.39 | 7.10-7.18 | 0.07-0.15 | 10.33-10.41 |
| Casual worker | 17.36-17.37 | 4.41-4.42 | 0.84-0.85 | 58.07-58.08 | 8.08-8.09 | 1.09-1.10 | 0.15-0.16 | 9.91-9.92 |
| Regular worker | 6.77-6.81 | 3.51-3.55 | 1.42-1.47 | 20.61-20.65 | 52.14-52.18 | 0.68-0.73 | 0.03-0.07 | 14.67-14.71 |
| Unpaid family worker | 11.60-11.66 | 16.62-16.68 | 4.91-4.97 | 19.11-19.17 | 4.32-4.38 | 19.84-19.90 | 2.31-2.38 | 21.04-21.10 |
| Student | 22.70-22.71 | 0.81-0.82 | 0.28-0.29 | 11.91-11.92 | 2.92-2.93 | 2.71-2.72 | 49.89-49.90 | 8.71-8.72 |
| UNLF | 17.15-17.16 | 1.73-1.74 | 0.46-0.47 | 10.63-10.64 | 2.61-2.62 | 1.71-1.72 | 31.52-31.53 | 34.12-34.13 |
[i] The estimated multinomial confidence intervals are based on the Simon-Graz method (Sison and Glaz, 1995).
Estimated coefficients are calculated using sampling weights (2004-2005).
Notes: OAW = Own-account workers; UNLF = Unemployed and Not in the Labor Force.
Source: Authors' calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
Table A9
Fixed-effects regression coefficients for the interaction between sectoral choice and age
| Fixed-effects regression coefficients | Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference categories | ||||
| OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | |
| OAW*Age | –0.38 | 0.15 | –0.13 | |
| Employer*Age | 0.38 | 0.53 | 0.25 | |
| Casual worker*Age | –0.15 | –0.53 | –0.28*** | |
| Regular worker*Age | 0.13 | –0.25 | 0.28*** | |
[i] Notes: Additional control variables included in the model include age, years of education, education of the father of household head, dummy for urban residence, dummies for knowledge of computer and English usage, occupational dummies, industry dummies, as well as dummies for household headship and being married.
Significance levels: *** 1%; ** 5%; and * 10%.
Estimated coefficients are calculated using sampling weights (2004–2005).
Estimations have been conducted using real earnings at 2004–2005 price levels.
Standard errors are clustered by 34 state regions.
The different columns report the coefficients of the interaction term between sectoral dummies and age.
The different columns report the coefficients for separate regressions with different reference categories.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data
Table A10
Fixed-effects regression coefficients for the interaction between sectoral choice and education
| Fixed-effects regression coefficients | Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference categories | ||||
| OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | |
| OAW*Years of education | –1.41* | 0.50* | –0.02 | |
| Employer*Years of education | 1.41* | 1.91** | 1.39 | |
| Casual worker*Years of education | –0.50* | –1.91** | –0.51*** | |
| Regular worker*Years of education | 0.02 | –1.39 | 0.51*** | |
[i] Notes: Additional control variables included in the model include age, years of education, education of the father of household head, dummy for urban residence, dummies for knowledge of computer and English usage, occupational dummies, industry dummies, as well as dummies for household headship and being married.
Significance levels: *** 1%; ** 5%; and * 10%.
Estimated coefficients are calculated using sampling weights (2004–2005).
Estimations have been conducted using real earnings at 2004–2005 price levels. Standard errors are clustered by 34 state regions.
The different columns report the coefficients of the interaction term between sectoral dummies and the years of education.
The different columns report the coefficients for separate regressions with different reference categories.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
Table A11
Fixed-effects regression coefficients of the interaction between sectoral choice and gender
| Fixed-effects regression coefficients | Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference categories | ||||
| OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | |
| OAW*Dummy for male | 18.60 | 0.88 | –1.31 | |
| Employer* Dummy for male | –18.60 | –17.71 | –19.91 | |
| Casual worker* Dummy for male | –0.88 | 17.71 | –2.20** | |
| Regular worker* Dummy for male | 1.31 | 19.91 | 2.20** | |
[i] Notes: Additional control variables included in the model include age, years of education, education of the father of household head, dummy for urban residence, dummies for knowledge of computer and English usage, occupational dummies, industry dummies, as well as dummies for household headship and being married.
Significance levels: *** 1%; ** 5%; and * 10%.
Estimated coefficients are calculated using sampling weights (2004–2005).
Estimations have been conducted using real earnings at 2004–2005 price levels.
Standard errors are clustered by 34 state regions.
Dummy for male equals 1.0 if the worker is male, and zero otherwise.
The different columns report the coefficients of the interaction term between sectoral dummies and the male dummy.
The different columns report the coefficients for separate regressions with different reference categories.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.
Table A12
Fixed-effects regression coefficients of the interaction between sectoral choice and caste
| Fixed-effects regression coefficients | Column 1 | Column 2 | Column 3 | Column 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reference categories | ||||
| OAW | Employer | Casual worker | Regular worker | |
| OAW*Dummy for SC/ST | 10.82** | –2.48 | –1.25 | |
| Employer* Dummy for SC/ST | –10.82** | –13.30*** | –12.07*** | |
| Casual worker* Dummy for SC/ST | 2.48 | 13.30*** | 1.23 | |
| Regular worker* Dummy for SC/ST | 1.25 | 12.07*** | –1.23 | |
[i] Notes: Additional control variables included in the model include age, years of education, education of the father of household head, dummy for urban residence, dummies for knowledge of computer and English usage, occupational dummies, industry dummies, as well as dummies for household headship and being married.
Significance levels: *** 1%; ** 5%; and * 10%.
Estimated coefficients are calculated using sampling weights (2004–2005).
Estimations have been conducted using real earnings at 2004–2005 price levels.
Standard errors are clustered by 34 state regions.
Dummy for SC/ST equals 1.0 if the worker belongs to the SC/ST caste group, and zero otherwise.
The different columns report the coefficients of the interaction term between sectoral dummies and the dummy for SC/ST affiliation.
The different columns report the coefficients for separate regressions with different reference categories.
SC/ST = Scheduled castes and Scheduled tribes.
Source: Authors’ calculations based on Indian Human Development Survey data.